Slashdot Mirror
Is Finding Security Holes a Good Idea?
ekr writes "A lot of effort goes into finding vulnerabilities in
software, but there's no real evidence that it actually improves security. I've been trying to study this problem and the results (pdf) aren't very encouraging. It doesn't look like we're making much of a dent in the overall number of vulnerabilities in the software we use. The paper was presented at the Workshop on Economics and Information Security 2004 and the slides can be found here (pdf)."
Looks like a school project or something...the company name is RTFM, Inc.
I meant to post as AC.. Karma be damned.
stupid moderators, it was supposed to be a joke
www.mercatur.net
Her brother and his girlfriend have kicked her out of their house because Mercatur keeps bringing men back to their house to copulate with.
So what if Mercatur believe in free love? So what if she is sexually active and attractive? This woman is so hot, can you blame men for being drawn into her web of seduction?
Mercatur was brought up in Texas but she didn't let that hold her back. She's now queen of the Internet Camgirls, with a body to match her reputation.
Mercatur is the sexiest woman on the Internet. Don't you dare deny it.
www.mercatur.net
Should we jail murderers, since it doesn't seem to prevent murders, or curb the murder rate? Whatever.
Anyway, he is looking at the problem on too wide a scale. Slash (the code running this site) is much less vulnerable to various exploits than many of the alternatives that have cropped up, and yes, it has been a huge benefit to the people who run and use this site, undoubtedly.
FYI FWIW: If you want to link to the Slashdot Nigritude Ultramarine artcile you need to link to the archived URL as done here.
Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
So if there's a static, 20KB PDF file, it somehow slashdots a server? Bah, I call whore.
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
Apparently, not as long as it took to get the first predictable post from a member of the "I'm better than you all because I don't follow the anti-Microsoft herd" herd.
Not as fast as some overly sensitive type launches a pre-emptive pro-Microsoft strike to deflect justly deserved criticism.
Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos
People's safety concerns for SUVs are not jealousy issues in which we are worried that SUV drivers are safer than us. In fact, SUVs are safer in collisions with other vehicles - but they cause more additional deaths in the other vehicles than the lives they save of SUV occupants. BUT, in terms of fatalities of occupants per mile driven, they are WORSE. Weighty, top-heavy, relatively narrow SUVs are more prone to go out of control on wet roads and especially likely to flip if the steering wheel is turned too quickly or if they hit a guardrail.
s sdisplay.cfm?year=2003&filename=pr32-03.html and http://www.suv.gs/suv-rollover/suv-rollover-fatali ty-risk-suv-controversy.html and http://www.smartmotorist.com/suv/suv.htm or just google for "SUVs accident statistics rollovers" for yourself.
See http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/announce/press/pre
So, it sounds to me like a selfishness and cowardice issue on the part of the SUV driver - I would rather two other people die in a car to car collision than I die. And then of course you factor in the foolishness issue - in fact, my chances as an SUV driver of dying on the road are higher. It's only my chances of dying in a collision with another car that are lower.
I personally firmly believe SUVs have their place. If you have three kids and a frequent need to haul things, by all means drive an SUV. If you have rough dirt roads or offroading, again - go for it. However, I have serious issues with dealing with the externalized costs of higher pollution, higher risk of accident and higher risk of fatalities from accidents of people who use their giant SUV as a commuting vehicle in congested city driving.
emerge -UD world
And yes, I am a Gentoo zealot...