Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Nigritude, Indignation, Artifacts

Slashback brings you updates this evening on a handful of previous and ongoing Slashdot stories: read on below for more on how to manipulate Google rankings, what's wrong with Sun's Java Desktop, Claria's plucky response to L.L. Bean's suit, and a fly in the infinite-twin-primes theory.

How to not make friends and influence rankings. Ben Michel contributes an update to the search-engine optimization (SEO) contest mentioned last month, the object of which was for contestants to create a site ranked highest by google for a nonsense phrase, "nigritude ultramarine."

Michel writes "The first phase of the competition ended last Monday, and the winner was the owner of a forum called nigritude ultramarine--previously known as Merkey.net. According to Brandon Suit, the owner of this forum, the key to his winning strategy was "getting high PR backlinks"--having other websites with high Page Ranks link to him and vice versa.

What impact does this have on SEO, and indeed for the rapidly growing search industry in general? The viability of certain underhanded methods in the pursuit of SEO has been clearly reinforced by many of the results of the contest--both Suit and his closest competitor, Philipp Lenssen, posted links in Wiki Sandboxes in order to better their standing. According to Suit, "If you want to manipulate [Google], you can." While search engines certainly have come a long ways from relevance-based searching, it seems that they still have significant changes to make before they can more accurately order results for any given query. The search engines' creators themselves must make countless revisions in their own, perhaps quixotic, quests to create the perfect tools to retrieve relevant data in the vast, ever-expanding realm of the internet."

However, not everyone is as matter-of-fact about this method of increasing search-engine visibility; May Kasahara is one of the webmasters and wiki users who isn't.

Kasahara writes: "The Search Engine Optimization contest previously mentioned on Slashdot has had a detrimental effect on wiki users and admins (including myself) lately , as the words 'Nigritude Ultramarine' have been showing up in wiki sandboxes across the web. A search on UseModWiki's homepage brought me to this informative entry, which in turn led me to Nigritude Ultramarine and the Wiki Sandbox Effect [note -- mentioned last week on Slashdot] and to these accompanying comments, mostly from very annoyed wiki users."

OK, so maybe "infinite" was a strong word. Prof.Phreak writes "Quoting wikipedia: On May 26, 2004, Richard Arenstorf of Vanderbilt University submitted a 38-page proof that there are, in fact, infinitely many twin primes. On June 3, Michel Balazard of Bordeaux reported that Lemma 8 on page 35 is false.[1] As is typical in mathematical proofs, the defect may be correctable or a substitute method may repair or replace the defect. Arenstorf withdrew his proof on June 8, noting "A serious error has been found in the paper, specifically, Lemma 8 is incorrect"."

What are these dashed lines all over your sacred cow? reifman writes "Slashdot's link to my article in the Seattle Weekly helped generate 175,000 page views and numerous letters and comments. The article seemed to touch a nerve in the Mac and Linux communities. I've posted a follow up responding to people's letters."

Updates from the Academic Affairs Division. zenrandom writes "As Case Western has just recently been reported, we may as well mention the initiative that will be connecting many schools in Ohio. Oarnet, a part of the Ohio Supercomputer Center and The Ohio State University is building a statewide academic and research fiber optic network. Composed of multiple metro-rings and over 1600 miles of fiber."

In unrelated college news, Mirell writes "After the FBI previously investigated an open records request filed for the tunnel blueprints at UT, students decide instead to enter via brute force. Hooligans - 1, War Against Terror - 0."

The problem with opening Pandora's Box. WC writes "The previous review on JDS2 ended with no successful installation so it wasn't very helpful on what to expect from the Sun distro. This new review has got a working installation but with a slew of new problems: more installation woes, unusable networking, buggy Nautilus and Mozilla window resizing artifacts among others. The author concludes that JDS2 is --effectively-- nothing but JDS 1.1 with the added Sun server software on top, but the desktop part has the same (and more) issues like JDS1 had."

Looking innocent is not their strong suit. tbase writes "As reported on News.com.com, Claria, formerly known as Gator, has sued L.L. Bean, charging the retailer with filing a frivolous lawsuit against its advertisers. As covered in a previous Slashdot story, L.L. Bean has filed suit against current and former Claria advertisers for advertising via pop ups over L.L. Bean's site."

58 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Google results? by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I know one way to get great results. All you have to do it be Litigious bastards and you're set.

