Slashdot Mirror


Future Weapons of War in the Works

An anonymous reader writes "Who needs explosive missiles when you can just launch a 3 foot long chunk of metal at near Mach 7 speeds and get the same result? Popular Science looks at weapons the military is developing for future wars including electromagnetic railguns, space darts, superfast torpedos, laser cannons, and a gun that fires a million rounds per minute."

5 of 983 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It would be MUCH better... by torpor · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    It would be far better to spend all this money on giving people less reason to fight each other.

    Say, better resource control in Mozambique (water)? What about building a machine that, instead of pumping out millions of rounds of lead per second, are able to make mud bricks and houses at a rate of 10 a day?

    Why isn't this a priority? Simple. The ones in control of the funding are fucking assholes and have all the justification they need to continue bringing misery and death to the world ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  2. um... Bush doesn't by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Listen to his allies? Bush blew the cover of a CIA spy because her husband was saying things he didn't want to hear.

    Bush decides what he wants to do, and goes fishing for someone who will give him a good excuse for doing it.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  3. American Flag? by peterprior · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I find it interesting that the slashdot story icon for this is a nice wavy American flag. Is making missiles and weapons what America is proud of ?

  4. Re:It would be MUCH better... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    ... because there are people like you in the world who serve only to justify inhumanity

    People like me, eh? I haven't started any genocidal wars, not that I can remember.

    The problem with liberals like you is that you assume that people are fundamentally cooperative and sane, if only the nasty Warmongers (or Americans or Jews or Capitalists or whoever you blame) would go away, the world would return to Eden-like bliss. My advice to you is to grow up a bit.

  5. Re:War Crimes by vandan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Why don't I volunteer for a suicide squad?
    Because I have things to live for.
    You clearly still don't understand what makes a terrorist. It's simple. So simple, even a fucking Yankee could understand it. You kill someone's family, take away their home, destroy their community and make sure to take anything else they might possibly be able to call their own. After that, they're a terrorist.
    But I'm sure there are Americans who share my horror at what the majority support ( calling them sheep is insulting to sheep ), and a small percentage of them will be terminally ill. They are your problem. They have very little to loose, and if you keep up your attitude and foreign policy, Bin Laden will be the least of your worries; you'll have plently of home-grown terrorists to defend yourself from.
    And while I won't go quite so far as to say "bring them on", I will point out that karma always catches up with you. It's only a matter of time.