Slashdot Mirror


DOOM III This Summer

Crusader writes "Activision and id Software have issued a press release announcing that DOOM III will be released this summer. A Linux client has also been in development alongside the requisite Win32 version."

17 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Final Version by UnkyHerb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I anticipated this game more than any other game ever I think. I wonder how much different the final version will be from the alpha that I played so long ago. Trent Reznor's soundtrack will be a definite plus as well!

    --
    Your Momma's so fat she makes emacs look like nano!
    1. Re:Final Version by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's the story on Reznor and Doom III? I heard he left the project to work on a new album. Anyone know if he left in the early stages, or if most of the work was done before he left? I hope his work is a major part of the project, the man's a fucking brilliant musician and a flat out genius at sound engineering.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Really Good News by Rikerag515 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is really great to hear, a major software publisher is actually going to have a Linux Client available, possibly in around the same time the Windows client is released, bravo ID.

    --
    HAHA Injured Hippies
  3. Mac Version by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess a Mac version won't be too far behind if there will be a Linux version. Now... all I need is one of those new fangled G5s to play it on...

    Does anyone know where system requierments might be found / when they will be announced?

  4. Nice graphics.. by DR+SoB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Too bad I'll need a new computer that comes with the kitchen sink to run it..

    The screen shots look suspiciously similiar to Half-Life 2 though, what's up with that? Even some of the monsters look HL1 like. I have a feeling this isn't going to have nearly the popularity as Doom1 did (well it might but that'll just be riding there fame). It's kinda like movie sequels, you're so excited about a new edition, but then it always ends in disappointment..

    If HL2 and Doom3 battled I wonder who would win? I wonder if the fundamentals of the game will be the same between the two, and if Worldcraft (or hammer) is going to work on both as well?

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:Nice graphics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If HL2 and Doom3 battled I wonder who would win? I wonder if the fundamentals of the game will be the same between the two, and if Worldcraft (or hammer) is going to work on both as well?

      In many ways, they're two very different approaches to an FPS engine - from a point of view of the lighting systems, what they can render (indoors vs outdoors) and what they can do.

      In particular, the lighting models are completely different. Half-Life 2 uses pre-calculated radiosity lightmaps which, while awesomely realistic, are somewhat static. It does preserve some directional information in the lightmaps for model lighting, normal maps etc, but I gather it's limited to simple non-shadowed dynamic point sources like the original Half-Life.

      Doom 3, however, looks like it does everything real-time. I don't think there's any precalculated radiosity light maps (but I could be wrong), and all lighting is done on the fly with what are effectively point sources. Things can be hugely dynamic, with lights casting shadows from world geometry, models, etc, but it's not particularly realistic due to the absence of radiosity 'bouncing' and the ultra-sharp shadows. It can also project textures as lights, giving the atmospheric 'light through a grille' effect and so on.

      The scenes they can render look very different, too - Half-Life 2's got a terrain engine thing which can render some pretty huge outdoors maps, along with parallax-enabled, brush-based 'skyboxes' which can be rendered behind everything for giant-looking city scenes. Doom 3 seems to specialise in highly detailed indoors scenes, with a couple of outdoors scenes being effectively just large rooms.

      The engines are very different, but they seem well-suited for the games they've been written for. The slightly plastic-looking, ultra-atmospheric-lighting indoors engine of Doom 3 would be rubbish for Half-Life 2, while the naturalistic, realistically-lit indoors-outdoors engine of Half-Life 2 would look terrible used for Doom 3.

      In terms of editors, I do know that an enhanced Hammer is being used for Half-Life 2, but I've heard very little about Doom 3's editor (and that's with friends working for Raven!) I understand it's somehow integrated with the engine, and it definitely sounds like another home-grown thing, but other than that I don't know. I'd be surprised if Hammer (or another brush-based editor) would work with Doom 3, but of course I could be completely wrong. :-)

    2. Re:Nice graphics.. by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Considering that Half-Life ripped off the basic backstory for DOOM, yeah, I'd say they were pretty similar. If you read Tom Hall's Doom Bible, you'll see that Tom Hall planned to have a monorail in the original game.