    --
    I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    1. Re:Google results? by Senjutsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Such an effort is doomed to be a miserable failure.

    2. Re:Google results? by akgoatley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, if you think about it, what we want is "SCO" to point to "litigiousbastards.com" as people are more likely to search for "SCO" than "litigious bastards". Join the fight! Visit SCO's website!

      --
      (-(friend^2))^(1/2)
      Incoming mod-bombing for having a different viewpoint, 2 o'clock! Heads up!
    3. Re:Google results? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 2

      Better than somebody who waffles.

    4. Re:Google results? by pommaq · · Score: 2, Funny

      SEO? SCO? Whatever, to me it's all just a load of Santorum.

  2. Lemma? No kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Arenstorf withdrew his proof on June 8, noting "A serious error has been found in the paper, specifically, Lemma 8 is incorrect".

    I guess that Lemma turned out to be a real Lemon, eh?

    *symbol crash* ba-dom-bom

    Thank you! I'll be here all week!

  3. PageRank. by salvorHardin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Idea of having lots of high-ranking back-links is most certainly an effective one. I used to have a plain old personal homepage, which was ranked as '1' by google, and then I added a link to my site on my page at h2g2, and watched my rank go up to 4 within a week. Sadly, it didn't last...

    1. Re:PageRank. by iserlohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this property is being exploited endlessly. Google needs to find a way to recognize the contribution of a site, rather than just its content and the links. There are tons of sites out there that the sole purpose is to link to other sites and prop up their rankings.

    2. Re:PageRank. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I added my website to my sig. Within a week, I had a shitload of spam attached to my article #1.

      At least I'm still the first link when you google for "das megabyte." Like I'm sure you always do. I'm also the third link down when you google for "Sorry, ryan."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  4. Claria suing another company??? by The+Ancients · · Score: 4, Funny
    What is this - a game?

    Half time - change sides....

    I wonder what the half time pep talk would have been like in the Claria camp:

    Now troops, we're going to need to pay for filing motions, and all that other stuff that comes along with suing someone, as well as our defence lawyers.

    WADDYA MEAN WE SPENT IT ALL ON REBRANDING???....oh that's right (*fights through the fog of denial*)...we were Gator *blushes*

  5. Darl is a googler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darl let it be known today in the conference call that he uses google to search the net.

    Apparently they irony of that, seeing how Darl's position is that ''linux is destroying the foundation of the industry!'', is completely lost on him.

  6. Use NOINDEX or Robots.txt for Sandbox? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The sandbox is a junk area where users can play right? So change the .htaccess to use Follow, NoIndex and google should be blind to them. Or the robots.txt file to block access.

    Is there some reason you would want the Sandbox indexed?

    1. Re:Use NOINDEX or Robots.txt for Sandbox? by jcuervo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Shouldn't that be the the other way around? The robots.txt file can use Follow, NoIndex to ask Google to go blind, while .htaccess can be used to block access.
      Correct. Basically, robots.txt is client-side, .htaccess is server-side.

      The latter is also far more powerful. robots.txt was created brain-dead.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Use NOINDEX or Robots.txt for Sandbox? by Gleef · · Score: 2, Informative

      In addition to making the sandbox harder to find, it also means that spamming that sandbox will be less valuable, since the spam link won't enter into the ranking.

      Since Wiki Sandboxes are for people who want to use that Wiki, having the sandboxes not show up on searches hurts nobody. That is, nobody except for the Wiki admin, who has the initial nuisance of having to reconfigure apache, set up robots.txt, etc.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  7. Dear Slashdot by Letter · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear Slashdot,

    It seems, unfortunately, that comment #9393632, story #110689, is wrong. Simply take v_0=1, r(v):=(1+\cos v)/\sqrt v, \rho(v)=3/\sqrt v, and \phi(v)=v. I imagine that such a mistake has heavy consequences.

    Sincerely,
    Letter

  8. Re:Lemma? No kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thank you! I'll be here all week!

    After a joke like that? Not if someone gets you with those symbols first...

  9. Re:Here it comes... by NoData · · Score: 5, Informative

    Except that nigritude actually has to do with blackness (at least the color), whereas the more vulgar sounding "niggardly" has nothing to do with color or race. However, contrast the neologism negritude which is about blackness in racial terms.

