Slashdot Mirror
Robotic Space Workers of the Future
Roland Piquepaille writes "In an article named "Puckish robots pull together," Nature describes the work done at the Polymorphic Robotics Laboratory (PRL) of the University of Southern California on self-reconfigurable teams of robots. There, Wei-Min Shen and his colleagues simulate the absence of gravity by creating a 2D representation of space by using an 'air-hockey table.' With jets of air flow blowing on the surface, the 30 cm-wide robots, working in pairs, evolve in a frictionless environment, pick elements such as girders to assemble structures like if they were in space. NASA will use these teams of autonomous robots to build space systems like 10 km-long arrays of solar panels and other huge spatial structures. You'll find more details, illustrations and references in this overview."
...welcome our new puckish robot overlords.
Open the pod bay doors hal! This is a big step, i was worried that the spare program was buggerd after the shuttle accident, but if this tech. is continued we just might be moving to the final frontier,
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
It's an air hockey table! It's not exactly frictionless, as there is air resistence and other factors. Maybe these scientists know more than I do, but I can't really imagine an air hockey table can even remotely simulate space; where you bump into something and when you bounce back you'll keep going forever, etc. Other than that, it looks intresting of them all working together, a beowulf cluster of space robots, heh.
For the last time, meatbag^H^H^H^H^H^Hpeople...
Please, do not use the "R-word".
We prefer to be called Electronic-Americans.
Thank you.
end transmission.
it seems that in the U.S. people really dislike working. they are sending jobs everywhere.
Nah... They been using robot's to replace people all over the place. What better then space... No comfy jeffrey tubes to ***** in, all programmable.. let's hope they're running a more reliable version on Linux then the english (JK)... but seriously... This is where it needs to go if it is going to go anywhere... Saves live's, space, in space, blah blah blah...
Hmm, I just hope the robots don't stop working after they let 7 goals get by them.
But Maaa! Everyone else has a
So these robots are small pieces that come together on their own in order to form larger structures?
I have a feeling the Asgard are going to be rather pissed at us...
These hocky puck things remind me of another robot devoloped by nasa. They both like floating around in space, but nasa's has more of the little buddy going for it.
Let's see how these things do in a swimming pool. It's probably a closer approximation to space than an air-hockey table... Astronauts Take a Dive
hi.
Will this come in time to protect us from the terrible secret of space?
I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
Warcraft anyone? ..beats air-hockey any day.
--
Hate the playa, not the game
"Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
Air hockey on the 'SwineTrek'! Groovy!
I can hear it now, "NASA can bite my shiny metal a$$" /bender
Perhaps the PRL will purchased by some international conglomerate and renamed to "Mom's Friendly Robot Company"
"Snoochie-Boochies? Who talks like that? That is babytalk!"-Jay, Chasing Amy
Imagine what kind of a strategy game this makes possible. As a long time SCBW player I sometimes hate all that scrolling arround. Now, if someone would take let say, 10 or those tables, big number of smaller robots, and devise some nifty control interface where two teams can duke it out while overseeing the whole table, THAT would be REALLY RELLY nice. Oh yeah, and if someone decides to do this, I want paid trip there and a few days of unlimited playtime :)
It says that these things are able to continue to learn and adapt. I am not an AI expert, but how many mistakes does it have to make before it figures everything out? I have yet to see a machine programmed with every facet of the instincts that might prevent disasters from unforseen situations. Of course, humans make their own mistakes.
_____
Thank you.
If robots do everything, what are we humans useful for?
Not only will we get to live pointless lives from a functional point ofview, but we will also get to starve to death unless we can do a job robots can't do. Why do we want to compete with robots?!
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
This is the worst thing we could do as humans. IF you want society to fall apart simply make the majority of humans useless. I mean if Robots can do what the average human could do, what the hell is the average human useful for? I guess its time to start slaughtering and killing about 6 billion useless people so we have space for these robots. Don't you agree?
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
I want robots to be as stupid as insects forever, this way we will all have jobs as programmers at least. The day robots can learn is the day humans go exstinct. There is simply no way for us to compete with robots that can learn.
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
I have a feeling the Asgard are going to be rather pissed at us...
You mean the Aesir. Asgard is where the Aesir lived.
I think that this is great - low-cost zero gravity, or a 2-D version - it may open up more possibilities for people who want to experiment with the robots or the AI. Pesumably, more people will build the hardware, which would (hopefully) be good for the AI people as well.
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
Smells like a troll to me.
Ludites reading /. now. What is this world coming to?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
What happens to these massive space structures when a 3 inch rock or space junk going at hyperspeed punches through them. If I were building a space station I wouldn't be building windows, I would be thinking submarine with a thick hide. One day those guys in the space station are going to hear this *THONG* *THONG* as a rock enters and then exits the station punching through the walls and they are subsequently sucked up against the hole in the wall and have the flesh torn from their bones.
Same problem applies to getting places real fast, lets just say you can approach the speed of light, and that you can go into a cryogenic sleep or whatever. What happens when you plough through the ever-so-faint tail of a comet that consists of metalic rocks and the like.
Sure, you replace people with robots, and most systems with redundant and backup systems.
But for all those people blowing their load over commercial and civilian/tourist space flight. There isn't much you are going to do, or see. It will be just as viable as commercial and civilian/tourist submarines. Some, yes, but not that many. And not many things that aren't based around science and/or money making commercial ventures.
I wish people would realise that we are hundreds of years away from being a viable space faring race (should we so desire) and that there are some problems at home that we have to think through first.
Global warming - I don't care whether we caused it or if it's a natural cycle.... it's real we have to deal with it.
The carrying capacity (longterm sustainable population to resource ratio) of the earth is being exceeded and we aren't doing squat. There is no rationale to have more people, there is no reason why 500 million people in europe or america is better than 300 million... these numbers are meaningless. We need to halt population growth, big time. Population to resource ratio inequality usually leads to death, either by starvation or by war. Not a good future
Other climate effects we don't understand like currents in the sea that affect the whole global climate, errosion, salinity etc.
We have a million and one problems down here, and floating we monkeys into space doesn't solve ANY of them. I hate this romantic notion that it will be all like star-trek when we forge out into space. It WONT, it will be exactly like it is down here. The only way things are going to change is if they change down here first.
I don't want to troll to badly here. But tons of people are starving, our global political order is on the brink (brought there by a "peace loving" democracy no less), at home in liberal democracies we cover up the fact our education systems suck, our environment is polluted, we don't look after our sick and ill properly and we don't care about the homeless.
We need fewer great minds to be looking into the sky and more great minds to bent their will towards these problems. I'm sorry, but until that time... people looking through telescopes will always be immature little boys who are in a fantasy world and ignoring the problems at hand.
I suppose the same could be said for any technology enthusiast. Think about that. THAT, my freinds, is stuff that matters.
While it probably won't happen in my lifetime, space is probably the only hope for finding a use for that "infinite supply" of "human labor".
We're going to need robots to make it happen. All the laborers are just going to have to become smarter than the robots. It's called progress.
hi.
Completey OT: I'm surprised this user's name has such a high /. id#. Does a comment from this user automatically invoke Godwin's Law?
"I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
What happened to that pesky 3rd dimension? Y'know, it tends to complicate interactions just slightly. Not to mention air resistance, air currents, and the possibility of friction if/when the pucks come too close to the surface. Sounds like a half-baked idea to screw around with robots and leftover air hockey tables.
First I never said capitalism is good. What I'm saying is capitalism and robots can not co-exist. Humans become absolutely useless once robots become efficient. Yes at first robots increase jobs and productivity, but soon the knowledge and intelligence level required to continue to program/repair/ or stay above the robots will become too much for the average human to handle.
Can we all have A PHD from MIT/Harvard/Yale/etc? Competition with humans in the third world is enough, and the population keeps increasing every year meaning competition keeps increasing. How the hell are we supposed to compete with each other as 6 billion humans along with the machines?
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
hi.
Automation actually reduces jobs and eventually the reduction of jobs = a major major problem.
Yes at first the reduction of jobs will be good due to increased productivity, this happened with the computer industry in the USA, but after a point the productivity stops increasing while the jobs continue to decrease. The need for unskilled labor will continue to decrease until the majority of people in the world simply won't be as qualified as the machines are. What the hell are service workers supposed to do once they are told the robot can do their job perfectly? What will garbage men do once the garbage machine replaces them? I don't see how robots is good, this would be equal to China working hard to increase its population.
Population is already out of control and needs to be vastly decreased simply because theres not enough jobs for the 6 billion people currently on the earth. Computers will only make us compete harder for fewer jobs. To top this all off, we will be paid less.
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
Why are robots needed for space travel when we have all these humans in the third world who we could send to space? We have sent humans to the moon and could do it again easily.
We're going to need robots to make it happen. All the laborers are just going to have to become smarter than the robots. It's called progress.
You and I both know progress takes centuries if not longer. Evolution does not happen overnight, it takes thousands or millions of years. We have not evolved much since Roman times which explains why we keep making the same mistakes we made back then, getting into wars and making so called "human" mistakes which are then excused or ignored due to "human nature". Until we correct human nature, your utopia is as impossible as the communist utopia which would be required for machines to co-exist with man.
So forget about progress and worry about survival.
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
Snake? Snake?? SNAAAAAKE?????
"As played by stuffed mechanical ape"
Any thought you've ever had has already be
And, dare I point out, that one of the things that, despite its being " vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big," space is absolutely chock-a-block full of is the radiative effects of nuclear reactions?
KFG
"I am bender. Please insert girder."
So is this a true swarm relationship (as described, albeit badly, in Prey by Michael Crichton), or is it pair-only?
And can they get a divorce if one of the robots is cheating?
Who said we have to compete with the robots?
All we have to do is program the robots to not kill us, and make them like "wasting" resources keeping us alive and comfortable. Then we can all live on permanent vacation while the robots do all the nasty working.
I know I'm much happier when I'm at home "wasting" time doing nothing productive.
Only half of the parent post was OT. Granted, the anti-capitalism comment was guaranteed to piss off Republicans and the Teamsters' Union alike, but is that a reason to censor?
Someone's been watching too many bad sci-fi moovies *cough*alienresurrection*cough*. No to mention too many doom and gloom political manifestoes.
An astronaut against the hole would plug the hole. Vacuum does not suck. Air expands into vacuum. Higher pressure expands into lower pressure. On Earth we call this "weather fronts.
The scene in the movie where the alien is pulled through a tiny hole is utter bullshit.
And the "we have problems here!" argument is tired, old and fallacious.
1. It's not an either/or proposition. We can solve problems on Earth AND do things in space.
2. Many of our problems on Earth are rooted in human nature, and will most likely NEVER be solved, so we might as well advance where we can while we can.
--- Ban humanity.
3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543264832 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0633558817 4885320920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885234227 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989 3809525720 1065485863 2788659361 5338182796 8230301952 0353018529 6899577362 2599413891 2497217752 8347913151 5574857242 4541506959 5082953311 6861727855 8890750983 8175463746 4939319255 0604009277 0167113900 9848824012 8583616035 6370766010 4710181942 9555961989 4676783744 9448255379 7747268471 0404753464 6208046684 2590694912 9331367702 8989152104 7521620569 6602405803 8150193511 2533824300 3558764024 7496473263 9141992726 0426992279 6782354781 6360093417 2164121992 4586315030 2861829745 5570674983 8505494588 5869269956 9092721079 7509302955 3211653449 8720275596 0236480665 4991198818 3479775356 6369807426 5425278625 5181841757 4672890977 7727938000 8164706001 6145249192 1732172147 7235014144 1973568548 1613611573 5255213347 5741849468 4385233239 0739414333 4547762416 8625189835 6948556209 9219222184 2725502542 5688767179 0494601653 4668049886 2723279178 6085784383 8279679766 8145410095 3883786360 9506800642 2512520511 7392984896 0841284886 2694560424 