Slashdot Mirror


Quick Fixes For Those Pining For A 6-foot Cabinet

Joe Barr writes "Over at Newsforge [part of OSDN, like Slashdot], there's a look at the arcade/system emulator movement and two Linux-based Live CDs designed to put you in touch with your inner Donkey Kong: KnoppixMAME and AdvanceCD. I'm happy with gameplay under both. I only wish I knew more about the legality of using them." S!: We previously covered release details on KnoppixMAME and AdvanceCD last year, and also mentioned the categorically legal, if limited StarROMs site on Slashdot Games a few weeks back.

46 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Space Invaders... by Kjuib · · Score: 4, Funny

    here I COME!!! I love being able to count the pixels as they disappear when my 2x16 lazer almost makes contact...

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  2. Sweet! Now all I need is... by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    an old DDR cabinet, KnoppixMAME, StepMania, and a few days of free time. Then I will never have to leave the house again!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  3. Just in case the server crashes and burns... by mirror_dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just in case the server crashes and burns (like they usually do),I have put up a mirror.
    The mirror of http://entertainment.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid= 04/05/14/1441241 is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_616/entertainment.n ewsforge.com/article.pl%3fsid=04/05/14/1441241
    The mirror of http://www.starroms.com/ is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_616/www.starroms.co m/

    --
    Note to Mods: When I post mirrors, it's a best guess. I don't know for certain whether or not the site will go down!
  4. Xbox MameoX by SpudGunMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i use a hacked xbox in my cabinet boots faster then the Knoppix solution and you dont need a keyboard at all.

    1. Re:Xbox MameoX by UncleRage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only problem I've had with that solution is the limited amount of memory (as it pertains to NeoGeo and newer ROMs).

      While the PC solution is a few extra steps (not so if you've yet to mod yer xbox), it does provide an overall memory footprint to get the ball rolling with.

      Not to mention cheaper (if you've got a spare PC around). Think Xbox ($150), modchip ($35-$80), hard drive ($40-$80) and then the time necessary to get it all running.

      Personally, for the most part, I'm with you, though. I'm not a huge NeoGeo fan and most of my personal fave's play fine on my xbox (late 70's to late 80's arcade gmaes -- defender, joust, pacman, golden axe, etc...) and with four players on the couch, some beer and a 46" tv, Gauntlet is still mucho fun.

      --
      #SickNotWeak
  5. What is everyone's fav game by bevisthegod · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I assume everyone has a favorite arcade game from their childhood. I was wondering which games people have picked up recently and still, enjoyed playing (pong just isn't as fun as I remembered years ago).

    Recently, I have been playing Cleopatra Fortune and Guwange... legally of course...

  6. Wow by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    not even the article writer can RTFA before it makes it to slashdot...

    I only wish I knew more about the legality of using them.

    ...

    The software for most of these arcade games is not free. If you do not have a legal license for a game you are playing under MAME, you are infringing on someone's copyright.

    I think that about sums it up right there. Yes, most MAME use is illegal. No, they probably won't call you on it for the older games. They might call you on it for some of the newer ones that are still making money in the arcades, but they'd need to catch you first, which is pretty hard if you just do it at home.

  7. You don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I only wish I knew more about the legality of using them.

    Trust me, you don't.

  8. A thought by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If one downloads old arcade games which aren't really distributed by the manufacturer anymore, who are you hurting by using them? Sure, it's a copyright violation, but is it really hurting the distributor, since they aren't even trying to make money off of it? Copyrights are to protect innovation, but is there a point when the innovation should be freed for everyone to be...innovated by?

    1. Re:A thought by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, it's a copyright violation, but is it really hurting the distributor, since they aren't even trying to make money off of it?

      I couldn't agree with you more. I've always felt that the term on software should be shorter then the term of other forms of published works simply because the only way to access abandoned media is by getting a copy from amature libraries. I remember actually *trying* to get a copy of Agent USA or M.U.L.E the legit way in the 21st century. It can't be done.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:A thought by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll come back at you with the argument that every minute spent playing a free game of Pac Man or Bump N Jump is a minute spent depriving their currently-marketed games of revenue.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:A thought by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it's illegal. I agree with you, though. At netmar, we had some guy who set up basically an abandonware server. We noticed it because of the huge jump in bandwidth, and we looked - all the stuff was like DOS versions of lemmings and stuff.

      So, we called the feds (who have a computer crime department), and we started trying to get in touch with publishers and distributors for the games.

      Know what?

      No one cared.

      We're still waiting for a call back from the feds, 2 years later. They told us to fill in a submission form on a website, which we did. And we never got any callbacks from any distributors or publishers either.

      This is what makes you jaded to things like abandonware. If the company still owns the copyright, but isn't selling the product, what do you do? What if the company is unwilling to protect their copyright? What does that say about the laws?

