Slashdot Mirror


New Viruses Hit 30-Month High

Mz6 writes "InformationWeek reports that Sophos has analysed and protected against 959 new viruses in May, this is the highest number of new viruses discovered in a single month since December 2001. From Sophos' own TopTen list they continue on to say that the 'Sasser and Netsky worms may have captured the headlines. ...May has seen a noticeable spike in cybercriminal activity, suggesting that even the arrest of Sven Jaschan ...has done nothing to curb the problem.'"

18 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad by frankmanowar · · Score: 5, Funny

    That Sophos antivirus has the somewhat incredible problem of not being able to remove and clean viruses on an infected host... but hey, at least we know they're there.

    --

    "Other bands play, but Manowar KILLS"
    1. Re:Too bad by Shardis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone who needs antivirus software to protect or even diagnose their machine, is doomed before they start. (emphasis mine)

      Is that like they theory that if you drink too much and don't remember, you can insist that the previous night's events never happened?

      I've had nights like those...

      Very sloppy...um...Sloppy.

  2. Yeah, but... by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    as was stated in many after school specials back in my day...

    "Kowing is half the battle!"

    On a totally unrelated note.. is it bad when you post comments to your own stories?

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by darkain · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Kowing is half the battle!"

      the other half is killing.

  3. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the school semester ends in May. What are all those CS graduates supposed to do in between being rejected for an interview and filling in a McDonald's application!

  4. gawd by abscondment · · Score: 3, Funny

    that explains the porn advertisement posts on my blog with IPs tracing back to infected machines all over the world...

    damn those script kiddies.

  5. HAZMAT by chaffed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm investing in a hazmat licence with all the infections I see on enduser computers.

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
  6. Or did a new virus hit virus tracking databases by seanscottrogers · · Score: 3, Funny

    to boost virus levels 30 months ago to never before seen heights.

  7. Re:Do they not track anybody other than Win32? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give it time! 64 bit Windows isn't even widely available yet. Sheesh!

  8. Yes, but... by gillbates · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many of these affect Linux?

    Oh, right.

    And how is this news? Windows users expect to get hit by viruses; this is nothing new.

    When Linux starts getting hit, then I'll take notice.

    All those people who claim that Linux is ready for the desktop conveniently forget that it still doesn't support anywhere near the number of viruses that Windows does. A single release of Windows contains more virus enablement than all releases of Linux combined. When it comes down to it, Linux won't ever break into the desktop mainstream until Linus improves support for viruses.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Yes, but... by xmorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      There isnt really alot of GNU viruses out there. We need to get a drive going to encourage virus creators to release their source code along with their viruses(i) so we can get more linux support! DONT forget BSD, we bsd users always get left out :P

  9. It's not even that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most viruses, like Bagel and Netsky, spread via user stupidity. They e-mail themselves to everyone on your list, and then people open them, and infect themsleves, etc. The exploit viruses are far rarer.

  10. Re:Phatbot/Polybot/Gaobot/Agobot... by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not everything should be released under the GPL, I'm afraid.
    Why not? When we catch these guys, we can go after them for copyright and GPL violations for not distributing the source of their derivative works.
  11. Re:Do they not track anybody other than Win32? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

    no, W32/ is a standard prefix for virus names, it just exists so you know it is a virus name

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  12. Re:That's all very nice, but Sophos is 'moneyware' by Ggggeo · · Score: 2, Funny
    What a stunning endorsement:

    I use ClamAV on my mail server and it works pretty good.
    When you think mediocrity, think ClamAV

    :)

    --
    In God we trust...all others please have two forms of ID
  13. Re:I wonder if virus writters know the damage they by ImpTech · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry. Even if all the virus writers go away, there will still be the spammers and the spyware writers. Not to mention the really-shitty-driver writers. They're the most nefarious of the bunch.

  14. You need to know this by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Funny

    A very good parent post. You should forward a copy of it to all of your friends by email.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  15. Re: arrests won't stem the tide... by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know people that would snitch on their own mothers for a reward!

    shit now I know why mum won't talk to me any more!
    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit