Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Receives Patent For Double-Click

kaluta writes "The Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that Microsoft was granted a patent for double-clicking on April 27. The patent in question is 6,727,830 and says, amongst other stuff: 'A default function for an application is launched if the button is pressed for a short, i.e., normal, period of time. An alternative function of the application is launched if the button is pressed for a long, (e.g., at least one second), period of time. Still another function can be launched if the application button is pressed multiple times within a short period of time, e.g., double click'. So this is what we have to look foward to in the E.U. now?"

11 of 836 comments (clear)

  1. Quick! by arabagast · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Run for it, gotta get the trippelclick patent before microsoft gets it!

    seriously, this is really ridicilous, the patent system as it is is really just a giant joke. The system desperatly needs a remake or makeover, making the important patents pass, and the ridicilous ones take a loong vacation in .. the trash bin.

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
  2. Prior Art by doneagain · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There has to be prior art for this!! Or has the world gone totaly mad

    --
    Same s**t, different day
  3. Re:For the millionth time... by JamieF · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The problem is not that someone has a loaded gun pointed at your head. The problem only comes when that person pulls the trigger. By all means, let them become a felon. The jail time will teach them a lesson.

  4. Re: Absurdity by orthogonal · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Now here we have the powers that be granting patents based on how we move or interact?

    Well, I don't think any Slashdotters will be getting those patents on moving and interacting.

    And certainly not the patents on moving and interacting with women.

    (Well, maybe with one woman: the patent on moving back into the basement and interacting with Mom.)

    :)

  5. Re:I cannot believe this crap... by SilentChris · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Nah, next is someone trying to patent the patenting procedure. Then the world explodes.

  6. I would be rich, by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1, Redundant

    But my patent for a process to aquire technology in widespread use via deep pockets and infinite legal resources was turned down.

  7. not suprising by prockcore · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This just in -- Slashdot Headline Misrepresents Patent Again.

    Why does every article regarding a patent here have to have a headline and summary that totally gets it wrong?

  8. Re:Double-click patent? MOD Parent +1 Funny by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Well, double-dumbass on you!

    Definitely a +1 Funny reference, if I had mod points.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  9. Obligatory by mrgsd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, double-clicking patents Microsoft!

    --
    End Communication.
  10. Re:Hmm... BUT!!! by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Haha.

    That doesn't surprise me at all. Pretty soon we'll see Microsoft trying to get a copyright on the damn taskbar...

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  11. Re:Hmm... by Reziac · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Not to mention four clicks to select page (or entire text box, depending), five to select entire document, and a few variations thereof (frex, my fave HTML editor does a variety of selections depending on what you clicked on and how many times). I first encountered the "multiple clicks to select more stuff" function in some word processor in 1993, and I doubt it was new then.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?