Slashdot Mirror


WiFi Gone Wild

b4k4 writes "According to this news release, the Texas Department of Transportation is proposing to install hotspots at all 84 Safety Rest Stops and 12 Travel Information Centers statewide. This would be in addition to the four test locations already in place along US287." Reader polluted notes that Portland is working on free WiFi. An anonymous reader sent in word of this year's wifi-shootout, a contest to maximize the range for an 802.11b connection. And Roland Piquepaille writes in regarding cows wearing WiFi collars, which I'm afraid reminds me of a crummy sci-fi movie.

5 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. APs along the Interstate by moorg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some truck stops in Texas already have WiFi access (though not free) via a service for truckers.

    From my wardrive along the interstate it can be debated that there are enough hot spots already.

    All joking aside I can't wait for there to be legitimate free APs.

  2. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...this is a huge waste of taxpayer money.

    You need to go back and read the news release more carefully.

    TxDOT is taking bids for private companies to come in and install intenet kiosks in rest areas. These kiosks would charge users per time-unit to use them to access the internet.

    These private vendors are also required by TxDOT to provide free wireless coverage. The income from the use of the kiosk is expected to fund the wireless usage.

    The only expense to the taxpayer is whatever administrative time is required to run the bid and selection process. After that, it's all in the hands of private companies.

  3. Re:Fleecing of America.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
    I do love the idea of having more places to connect my laptop via wifi, but it's not blinding me of the fact that the state govenments will pay %4000 of what it should cost to install/run
    Ironically, you are blinded -- but by a knee-jerk response that erroneously assumes that anything free with government involvment must be government funded. Re-read the news release. The wireless APs will be run by private companies, not the state. The companies make money by charging for internet kiosk use, but a condition of being in the rest stop is that they provide free wireless. The net cost to Texas taxpayers once the system is in place? Zero.
  4. Re:Terrible waste of money by chefmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
    If there is a compelling demand for this kind of service, then Texas should have stopped at a trial of 4 spots (if even that) and let private industry take over.
    You mean, perhaps, like taking bids from private companies "able to provide free wireless Internet service and pay telephone-like Internet access at kiosks"? In other words, putting together a business case and selecting a private company to come in and run it, with no funding from the state? Perhaps you should RTFA.
  5. This is NOT Tax Payer Funded by krgallagher · · Score: 3, Informative
    OK I downloaded the Request For Offer from TxDOT. This is not intended to be a taxpayer funded initiative. In fact here is an excerpt that says just that:

    "3. CONCEPT: TxDOT envisions a concept where wireless internet service is available for public use.
    3.1. The traveling public would be able to use a personal computing device, such as a laptop computer, equipped to acquire a wireless internet signal, to use the internet and send email during a break from the road.
    3.2. A separate kiosk, provided by the vendor, would allow those traveling without a personal computing device to utilize the internet service.
    3.3. This service will be provided at a cost to the consumer, not to TxDOT."

    TxDOT is expecting the "People not traveling with wireless equipment" to cover the cost of the project when they "connect to the Internet at kiosks for a reasonable fee to be collected by the vendor."

    Personally I think this is the fatal flaw in their plan. I doubt there will be enough kiosk users to cover the costs. Still I have to give them credit for trying.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here: