Slashdot Mirror


Get Scanned As You Drive Through Ohio

kai5263499 writes "A local news station is reporting on a new license plate scanning system being tested in Ohio. This new system is supposed to be able to scan a passing vehicle's license plates and match it against a database of reported stolen or lost vehicles. Lawmakers are supposed to be briefed at the year's end for further funding and/or implementation in other areas."

70 comments

  1. Of course the next step is... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    To send you a citation for expired tags.

    It could also be used to find out whether or not someone committed perjory when they filled out a certificate of non-use.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Of course the next step is... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1, Interesting
      To send you a citation for expired tags.

      Next thing you know these bastards are going to find a way to stick automated speed traps throughout the state and just mail you a ticket if you're caught speeding. Welcome to John Ashcroft's Amerika. Why not just implant a microchip under our skin and mail us a ticket anytime we do anything wrong?

    2. Re:Of course the next step is... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Next thing you know these bastards are going to find a way to stick automated speed traps throughout the state and just mail you a ticket if you're caught speeding. Welcome to John Ashcroft's Amerika. Why not just implant a microchip under our skin and mail us a ticket anytime we do anything wrong?"

      They do that to cut down on fatal car accidents at intersections, not to make us happy compliant americans.

      Don't be so dramatic.

    3. Re:Of course the next step is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Posting AC since I just modded you up...

      This is already in use in Washington DC and Phoenix, AZ. In DC there are police cruisers that sit on the side of the road and take pictures of the backs of passing cars which are exceeding the speed limit. The ticket is then sent to the registered owner's address.

      In Phoenix they don't even use the police - it's actually contracted out to a private company which has white vans which again, take your picture as you drive by. They're supposed to be conspicuously marked, etc., but most of the time are not. Unfortunately, the courts seem to be on the side of abuse and back the company a lot of times depsite the fact that they are breaking the law as well.

      And yes, it's time to get rid of John Ashcroft. Jefferson rolls in his grave thanks to that man.

    4. Re:Of course the next step is... by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      They are already doing that in Arlington, VA.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    5. Re:Of course the next step is... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If you think that's bad, I've heard they're already using fingerprints to identify you if you commit a murder. What is the world coming to when you can't even kidnap people at random and kill them in the privacy of your own dungeon without some local "detective" who thinks he's Clint Eastwood invading your privacy in this way?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Of course the next step is... by joranbelar · · Score: 1
      Next thing you know these bastards are going to find a way to stick automated speed traps throughout the state and just mail you a ticket if you're caught speeding.

      They've been doing exactly that in most parts of Europe for over a decade now, and it's nothing that even remotely resembles invasion of privacy. Unless, of course, you have an expectation of privacy while barrelling down a school zone at 60+?

      It's a safety measure that is impartial, accurate, and allows police officers to use their time more productively (rather than sitting on the side of the road for a whole day, waiting for someone to speed)

    7. Re:Of course the next step is... by Nynaeve · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next thing you know these bastards ...

      Click ... Whirr ...

      "AKnightCowboy, you are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute."

    8. Re:Of course the next step is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly which law are they breaking?

      Cite, please?

    9. Re:Of course the next step is... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      because it's in the police dept. or private contractor's best interest (or would that be conflict of interest) to have the speed camera detect a little higher than actual speed, plus the fact that it is almost impossible to dispute a cam ticket since you didn't even know when you get one. I'd like to see cars implement an optional speed log that could be used to fight cam tickets (the camera can't tell if you just accelerated to avoid getting T-boned by some dumbfuck)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:Of course the next step is... by Grab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean the police are actually doing something about it when you break the law?!?! Hell, that shouldn't be allowed! We should all be free to break the law whenever we want, right?

      Grab.

    11. Re:Of course the next step is... by Grab · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. If you can prove the camera is calibrated wrong, go for it. If not, you're talking urban legends.

      You certainly can dispute a camera ticket if you want. Your speeding fine will (or should) say where you were speeding, so you can look back and work it out. Speed cameras aren't on the junctions themselves, so getting T-boned in a camera zone is most unlikely. Plus in the UK at least, cameras need to take two photos of you speeding (at fixed intervals to prove how fast you were going), so if you want to dispute it then you can get the photos and use them to show the state of the road and positions of other road users at the time.

