Slashdot Mirror


Using Thin Clients with PeopleSoft?

lsmft2001 asks: "We're busy implementing a big ERP project with PeopleSoft. We currently run a mixture of Windows 95, 98 and 2000. These machines run most of the time, but all too often they fail for various reasons. Our IT department spends too much time fixing these machines, basically patching them enough so staff can get back to work. It's frustrating for them and for the users. PeopleSoft only requires a browser to run. Has anyone implemented PeopleSoft without Windows machines? What I would really like to see is some kind of plug and play solution. If a PC fails, the maintenance folks replace the whole machine or the hard drive and everyone is back to work. I would like to see this solution for the 'power users' as well, where they could log on to any machine and have all their files and applications available to them. Everything here runs Novell Netware. Has anyone implemented PeopleSoft with minimal client software? Could it be done with Novell and SuSe?"

27 comments

  1. details? by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it runs in a browser, why can't you use firefox, galeon, konqueror, etc inside linux? the only thing that would make it heavily windows dependent is if it required activex. if it does, then i have to say you're shit out of luck. if however all they need is web to access peoplesoft, most distros are more than adequate and can fix the patching issue by automation through the network and in general better security, less viruses, adware, worms, etc.

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:details? by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If all you need is Web access, then you could netboot a sub-100MB image (Google for Damn Smal Linux, a 50MB knoppix-based distro) with PXE or equivalent and have the image mount user homedirs via NFS. If your net can handle it, it would work very nicely for patching (test a patch on a copy of an image, then use a script to copy it to your tFTP server at night). Otherwise, you could use a 64 or 128 MB CF card and IDE adapter to boot the boxes, storing user data and non-essential (rarely used) programs on the network.

      Can't comment on NetWare though

    2. Re:details? by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Damn Smal Linux, a 50MB knoppix-based distro

      It's interesting to me that 50MB is considered "damn small" or miniscule. It must have been about six years ago that a friend of mine put together a Linux "distro" which included a few network analysis tools, all on one bootable 1.44MB floppy. I feel old :)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  2. We use Peoplesoft at my Work.... by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Informative

    We recently upgraded to PS 8.8 at my work and though I don't use Linux at work, I do use FireFox/Mozilla. Both of which have rendering issues on some of our pages. Some relatively new versions of mozilla won't even respond to menu clicks. It's really not the OS you ought to be worried about with Linux IMHO, it's browser compatibility. (And about people writing applications with browsers and standards in mind).

    As an alternate solution, I'd recommend Norton Ghost. Keep a backup of a "good" image for each PC model in the office. When a client fails, simply refresh the image (takes like 20 minutes). It's not especially elegant, but it gets the job done.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:We use Peoplesoft at my Work.... by DShard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or better yet, check out Novell's ZenWorks for Desktops. It handles both imaging and application/patch deployment. I work for A holding company which owns a general contractor. We service over 20 locations with two helpdesk individuals. These guys handle over 400 PC's and keep them patched and reimaged. We have only been struck twice with virii (once was due people bypassing sp4 and another was on a jobsite using kazaa, both situations are now permanently fixed).

      Having seen how well it scales I have to say I'm a true believer.

  3. Well by adamshelley · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a citrix client for a multitude of platforms. Setup a farm and they can connect no problem. Let their sessions stay open so even if they diss they can join back up. Spend some time setting up the servers so u don't have to reboot them every monday morning. but... it will cost you major cal $.

    Crossover office can run IE. Never tried it but nomachines.com sounds like a citrix like platform.

    If you are not IE specific then I'm not sure why the question is here.

  4. VMware by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    Put an operating system on the machine that runs VMware (Linux, Windows, whatever). Install your "desktop machine" as you want it configured and then save the image on a read-only partition (or as a read-only file). Configure it to boot into the VMware image by default, and when the luser fscks it up, you can just step in with a knoppix CD, copy the image file over, and reboot the machine. Instant Computer Restore - ICR(tm), just add water(tm).

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:VMware by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      hehe there is an even easier solution. Use Deepfreeze. Lock down the machine with the actual OS it will use, allow them to write to one dir. If anything goes wrong just reboot.

      www.deepfreezeusa.com

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  5. PeopleSoft supports most current clients by linuxhansl · · Score: 5, Informative

    Currently PeopleSoft supports the following clients: IE 4.X, IE 5.x, Netscape 4.x, Netscape 6.x, and Netscape 7.x on all platforms where these browser run.

    As server platform PeopleSoft supports Windows, Linux, AIX, HP-UX, Thru64, Solaris, etc.

    Supported Databases are Oracle, Sybase, DB2, MS-SQL.

    So there is no need at all to use Microsoft Software with PeopleSoft. Neither on the server nor on the client.

  6. Cut your losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Cut your losses and ditch PeopleSoft. I'm aware of about 5 colleges and universities, including my alma mater, that have tried or are still trying to get the PeopleSoft built to the stage where it can begin to handle daily tasks. Three of these eventually ran out of money early on.

