Slashdot Mirror
Sasser Author Under Arrest, Say German Police
Apogee writes "A number of german news websites, like n-tv, or the german yahoo news site (courtesy of the german press agency, lending this some credibility) (web sites in german) report that the programmer of the Sasser worm has been arrested by German police. The Sasser author is an 18-year-old man who was arrested on Friday in Rotenburg, Germany.
With the Sasser worm being the latest among worms that spread like wildfire among unpatched windows boxes, and apparently also caused serious computer outages and cost to the economy, how will this be transformed into an indictment?"
Update: 05/08 18:41 GMT by T : SexySas writes "As the German news site heise reports, the 18-year-old author of Sasser is responsible for Netsky, too. The German police is talking about 'a milestone in war against cybercrime'."
How did they find this guy? Was it that he was bragging like in the former MS worm cases, or was there a "higher technological power" involved?
Yeah, but even if you leave your house unlocked it is still a crime. If it weren't, any criminal could grab your wallet saying that since it wasn't pad-locked down to your chest, it's his. Or could kill someone and claim it was his fault for not carrying a loaded weapon and constantly surveying all around.
People lock their doors because they realize there is a threat, if they don't realize there is a threat, they lose stuff, but it is still criminal. Hopefully after the 5th time someone gets their house broken into they will realize that they need a lock, same goes with computers.
I'm no microsoft fanboy(I don't even use windows), but blaming them is like blaming a car manufacturer because your car got totaled when some jackass rear-ended you. You should have done your homework before you bought the car, and that still does not absolve the jackass.
However I am basing this on that fact he is 18 and on the assumption that he fits a profile of some kid who does n't have many friends and needs attention. I'm not saying I'm right, just my take as you'd be amazed on how many criminals get caught simply on the inability to keep their mouths shut.
If you leave the doors to your house open, and a large neon sign over the threshold saying 'WELCOME', you'll be *damned* lucky if your insurer would pay up.
This is more like just leaving your doors unlocked. There is no protocol for a system to advertise it's vulnerabilities.
Without regard to whether your doors were locked it is illegal to steal things from your house.
How, exactly, is he any more liable than the millions who run insecure, unpatched machines?
That's ridiculous - people who don't wear bullet proof vests aren't "as liable" as the people who shoot them.
If you leave the doors to your house open, and a large neon sign over the threshold saying 'WELCOME', you'll be *damned* lucky if your insurer would pay up.
No, but you could press charges for burglary if somebody came into your house and stole something. Insurance is a matter of commercial contracts - we're talking about the law here.
If he hadn't exploited it, someone else would have, and the result would have been the same.
No, if someone else had exploited it, then the gentleman under discussion here most probably wouldn't be in police custody facing criminal charges right now.
The reponsibility lies with microsoft, for creating shite software, with inherent vulnerabilities, and with the users, for not bothering to have any kind of protection.
What kind of a world do you live in where the people who write and send out a virus are not liable for the damage it causes?
#!/usr/bin/english
Actually, those are two completely separate issues.
Let's say you left your house and left your door unlocked. If a thief happened by, saw that it was unlocked, and came in and stole all of your belongings, the law in every jurisdiction that I know of is unequivocal: the thief is solely to blame.
On the other hand, if you put up a sign that said "welcome", then that could be construed as an explicit invitation to enter and the corresponding legal judgement would be less clear. You may recall cases way back when when some FTP sites said "Welcome To Private FTP site! Username: Password: ".. well.. some were broken into using brute force un pw attacks. The attackers were subsequently found and based their (largely successful) defense on the fact that it said "welcome!"
Now, about the rest of your point: about people being liable and microsoft being liable; basically, it's wishful thinking from you, who knows nothing. I dare you to build me a house that can not be broken into. It is NOT possible. the windows OS has arguably hundreds of thousands of parts and interfaces and it is not reasonable to expect that every aspect has been checked for every possible potential flaw. I remind you that but a few weeks ago, a new flaw was found in TCPIP, arguably one of the most "eyeballed" standards in the history of computing.
every window in your house can be broken, and a thief can enter by breaking it. the lock on your front door can be opened with a jimmy tool, your electric garage door opener signal can be captured and copied. your hidden key under the bushes can be found. your chimney may be a more or less perpetually open entrance, and yet nobody blames house builders or even home owners of gross negligence in such cases.
the fact is that in a society we recognize the inherent limits of any sort of physical protection. as many on slashdot here have observerd in other contexts (DRM), "if it can be broken, it will be" and "there are no unbreakable protection schemes."
Therefore, we must resort to law and the threat of punishment. It's not perfect, but it's what we have to do.
He should be punished to the maximum extent permitted by law - I don't care under which law. People who can't respect computers should not be allowed to (ab)use them. If he screws up his computer, it's his problem. But the moment he screws up boxes over internet, he's got to be punished hard. The punished should be harsh so that no other individual will ever attempt to write a virus. Microsoft users are already suffering with poor quality, tech-support and other stuff, guess they don't need viruses.
...but this man is the suspected author of the worm. The authorities haven't released his identity, nor how they arrived at the determination that he is the author.
Btw, Here'a an english version of the story.
"No due process, no suspect's rights, no Miranda warning, no 5th amendment, no court-appointed attorney, no judge, no jury, no appeals, no comfy jail cell, etc, etc, etc...."
No apology if they got the wrong guy.....
Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
nothing worse for a nerd then no computer.
Sending him to prison only makes him meet the really bad guys.
Jail is not the solution to everything. It denies you normal live, far beyond the duration of incarceration.