      Of course, usually it *is* almost impossible to dispute a cam ticket, because nearly always you've been caught red-handed and there's nothing you can do about it.

      Grab.

    12. Re:Of course the next step is... by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      Of course, usually it *is* almost impossible to dispute a cam ticket, because nearly always you've been caught red-handed and there's nothing you can do about it.
      Except there's no way to prove that I was the one driving the car. My wife may have been doing the driving that day, or I may have loaned the car to a friend.
    13. Re:Of course the next step is... by curiosity · · Score: 1

      And instead they increase rear-end collisions from people slamming on the brakes to avoid tickets when it would otherwise be safer to proceed through the yellow light.

      Good job!

    14. Re:Of course the next step is... by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      If that excuse was allowed to stand up then everyone would use it. I guess they are saying that unless your car [was reported] stolen, the owner of the car can be held liable for actions by persons that they have permitted to drive their vehicle. This doesn't sound much different than what corporations have to face. If Van X owned by Company Y commited some major raod crime, Company Y better prove who Driver Z is or its there a$$. (Disclaimer: IANAL just like most of us)

      If it's such a big deal, hook up a box to the car and make people log in to drive. That way you can prove who was driving. This would make for a good theft deterrant too. Of course, I expect people to counter with an invasion of privacy, but I consider that a matter of opinion.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    15. Re:Of course the next step is... by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      Ah, d@mmit. Sorry for all the typos. I don't care, but I wanted to preempt all the typoallergenic people out there.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    16. Re:Of course the next step is... by liamo · · Score: 1

      I suspect you had your tongue firmly-in-cheek but in case you didn't : This is a means to an end, not an end in itself. The means is to detect and punish drivers who are breaking laws; the end is to modify driver behaviour.

    17. Re:Of course the next step is... by Grab · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Then you can write to them and say "It wasn't me, it was my friend." And get your friend to acknowledge that yes, it was him/her. The police will take into account that the vehicle may be driven by the spouse of the owner, or that it may be a hire car, or whatever. Whilst the original ticket may have been issued automatically, you can bring in humans after that to deal with the special cases.

      What you *can't* dispute is that your car was going past the camera in excess of the speed limit, so the driver (whoever it happened to be) was breaking the law.

      Grab.

  2. Doesn't surprise me by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

    Isn't Ohio also the state that checks the timestamps on your Ohio Turnpike ticket and cites you for speeding if you get to your exit "too soon"?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:Doesn't surprise me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with checking the timestamps? If they're accurate and the time limits are valid then it's obvious you've been speeding.

      Don't like it then don't speed.

    2. Re:Doesn't surprise me by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      But the Flux Capacitor won't generate a wormhole unless you hit 88!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    3. Re:Doesn't surprise me by qtothemax · · Score: 1

      Isn't Ohio also the state that checks the timestamps on your Ohio Turnpike ticket and cites you for speeding if you get to your exit "too soon"?
      No, I drive on the ohio turnpike at least once a week sometimes averaging over 80, and the limit is 65. There are some areas that are really nasty speed traps, as some cities seem to have a thing for making a 50mph road 25 as soon as it enters the city limits and not posting it very clearly, but its probably like that everywhere.

  3. Yawn. by TwistedKestrel · · Score: 1

    Big deal. This kind of thing is already in place on the 407 ETR highway in Ontario, Canada. It's purely a side effect of the automated billing system (it's a toll highway), but you can get speeding tickets based on how long you went through two toll points ... both that and your toll bills are mailed to your house, by looking up your address via license plate. I'm sure they check for stolen plates/vehicles while they're at it.

    1. Re:Yawn. by IanO · · Score: 1

      I've been on the 407 quite a few times in the last year and haven't had this happen yet and my average speeds through there are well over the posted 100km/h. I also know of several people who are on there regularly (again at average speeds over the limit) who have never received tickets. So unless this is a really new program (ie. last few weeks), I'd put this down as an urban legend.

      --
      ------
      Objects in Mirror are Losing!
    2. Re:Yawn. by IanO · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate replying to my own post, I forgot the backup in my last post:

      407 Policies

      Under the section of things they don't do, speeding enforcement is explicitly listed. The same thing is stated on the insert that comes with the toll bills.