    It would be a more efficient use of resources to urge support for standard data formats rather than specifying specific client software. However, if they did that , then it would be obvious whether or not PeopleSoft works. So instead, departments are kept in turmoil as they chase a moving target and never get to find out whether they got sold some snake oil.

  7. If all you need is a browser, why not PXE it? by millisa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A year or so ago, setting up a PXE linux based system took a little bit of effort, but today? It's cake. Check this out. Its a simple to setup PXE environment. The documentation is fantastic and it 'just works'. You can setup a simple browser only xwindows type environment or do what I prefer to avoid weird windows issues: Setup a Windows terminal server and use Rdesktop in that pxe environment to give everyone a real microsoft desktop. I had difficult making the sound pipe down to the local machine but . . .who needs that anyways? With the money you save on replacing those hard drives buy that staff IPod's (and two or three for yourself) (though getting stuff on the ipods with those pxe boots might be challenging).

    The things that fail most often are things that move . . . it is absolutely possible to eliminate every fan and drive with this type of environment. Ram fails, but its a whole lot less often that the drives . . .and so what if it does?

    "What? Your system is just beeping. Oh. Well just use this system which I have magically moved all your stuff to already"

  8. Quick question: What is PeopleSoft? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    PeopleSoft® Enterprise is a family of best-in-class applications based on our Pure Internet Architecture® designed for flexible configuration and open, multi-vendor integration. It is ideally suited for financial, government, education, healthcare and other services industries. It is also ideally suited for large, company-wide functions such as human resources, finance, IT, procurement, marketing, services and sales across all industries.
    So, what is it again?

    Snide remarks about marketing speak aside, If you're having so many computer failures maybe the problem is your IT staff. There are (Windows) computers where I work that haven't had any problems since I installed them, which in some cases is up to two years ago. Moving to thin clients because your IT department doesn't know how to support normal PCs isn't the right reason to move to thin clients.

    1. Re:Quick question: What is PeopleSoft? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Any reason not to use Windows is the right reason, buddy.

      --
      My other car is first.
  9. MetaFrame XP, or maybe Terminal Services by erpbridge · · Score: 1

    I don't know how well it would work, but maybe trying Citrix Metaframe XP, or maybe having a port of a Windows Remote Desktop/Windows Terminal Services client, and having the whole Peoplesoft application published on the MetaFrame or Terminal Server.

    Of course, that's assuming there is a client port for either of those for your OS. It would make it so you could reinstall/replace the client machine, and not have to install/configure Peoplesoft.

  10. Back, somewhat, to the subject at hand... by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

    I have not used PeopleSoft, but I do have experience with browser only interfaces.
    You mentioned "replace the whole machine with hard drive..." how about one step simpler... LTSP (ltsp.org).

    No hard drive. No CD Rom. No Floppy. No Sound. (you can if you like, but we're talking simple.).

    You just have one server or maybe one server and one or two application servers (LTSP, X, Peoplesoft).

    I've set this up for several schools and it works great. Also at a few businesses for OpenOffice and Evolution. If a machine breaks, they just walk in and replace it and check it out later when they are scraping to build a few more standbys.

    I have one place with 15 client machines that are 150MHz, 32MB Ram, video and ethernet over 100 BaseT and a "server" that is a whopping 700MHz AMD with 1GB Ram. (don't skimp on server RAM). It takes a minute to load KDE and Mozilla (Maybe 60sec for both) the first time (we use Mozilla for composer, IRC and Email), but then is very quick for simultaneous users (15 seconds from boot to browswer). Then nice thing is that whatever your servers run at is what you appear to be running at your thin client.

    --
    There is a Universal Life Value Check it
  11. The PS system by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

    is certified to run on Netscape 6+ and IE 5.5/6. I work at PSFT, and although they told me not to, I went ahead and tried to work with it in FireFox, and it worked fine. As far as the server goes, its supposed to be able to work on a UNIX server, and you can use Oracle for the db, making Windows unnecessary at all ends.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
  12. Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be using Sunblades with java cards.

    1. Re:Sun by desau · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Sun Ray, not sunblade.

    2. Re:Sun by Antarius · · Score: 1

      My 14th level Paladin had a Holy Sunblade once. My thoughts? Paladins + Holy Swords are overrated.

      "Circle of Power" be damned...

  13. Go Ultra Thin by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 4, Interesting


    If the issue you're trying to solve is desktop maintenance, then I strongly suggest going to an Ultra Thin Client like the Sun Ray architecture.

    I have installed Sun Ray networks at universities, and they absolutely love them. Yes, I work with Suns as a profession, so if you feel you must, take this with a grain of salt. Then again, I'm very much pro-Linux and would love to see an LTSP installation as well, that doesn't reduce the maintenance as much as the Sun Rays will.

