Slashdot Mirror


SCO Caught Copying

linuxwrangler writes "While accusing everyone else of copying "their" code, SCO has meanwhile been caught copying documentation. In fact they copied several chapters of the Book of Webmin directly into their online documentation. While the book is available online, it is not licensed for redistribution. Details are sparse but it appears that SCO had to pay the publisher for using the material."

23 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. Oi, reminds me... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things are awfully silent around SCO lately...Cat got Darl's tongue?

    1. Re:Oi, reminds me... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like the one year graph better. It looks like Ayers Rock.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    2. Re:Oi, reminds me... by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
      I like the one year graph better. It looks like Ayers Rock.
      I was just looking at the 1 year too. It's not good for a stock to follow a bell curve, is it? Darl, this is the fan. It's what your sh*t is about to land on. Cover your eyes. It may splatter back messily. Don't worry. Everyone else knew it was going to happen so they took cover. You're the only one left standing next to the fan.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Oi, reminds me... by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Baystar is gripping *somthing* of Darl's, though I'm not sure it's his tongue...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Oi, reminds me... by bendelo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like the one year graph better. It looks like Ayers Rock.

      It looks a perfect fit

  2. Irony by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The irony here is palpable. Not that we expected anything more. Aren't there suspicions that their "Linux Kernel Personality" is a direct Linux ripoff as well?

    --
    Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    1. Re:Irony by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

      How could be a linux ripoff if they own linux?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  3. sue SCO by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Funny

    i'm going issue SCO an invoice for $699.

    i know what you're thinking. well it doesn't matter that i don't hold the copyright, isn't that right SCO?

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
  4. Just like a politician by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    its not that uncommon for a slimeball to go around and accuse others of doing what they themselves are doing. Thats the first sign of a cheating husband, he starts accusing his wife of running around.

    Are we really shocked that SCO was stealing someone elses IP?

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:Just like a politician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      I thought the first signs were zest for life and lack of sexual frustration.

  5. SCO Response by Hellkitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    Copyrighs on books published on the web is unconstitutional

    --
    - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  6. ownership by bobthemuse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that the authors of the Book of Webmin now own the SCO documentation? Cool!

    1. Re:ownership by 3dr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, either that or SCO will claim ownership of the Book of Webmin. You can hear them now:

      SCO: There are 10,000 pages copied from our materials
      FOSS Crowd: But the book is only 400 pages?
      SCO: Nevermind, there are still 10,000 pages taken.
      FC: OK, which pages, exactly, and what content?
      SCO: Look on the title pages and subsequent pages. The words "Copyright" and "Table of Contents" appear exactly as in our materials. Later on appears "Index". Page numbers also have a similar ordering algorithm.
      FC: Uhhhh
      SCO: This is uncontestable fact and proof!!!!11!!
      SCO: Oh, and, All Your Base Are Belong To Us.

  7. Thorough SCO SEC complaint. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
  8. Short on cash for shorting :( by Jtheletter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    With each passing day and new SCO article I bemoan a total lack of cash to short the hell out of SCOX. Shit, if I'd started in January I'd be buying a new car this spring.

    As to this infringement, I demand RIAA-style copyright sentencing. For each possible infringement SCO should have to pay the maximum fine, multiplied by the total possible number of people who had access to the material. Given that it's posted online on a public site, and not in a limited user base network (ala p2p) this means the entire world population had access and SCO should be fined roughly the total value of all money produced in the world from 1972 to present.

    If our justice system is going to let all these companies warp the law as they do it seems only fair they should fall prey to their own tactics.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  9. New Software announcement from SCUM by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Funny

    SCUM announced today the latest version of their Lawsuit Generator Wizard package. The updated version now has a web enabled user interface. "Using our patented lawsuit generator, companies can quickly and efficiently file numerous complaints without leaving their computer." said Blame Snowell. "People can now generate lawsuits from anywhere that has Internet access", said Darn McNugget, "even from non extradition treaty countries."

    The new version has a simpler user interface than previous versions. The user answers a series of simple questions. Many questions are multiple choice.

    For instance: "Do you want to sue a [x] current or [_] former [x] customer or [_] business partner? Do you have an existing contract to use against them?

    You can specify a defendant, or the software can randomly assign a defendant. Administrivia such as filing the documents with the court, sending copies to the defendant's lawyers, and generating the certificate of service is handled automatically. The Professional Edition will generate motions and memorandums in support of those motions.

    New modules in the updated package include the Affirmative Defense generator which automatically answers each of the defendant's counterclaims. For particularly unfavorable counterclaims, a motion to dismiss is automatically generated. In the Professional Edition, a new Case Law History module has been added. This module can find marginally relevant case law and then selectively quote favorable sounding portions using the selective quoting tool.

    Industry rumors have been circulating that a new add on module is in the works and was expected to be released last quarter. Lack of this module has apparently been a significant setback to the company. Company officials have been unusually quiet about this. Sources suggest that the rumored package is a Lie Management add on, which can also run stand alone. It has been rumored that the core engine was licensed from Microshaft. Company officials declined to comment.