      --
      ------
      Objects in Mirror are Losing!
    3. Re:Yawn. by RedCard · · Score: 1

      Big deal. This kind of thing is already in place on the 407 ETR highway in Ontario, Canada. ... but you can get speeding tickets based on how long you went through two toll points

      AFAIK, this is complete nonsense. The 407 is a privately-controlled toll highway (paid for by taxpayers and then leased out to a private company for a sickeningly low fee). The co. that controls the 407 pays the public police force to do enforcement on the highway. Part of the 407's attraction is that the police that patrol it don't seem to be nearly as interested in speeders as they are on the major public routes.

      It would completely kill business if the controlling company started handing out speeding tickets.

  4. Uh oh!! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ohio's enforcing the law! READY PITCHFORKS!!

    1. Re:Uh oh!! by CentrX · · Score: 1

      And, just incidentally, anyone with access to the system can determine where and when you travel anywhere.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Uh oh!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And, just incidentally, anyone with access to the system can determine where and when you travel anywhere. "

      Uh right. And they can't do that through your cell phone or credit card?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Uh oh!! by CentrX · · Score: 1

      I can very easily not use a cell phone or credit card. Depending on where you live, it might be nearly impossible to go places without a car. "Going places" should not be opt-in like cell phones and credit cards.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:Uh oh!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Depending on where you live, it might be nearly impossible to go places without a car."

      You have public transportation. :)

      Nar I get your point. Thing is, I'd be more alarmed if we were talking RF implants or something.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  5. This isn't new... by loftwyr · · Score: 1

    In Toronto (Canada), they have had vehicles that drive around town doing that for years. They say they recover thousands of vehicles a year.

    1. Re:This isn't new... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      They say they recover thousands of vehicles a year.
      Which they then use to drive around town, scanning license plates?
      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:This isn't new... by funkdid · · Score: 1
      We have had this in NYC too, and for a REALLY long time! We call them police.

      ;-)

      --

      I boycott signatures

  6. Correction by ToHaveAndHasNot · · Score: 0, Troll

    Should be "A local news station are reporting..."

    Can you people speak english?

    1. Re:Correction by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      In American English, the noun "station" is singular, so it gets a singular verb, "is". Only in British English do the contents of the noun - the employees at the station - receive the plural verb, "are".

      --

      Great Britain and the United States; two nations separated by a common language.

    2. Re:Correction by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      " Should be "A local news station are reporting..."

      I didn't exactly get an A in English, so please forgive me if I'm wrong, but since station is singular, shouldn't it be "is" instead of "are"?

    3. Re:Correction by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      Can you people speak english? Correction. That's "Can you people speaks English?"

    4. Re:Correction by ToHaveAndHasNot · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,

      YHBT.

      Regards,

      Rufus T. Harlemberry

    5. Re:Correction by ToHaveAndHasNot · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,

      YHBT.

      Regards,

      Horatio Panels from Chicago

    6. Re:Correction by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Dear Sir, YHBT."

      Sorry bud, but YHBT is about as effective at relieving embarassment as saying "I meant to do that!"

  7. One step at a time by Nynaeve · · Score: 2, Informative

    The patrol will report to lawmakers by year's end and won't implement the system or expand it without approval by the Controlling Board or the Legislature, said patrol spokesman Capt. John Born. Some lawmakers and advocates for civil liberties are worried the scanners could invade the privacy of law-abiding residents. "It's a free society, and we're supposed to move as we like without the government tracking us everywhere," said Jeff Gamso, legal director of the Ohio American Civil Liberties Union. Born said the devices don't take pictures or make videotapes and don't create any databases of individuals.

    Imagine how much crime could have been prevented in the 19th century if we'd required license plates on horses!

    The devices use optical scanners similar to those used in supermarkets to read bar codes.

    Somehow, I doubt it uses a laser to scan license tags on passing cars. My guess is that it uses a CCD camera with image processing - a simple task, really. This is what happens when journalists don't research an article and the editor doesn't force them to pay attention to detail.

    1. Re:One step at a time by vigilology · · Score: 1
      "It's a free society, and we're supposed to move as we like without the government tracking us everywhere,"

      In a free society you should be able to track whoever you want, without punishment. In a free society you should also be free to prevent anyone from tracking you, without punishment.