    If you aren't familiar with them, think of a telephone... if it breaks, you unplug it and put a new one in place and as soon as you plug it in, it's working. Same thing. No hard drive. No fans. No noise at all. Nothing mechanical to break, nothing to fix.

    They are effectively a remote display (+kb+mouse) to the Solaris system running the Sun Ray Server software... so everyone shares the same (remote) box. Suns are designed to be much more efficient in multitasking "server" environments than the typical PC, so you can run quite a lot of Sun Rays off one server without anyone noticing a degredation in performance.

    Browser choices include Netscape, Mozilla, Firefox, and I'm sure others.
    Desktops include CDE and GNOME (recommended) and soon, JDS (Java Desktop Environment = slicked up GNOME).

    Another plus is "hot desking".
    Say you get a page and have to run to the other end of the building, but you're in the middle of something, or remotely logged into the server you need to work on with tasks running you don't want to stop, etc. You either disconnect the display with a simple command or button push, or if you're using the available smartcards, you yank your card out and run. You get to the other end of the building or server room (whatever), you plug in your smartcard (if you're using it) or you just log in, and the display you had at the former location is now in front of you still running and active. I've done exactly this on many occasions, having something running on a console of a box, with the serial console controled via minicom in an xterm... but I needed to be in the server room to do something then get back to the console again. You get the idea.

    Ports on the incredibly simple devices include: VGA (DB15); 4 USB (for keyboard, mouse, etc.); ethernet; power; audio out (in case the internal speaker isn't loud enough for ya); audio in, and video in.
    Yes, you read that right, it has composite video (and audio) in, so you can do video-conferencing using these Ultra Thin Clients.

    I'm leaving a lot out... these things are much nicer and more versatile than I'm describing.

    I seriously think Sun should market these things more, everyone who I've demoed them for has loved 'em.

    Anyways, just to prove I'm not just trying to sell new Sun hardware (I'm not a sales-droid, I'm a tech), check out the used ones on ebay. I'm running some Sun Rays at home on an old Ultra 10... got the former for $30/each and the latter for around $125.

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:Go Ultra Thin by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Yes, SunRays are very very cool, neat devices. The next major version of SunrayServer should support Linux too.

      --paulj

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    2. Re:Go Ultra Thin by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      I wasn't there, but I heard that at the last LinuxWorld conference in NY, Sun announced the next version WILL run on Linux! (I can't wait!)

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    3. Re:Go Ultra Thin by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      It will yes, and the next version due Real Soon Now(TM). (month or so hopefully).

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    4. Re:Go Ultra Thin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should really try PXES Universal Linux Thin Client (http://pxes.sf.net) which is a software only thin client solution that runs on thin clients or in standard PCs perhaps converted into thin clients (removing local devices). The minimum requirements are very low (Pentium I, 32 Mb RAM).
      The easiest way to test it is to download a Pre-Built ISO image (~14 Mb), burn the CD and boot.

  14. lsmft2001 didn't designate which product line-- by LadyShiva · · Score: 1

    First of all--I work on EnterpriseOne primarily, and linuxhansl is addressing Enterprise products (Sybase gave it away). I have done an Enterprise install, but know enough to recognize the architecture differences, and know what to put where. *grin*

    Check the MTRs for the thin clients:
    1. Browsers other than Netscape and IE aren't supported. Mozilla support is in the works. However, a tweak to linuxhansl's post--it isn't all platforms--only on the client machines are browsers supported. That's what's important to you, but realize that a linux client isn't supported at this time, or in the next year. Windows XP is barely supported, so I doubt linux clients are going to be requested for my testing group for a while.

    2. Novell and SuSE are not going to be supported for enterprise servers for over a year--RedHat Advanced Server 3 has precedence, and is hogging the development resources currently. I'm banking my hardware requests on that.

    I think you're talking EnterpriseOne (because Enterprise is purely internet-based so the power user issue isn't a problem, and E1 has various implementation choices, like fat client), so you need to look into installing the WebSphere that comes with your folder of CDs and start up JAS. That gives you the flexibility you're wanting for your power users to only need a browser.

    The weird part about assuming E1 is you say Win95, 98, and 2000 clients-only 2000 is supported for a client anyway on the E1 line. I'm really familiar with the MTRs, so you're confusing me there. Any way you can put more info in your post? I'd love to help you out!

  15. Your first mistake was PeopleSoft. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Seriously -- PeopleSoft are the worst hacks out there. They can't develop anything worth crap. Concepts like "Standard Compliance" or "Usability" are completely lost on them.

  16. Toptier by BananaPeel · · Score: 1

    Can remember if this was for SAP or peoplesoft...one of the two bought out the company. Anyway you might find some useful information if you google for TopTier. Another way of looking at this is just to look at what middleware adapters you can put together with Peoplesoft that will allow you to link in a web server. Both of these approaches reach straight back to the db Layer but with a bit of hacking can be made to work well.