1965285022 2106611863 0674427862 2039194945 0471237137 8696095636 4371917287 4677646575 7396241389 0865832645 9958133904 7802759009 9465764078 9512694683 9835259570 9825822620 5224894077 2671947826 8482601476 9909026401 3639443745 5305068203 4962524517 4939965143 1429809190 6592509372 2169646151 5709858387 4105978859 5977297549 8930161753 9284681382 6868386894 2774155991 8559252459 5395943104 9972524680 8459872736 4469584865 3836736222 6260991246 0805124388 4390451244 1365497627 8079771569 1435997700 1296160894 4169486855 5848406353 4220722258 2848864815 8456028506 0168427394 5226746767 8895252138 5225499546 6672782398 6456596116 3548862305 7745649803 5593634568 1743241125 1507606947 9451096596 0940252288 7971089314 5669136867 2287489405 6010150330 8617928680 9208747609 1782493858 9009714909 6759852613 6554978189 3129784821 6829989487 2265880485 7564014270 4775551323 7964145152 3746234364 5428584447 9526586782 1051141354 7357395231 1342716610 2135969536 2314429524 8493718711 0145765403 5902799344 0374200731 0578539062 1983874478 0847848968 3321445713 8687519435 0643021845 3191048481 0053706146 8067491927 8191197939 9520614196 6342875444 0643745123 7181921799 9839101591 9561814675 1426912397 4894090718 6494231961 5679452080 9514655022 5231603881 9301420937 6213785595 6638937787 0830390697 9207734672 2182562599 6615014215 0306803844 7734549202 6054146659 2520149744 2850732518 6660021324 3408819071 0486331734 6496514539 0579626856 1005508106 6587969981 6357473638 4052571459 1028970641 4011097120 6280439039 7595156771 5770042033 7869936007 2305587631 7635942187 3125147120 5329281918 2618612586 7321579198 4148488291 6447060957 5270695722 0917567116 7229109816 9091528017 3506712748 5832228718 3520935396 5725121083 5791513698 8209144421 0067510334 6711031412 6711136990 8658516398 3150197016 5151168517 1437657618 3515565088 4909989859 9823873455 2833163550 7647918535 8932261854 8963213293 3089857064 2046752590 7091548141 6549859461 6371802709 8199430992 4488957571 2828905923 2332609729 9712084433
Humans are allowed to replace humans because at least the human species always comes out on top.
What the hell are they supposed to do? Don't you think they would be happy now that they can actually get a job elsewhere that makes use of their unique human abilities, like creativity for instance? We *do* have a shortage of innovators and thinkers in this world, after all. Why aren't there more people filling those positions? Well, because they are needed for dumping garbage bags in a truck. A waste of human talent, if you ask me. Bottom line, humans should be doing what humans are good at, *not* cutting lawns or picking up garbage bags.
You act as if everyone is designed to be creative. Most humans arent creative. Most arent smart enough to come up with some revolutionary new idea. But ok lets assume your idea is possible, if it were then why arent we tapping the people in the third world for "ideas" if theres truely a shortage? Theres billions of people who could come up with ideas but instead they are just being allowed to starve to death.
- there is always room to innovate, create, and if anything, create better robots.
Create better Robots? Yes we all have that PHD from MIT. You ignore my arguement on how as the jobs become more complex that the natural capabilities of most people will not be enough to do the job.
For your world to ever exist, we'd have to change the education system and make the focus of education on creative thinking instead of memorization. We aren't trying to make the masses creative so you are nt convincing me that theres a shortage of creative people. Most creative people want to limit the number of creative people so that their job remains important and they continue to get high pay.
Musicians, Actors, CEOs, etc don't want any competition else they'd end up like the average man constantly being replaced. Assuming we did do this we still would only pick the most creative and this may require a number of skills, such as using computers to increase your creativity.
1
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
they are subsequently sucked up
Pushed up! Pushed up!!!
Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
In a pool or in water for that matter, you have boyancy. While this works for astronauts because they are heavy enough to not float to the surface, I have a funny feeling these robots would float to the top. On top of that, water wouldn't do these things good.
On a side note, since the idea of testing these things in a pool was brought up. If they were heavy enough to float around in water, would it be possible to test these in that liquid that one company invented that doesn't stick to anything or is the density vastly different from water that it might not work?
Stanford has had air-bearing robots to simulate space operations for over a decade. Theirs, though, carry an air tank and work against a flat granite slab.