    Anonymous sources told us on condition of remaining unprosecuted, that the Lie Management module can manage competing bundles of lies that are told to multiple parties. The lie consistency checker helps keep stories straight, preventing a runaway lie cascade of escalating magnitude. A bit of truth, from a large predefined gallery, can be mixed in to give documents a professional sense of credibility.

    "This is a perfect example of how corporations can benefit from proprietary software over open source software" said analyst Lorra DiDdlings.

    Also updated is the Case Scheduling module which generates motions to unnecessarily delay the case. If multiple cases are concurrently in progress, the software is now able to coordinate the motions into a deadlock such that each case depends upon the outcome of the other cases.

    Company officials confirmed the development of a companion product, the SEC Filing wizard. This separate package will fully integrate with the Lawsuit Ganerator if both are installed together. Pricing and the expected release date were not available.

    Analyst Robber Pretenderle said "I give SCUM a 99% chance of winning their lawsuits based on their statements alone." The company's stock rose quickly on the news. (symbol: SCUM)

    About SCUM.

    SCUM, the owner of all software operating systems, is the leading provider of business lawsuits worldwide. Suing and threatening customers and business partners in over 86 countries, SCUM provides a full range of litigation fiascos. The recognized leader worldwide in providing lawsuit protection licenses, SCUM has been in business for over 25 years.

    SCUM, Lie, and Lawsuit are trademarks of The SCUM Grope. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.

    This story contains forward looking statements. Investors are advised that some forward looking statements may look further out than the expected life of the company.

    Any similarity to the truth is unintentional and purely coincidental.

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  10. At least they ripped off GOOD documentation by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The book of Webmin is a great reference for a great tool. I've used both to take the initial fear of Linux out of newbie admins. Once I show them how frigging easy even SENDMAIL config is under webmin, they jump right in.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  11. Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Details are sparse..."

    This should prefix ALL slashdot stories.

  12. Stated 15 minutes before this article was posted: by archnerd · · Score: 5, Funny

    14:24 < chmeee> I'll say this about SCO: they have great documentation

  13. Ash Sez: by Moses_Gunn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darl, it looks like you're in control of two things right now: Jack and Shit. And Jack just left town...

  14. Help on Copyright Law for Poor SCOX by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Funny
    Perhaps SCOX, so bedraggaled with its failing business and launghingstock license offerings hasn't had the resources necessary to devote a fine eye towards matters of intellectual propert laws such as copyrights. Fortunately, there is an expert on IP Law who has published his salient thoughts on this subject to benefit the world. Perhaps we could kindly point SCOX to this great resource to assist them in this confusing arena of proper attribution and distribution with prior permission. Below is an excerpt:
    Intellectual Property Rights Explained

    If [SCO] wants to develop products for enterprise corporations, it must respect and follow the rule of law. These rules include contracts, copyrights and other intellectual property laws. For several months SCO has been involved in a contentious legal case that we filed against IBM. What are the underlying intellectual property principles that have put SCO in a strong position in this hotly debated legal case? I'd summarize them in this way:

    1. "Fair use" applies to educational, public service and related applications and does not justify commercial misappropriation. Books and Internet sites intended and authorized for the purpose of teaching and other non-commercial use cannot be copied for commercial use. ...

    2. Copyright attributions protect ownership and attribution rights--they cannot simply be changed or stripped away. This is how copyright owners maintain control of their legal rights and prevent unauthorized transfer of ownership. ...

    3. In copyright law, ownership cannot be transferred without express, written authority of a copyright holder....

    4. Transfer of copyright ownership without express written authority of all proper parties is null and void.

    5. Use of derivative rights in copyrighted material is defined by the scope of a license grant. An authorized derivative work may not be used beyond the scope of a license grant. License grants regarding derivative works vary from license to license--some are broad and some are narrow. In other words, the license itself defines the scope of permissive use, and licensees agree to be bound by that definition. ...

    Oops, almost forgot to give attribution to the source! Ha, ha, almost slipped, and when trying to give examples of following copyright laws -- that would have been too ironic, don't you think? Anyway, here's the source for the above prescient insight into IP Laws for poor old SCO:
    Darl McBride, CEO, The SCO Group, http://darlmcbride.com
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  15. SCOX at $5.30 today and dropping by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    SCO stock continues to drop. The chart for the last three months is almost linear, going from 14 to 5. The bump in April was apparently SCO's announced "stock buyback" program, which had little long-term effect.

    Two more points down, and SCOX will be back where it was before all the lawsuits, down around 3. That level looks likely within a month.

  16. Re:Uh by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It goes like this.

    Good person:
    1) Pay for content
    2) Get content.

    Bad person:
    1) Get content.
    2) if (Gets_Caught())
    Pay_For_Content();
    else
    Never_Pay();

    The point is, they likely wouldn't have paid if they didn't get caught, and they still broke the law. Do you say everything's ok and you're just like a normal, honest citizen after you've served your 4 years in jail for auto theft, or do you have a GTA record?