Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

2nd Multi-Format 128kbps Public Listening Test

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the music-to-one's-ears dept.

technology is sexy writes "Roberto Amorim has launched his latest public listening test evaluating the performance of different audio codecs at 128kbps, among them Apple's AAC implementation (used in iTunes), LAME, Ogg Vorbis fork auTuV, WMA, Musepack and even Sony's Atrac3 format, which is soon to be used in their own music store. Read more on Hydrogenaudio and check out the results of prior tests. As opposed to most evaluations of audio codecs, this is a scientific test adhering to ITU-R BS.1116-1 as much as possible while still allowing everybody to participate."

7 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. Listening test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never heard of it.

  2. Ogg! by gekkotron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ogg, ogg ogg. Ogg oggity ogg ogg!

    Now that that's out of the way, let the insightful comments begin.

    1. Re:Ogg! by gekkotron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vorbis vorbis vorbis!

      Nope, it just doesn't have the same ring to it.
      Plus, vorbisty just doesn't work.

    2. Re:Ogg! by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish there was a filter that scored any post with the words "You're new here, aren't you?" -5 stupid joke.

      I, for one, would welcome our new filter overlords.

    3. Re:Ogg! by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Badger badger badger!

      Now that has a ring to it!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Ogg! by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're not doing it right. Try this:

      Vorb-Vorb Vorbbity Vorb Vorb.
      Bissy Bis... ba bis bis bis.
      Vorbbity Vorbbity va va vorb. bissity bis.

      --
      HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
  3. Re:How about: by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Funny

    FLAC! Flac-a-flac-a-flac!

    Aflac? What does a silly duck have to do with sound compression?

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.