Slashdot Mirror


Mandrakelinux 10 Now Available To All

EvilAlien writes "Mandrakelinux has released the ISOs for Mandrakelinux 10.0. Mandrakelinux 10 is one of the first commercially available Linux distributions to feature the 2.6 kernel by default. As always, you can download the release via FTP or Bittorrent. Remember, if you use Mandrakelinux, join the club or buy a box to support them."

5 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Community Edition by Xshare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been using the v.10 Community Edition on one of my older PCs for my little sister. It's easy enough for her, but powerful enough to run what I throw at it. I'll definately be upgrading to the Official Version now.

  2. MandrakeMove by vigilology · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will they release a MandrakeMove 10? I want to see if and how well Mandrake 10 will perform on a certain set-up, but can't without commiting to a full install.

  3. Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by astrosmash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does Mandrake 10 suffer from the same MBR corruption bug that currently plagues Red Hat Fedora? Apparently it's caused by some of the changes to the 2.6 kernel and is affecting other 2.6 distros.

    --
    ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
  4. I used to be a club member by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For two years, as a matter of fact. I joined for three reasons - 1. I could give back to MDK without paying the 2. Duval's March call (2 years ago) 3. Subscription is the way to go for Linux, IMHO (because of the very rapid movement in the Opensource World)

    Once thing I was promised was my voice to be heard. Another one - to get some benefits.

    My voice was heard, but only by other members. I asked once - "are we gonna get a dvd iso as well ? (regarding 9.2)". Not a single answer from MDK. When 9.2 was released, Gold members were given an ISO download, but not bronze/silver (I can't really afford a Gold membership, I'm just a student). What I really disliked is that they didn't tell me anything. And nobody can really argue that they didn't notice my message, since the traffic on MDK club is very small.

    The benefits - well, the package system is reasonably good. Other than that ... it certainly doesn't feel like a subscription service. There are many products (like the x86-64 distro) that are not available for club members at all. For the main distro itself, it felt that I was paying to be a betatester more than a priviledged downloader.

    I think that the way to go for MDK is to convert the club into a true subscription model (not the very ambiguous hafl charity, half business thing that the club currently is). Until then I'll be happily using MDK on my laptops without being a member, but won't be too sorry if I have to switch to Debian.

    --

    The Raven

  5. a review of various distros by RouterSlayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all, I've used just about every distro out there, and even some you've never heard of...

    Way back since the slackware days, even kernel 1.0 days and before that... Yes floppies were great.

    Mandrake has had its troubles, not the least of which has been the financial stuff that it's now finally out of...

    But even before Red Hat 7.0 it was a better distro. Its always had better package management.

    I see people whine that Debian is better JUST because of "apt get", well guess what? Mandrake has that too! so get a clue...

    and RPM? well it does that... and it does it all better. I have yet to see a better packager than URPMI... ever.

    also, through all my testing over the years, I have never, EVER seen a distro support all my hardware "out of the box", I mean, it JUST WORKS. On all the wierd laptops I've owned, it installs and runs like a charm, every time, supporting all the whacky devices without me having to do a thing. ever...

    wireless? yep, it was there, done and work, weird ass DSL setups, it worked. and it detected it all and set it up right, the first time... during install.

    Package support? it has soo many different packages, for desktops, for servers, for whatever you want, even if you want everything. Me, of course, I experiment, so I literally install EVERYTHING, and it still works!

    Today, for newbies I always point them at Mandrake, its dirt simple to install, and it gets it all correct, the first time, no weird questions, no BS, ever. it just works. period. and thats what people want.

    for the hardcore people, I still recommend it, for servers, I still recommend it. always.

    no matter what you are trying to do, it'll support it, no matter what your hardware, it'll work.

    if it doesn't, you did something wrong. I hate people who say "Well I just installed it and it doesn't work" well guess what, it is STILL possible to do "something wrong" even then.

    I watched friends do this, and they complain that whatever doesnt work afterwards, and I noticed during install they didnt select those packages... well, guess what? it wont work... duhhhh... and they even claim they selected "everything"... uh, no, I was watching bubba, you missed more than half of it. hello...

    if you have a specific use, need a specific package, and specifically DONT choose it during install, of course it wont be there... jeez, get a clue...

    I dont know of a better distro, I've been supporting them since way back when, and always will, I pay support, I buy extra stuff, you name it.

    right now on the market there aren't many choices...

    Debian - forget it.
    Fedora - this thing is a joke
    SUSE - I hate Yast with a passion
    slackware - they ruined it after 7.0
    nuff said.