Slashdot Mirror


Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials

An anonymous reader writes "There's an Astrobiology.net interview up with a Vatican astronomer, Guy Consolmagno, who also curates one of the world's largest meteorite collections. On the possibility of a non-terrestrial lifeform, he says initially 'I don't know', followed by three scenarios. First, he argues: 'We find an intelligent civilization and there's no way in creation we can communicate with them because they're so alien to us. We can't talk to dolphins now. In which case, we'll never know.' Secondly, he suggests: 'We find the intelligent civilization. We can communicate.' As agents of free-will, the aliens are self-aware of good and evil, thus convertible to some terrestrial religion. Thirdly: 'We find a dozen civilizations out there, and a bunch of Jehovah's witnesses go up and convert them all.' The question of whether an alien civilization might convert Earth to their religion, or become a religion unto themselves, is left unconsidered. This compares to the many reasons people give for hosting a SETI@home client, including that ET contact would unite humanity, challenge religion, or all of the above."

13 of 1,312 comments (clear)

  1. I doubt it by Ckwop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As agents of free-will, the aliens are self-aware of good and evil, thus convertible to some terrestrial religion

    Even if Aliens know the difference between right and wrong but they might not be able to understand the concept of god. Even if the did understand god I doubt you could convert a space faring race to any of our religions in their current form. It makes the earth too special and they'd probably wouldn't take kindly to that. I do suspect religion will transform in to a 'many games of chess' set-up. Adam and Eve was Earth's story. Kalcknor and voltak was Vulcan's story etc etc.

    Simon

    1. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even if Aliens know the difference between right and wrong but they might not be able to understand the concept of god. Even if the did understand god I doubt you could convert a space faring race to any of our religions in their current form. It makes the earth too special and they'd probably wouldn't take kindly to that.

      Beyond the fact that Christians don't mind that Jesus was Jewish, there is other contrary evidence to that right here on earth... Christianity, fundamentally, is an extension to Judaism that says "you jews have gone off course and gotten things wrong." Islam says to Christianity, "well, BOTH you and the Jews have gone off course." In either case, the new religion on the block says to the old, "we're kind of like you, only you've messed up so much that God sent us to get the truth straight again."

      Given this, it would truly be ironic if some aliens came down and proclaimed that they were true Christians (or Jews, or Buddists, or any other group you care to go with), but that the whole lot of us had gotten Christ, Moses, Mohammad or Buddha all wrong. They would basically be calling us heretics within our own religions. We've done that enough on or own, so why should we assume that somebody else wouldn't?

  2. Good and evil by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if any aliens were to have a concept of good and evil there's no reason why they would see things the way we do. Just look at how it is on Earth: there are people who genuinely believe it is 'good' to do things that many now believe are profoundly evil. Take the Spanish Inquisition, for example: they really believed that it was the right thing to torture suspects - give a sinner hell here, so they don't suffer so much in the next world.

    In fact, I don't think there is anybody that considers himself 'evil', no matter what.

  3. Advanced tech indistinguishable from magic... by writertype · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...what about religion?

    Seriously, if some advanced race landed on Earth, at least some cult/faction/group would characterize them as gods. What I find interesting is the practical viewpoint of the Vatican astronomer; new scientific discovery does not eliminate the need for a God, it just redefines the boundaries between humanity and the Other.

    I also think that a chance encounter with aliens would certainly polarize the creationists. Did God create the Earth in seven days? OK, what about Gamma Epsilon 7? The Catholic Church has had many, many faults, (hello, Galileo) but IMO the modern Church is much more accepting of scientific theories than, say, fundamentalist Christians.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:Or how about by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Western notion of God means the being is all-powerful, morally perfect, and the creator of the universe. It's difficult to believe people would start bowing down, like it was C3PO with the Ewoks...

    There's already a lot of people who believe in Grey Aliens, but I haven't heard of people interpreting these Greys to be Christian angels or demons.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  6. Parallels by ArbiterOne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the Vatican? This made me think it was going to be a religious commentary on the possibility of ETs. This is addressed very well in a book called "The Hercules Text", (kind of old).
    The premise of the argument was, if ETs exist, there must be immortal ETs, if you subscribe to Roman Catholic religion. I.E. : The reason we are not immortal is that we failed the "test": we ate the apple!
    Therefore, somewhere out there there must be people who passed it, or the test is "spurious".
    Therefore there must be immortal aliens, or the test is invalid, and therefore the Redeemer is invalid.
    That's just the argument in the book.

  7. Re:Dolphin Communication by Beautyon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that's a logical fallacy.

    Or a "straw man argument". Dolphins are not even aliens.

    Whilst we are on the subject, this story has been shooting around the world; some very interesting infra-red footage shot by the Mexican Airforce shows...make up your own mind. The footage was shot by drug interdiction aircraft on patrol for smugglers.

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  8. Re:Ninnle has you ! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's odd. I think a lot of the shit surrounding "Passion of the Christ" stemmed from the fact that Gibson rejected some of the Vatican's reforms. In particular, his splinter group of Catholisim ignores the reforms which absolved the Jewish people, collectivly, of culpability for Jesus's death.