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:A thought by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While in general you aren't hurting anyone, this isn't always the case. Sometimes these games are bought by companies who plan to release an update version, including a version of the original as well. Or they are planning to release a compilation of old games. There are at least a few compilations packs that include things such as Pacman, DigDug, Asteroids, etc. So while you may think you never hurting anyone, that isn't always the case. Just look at the current "control games" that have become fairly popular. There is an Atari 2600 one with 10 or so old Atari cart games on it and an arcade version with 6 old arcade games. Certainly your hurting the sales of these type of devices.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    5. Re:A thought by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're confusing copyright and trademark law.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:A thought by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and that's another problem with the whole reporting copyright violaions... consolidation of video game holdings. Think how many titles are owned by Electronic Arts, or Atari. If we went to atari and were like, someone's distributing xYZ game, i'm sure the most common reaction would be, "Do we own that?!"

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:A thought by Tetrad_of_doom · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, what is this "Public Domain" you talk about?

      Oh wait, I remember...didn't Disney buy the public domain a while back?

  9. Pining for a 6 foot box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Me, I'm pining for the fjords!

  10. 6 foot cabinet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait about 50 years or so, and you'll get your very own 6 foot pine cabinet. It'll even be six feet under too! Of course, you'll have a bit of a challenge playing games by then, but hey...

  11. If you are really pining for a 6ft arcade cabinet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is one site that tells you EVERYTHING you need to know.

    www.arcadecontrols.com

    Enough of these side articles about mame.

  12. 3.NLARGE Y.0UR C.A.B1.NET by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are y.ou D1S5AT1S.FIED with the S.1.Z.E. and G.1RT.H of you.r C.AB1N.ET????

    We can help, with our A.11 N.A.T.U.R_AL H.3RB.AL F.ORMULA!!!

    C.LI.C.K H.3RE for r.3M0.V.@.L

  13. Who needs a stand-up cabinet? by ranger714 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd be looking around for an old-style sit-down cabinet, and then get a copy of the old "Hard Drivin" or "Race Drivin" game...

    Vector graphics, decent force-feedback and an operable clutch, which can really show you who knows how to drive. The physics were pretty realistic, even allowing for throttle steering.

    Of course, it only came with a four-speed transmission, but it's better than the contemporaries, which had no clutch and paddle shifters, with laughable physics.

    --

    "Snoochie-Boochies? Who talks like that? That is babytalk!"-Jay, Chasing Amy

    1. Re:Who needs a stand-up cabinet? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      Hard Drivin' and Race Drivin' weren't vector based. They used polys with dithering for shading and psuedo-transparency.

  14. StarROMs is more than just limited. by JessLeah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    StarROMs is a fucking joke. Let's not beat around the bush. If they really want to combat piracy, then they need a much, much bigger selection. A more sane pricing scheme (e.g. a sliding scale based on the age of the ROM-- 1970s and early 1980s ROMs like Pong and Pac-Man for $5, late 1980s ROMs for $10, early 1990s ROMs for $15-- with all prices decreasing as time goes on) would help too.

    1. Re:StarROMs is more than just limited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      StarROMs is not the only way to get legal ROMs for MAME, HanaHo distributes Capcom games with their products, and you can get some SNK games like the Metal Slug series at Play-Asia

      (The site says they are ports, but I know for a fact that at least Metal Slug Collector's Edition includes the ROMs for the first three Metal Slug games)

    2. Re:StarROMs is more than just limited. by mlyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      a sliding scale based on the age of the ROM-- 1970s and early 1980s ROMs like Pong and Pac-Man for $5, late 1980s ROMs for $10, early 1990s ROMs for $15-- with all prices decreasing as time goes on)

      All the starroms games cost less than $6 in credits. And many are only $2. (There's better deals if you buy more credits at once, too.

      In general, new titles are more expensive than older ones on starroms (with the exception of some early classics like Tempest for $5.50).. They do only have the Atari catalog, though.

  15. Here's My MAME Cabinet by nuxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    If anyone is interested, here are a bunch of photos I took of my MAME cabinet when I built it back in the summer of 2000. The pictures are kinda crappy, and were all taken at my parents house, but they show a full stand-up MAME machine, with a cabinet made competely from scratch. The cabinet was patterned off of a Data East Robocop / Bad Dudes cabinet, but made a bit deeper to accomidate my monitor.

    1. Re:Here's My MAME Cabinet by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your poor mother...she's got "Bad Dudes" right next to her china hutch!

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  16. Mame use shouldn't be illegal. by ajutla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a perfect world, I mean. I use MAME, and I use it to play really old arcade games. Yes, I realize that this is almost certainly illegal--Nintendo would probably sue my ass off if they knew that I played Donkey Kong with my setup. But why? Look at it realistically; Donkey Kong is freaking old. Even if Nintendo were to rerelease it for, I dunno, the GBA or something--hell, they might have already done this--how well would it actually do? Most people who play games today would take one look at it and say "Eeew! That's crap!" based on the graphics / difficulty and go away. The only people who would actually buy a rerelease of Donkey Kong would either be people who played it in arcades long ago or those or who, like me, played it via MAME. MAME is therefore actually a good thing--it spreads around old games and gets people excited and interested in them, thus boosting sales if those games are ever rereleased. Changing the subject slightly, look at Super NES emulation. Tons of people use things like ZSNES to play old RPGs like Final Fantasy VI. When Square actually did rerelease that game, it sold pretty well, but it arguably would not have sold nearly as well if the ROM trade hadn't made games like that popular among "pirates." Hell, I played that game on an emulator and then gladly purchased the rerelease when it came out; had I not played the game before in ROM form, there's no way I would have done that. Emulation, especially for older/obsolete game platforms, is a Good Thing.

    1. Re:Mame use shouldn't be illegal. by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I'm concerned, playing roms older than 13 years is fully justified and should be legal. The original copyright term in this country (USA) was 13 years; after that, everything went into the public domain. This was further backed up by the Constitution, which said Congress could enact legislation to protect the arts for "a reasonable term". Only lately has Congress passed laws extending this term to infinity (every time Steamboat Willy is about to fall into the public domain, Disney gets Congress to pass another law extending copyright). The way I see it, these copyright extension laws are all unconstitutional. Therefore, if you're feeling guilty about playing a game that's more than 13 years old and not paying for it, don't.

    2. Re:Mame use shouldn't be illegal. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look, Linux is freaking old. Just let anyone steal the code.

    3. Re:Mame use shouldn't be illegal. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you support companies taking 'old' Linux code and using it in closed source products?

  17. iGame Arcade Store by cowscows · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Really, what would be perfect for this whole MAME rom issue would be for someone to create the equivlent of the iTunes music store, just geared towards old, obsolete arcade games. Gather all the roms together, make them accessible through a clean, easy, and reliable interface, and charge a reasonable price. Just like in the music world, it wouldn't end all of the illegal copying going on, but it would create a decent alternative.

    There are, of course, a lot of practical issues that would make this very difficult to do. There are a whole lot of little game developers, it'd probably be hard to track down who owns many games, and offering newer games along side older ones would complicate a lot of things, least of all the pricing issues.

    But yeah, it'd be cool.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    1. Re:iGame Arcade Store by drfreak · · Score: 2

      That is pretty much what StarRoms is doing.

  18. self-delusion by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    MAME user: I wish the law wasn't so ambiguous about playing ROMs.

    The Law: It's illegal unless you have the copyright owner's permission.

    MAME user: like I said, so vague...

    Copyright holders: Don't do it. We don't give permission.

    MAME user: can't I get a clear answer out of either of you two?!

    1. Re:self-delusion by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > MAME user: I wish the law wasn't so ambiguous about playing ROMs.

      I wish the law just made sense when it comes to playing ROMs! I mean, by the strictest of interpretations, if I physically move the ROMs off of my boardsets and plug them into the computer where they are read (and not cached) as the game is played, then it is probably legal.

      But if I emulate Pac-Man with a copy of the ROMs on my computer and not on the actual ones in my game room, then I'm a criminal. Oh. And I'm stealing from Namco, too.

  19. But does Linux MAME make sense? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I now run my native desktop as Linux. But I've done a speed comparison with some games between MAME under Linux and MAME under DOS. It isn't necessarily Linux's fault, but MAME under DOS just runs faster than Linux, and that means that more games can run at faster framerates with lesser hardware.

    I'm trying to see a compelling reason to run a Linux based MAME cabinet, as opposed to an MSDOS dedicated MAME cabinet? The speed issue really hurts.

  20. Title sounds like Spam... by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Want a 6' Cabinet?

    Eh? Do ya? Wink wink, nudge nudge.

    Say... No... More!

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  21. real use for advancemame projects by satsuke · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "real" use for advancemame and related programs is the magic it can work with real arcade equipment.

    I for one bought an old Rampage game that had been converted to Sunset Riders .. dead .. for $35 at a local auction last year.

    $4.00 in parts and $120 in joysticks / buttons / PC interface and some time on a drill press and I've got me a SF2 style cabinet with enough room to add another 2 joysticks and a spinner for spinnet games and berserk like games.

    All played on a real arcade monitor at 15.75 khz (that would be a 19" CGA monitor).

    Believe it or not the monitor is better because it isn't so crisp and high quality as a PC VGA monitor is. The look and feel of these old .50mm dot pitch screens is what makes it feel authentic.

    Advancemame's wonder is that you can feed it the scanning range of your monitor and it will generate a mode line that drives your video card and monitor at native resolution and scanning rate ,. rather than mame32 and others that use line doubling or tripling and overscan to get the same effect.

    Don't forget that most of these old games .. even new ones .. run at 320/240 or less.

  22. StarROMs is a good start by siredgar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    StarROMs is a good start. 51 games at an average cost of $2.15 each if you buy them all is more than reasonable. If StarROMs proves commercially successful, you can reasonably hope that other ROMs from other vendors will become commercially available as well. Trashing StarROMs because of their limited selection is like slamming a baby learning to crawl because they aren't walking and running yet. Give it some time and see what happens. I know they are looking to expand their offerings but they have an uphill battle convincing copyright owners to let them. Note that StarROMs isn't out to combat piracy. They're out to make money. That they convinced Atari that they could do so while combating piracy is what I hope other vendors take note of. If it takes off then it's likely that competitive forces will come into play similarly to what's happening in the MP3/digital-format-of-your-choice music industry today. Perhaps a competitor will open up shop with the pricing scheme you envision and the selection you want. So I wouldn't call StarROMs a joke by any means -- I'd call it a good first step. I personally hope they make a killing so they can grow like crazy and offer more consumer choices... --- saint Build Your Own Arcade Controls FAQ http://www.arcadecontrols.com/ Project Arcade http://www.projectarcade.com/

  23. Re:Who needs a stand-up cabinet? YUP by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

    Solid fill unshaded polygons.

  24. Well then wuit pussyfooting around. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

    Setup a high profile site that sells these ROMs. Do a little civil disobedience. Get a court to declare the law unconstitutional and you're all set.

    Except that well if they don't your screwed.

  25. Alert by cookiepus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoever says that weed doesn't make you dumber. It took me about a minute to figure out what this story is about and another two deciding how the hell the headline made any sense whatsoever.

    It does.

  26. why pine away... by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why pine away... just build one =) (or convert one --> UberCade: Mame Taito cabinet conversion

    As mentioned ealier Build your own arcade controls (be sure to check there forum, where helpful folks like me will help you along with your project... hey quit snickering!)

    Also of note is the new "how to" book by the guy who runs byoac... (with my referral link included of course =P ) PRoject Arcade Book

    *Shrug* or you could *shudder* use an x-arcade desktop controller if you can't fit a full sized cabinet, or cocktail, or cabaret cabinet in your pad...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  27. Emulation IS perfectly legal by NachoDaddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The rulemaking from the U.S. Copyright Office is perfectly clear. If you have rights to the game (as in you own a broken one, bought ROMs from StarROMs, etc), AND you the machine isn't made anymore, you can emulate the machine, even if it has anti-copying built in.
    So, the rest of us that have 2000 ROM sets for games we haven't ever seen in person, let alone own a broken original, then we are 'breakin the law'. But you know what else... NO ONE CARES!
    No one cares because there is no money involved. The people that own the rights to all the classic arcade games know that it's not worth there time and effort to try and sell old stuff. They're never going to make another Defender machine. They tried to sell Defender and other classics on CD, but that was hardly worth thier time and effort. They will sit on those old rights forever. I have approached a few of the owners and tried to buy the IP from them, and secure the rights for what I felt was some biz-ops, but they have some lazy ass lawyers that are not even sure what games they have right to (becasue of all the mergers), and they weren't willing to look into it.
    So if they aren't even willing to figure out what games they have the right for, how willing do you think they are to sue individuals over small time infrinement cases? Not very willing at all.
    As long as MAME keeps their distance from ROM distribution, they have nothing to worry about as there are legal and legitimate ways to use MAME.
    As long as you're not selling turn-key MAME cabinets fully loaded will all ROMs, you have nothing to worry about. Your not profiting from having and emualtor in your living room, and people that aren't making any money (from their illegal activity) generally don't get sued.

  28. Re:Not to troll.. by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried both and AdvanceCD rocks. I jammed 4.5 gigs of roms onto a DVD...took forever to build the image but after I burned it, I get sweet gaming anywhere I can find a PC with a DVD-Rom. The exception is my laptop, which doesn't appreciate the modes for the display (framebuffer I guess).

    Otherwise, AdvanceCD rocks. You should try it if you're considering trying something like this.

  29. Re:Not to troll.. by drfreak · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of space is sacrificed for the eye candy of using X whereas AdvanceMAME uses svgalib. They are certainly more "Advanced" than me in that respect. But with DVD burners getting so cheap, the difference in space between the projects shouldn't be a factor in deciding which to use. If you plan on using an arcade monitor, go with Advance. If you want a nice graphical wizard to remaster a CD with roms on it for you, my project might be a better choice.