Who said we have to compete with the robots?
The same people who say we have to compete with workers in the third world. Capitalism is all about competition, thats the core and soul of capitalism. Unless we are going to switch to communism overnight, what else are we supposed to do besides compete?
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
Let me give some straight facts through all this futuristic market speak in the articles and from my professor. Where are we now?
1. We are trying to do a proof-of-concept that a team of robots can indeed assemble structures together in a near-frictionless environment.
2. We are currently trying to build a triangle out of 3 reconfigurable beams assembled by a pair of tethered robots. With a triangle we can realize more rigid and useful structures such as trusses.
3. We are halfway there. We have achieved two-beam assembly with reconfigurable connectors and everything.
We have been working on this thing for almost a year, and one of the things you might be asking is why is this so difficult?
1. Main issue is connectors. You want to have connectors that can be automatically assembled together yet provided tight tolerances and carry heavy loads. These are often conflicting requirements and this has required a lot of tinkering to accomplish.
2. Reconfigurable connectors. These are connectors that not only automatically connect, but also automatically disconnect. Give the above requirements in 1 and this becomes doubly more difficult.
3. Precision control in a "near-frictionless" yet noisy environment. This is very difficult. Our positioning is kind of crude, our propulsion is non-linear, and the noise in the air-table is not predictable. We've been able to accomplish a lot of our results by using the tether to pull the two robots together and assemble the beams together with a rolling motion.
For those of you who are interested in seeing our latest results I recommend going to the media page at our lab here
The last video (which is surprisingly not up yet) is here
For future reference, the research involved in "evolving and adapting" has not yet been done. That is future work.
Thanks,
Jacob Everist
everist@usc.edu
------
wildmage
Memoirs of a Mad Scientist
How long before the AI is advanced enough for the computer/robots are able to identify flaws in their design and reprogram themselves accordingly. This kind of intelligence will allow 'robots' to evolve, superceding humans as the dominate species on earth. The will have all the assets that belong to humans, ie technology, brainpower, but none of the weaknesses, such as the neccesity of oxygen to exist.
Probably not in our lifetimes, but then the pace of technological development seems to be increasing exponentially...put it this way: take all the scientists that lived from year x to 1900: there are more scientists on earth today than in this total period.
Do you need a website upgrade?
ICQ Prank that started this all...
Thanks for the new (to my vocabulary) word 'codicil'. I like it when I'm forced to look something up in the dictionary.
"I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
You ship some orphans from Third World into outer space and see how well they can move girders in a vacuum.
Current Karma Status: Roadkill
Personally, I rather like the thought of licking peanut butter off of Mercatur. Or having her licking peanut butter off of me.
Either way is good.
What I'm saying is capitalism and robots can not co-exist.
I see no reasons why robots cannot exist within and maintain a capitalist society. Capitalism is just an economic system for allocating resources within a massive distributed multiagent environment --whether those agent are human or artifical is beside the point. Why couldn't a specialized robot sell its services/labor and use that money to invest in new equipment for itself and buy needed supplies (e.g., fuel, CPU time, lubricants, etc.). Why couldn't a group of robots form an organization that buys raw materials, makes stuff, and sells the product of their work to other robots?
I suspect that what you are really saying is that humans and robots cannot coexist because Moore's Law is much faster than Darwin's law.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
That's a problem, there is so much talent and brainpower being wasted because we can't even come up with a way to feed people in in the third world, let alone educate them to the extent that they can exploit their abilities.
Why do you assume we must feed them? Why do you assume they cannot educate themselves? Why won't we do business with companies from the third world?
There is enough food to feed every person in the world and food is pretty much free so anyone in the third world could eat yet somehow they cannot afford food because the jobs in the third world don't pay them enough money. The problem is not that they cannot do our work, look at India. The problem is that we don't pay them a fair amount of money and most of the idea based jobs will not be given to the third world because they are too profitable.
I can't wait for CEOs and Directors to be outsourced along with the programmers and sys admins. Why won't it happen?
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
In communism you may not have a use but to survive in a capitalist world you must be useful to the economy or you die.
People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.