    Historically, there have been many pogroms and a lot of anti-sematism which stemmed from the notion that 'the Jews killed Jesus' and should collectivly be punished for it till they convert.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  9. Re:Or how about by Micro$will · · Score: 5, Interesting

    McCoy: Just once, I'd like to beam down on some planet and say. "Behold, for I am the arch angel Gabriel!"
    Spock: I fail to see the humor in that doctor.

    Something even more amusing would be the discovery of aliens that take offence to the fact we don't believe in their god and start blowing us up. Oh wait, that happens right here...

  10. Re:WTF? by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to the Bible, Jesus is God made a man, now, how could you convert an alien to this idea if he doesn't give a fuck what a man actually is whereas he wants to exchange ideas in order to help both civilizations advance...

    Actually, the early church hit this one. Jesus was god made jewish man. How are you going to impress a Roman with `god became a Jew' if he doesn't care about that small tribe on the edge of empire. There was a significant shift when they turned from a jewish messianic cult into a catholic one. This is the cause of all the bickerring about circumcision and so on -- the greek and roman worlds found snipping bits of their children or themselves barbaric.

    So, one thing which might happen to the monotheistic religions on contact with an ET is that they mutate into a universallist outlook. The big question then being whether the history on Earth is unique -- eg did Jesus death save the Qxthipus of Raffita VII, was Mohamed the last ever prophet, or just the final prophet for earth?

    However, all this is probably moot. The religions of Earth are so heavily rooted in human psychology that they are unlikely to have any point of application to an alien intelligence.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  11. Re:Or how about by Katravax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You obviously haven't been reading Christian publications. It's a belief among many Christians, that "aliens" are fallen angels and/or demons. There are plenty of web sites, radio shows, and speeches given on the subject. The same things written about fallen angels thousands of years ago (kidnapping, cross-breeding, trading technology for access) is supposedly the same things the "aliens" are doing even now. If you beleive in both, it's an easy parallel to make.

  12. Never mind Religion by medazinol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Convertible to some form of terrestrial religion". Yeah right...

    Forget about religion, how about cultural assimilation?

    Read this exerpt from the Brookings report from 1960 comissioned from NASA about finding extraterrestrial life, it will make you think twice. Perhaps this is why the goverment is hiding the truth that "they" are already here. Oh and don't forget to see that Mexico video, just another iron in the fire so to speak.

    --
    Proposed Studies On The Implications Of
    Peaceful Space Activities For Human Affairs

    By

    Brookings Institution, 1960
    Report To The 87th Congress, Union Calendar 79
    Report Number 242

    For

    National Aeronautics And Space Administration

    The general public

    1.As with other matters not central to day-to-day living, the
    public, considered as a whole, is probably only selectively
    attentive to and knowledgeable about space activities. The
    relationship between the impact of events on indifferent or only
    occasionally interested people and their attitudes and values is
    but partly understood and needs further study.

    2.It has been alleged that the "public" is optimistic about
    space activities. If this is so and if the optimism is
    widespread, the present support it generates for the space
    program may not be lasting if the difficulties inherent in space
    efforts have not been appreciated enough to make the failure of
    specific projects understandable. The resulting disillusionment
    may be a serious factor in reducing public support as space
    efforts become more grandiose, the consequences of payoff more
    exciting, and the losses from failure more dramatic. On the other
    hand, this optimism, if it exists, may produce a state of mind
    tolerant of failures. The factors affecting optimism, realism,
    and tolerance of frustration need more study as an aid in
    preparing for this situation. The roles of the promoter spokesman
    and the mass media in encouraging expectations of great and
    imminent accomplishments are integral to this problem area and
    would benefit from research.

    3.The conviction that space activities will broaden man's
    horizons are presently based on the perspectives and special
    interests of a relatively few people in western societies. The
    claim may be justified, but there is need for research to assist
    understanding of the conditions under which innovations broaden
    or narrow perspectives in various cultures. For example,
    sufficient emphasis on space as the proper expression of man's
    highest aspirations may result in the evolution of a broadly
    based belief that this is so. But whether or not this is likely
    to be the case cannot now be decided in view of our limited
    understanding of how new ideas disseminate through societies. If
    and as horizons were broadened as a result of space activities,
    other aspirations would compete with them for attention and
    resources, and continuous study would be required to evaluate the
    appropriate position of space in this competition.

    4.Though intelligent or semi-intelligent life conceivably
    exists elsewhere in our solar system, if intelligent
    extraterrestrial life is discovered in the next twenty years, it
    will very probably be by radio telescope from other solar
    systems. Evidences of its existence might also be found in
    artifacts left on the moon or other planets. The consequences for
    attitudes and values are unpredictable, but would vary profoundly
    in different cultures and between groups within complex
    societies; a crucial factor would be the nature of the
    communication between us and the other beings. Whether or not
    earth would be inspired to an all-out space effort by such a
    discovery is moot: societies sure of their own place in the
    universe have disintegrated when confronted by a superior
    society, and others have survived even though changed. Clearly,
    the better we can come to understand the factors involved i