      From looking at the Doom Bible, it looks like DOOM 3 is going to be a hell of a lot closer to Tom's original vision than DOOM1/DOOM2 ever was. I wonder what the hell the Hand of Lothar will be used for?

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  5. Re:Requirements by aliens · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think a Geforce3 or better seeing as they first did tech demo's on that hardware way back in the day. I'm guessing, but Pixel Shaders would probably be required and that means GF3.

    Of course I can't wait till GF4MX users try and play.

    Bear in mind HL2 is supposedly very scalable so Doom III should be too. Although I can't imagine it being as immersive without a great video card.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  6. Re:Interesting on Linux by pubjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our options from here are [...]

    Another option - why not just sell the Linux version online? Nearly all current Linux-types are techies who are going to have big bandwidth connections. Might reduce the cost of suppling the Linux version and increase the business case for it?

  7. Knoppix by IceFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how long after it is released a Script/app comes out that when given disk 1 (DoomIII) and disk 2 (Knoppix) it will give you an iso that you can burn and then boot straight into DoomIII under Linux without anything else running for maximum performance without the hassle of installing Linux.

    -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  8. S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Shadow of Chernobyl by Zx-man · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, DooM III is just fine, but, since I'm form Ukraine, 'tis more exciting for me && I'm more waiting for the S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

    Here are the movies from the game: Video

    P.S. I'd really like to view them, but, ahh, my 14400Bps modem just rules the world! P.P.S. Unfortunately, it uses Micro$oft DirectX, so do not expect a version for GNU/Linux or MacOS X...

  9. No Linux Client by Bruha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There has been no announcement on a Linux client. Someone misquoted Linuxnews's article.

  10. Re:So a mac version won't be long now! by clichekiller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No doubt you don't give a shit about Mac games - there aren't any! My post (a joke) was pointing out how sad it is that the mac platform never had anything other than the most popular PC games ported to it (and years AFTER the PC release). Now even the linux platform is getting DOOM III well before OS X will.

    How do you explain Halo, admitedly 6 mos. later, and oh Warcraft III (simultaneous), and oh yeah Unreal Tournament 2004 only a week after the PC release.

    The Mac is getting more and more games and earlier then ever before. Take a walk into an Apple store or the section of a CompUSA and you will probably find more mainstream games for the Mac there then exist for Linux.

    --
    Sir, there is a dragon outside with an armful of armor. He's inquiring if we offer free refills.
  11. Far Cry beat them to it by bonch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was blown away by Far Cry. It matched the Doom 3 screenshots I saw, but running NOW. In addition, they had the nerve to set the game in an outdoor tropical environment with no visibility limit.

    That game seamlessly goes from hunting mercenaries on an island camp in the jungle to entering a cave and suddenly being in a Doom 3-esque claustrophobic environment shooting at genetic mutations.

    As far as all the reports and screenshots have shown, Doom 3 is almost entirely shadowy, indoor environments. Blech. Far Cry was a breath of fresh air.

    1. Re:Far Cry beat them to it by netdudeuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, the game is awesome and does indeed look as good as some of the Doom 3 images. For example, in some of the indoor scenes you'd be hard pressed to differentiate between the two. Try shooting a suspended strip light and admire the lighting effects as it rocks on it's chains.

      Outside though, we have a Trueman Show behaviour. I sailed right away from land and you get a helicopter come and blow you away !

      I'd rather just bump into a wall ;-)

  12. You know... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if NiN was the reason for the "nailgun" in Quake. People who knew of the band could hardly miss their logo on the ammo boxes.

    And many of us who'd only heard of them because of the game saw it, too.

    Just one of those things I wonder about.

  13. Re:URL Please by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nearly a year ago it was announced that Thrent Reznor was no longer involved with Doom 3.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players