Slashdot Mirror


Ars Technica Interviews Scott Collins

SnoopTodd writes "Ars Technica has an interview with Scott Collins of Mozilla. 'That's the thing I learned to lust after as a programmer. It's not my ability to solve one problem, to plow this field, but the ability to build a plow that every farmer uses. The ability to make something that touches not ten people, not a hundred people, not a thousand people but a hundred million people. I want Mozilla to be there again. IE is a browser with no soul. I want it to be Mozilla because I think that people who care deserve a browser with a soul.'"

7 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Nice to see by cbrocious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's really nice to see this sort of passion, and such an ambitious goal for an F/OSS project.

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
  2. A soul? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't need a "soul" in my browser; I need a good, standards-compliant and stable rendering engine in my browser.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  3. History repeating itself. by SinaSa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a guy here on slashdot, and his sig is

    "The only thing a liberal has to do to become a conservative is to not change views for twenty years"

    Or something similar. The point is, Netscape was crap by 4.7, and Internet Explorer was fresh, new, fast and hade the exact same pricetag.

    But now, Internet Explorer is, well, you know how it is :P and Mozilla is coming back in a big way. Fast, clean, lots of new features (I'm not going to call it fresh), and lots of choice.

    I think this time, with Mozilla being in the hands of the OSS community, and not a corporation, it will stay on top of Internet Explorer for a long time to come (well at least I hope so).

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
  4. Re:Mozilla has a soul? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    tabbed browsing
    better bookmarks
    themes
    find as you type
    works identically on all 3 platforms
    secure (and you never have to be paranoid about clicking on dodgy links)
    popup-blocking
    ad-blocking
    a zillion extensions, some of which are extremely useful

    nobody's denying that ie also lets you browse the internet :/

  5. I've seen some sites... by zogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... not render correctly, but I haven't had an actual crash using mozilla. Is this limited to a specific OS? Do you have any reference URLS where mozilla crashes? 20% seems like a high number to me. I go to quite a few different sites a day, and have yet to see that happen one time. BTW, using moz 1.6 here on FC2.

  6. Re:I don't care how many people Mozilla touches or by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about this thought:

    If only IE didn't let my machine (and 'mom & pop's') get infected with spyware/adware/malware/hostageware by JUST CLICKING ON A LINK.

    Remember, ~60% of spam comes from infected windows machines, and IE helps this problem along.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  7. Screw the soul, how about important features? by EvilStein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, Mozilla has a lot of nice features. But you know what's keeping people from switching (at least in our organization)?

    Calendar.

    Netscape 4.x had a nice calendar that worked great with Netscape Calendar Server.
    Mozilla Calendar (sunbird/whatever) just doesn't cut it. It fails to send calendar invites properly. When a user receives one, it opens it in a browser window, displaying the raw .ics file. Not friendly for users.
    We don't even use Exchange at all - and people still want to cling to Outlook because of its Calendaring features.

    I cannot stress how important this actually is! We're not the only company that has users sticking to Outlook because of the calendar... I've dealt with quite a few others.
    Users like to have their email & organizer functions in one.
    None of them use Palm Desktop because it's still a seperate app.

    The users that I *have* moved to Mozilla really like it. But the rest? They won't budge unless there's a fully functional calendar - one that lets you accept calendar invites, add them to the calendar, and send them with a few clicks.
    Mozilla Calendar just isn't doing this right now and I don't understand why the team doesn't direct effort towards 'enterprise features' rather than Chatzilla.