Slashdot Mirror
Sasser Author Under Arrest, Say German Police
Apogee writes "A number of german news websites, like n-tv, or the german yahoo news site (courtesy of the german press agency, lending this some credibility) (web sites in german) report that the programmer of the Sasser worm has been arrested by German police. The Sasser author is an 18-year-old man who was arrested on Friday in Rotenburg, Germany.
With the Sasser worm being the latest among worms that spread like wildfire among unpatched windows boxes, and apparently also caused serious computer outages and cost to the economy, how will this be transformed into an indictment?"
Update: 05/08 18:41 GMT by T : SexySas writes "As the German news site heise reports, the 18-year-old author of Sasser is responsible for Netsky, too. The German police is talking about 'a milestone in war against cybercrime'."
they shoulda waited until MS announced a reward for it first!
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/v iew/83848/1/.html
The motives of the alleged Sasser author were still unclear, but Der Spiegel suggested the teen may have wanted to drum up business for his mother, who owns a company offering assistance to computer owners.
they were also arrested on Friday.
Here is Reuter's take on this and the news release at Biz Ink.
How did they find this guy? Was it that he was bragging like in the former MS worm cases, or was there a "higher technological power" involved?
find it ironic that an ad for Microsoft security services accompanies this story?
There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
:wq
WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
Excellent, hopefully they can ask hima simple question and we can put another argument to rest - Was he aware of the exploit from his own hacking, or being told about it by someone, or did he just read the exploit advisory from Microsoft when they released the patch?
Realistically odds have to favour just reading the advisory, but there have been plenty of claims to the contrary.
The next question is, will any media actually bother to find out and publish the answer to that question. I'm guessing "absolutely no chance in hell".
Jedidiah.
Craft Beer Programming T-shirts
Yeah, but even if you leave your house unlocked it is still a crime. If it weren't, any criminal could grab your wallet saying that since it wasn't pad-locked down to your chest, it's his. Or could kill someone and claim it was his fault for not carrying a loaded weapon and constantly surveying all around.
People lock their doors because they realize there is a threat, if they don't realize there is a threat, they lose stuff, but it is still criminal. Hopefully after the 5th time someone gets their house broken into they will realize that they need a lock, same goes with computers.
I'm no microsoft fanboy(I don't even use windows), but blaming them is like blaming a car manufacturer because your car got totaled when some jackass rear-ended you. You should have done your homework before you bought the car, and that still does not absolve the jackass.
However I am basing this on that fact he is 18 and on the assumption that he fits a profile of some kid who does n't have many friends and needs attention. I'm not saying I'm right, just my take as you'd be amazed on how many criminals get caught simply on the inability to keep their mouths shut.
If you leave the doors to your house open, and a large neon sign over the threshold saying 'WELCOME', you'll be *damned* lucky if your insurer would pay up.
This is more like just leaving your doors unlocked. There is no protocol for a system to advertise it's vulnerabilities.
Without regard to whether your doors were locked it is illegal to steal things from your house.
Since both Sasser and Phatbot developers are native germans, they will never be extradited. German constitution luckily forbids it. Only foreigns can be extradited to other countries and only if they don't have to fear death penalty and will get a fair trial.
How, exactly, is he any more liable than the millions who run insecure, unpatched machines?
That's ridiculous - people who don't wear bullet proof vests aren't "as liable" as the people who shoot them.
If you leave the doors to your house open, and a large neon sign over the threshold saying 'WELCOME', you'll be *damned* lucky if your insurer would pay up.
No, but you could press charges for burglary if somebody came into your house and stole something. Insurance is a matter of commercial contracts - we're talking about the law here.
If he hadn't exploited it, someone else would have, and the result would have been the same.
No, if someone else had exploited it, then the gentleman under discussion here most probably wouldn't be in police custody facing criminal charges right now.
The reponsibility lies with microsoft, for creating shite software, with inherent vulnerabilities, and with the users, for not bothering to have any kind of protection.
What kind of a world do you live in where the people who write and send out a virus are not liable for the damage it causes?
#!/usr/bin/english
Actually, those are two completely separate issues.
Let's say you left your house and left your door unlocked. If a thief happened by, saw that it was unlocked, and came in and stole all of your belongings, the law in every jurisdiction that I know of is unequivocal: the thief is solely to blame.
On the other hand, if you put up a sign that said "welcome", then that could be construed as an explicit invitation to enter and the corresponding legal judgement would be less clear. You may recall cases way back when when some FTP sites said "Welcome To Private FTP site! Username: Password: ".. well.. some were broken into using brute force un pw attacks. The attackers were subsequently found and based their (largely successful) defense on the fact that it said "welcome!"
Now, about the rest of your point: about people being liable and microsoft being liable; basically, it's wishful thinking from you, who knows nothing. I dare you to build me a house that can not be broken into. It is NOT possible. the windows OS has arguably hundreds of thousands of parts and interfaces and it is not reasonable to expect that every aspect has been checked for every possible potential flaw. I remind you that but a few weeks ago, a new flaw was found in TCPIP, arguably one of the most "eyeballed" standards in the history of computing.
every window in your house can be broken, and a thief can enter by breaking it. the lock on your front door can be opened with a jimmy tool, your electric garage door opener signal can be captured and copied. your hidden key under the bushes can be found. your chimney may be a more or less perpetually open entrance, and yet nobody blames house builders or even home owners of gross negligence in such cases.
the fact is that in a society we recognize the inherent limits of any sort of physical protection. as many on slashdot here have observerd in other contexts (DRM), "if it can be broken, it will be" and "there are no unbreakable protection schemes."
Therefore, we must resort to law and the threat of punishment. It's not perfect, but it's what we have to do.
Obviously, you don't know much about the german judicial system, nor about our police.
The boy is already back at home (no risk of escape) until he'll be tried. He'll probably get probation, at most. He'll MOST probably be tries under juvenile laws, which have the overruling goal of "educating" young people.
However, he'll be held responsible for the financial damages he's done.
Hardly likely to have happened, since according to the Yahoo! Germany newswire, Microsoft gave the vital hint to the German police that led to the arrest. Which makes you wonder whether they scanned their Apache..erm..IIS server logfiles to see who was reading about certain security alerts.
Bullshit. Harsh penalties do *nothing* to deter crime.
Texas is the death penalty capital of the world. By your logic that would also make it the safest place in the world, yet people are murdered here every day. A person can be imprisoned for years (years!) if caught with trace amounts of cocaine, yet the crack epidemic is as strong as ever. Community services do more for crime prevention than the prison system can ever do. Prisons are necessary of course, if only to separate the truly incalcitrant, but the current reliance on them as a deterance is simply pig-headed.
The point is, discipline is necessary, but not without compassion. Strict adherance to discipline for the sake of revenge mearly engenders hatred in those being disciplined. Unless you kill that person, he will always be a problem. Compassion can divert that hatred so that lessons can truly be learned. Community based organizations can provide that, the prison system cannot.
They should just give the boy (if proven guilty) an appropriate penalty followed by a period of community service. Get the boy involved in his community and he will not be such a problem. That is the only answer to such things.
(Hey mods, mod the parent underrated. His opinion may be wrong, but it is valid non-the-less. It doesn't deserve a troll mod.)
No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey