Slashdot Mirror


Snap Appliance Snap Server 1100 NAS Device

~*77*~ writes "While taking up considerably less space than a shoebox, this little device seamlessly allows users to add additional storage to any network in less than five minutes. Today we review the Snap Appliance 80GB Snap Server 1100. This compact NAS (network attached storage) device has many great features including: 5 minute installation, a compact web and ftp server, or simply a network share. Most importantly it works in a network mixed with Windows, Netware, UNIX, Linux, and Macintosh machines... "

7 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Does it support SMB ACL"s? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Their older produdcts didnt do this.. and made it a royal pain to manage.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  2. Getting more common by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This Slashvertisement brought to you by Snap Appliance, makers of fine SOHO NAS devices. When you are ready to deplot a SOHO NAS solution, Snap your fingers and head on over to one of our quality resellers for information about how you could own your very own Snap NAS Appliance. For a limited time, buy 4 NAS appliances and get the fifth one for just one penny!

  3. An Open Letter To All Future Small Time Reviewers by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Small Time Reviewer,

    As you get too big for your britches and feel the need to post your 2-bit "review" (read: advertisement) on slashdot so you can get click-throughs and display money, please, for the love of God and all the 1s and 0s, use a reliable hosting company, and not your own l33t site off of your cable modem. When a story doesn't even have a post yet, and you are slashdotted, its time to seriously re-evaluate your how large you thought you were.

    Sincerely,
    TickleMeOzmo
    (on behalf of the slashdot community)

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  4. SNAP Experiences by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We've been using SNAP servers for a while now at work... Mostly pretty good experiences to report. The little boxes run some BSD derivative, support SMB/NFS/FTP/WWW/etc access to the files stored on them, and some can even run Java Servlets. They can even use a NetWare or Win NT/2K Domain to handle logins and security. We normally use them for small remote offices that don't justify a full server or for storing large rarely accessed files like aerials of the parish. Much better than storing them on a few hundred CDs that have to be tracked and stored properly.
    My only real complaint is backup can be annoying due to a lack of tape drive or any real backup feature on the device itself. You'll have to write some scripts or make use of an external package on another machine to get some sort of backup procedure going.
    They seem to use normal IDE drives, so they WILL eventually fail. However, Snap Appliance went ahead and replaced one of our 1100s free of charge when the drive developed errors and the software update applied incorrectly while trying to fix it. This was despite the fact that the server was no longer under warranty.
    All in all, beautiful little boxen.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  5. Man by Aggrazel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Need spam filtering software for /. now ... :(

  6. Re:SnapServers are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Dr. Frank J. Nagy Fermilab Computing Division Data Communications Dept Technology Group

    That is so much begging for an acronym.

  7. Hate. by lemonylimey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have an 80GB Snap Server at work, and I dislike the thing throughly. It only picks up a random 80% sampling of our Active Directory users every time it's rebooted, which means we have to run it with no file security. Snap's helpdesk claimed this problem would be fixed by installing the new "Snap OS 4", which at the bargin price of $100 offered "Complete Windows 2003 Server ADS compatibility!" But, I protested, we were only running Windows 2000, and it says Windows 2000 compatibility on the box ...

    After much cajoling, the helpdesk admitted that wasn't strictly true, but Snap OS 4 would make it so, and add a glorious weath of new features into the bargin. So we sighed, and bought it.

    Needless to say, it's now picking up about 70% of our Active Directory.

    The moral of the story is: Don't buy hardware from companies that charge $100 to patch something that should have worked from the get-go.