    2. Re:One step at a time by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      BWAHAHHAHAAHA! Excellent point. Far too many people don't realize that freedom is a double edged sword. Most people don't REALLY want freedom, they just want everyone to do what THEY want to do.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:One step at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, that is a common distortion.

      Freedom only extends to the point where you encroach on another person's freedom. There is a famous quote that says the same thing although the exact quote and author escapes me at the moment (it was by Jefferson, Lincoln, or similar).

      So a free society would mean that you could track anyone, without punishment, as long as they wanted to be tracked.

      In other words: Do what you want as long as it doesn't effect me, because at that point you are restricting my freedom.

      That is a free society.

    4. Re:One step at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do what you want as long as it doesn't effect me, because at that point you are restricting my freedom.

      Sounds good to me. Now you shut the fuck up, because it's affecting me, thus restricting my freedom.

    5. Re:One step at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our liberties begin to reach their limits when they infringe on the liberties of others."

      "Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins!"

    6. Re:One step at a time by mschiller · · Score: 1

      Your probably right about it using a CCD. But that doesn't mean it's not like "the Optical Scanners used to read bar codes"

      See:
      http://www.symbol.com/products/barcode_scanners/ba rcode_handheld_vs4000.html

      Symbol makes a CCD based bar code scanner. Basically it takes pictures and firmware/software digitally detect the barcode thru image processing. Great thing about it is that you can barcode something, AND take pictures of it. EG if the product is damaged er whatever.

      Same concept here, but you use OCR processing here, instead of detecting lines.
      --Matthew Schiller Previous Symbol Electrical Engineer

  8. It's been done... by hookedup · · Score: 1

    In Toronto, they have a similar system mounted to a car wich drives up and down streets reading plates. It checks the numbers, and then tries them against a db, no flags, it keeps going..

    I couldnt find any reputable sites about it, just a forum post by somebody with more info on it here

  9. O Hai Oh by Apreche · · Score: 1

    OHIO has always been super anal about speeding. I mean they have cops camping the interstates at the border 24/7. If you are going even 1 over and you have out of state plates they pull you over. Then they let you pay with a credit card right then and there. The plan has always been to increase revenue for the state by stealing it from non-Ohionians. While they say that they are looking for lost and stolen vehicles they are no doubt going to use it to ticket every traffic violation they can detect automatically.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:O Hai Oh by a24061 · · Score: 1
      I don't have a problem with strict enforcement of speed limits, since a car is potentially a deadly weapon. The discrimination you mention is very wrong, however, and should be stopped---by treating every speeder that way.

      What concerns me about tracking and surveillance systems is their value for blackmail and witch-hunts.

    2. Re:O Hai Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolutely untrue. I have never been pulled over for one mile over. And they do not accept credit cards on the spot. I drive the turnpike from Illinois weekly and have never seen a state patrol officer camping at the border. I grew up in Ohio and know that you are, at best, thoroughly misinformed.

  10. do things like this exist In other States? by herbhork · · Score: 1

    has anyone seen the strange poles on I-95/128 in Mass? Are these the same things? White poles every ~3 miles, two solar panels on top, and a small white box mounted half-way up the poles aimed at traffic perpedicular to the highway about the same size as a boze indoor/outdoor speaker? Anyone have a clue what these things really are???

    1. Re:do things like this exist In other States? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      OMG!!11 IT'S TEH A-LEE-N L@NDING STRIP!!!~~!` RUN!12

      If I had to guess, I'd say those are cameras. We have something similar on a few roads here in Texas. They're used to monitor traffic levels, watch for accidents, and speed up the trucks that go out and assist people in stalled vehicles.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:do things like this exist In other States? by herbhork · · Score: 1

      Right, they have the cameras too, these really don't look like cameras..... must be elians

    3. Re:do things like this exist In other States? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn those Cuban refugee children! Sneaking into our borders with the same name and climbing up our poles to steal the precieous energy we get from the sun! Then they just lay about, soaking up precious energy and not contribute to the betterment of our society!

  11. Then you shoud... by jpsowin · · Score: 1

    Replace or take off the license plate. That was a hard one!

