I always thought the CC in CCTV stood for 'Closed Circuit', meaning the pictures are not being broadcast.
I know they're not being broadcast over RF but shouldn't making them available to anyone via a website be classed as 'broadcasting' therefore making it Open Circuit TV or just 'TV' ?
You're thinking too logically. This is the UK education system we're talking about. Hell the government loses half the populations details in the post - this isn't going to be much more advanced than a PC sitting in an office.
Not only that - but who has the time to "quickly and effectively print data off from the system showing who was on site" when there is a bloody fire alarm. When I was in school we were told to leave everything and get out, not wait for a laser printer to warm up or an epson stylus to clean its printer cartridges.
I wonder how people would react if the postal service were allowed to hold envelopes up to a light, say "theres a CD in there which could have illegally copied copyrighted data on it!" and then after doing that 3 times, stop all mail to your house without having to provide any actual evidence or give you a chance to prove your innocence.
"But who's going to install it? people of a political bent who oppose your wiretaping. The sort of people who will be first against the wall when the military coup comes."
Curiously enough, an edition of Slashdot that had the good fortune to fall through a time warp from a thousand years in the future listed the people who installed such software as "a bunch of people of a political bent that opposed the governments wiretapping who were the first against the wall when the military coup came."
Quote: "I mean, the metaphor I've used is... somebody's going to push my family off a cliff pretty soon, and I won't be there to catch them. And that breaks my heart. But I have some time to sew some nets to cushion the fall. So, I can curl up in a ball and cry, or I can get to work on the nets."
Google claims no ownership or control over any Content submitted, posted or displayed by you on or through Google services. You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any Content you submit, post or display on or through Google services and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate.
On the plus side you'll be able to pay $2 to skip the ads...
By linking to their site from here you just violated their "no linking" policy found here: http://interneteyes.co.uk/terms-conditions.html
"Linking to our site
You may not link any other site to our website."
Whoops - and now I have as well
I always thought the CC in CCTV stood for 'Closed Circuit', meaning the pictures are not being broadcast.
I know they're not being broadcast over RF but shouldn't making them available to anyone via a website be classed as 'broadcasting' therefore making it Open Circuit TV or just 'TV' ?
That was fast..
Well it is bleeding edge hardware....
He came in through the back door ;)
You're thinking too logically. This is the UK education system we're talking about. Hell the government loses half the populations details in the post - this isn't going to be much more advanced than a PC sitting in an office.
I said nothing about being required to wear one.
Replying twice as I've just thought of something else.
"What if they deliberately obscure their face or object to the system?"
In todays multicultural Britain, what if a Muslim wearing a Burqa wants to enroll at the college?
Not only that - but who has the time to "quickly and effectively print data off from the system showing who was on site" when there is a bloody fire alarm. When I was in school we were told to leave everything and get out, not wait for a laser printer to warm up or an epson stylus to clean its printer cartridges.
I wonder how people would react if the postal service were allowed to hold envelopes up to a light, say "theres a CD in there which could have illegally copied copyrighted data on it!" and then after doing that 3 times, stop all mail to your house without having to provide any actual evidence or give you a chance to prove your innocence.
Maybe ask in the Crackberry Forums (a Blackberry user site)
"But who's going to install it? people of a political bent who oppose your wiretaping. The sort of people who will be first against the wall when the military coup comes."
Curiously enough, an edition of Slashdot that had the good fortune to fall through a time warp from a thousand years in the future listed the people who installed such software as "a bunch of people of a political bent that opposed the governments wiretapping who were the first against the wall when the military coup came."
"Jacqui Smith MP, is one of the worst of them."
Indeed.
Public Can't Wait To Be Truncheoned Across The Jaw, Says Smith
s/terrorists/politicians/g
There - fixed it for you.
Quote: "I mean, the metaphor I've used is ... somebody's going to push my family off a cliff pretty soon, and I won't be there to catch them. And that breaks my heart. But I have some time to sew some nets to cushion the fall. So, I can curl up in a ball and cry, or I can get to work on the nets."
Wow.
"Just a week ago France became maybe the first large rich country to start systematically blocking websites at the country level."
:)
Um - China is very large and very rich
Next thing you know he'll start using a web browser to view websites. :O
Don't forget Captain Copyright! :D
Yes he did - half way down ish he describes the process of fitting an 8 switch DIL package that he can access from the memory upgrade panel.
Morons
There - fixed that for you...
This might be true: If there are 0 elephants in New Zealand, tripling that would still result in 0 elephants in New Zealand.
...or they could just both make sure that their products implement and adhere to standards correctly.
Though given the recent OOXML ISO happenings, maybe more companies will need these labs to make their products work together...
"Phfft. You can forget me ever visiting the UK and spending my vacation dollars."
It's ok. We don't accept dollars anyway.
Indeed:
m l:
From http://www.google.com/google-d-s/intl/en/terms.ht
Google claims no ownership or control over any Content submitted, posted or displayed by you on or through Google services. You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any Content you submit, post or display on or through Google services and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate.