Slashdot Mirror


Return of the TV Wristwatch

An anonymous reader writes "20 years after the Seiko TV watch, another Asian firm has given it another go. The Globe and Mail in Canada got their hands on the NHJ TV Watch and have posted a review. The writer thinks it's still just way too huge to be a watch but is still impressed."

21 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Seiko Wristwatch TV wasn't a watch and it wasn't just a "thing" on your wrist. It had a breakout box that carried audio and power that fit on your belt. The actual wrist part of the device was MUCH smaller than this device (at least as it appears in the picture)

    I got one of the Seiko's off eBay as a novelty item not too long ago. I actually would like it if someone did the same with the breakout box also being an iPod like MP3 player. I'd rather have as small a device as possible on my wrist and have it tell time, if I want higher functions - connect the breakout box.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by computechnica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not use Bluetooth instead of a cable. Your pocket harddrive Ipod could then stream video and audio to it or pair of sunglasses. Cool Stuff

  2. Pulp fiction time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fabienne: Whose watch is this?
    Butch: It's a TV, baby.
    Fabienne: Whose TV is this?
    Butch: It's Zed's.
    Fabienne: Who's Zed?
    Butch: Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.

  3. What is it with these watches.... by gorre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really don't understand what it is with geeks and these big ugly plastic watches! Personally I just like a very simple analog wristwatch.

    --
    "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
    1. Re:What is it with these watches.... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's actually not a watch - it's a wrist-mounted TV unit. Which makes it a bit of a misnomer; as the article states, nobody would wear it on his wrist like he would a watch.

      Offtopic part:
      I used to have a calculator watch in 7th grade. It beeped when you pushed ANY of the buttons, and I couldn't find any way to turn the beeps off. So the teacher wouldn't let me use it on my tests, because it disturbed the rest of the class. So I was taking math tests with no calculator, too many problems to do in my head or on paper, and I was no less geek than when I had it on.

      Now I don't wear a watch at all.

  4. Who would want to watch TV on their wrist? by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Seiko thing is a pretty amazing piece of engineering for the time, IMO. But who would want to sit there staring at their wrist for more then a few seconds. I mean, after a couple minutes wouldn't your arm get tired?

    Why not make some "eyephones", not to be so gibsonesq, but wouldn't a small monitor suspended a few inches from your face make a lot more sense for 'ultraportable' TV?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  5. In case anyone wants one... by antiracist · · Score: 4, Informative

    these have been available for a while now from Dynamism. they're cheaper than i would have thought at $219. probably the cheapest item dynamism carries...

  6. good grief! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Funny
    If I saw someone wearing that thing, I couldn't help but say:
    • Go Go Power Rangers

    It looks just like their wristband gadgets

  7. Cell phones by awhelan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cell phones have become the piece of technology that everyone wants to show their friends now. A lot of people even use them as a replacement for their watches. There may be a market for cell phone TV's, but I can't see anybody buying this.

  8. Making progress by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah...its still too huge, but its still a helluva lot smaller, and doesn't have a wire that has to go up your sleeve to the battery pack/antenna strapped to your arm. Fact is, there's been a lot of progress and once they've really worked out these flexible OLED displays, we will start to truly see a lot more miniaturization, as the display is the largest part of most of todays electronics.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  9. Excellent quote by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    The writer of the review is quite the humorist. For instance:

    Sacrificing my public image in the name of science, I wore it as a watch for about an hour at the local mall. If you're into female repellant, wearing it this way will give you better results than a wet spot on the front of your pants.

    In light of this, I propose that slashdot's motto be changed to: News for Nerds. Stuff That Repels Females.

    Hmmm ... maybe not. Don't see it catching on, somehow.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  10. Re:One question... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    WHY?

    So you can have a convenient WebTV based interface with which to interact with your toaster remotely from the mall, silly.

    KFG

  11. Re:Don't like the trend by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I want a watch that tells the time and just tells the time. A cell phone that only makes calls. A keyboard without Internet Keys. Why do I end up paying a premium for these simple devices? :(

    Please note that you are not forced to purchase this TV watch. You can buy a watch that just tells time at any number of stores. In fact, I understand that they are rather common and have gotten less expensive over time.

    As far as the cell phone goes, I want one that can receive calls as well, and find the fact that mine can store numbers to be very useful. Oddly enough each cell phone I have purchased it less expensive than the previous one and superior in every way.

    I have an IBM Model M keyboard that just had its tenth birthday. Why pay a premium for a new keyboard when you can just keep using your existing keyboard? If you want one, head to your local thrift store.

  12. Re:I used to have a TV watch by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Funny

    And with the cable constantly following you, you could always know how to get back home... now, it's a little riskier to go outside with no string leading you home... maybe you should invest in a wristwatch GPS too? ;-)

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  13. eyephones today! by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Informative
  14. There is a cultural difference by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Asian countries there is a fashionable trend and social acceptance to wearing these newly looking watches.

    Like the Casio G-shocks and other hi-tech watches, they sold like hot cakes in the mid 90s. It wasn't until the year 2000 before they start making an appearance in the U.S. This TV watch will probably be a super trend in Asia for years before people start buying it in U.S.

  15. As with all gadgets... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The usage bottleneck is still the battery... limited to one hour of tv in this instance.

  16. Phones, maybe. Watches, no way. by Octagon+Most · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Phones with TV reception are far more likely to receive mass acceptance than these wrist monstrosities. Toshiba and NEC have working models in Japan, check this WSJ review, and SprintPCS is brining MobiTV to some of its models in the U.S.

  17. jesus this is dumb by sbma44 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Enough with the Dick Tracy fantasies! The idea of a TV watch is asinine. Practical considerations about size aside, there's no point to it. The point of a wristwatch is that it can be looked at immediately at any time. If you feel like checking the time, your wristwatch allows you to do it immediately, anywhere. The operation takes about half a second.

    These attributes do not apply to watching television. Whatever video you watch will probably be of sufficient length that the time wasted fishing a larger, more useful device out of your pocket is negligible. This is why wristphones are stupid, too. If the device's use takes more than a split second and/or it doesn't need to be accessible on an instant whim, there is no reason to put it on your wrist. I'm all for video-enabled cell phones. I see no reason why my portable electronics need to reside somewhere other than my pockets. Hey, why not attach an ipod to a headband? The controls would be SUPER accessible!

    Now can we please forget these stupid wristwatch gadgets and get on with the flying cars?

  18. Re:bah by Mikkeles · · Score: 3, Funny
    'TV on a watch is a waste of time.'

    I don't need a TV; I have a front loading washing machine;^) Now, if they could get that on my wrist, I'd be interested!

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  19. TiVo? by MellieMel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do we need this? Seriously. What do you have to watch that is so time-critical that you MUST see it real-time? The News? What self-respecting geek watches TV news, when there's Google? Sports? Use a radio, check the scores online, or go to a sports bar.

    If there's something on that I want to see, but will be out of the house for, I just TiVo it. If I wanted to be low-tech about it, I could use my trusty VCR to tape it. Either way, I can watch Good Eats when I get home. I see no reason to carry a postage-stamp-sized TV with me. Are y'all that addicted to Jerry Springer?