  10. Mwahahah by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    OK, so the "Microsoftie" sacred cow follow up quotes this from a Slashdot comment in the story, theorizing that "he couldn't have put it better":
    "In his lust to dominate the browser market and bring down Netscape, Bill and his cronies decided to give Internet Explorer away for free. They succeeded in undermining Netscape and getting the lion's share of the browser market, but in the process they got an entire generation of users hooked on getting stuff for free. Once users get a taste of free, getting them to pay for stuff becomes difficult or impossible. Why pay for a browser when I can get it for free? Why pay for an operating system when I can get it for free? Why pay for software when I can get it for free? Why pay for music when I can get it for free? Why pay for movies when I can get them for free? In the end, it isn't just Microsoft that's hurt by this."
    Heh. This, coming from the "teh softwarez must be free-as-in-um-actually-i'm-just-cheap" crowd (which unfortunately makes up the majority of the people who use open source) is absolutely hilarious.

    In any case, Microsoft has given software away for ages. Suddenly because they gave away IE, the world is on track to become evil purveyors of stolen... things.

    If that isn't ironic I don't know what is.

    1. Re:Mwahahah by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, No - This is good

      If I ever get an RIAA extortion letter I can just explain that I have a long standing habit of getting free stuff from the internet and that complaining at this late date is pointless because it's become the established norm. Kinda of like common law marriages or squatters rights.

    2. Re:Mwahahah by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why pay for music when I can get it for free? Why pay for movies when I can get them for free?

      The concept is basically right, but it's misapplied. The public is addicted to free music and movies because they've been getting them for free on TV and radio for decades. THAT's why P2P is not viewed as wrong by the public- "because TV is free anyhow"

      Suddenly because they gave away IE, the world is on track to become evil purveyors of stolen... things.

      That's not what was meant at all. The Slashdotter's theory was that consumers addicted to free software would look for... wait for it... Free Software.

    3. Re:Mwahahah by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not what was meant at all. The Slashdotter's theory was that consumers addicted to free software would look for... wait for it... Free Software.

      But Free Software doesn't have to be free software! (Thank you, RMS, for that genious naming scheme.) Remember, it's free as in speech, not free as in beer.

    4. Re:Mwahahah by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People may point out that most 'free' tv is paid for by watching ads, and that consumers are mistaken in counting that as free. But, what if the consumer is aware of that, and it still gives rise to the current situation? A typical hour long TV program has about 8 minutes of commercials. For a person who makes minimum wage, 8 minutes of time is worth about 75 cents, IF he treats all his time as worth as much as work, and that's itself debatable. If 52 minutes of entertainment has a base value of only about 75 cents, or argueably less, then what's the 'fair' price of a music download? 75 cents for a number of tracks the consumer will listen to for 52 minutes total? A two hour movie watched once? $1.68? For as person making 11 bucks an hour, that "fair" value is more like 3 dollars, by the same reasoning. There's going to be some price points where the 'fair' value of downloads looks about even with the amount a person pays for internet access or a commercial news server, even though none of that money is going to the content producer.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:Mwahahah by mabinogi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > one that assumes most advertisers are marketing a product that most viewers of a particular program can afford

      Starting to get off topic but anyway -

      I don't think that in a lot of cases they are marketing towards people that can afford the item. At least in the case of things like cars or other non trivial or mundane stuff. If someone was in the market for a new car, and could afford one - they'd buy one. They wouldn't see an ad and suddenly decide to. So what the ads are doing, is trying to put the desire for the product in you - regardless of whether or not you can afford it now. Because one day, you might be able to. And you're far more likely to buy a product after having lusted after it for years, seeing the ads wishing that you could afford one, and now finaly being able to, than if you could already afford it, and you saw the ad for the first time.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    6. Re:Mwahahah by phliar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This, coming from the "teh softwarez must be free-as-in-um-actually-i'm-just-cheap" crowd (which unfortunately makes up the majority of the people who use open source) is absolutely hilarious.
      And you know that "the majority of the people who use open source" are cheap bastards, how?

      My experience has been that people who use Unix tend to be technically oriented adults who are more aware of ethics, copyrights and patents than the general population. It is self-evident that the Microsoft-using population is where the demand for "cracked" Photoshop and Windows XP registration keys etc. comes from -- those programs are just not available/applicable on Unix.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    7. Re:Mwahahah by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not RMS's fault that the English language fails to distinguish between libre and gratis as meanings of the word "free."

      No, it's RMS's fault for mindlessly insisting that "Free" != "free" despite the shortcomings of the English language. Instead of picking a suitable adjective, or even using libre (which most English speakers will understand anyway, and not confuse with the gratis meaning of "free"), he insists on using the ambiguous term "Free", explaining that the capital 'F' makes all the difference (as if you can hear a capital letter).

    8. Re:Mwahahah by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's spelled "genius", genious. :)

    9. Re:Mwahahah by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like I said, its an obviously false assumption that most viewers of a TV show can afford a particular product. The point was, if you treat it as true just for the sake of arguement, then the "average" consumer has a much higher income, and so the value of their time would be a lot more. (Say they earn 30$ an hour on average, their time is worth 50 cents/minute, so watching eight minutes of commercials to get a program works out to them thinking the program was worth about 4$, and by that rule, 8$ for a two hour movie ticket or 16 dollars for a CD they will listen to twice should be about right, and 16 dollars for a DVD they, and their spouse and two kids will watch three times becomes a real bargain.).
      I didn't mention whether anyone in the RIAA or MPAA is reasoning from this false assumption, but there is a quote I've seen from Jack Valetti, that reads (very approximately, from memory ). "Those little guys, they only make 100,000$ a year. That's not much to live on.", so it sounds like some industry people might be.

      The real reason the assumption is false is, when consumers estimate prices and values, they simply don't think of it like "I can't afford to buy one of those, so I'm freeloading on the system by watching the program this commercial pays for", so they think their income should be irrelevant to the company. Rather they think more in terms of "The company that advertised got its fair reward, whether it came from me or some other viewer" or "The company chose to advertise here - no one was pointing a gun at their head to make them do it. No one is pointing a gun at my head to make me watch." Then they decide that their income may be irrelevant to the advertiser, but it is still very relevant to themselves. Consumers don't haver much respect for an industry that doesn't want to admit that either of those last two quotes are valid, and less if some industry flack starts claiming the first quotes are true instead. If someone tells you that you are stealing just by getting up during the commercials and going to the bathroom, why should you believe them when they say you are stealing by downloading software or MP3s?
      The original point about free software stems from the same clash of viewpoints. The downloaders don't view it as free, because they paid something to an ISP to get on the net, and they are paying in time and effort to find content, sit there twiddleing their thumbs while it downloads, and to burn it to a blank CD they also paid for. Often they have bought video capture cards, memory, or faster systems to get access to broadband. What did anyone expect them to do with a cable modem except download more and faster to get their extra 30$ a month use out of it? That often looks like about the same value as they pay for other entertainment, and the fact that none of it goes to the content producer is "not their fault".

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  11. JDS by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    kinda interesting to watch the JDS effort.
    You would think that someone like Sun has nerves,resources,etc. to pull a decent Linux desktop.
    The reasons it is not are probably combination of:

    internal apathy of the development group - Linux, desktop, whatever.. Any AC from Sun can comment?

    cluelessness of the upper management - there is no marketing plan, they just grasping the straws

    wrong marketing (different from cluelessness). Wtf it is called "Java"? To me, JDS would mean a Swing-based desktop shell on top of very thin Linux distro. Now, that would be innovation.

    Overall, the JDS just confirms the point that you do not have to be a multi-billion-dollar co to produce major product and when you ARE a m-b-d co, your product may still suck. The innovation is the field owned by talented individuals and hungry startups.

    1. Re:JDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or more likely an incompetant reviewer. I have had JDS2 running on several machines for over a week now and have not experienced a single one of the problems this reviewer mentioned.

    2. Re:JDS by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is Eugenia that we all know and love ;-)

    3. Re:JDS by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's another review if you're interested.

    4. Re:JDS by neomac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to Sun, they're capitalizing on the Java® brand recognition...

      ...which is dumb. We, the folks who know what things like "Linux," "desktop," and "Java" mean from a technical point of view, would likely be confused. I know I was before I read into it. My first reaction was, "Why the hell are they building a Linux desktop distro in Java?" (For the record, my second thought was, "How the hell are they building a Linux distro in Java!!?!")

      This is a good example of what happens when Marketing wins. Sun would have been branding enough for us and IMHO, a better sell to the execs..

    5. Re:JDS by cbowland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have installed JDS on at least 5 machines at work, mostly low end 2 year old pc's, but also 1 v60x (dual booting suse). JDS seems pretty on target for Sun's stated market, i.e. limited functionality/requirements people. Call centers, hospitals, etc.... Basically, people who need word processing, spreadsheets, email, and and a browser. Sun is not targeting Slashdot readers for JDS users, although a some number us will probably end up administrating them. Sun is not trying to create a sexy, leading distribution, but instead is trying to replace (in their eyes) buggy, insecure, virus ridden, expensive windows machines. Of course, all slashdot readers know this, but still insist on judging the distribution on whether it meets their personal needs, including any wingnut hardware combination they may have. Of course its not a perfect distribution, but that's not Sun's pitch. They are going in to companies saying "Look, we have a product that is more secure, less expensive, and provides all the fuctionality your people need. Plus, we will support it, including phone support."

      I think the "Java" in JDS is a hint that the linux base is not important to Sun. My guess is that they are trying to get to a Common Desktop Environment ;-) across all their platforms, sparc, x86, and thin client (sun ray). Using the Java name is just a marketing thing now, but it could be more meaningfull (project looking glass, anyone?) in the future.

      --

      Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
      Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

    6. Re:JDS by cbowland · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sort of off topic, but JDS is starting to show up in screenshots of linux machines, even when the main focus of the article isn't JDS.

      See Windows Compatibility for the Linux Desktop for an example.

      --

      Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
      Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

  12. My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "It's a Homeland Security issue," he said. "We've been aware of the security aspects of the tunnels for a long time. We became more conscious of the security needs after 9-11."

    Jesus, does everything have to be a Homeland Security issue and tied to 9-11?

    Whatever happened to harmless breaking and entering? Really, what the hell is the impotent Homeland Security department going to do? Guard the tunnel entrances? Overreact and send the students to Git-mo?

    Terrorism is old and busted, and is nothing but a political tool and soundbite op.

    Those who respond, "tell that to the victims of 9-11", I submit that if all those people were here today they would be pretty fucking pissed at all the unconstitutional bullshit that has been done in their name.

  13. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by Grrr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...does everything have to be a Homeland Security issue and tied to 9-11?

    Only so long as it works...

    Remember It's for the children! ?

    <grrr>

  14. For the Wiki Sandboxes by LuYu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why do they not just disable links to outside pages entirely? It is experimental, right? So why have links to other websites at all?

    Links could create a bogus page like:

    You have linked to the URL: http://somesite.wherever.net
    Internal links within the wiki could be preserved.
    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:For the Wiki Sandboxes by arlandbayes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone learning might want to test ceating outside links. I think the noindex option is better so that sandboxes are invisible to the google bots.

    2. Re:For the Wiki Sandboxes by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think a better option is a meta tag that lets search engines know that there's user contributed content on the page.
      (Or maybe something in robots.txt)

      Google could still index the page, but weigh links on the page lower.

      -- not a .sig

  15. More Googlebombing by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Recently my local computer user group's blog was spammed with user registration. The same user registered about 200 times with slightly different user names and all his home pages linked to the same website. The user never needed to post a single comment in our forums, just the registration page alone gave him 200 links to his home page.

    If you wanna read a more detailed account of how this works, read here.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  16. Meh...if I were google i'd have... by Phil+John · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...made all searches for nigritude ultramarine return results in a random order, shouldn't be that hard for them to do, would have been side splittingly funny as well, hah...SEO spammers...take that, and heres another one for your pointless competition ;o)

    --
    I am NaN
  17. Not so great an idea. Don't follow Phillip. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why do they not just disable links to outside pages entirely? It is experimental, right? So why have links to other websites at all?

    Links could create a bogus page like:

    you have linked to the URL: http://somesite.wherever.net

    That's not very helpful because it would be difficult to test the link that way. The idea is to encourage legitimate users to actually make and edit pages.

    It is unfortunate that Wiki site administrators have to do anything at all. Phillip admits that he does not get it:

    I still don't understand why something like a newsgroup alt.test could possibly be hurt from anything (spam, backlink-postings, whatever) but I guess I still don't get it.

    Phill, baby, it's rude to use other people and expect them to clean up your mess. As many of the posters stated, Wiki administrators did not set up their service for your purposes and you caused them grief. I can't believe you said this after apologizing.

    He also insults Wiki software itself:

    In any case it seems Wiki software is not up to handle these things.

    Bad attitude, Phill. You bragged about how clever you were, how about comming up with a solution instead? Someone might even give you an ipod or something.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  18. So where can we find the old Lemma 8? by sixpaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the author having withdrawn the twin primes paper in the wake of the discovered flaw, arXiv no longer has the original up so we can see what went wrong. Does anyone have a mirror?

    1. Re:So where can we find the old Lemma 8? by fizbane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Withdrawing from arxiv.org doesn't mean the original version goes away: math/0405509v1

  19. Re:Lemma? No kidding. by RepeatedEigenvalue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some poor grad student isn't gonna be very much liked by his board. They usually have grad students bitch out lemmas like this - but I might be wrong. If I'm right though, some poor schlub is being handed a Master's and shown the door. Piled Higher and Deeper indeed.

    --


    friends don't let friends use linearly dependent row vectors.
  20. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indeed, as a non-american and certainly someone who's not inside (except for my girlfriend living in the states)

    Dear Reichsminister Ashcroft,

    As you can see from the above, the terrorists -- or foreigners, hey, no real difference -- are stealing our pure American women now.

    Please arrest this self-admitted anti-American woman-poacher and send him for some non-torture (because it's not illegal even if it breaks a law if the President says it's ok) "mechanical persuasion application" in Guantanamo, so that real Americans like myself can date his girlfriend.

    If you do this, I promise not to do anything with her than you think is immoral, like dancing or criticizing the government, and to make her my submissive wife in accordance with God's desires as explained in the Holy Scriptures.

  21. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Terrorism is old and busted, and is nothing but a political tool and soundbite op."

    In a political sense, yes. In a practical sense, not on your life. Just like "the war on drugs" was mostly a political tool, there was a REAL underlying problem that existed (and still exists). Just because some polish up phrases and use them as soundbites doesn't mean the root cause isn't important.

    There's some very real people out there that want to do some very real harm to our very real civilians. Are they as numerous as people say? No. Are people be incorrectly persecuted in this country for it? Yes. But taking away the injustices, there's STILL a core group of real people wanting to mass murder US civilians. Ignoring the issue just because it's a political soundbite is almost as dangerous as ignoring the injustices.

  22. Re:Here it comes... by Phybersyk0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll bite. However I'll prolly get killed for this one..

    "Nigri-please?!"

  23. PlayingWith Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nigritude, ouch...

    Playing with fire. Expect the wrath of the NAACP
    anyday now. Remember the guy who actually got
    fired for using the word niggardly?

  24. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm glad you brought up the 'War on Drugs' - I agree that there are problems with drugs, terrorism, piracy, poverty, illiteracy, and many other things.

    Why is it that every time that a 'War' is declared, we end up fighting the symptoms of the problems and not the root causes?

    We'd probably be somewhat safer from terrorists if we'd stop training them and giving them weapons...

  25. Glad I did this before 911 by quinkin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Uni of Queensland has a tunnel network underneath it's central buildings aswell. I am told that it was originally designed to be used by the army in emergencies, but I can't find any record of that (although I believe this is a picture of the tunnel construction).

    After a few years mapping what entrances were visible, we found a grate that had been left open, so those of us who dared went for a jaunt.

    They must have had silent alarms aswell (I saw the sensors) so I knew we wouldn't have long. The group split in two and went opposite directions (the central tunnel is a large ring circumnavigating the great court). A couple of security guards came noisily blundering along the tunnel towards my girlfriend and I, but then they heard they other group and took off after them, not noticing us lurking in the shadows of an alcove.

    The other group made it to a service entrance before the guards caught up, and we scurried back out the original grate. All in all a fun day at Uni.

    Note for law enforcement: This is an ENTIRELY FICTIONAL account of something that NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:Glad I did this before 911 by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like you might enjoy some recreational urban exploration.

  26. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's like the Reichstags fire in the Weimar Republic (Germany). Blamed on "them nasty jews" and used as an excuse to round up undesireables and put them into concentration camps. You'll eventually find out that America is not one iota better, and that you have given up just as many rights as the Germans did in 1933. Sure, sure, you are still allowed to vote; but as long as they count the votes what are you going to do about it?

  27. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by jcuervo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Terrorism is old and busted, and is nothing but a political tool and soundbite op.

    Those who respond, "tell that to the victims of 9-11", I submit that if all those people were here today they would be pretty fucking pissed at all the unconstitutional bullshit that has been done in their name.
    Agreed. If I died in any manner, and someone used my death to justify fucking up my country, I'd be pretty god damned pissed. (Well, moreso.) What are we doing about it?
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  28. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with you, teamhasnoi. A couple nights ago I watched Ashcroft squirm while Congress grilled him (replayed from that morning on CSpan). Boy that was high entertainment. (He almost got jail time for "Contempt of Congress. ;) But what really caught my attention when he protested that some Patriot Act provision (something to do with police hijinks sans subpoena) was just an extension to terrorism of what they already could do with health insurance fraud. Health insurance fraud!

    Sound like some congress critter owned by the insurance industry already signed away our rights long before 911. I wouldn't be too surprised (now) to find that a lot of the Patriot Act's more odious provisions were simply preexisting cracks widened by it and 911.

    As for the terrorists (the real ones, not the PR ones), apply what's in my sig to our foreign policy, and that little problem should clear itself up. What's sauce for the King of Terror, is sauce for the terrorists. True peace alone (not Bush's fraud) can conquer both. Not peace with terror, but peace with people so their hatred and anger isn't stirred to empower terror. Rumsfeld, in a memo, has already noted that the War on Terror (and especially in Iraq) is stirring up so much hatred and anger that they are making terrorists faster than we can kill them.

    "Lola, kindness is not enough, look for the reason of hatred and anger.
    When you find and understand that, love becomes the strongest power; stronger than courage or wisdom."
    Belabera, "Mothra 3: King Ghidora Attacks"

  29. Altavista by XanC · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Funny thing is, Altavista ranks itself below Google in a search for search engine.

    Seems like both search algorithms suffer from low self-esteem.

    I guess nobody figures on people searching for search engines anyway...

  30. Re:My turn to use '9-11'! My turn! My turn! by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There's some very real people out there that want to do some very real harm to our very real civilians. Are they as numerous as people say? No. Are people be incorrectly persecuted in this country for it? Yes.


    There seems to be a growing trend of people interviewing themselves as a rhetorical technique. Does John Ashcroft do it every time he's on TV? Yes he does. Is it an effective means of controlling the direction of the interview? You bet. Is it starting to grate on my nerves? Absolutely! Will it get old and go away soon? We can only hope.


    (Yeah, it's off-topic, but when the topic is "Nigritude Ultramarine", so is pretty much everything else)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  31. Microsoft, OSS, Black by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Informative
    Trust a Winnut to twist this in to some kind of anti-MS / anti-OSS statement. But hey - let's start off by making completely unrelated attacks:


    Heh. This, coming from the "teh softwarez must be free-as-in-um-actually-i'm-just-cheap" crowd (which unfortunately makes up the majority of the people who use open source) is absolutely hilarious.


    Hey - let's ignore the Windows-based warez scene. Windows freeware, shareware, and spyware. Let's not bother ourselves with how gleefull Winnuts get when Microsoft slips them CDs of the latest Enterprise app or OS at a Cert class, tech talk, or conference. After all, liking free stuff is solely the domain of the OSS crowd.

    And since this exists within the OSS crowd, obviously its all about money. Forget all those high-hat morals and ideals. Its all about being cheap. Nevermind professionals who deploy OSS even though they have access to budgets that enable them to pick from any option available.

    Pot, kettle, black.


    In any case, Microsoft has given software away for ages. Suddenly because they gave away IE, the world is on track to become evil purveyors of stolen... things.


    You might want to go back over what you quoted. In the litany of "free" stuff, it includes:


    Why pay for an operating system when I can get it for free? Why pay for software when I can get it for free?


    One could easily take this statement and place blame on OSS for putting the world on track "to become evil purveyors of stolen... things." In fact, that sounds awfully like the arguments put forward by Darl McBride and Ken Brown. Suddenly that quote doesn't quite have the MS-bash tone to it anymore.

    Of course, if you weren't so busy trying to mine the article for propoganda, you might have caught on to a good point. Whether Microsoft started the process or contributed to it... today they have a serious problem. They have to fight more than a product put forward by IBM or Novell or Redhat, et al. They have to battle a perception that the OS itself is as much a commodity as the hardware it runs on. If Microsoft is unable to stop this shift in perception, they will face the same kind of upset IBM faced when its market became a commodity.

    Now THAT is ironic.