Clear Channel Buys Patent For Instant Live CDs
An anonymous reader writes "According to this Rolling Stone article, and this article at P2P, everyone's favorite monopolist, Clear Channel, is bullying DiscLive and other companies in the available-after-the-concert live CD business by forbidding them from operating in their venues.
Looking at the actual Clear Channel patent itself, it's obvious that, unlike what is said by their Instant Live program head Steve Simon, their patent is very specific, and doesn't cover all media types and all onsite production, so isn't CC just standing behind a bogus patent to continue to act like a monopolist? Anyone have prior art to invalidate their patent?"
At least they are my favorite monopolist. Who is ClearChannel anyway?
Anyone have prior art to invalidate their patent?
Back in 1988, I recorded a Pet Shop Boys concert on DAT, and got mugged outside the stadium. Does that count as instant distribution?
The RIAA sues ClearChannel for illegally suing anyone for any reason having to do with music before they had a chance to get in on the fun.
the patent specifically states that aspects of the process can be left out whilst still performing the same function - ie editing module etc.
:)
I think I'm going to patent "Process of urinating through big media corporations letterbox" and seeing how far I get
liqbase
Maybe the grassroots, word-of-mouth approach isn't that bad afterall...
Nah, thats just hippie bs. Look at the failure of linux, *bsd, gnu, etc.
>seeing how far I get :)
Have a few beers beforehand, you should be able to get six feet or more!!
Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal
Maybe they just want him to clear his throat before singing it again...
--RJ
how about a 1 second buffer in the recorder, then it is no longer "as it happens" instead it is "1 second behind what is happening"
Snowden and Manning are heroes.