  12. Let's tie this to biometric ID's... by Cranx · · Score: 1

    Let's tie this to biometric ID's, RFID tags embedded in your underwear, facial recognition cameras on every corner, etc. until we know exactly when someone does anything suspicious or unusual. We should record everyone's habits, so we can alert officials when you do something new. I bet you could even predict when someone's about to commit a crime with enough information about where everyone is and what they're doing.

    1. Re:Let's tie this to biometric ID's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You been watching Minority Report or something?

    2. Re:Let's tie this to biometric ID's... by alw53 · · Score: 1

      The only way this is going to end is when somebody puts up a web site that continuously tracks every senator's and every cop's whereabouts. After all, they have no expectation of privacy once they venture outside their homes, right?

    3. Re:Let's tie this to biometric ID's... by Cranx · · Score: 1

      Surely they'll pass laws making that illegal. Only the government can legally track everyone's every move.

  13. Nebraska by bmasel · · Score: 1

    Has been scanning plates on Interstate 80 for a little over a year. Haven't caught any terrorists yet, but they have nabbed several mules hauling carloads of reefer.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
    1. Re:Nebraska by bmasel · · Score: 1

      just west of Fremont.

      --
      Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  14. Two words: by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

    muddy plate. Strategic placement of dirt can do wonders for making it difficult for these cameras to get an accurate bead. Sure, there's an outside chance you'll be cited a non-moving violation for obscured plate, but that's better than being tracked like an animal by armed forces of the state and having your movements recorded in a database for ready access by any cop, politician, or person who knows somebody who might take an interest in you or a member of your family.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  15. This is great news. by cgenman · · Score: 1

    This is actually good news, for once. We already have automated systems that give tickets for speeding and automated systems that give tickets for running red lights... while useful for enforcing the law (and teaching those bastard San Fransisco kids that RED means STOP), none of these helps out the owner of the car. Trying to return stolen vehicles automatically is actually really nice. If your car was stolen, wouldn't you want the automated scanners that they already have anyway to call the police?

    Would that mean that a government database somewhere would know that I was passing through Ohio on my way somewhere? Sure. But what do you think happens when you swipe your card to pay for gas?

  16. Tex-Ass by unixbugs · · Score: 1

    Pay with a credit card? No thanks, just put it on my tab. They will have a hell of a time finding me in New Mexico anyway. What are they going to do, send a paddy wagon to my house in the mountains for a speeding ticket?

    They probably would just so I can pay some marked up fee attributed to "court costs" for the whole ordeal. I got a ticket in Texas a while back for getting stuck on the beach. They plow it up for spring break, putting 3 foot high walls of sand to separate the two lanes of traffic. Real scenic, I must say. There is even a lane in the middle just for law enforcement to roll down. Every few hundred feet there is a turn around and this is where I got stuck. "Spinning out" is how this rookie cop put it on the ticket. Even then I didn't get any help from these "public servants" in getting my truck out. It only took the help of 2 other people to get the truck moving again. Weeks later a huge riot broke out over what was allegedly a cop beating an innocent bystander. I bet that cop wished thats all people were doing was getting stuck.

    Like I said, hell of a time picking me up in the mountains of New Mexico. Pricks. I have alot more to say and will forget about it with this statement:

    We are rapidly heading into a Police State. Laws on local levels are being passed daily in order to rake in revenue for municipalities and thier corrupt officials. Good luck people, and don't let your auto insurance slip or you will be without a drivers license for 2 years in Texas. A little research will yield a finding that Texas has some of the worst localized ordinances in the country. If you have a few bucks and know a few people you can get your competitors run out of town. Yee-Haw.

    --
    You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  17. Speeding on the turnpike by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with this. As soon as you stop for fuel or to take a leak, and factor in 15-20 minutes at zero miles per hour, your average speed for the trip goes way down.

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  18. Speed Enforcement by phlack · · Score: 1
    I don't know about other areas. But the e-pass system in Central Florida has specifically stated that time stamps collected (and recorded) will NOT be used for speed enforcement.

    'Course, I'm sure they are free to change their minds at any given time. I've never had an issue with it, though.

  19. London UK has had this for years by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 1

    *yawn*
    This was initaited in London years ago suposidly in resopnce to a large IRA bomb attack.

    And dont even get me started on the automatic congestion charge cameras.
    More details here

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  20. Tinfoil??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, does this mean I'm going to have to wrap my license plate in tinfoil too???