FTC to Examine Patent Application Process
Armchair Dissident writes "The BBC is running an article that suggests that the FTC is to look into the way that patents are reviewed and issued. If this article is correct it seems that many guesses as to how patents are issued were correct; with 95% of patent applications being approved. They may also address the issue of "patent trolls"."
Are you telling me Microsoft didn't really invent the double click?
Did they patent the first post?
Can it be that somebody at the FTC actually reads slashdot?
"Outlook Positive"!]
Online Starcraft RPG? At
Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
I just took out a patent on running articles that suggest that the FTC is looking into the ways that patents are reviewed and issued.
1. Make a Patent.
2. Enforce the Patent.
3. Profit!!
Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
... slashdot, check...
... patent office, check...
... FCC, check...
... TV? Well, we have foxnews and soon-to-be AlGores Democratic-fest channel.... check
So... who's left to troll?
Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
>>So let's not hold our breath, eh?
Until they patent breathing through biological devices that exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide...
NeoThermic
Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
Well.. logically the next patent in line is the Ctrl-Alt-Del one. It was probably used more than their double-click.
Hmmm.
Then all our patents would be classified as "Overrated", "Funny", or "Troll"...and there'd be at least one mention of soviet russia in every schematic.
At least until the lobby gets built to make EVERYTHING patentable.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
Don't forget Overrated, Informative, and Interesting you insesitive clod!
Hmmm.
If trolls are a problem with the patent office, the solution seems simple: start giving citizens patent moderator points.
...and every now and then you'd open up one of the illustrations and it'd be ASCII donkey pr0n.
As long as we're allowed to patent business practices and most patents are granted without proper examination, there's a neat way to eliminate the problem: simply patent the business practice of patenting something that doesn't deserve one then suing everybody that's already using your idea.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
I thought that was SCO's vision statment...
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
Is that where someone faxes the goatse ascii art to the patent office???
Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
Then all our patents would be classified as "Overrated", "Funny", or "Troll"...
...and especially Redundant would apply as well.
Don't forget Overrated, Informative, and Interesting you insesitive clod!
I'm not giving up my gills for anyone ;)
This is the sig that says NI (again)
warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
Is it an indicator of system problems when a British government-sponsored news organization is providing good coverage of American federal trade overseers examining an IP service organization?