"Granted, they've been very creative with things like the MsPL but people see through those ruses pretty quickly."
Yes, total ruse. Except that the MSPL is an OSI-approved open source license. There's plenty to bash MS on, the MSPL isn't one of those things.
This is a false dichotomy. Most software that uses less RAM is actually also faster.
Nowadays, it's usually faster to recompute than read it all back from RAM, and if an interactive program uses a lot of RAM, then it's likely keeping a lot of junk in memory that it doesn't need.
Wow, this is a perfect example of completely misunderstanding memory-CPU tradeoffs.
No. For a non-trivial amount of data, it is never cheaper to recompute the data, at access-time. It may be faster overall, as you might be able to use the freed RAM in a better way elsewhere, but it will never speed the accessing task up.
If you recompute the data constantly, it has to hit RAM and then read it back, unless you're dealing with a dataset small enough to be stored completely in cache, in which case this is a nonissue anyway.
More caching is never a bad thing, so long as you set smart defaults for how the caching is done, and you allow the users to configure it. More RAM, in the hands of a smart developer, is a Good Thing (TM).
You don't even need to go the FPGA route. The baseband firmware on the iPhone has been patched for an unlocking, there's nothing stopping someone from patching it to change the IMEI built into the phone or the IMSI it "reads" from the SIM. Change these and the phone can become any other.
When you're in a position of power for a long time and an alternative comes along, what do you do? You assert control in any way you possibly can. Not that that's a good thing, but that's the way it goes.
I don't like the Neo Nazis. I'd rather they chose not to say what they say. But I will defend, to the death if needs must, their right to say it.
Someday, I might find myself the lone voice of dissension. I'd hope no matter what my views you'd stand up and support my right to say them.
Otherwise, one day *you* might be that lone voice...
I agree fully, and that's why my Troll moderation is nonsensical. Apparently I should've laid down the sarcasm a bit more thickly...
There's no reason you can't have your cake and eat it too. We have virtual filesystems like proc, why not a 'registry' filesystem? People will still be able to modify config files to their heart's content, with all the benefits of a 'registry'.
'Company-specific knowledge' is covered by NDAs, which are universally (in the US and most other countries) recognized. If you don't want them to leave at all, compete.
Slashdot Mirror
"Granted, they've been very creative with things like the MsPL but people see through those ruses pretty quickly." Yes, total ruse. Except that the MSPL is an OSI-approved open source license. There's plenty to bash MS on, the MSPL isn't one of those things.
This is a false dichotomy. Most software that uses less RAM is actually also faster.
Nowadays, it's usually faster to recompute than read it all back from RAM, and if an interactive program uses a lot of RAM, then it's likely keeping a lot of junk in memory that it doesn't need.
Wow, this is a perfect example of completely misunderstanding memory-CPU tradeoffs. No. For a non-trivial amount of data, it is never cheaper to recompute the data, at access-time. It may be faster overall, as you might be able to use the freed RAM in a better way elsewhere, but it will never speed the accessing task up.
If you recompute the data constantly, it has to hit RAM and then read it back, unless you're dealing with a dataset small enough to be stored completely in cache, in which case this is a nonissue anyway. More caching is never a bad thing, so long as you set smart defaults for how the caching is done, and you allow the users to configure it. More RAM, in the hands of a smart developer, is a Good Thing (TM).
That's the firmware for the application CPU, but I don't believe the GSM baseband chip's firmware is open.
You don't even need to go the FPGA route. The baseband firmware on the iPhone has been patched for an unlocking, there's nothing stopping someone from patching it to change the IMEI built into the phone or the IMSI it "reads" from the SIM. Change these and the phone can become any other.
When you're in a position of power for a long time and an alternative comes along, what do you do? You assert control in any way you possibly can. Not that that's a good thing, but that's the way it goes.
Helluva drug^Wengine
There's a bird virus going around. They used to sing in a way that let me know what was going on, but now even the birds are pushing g3n3r1c c14l15.
And Nothing Of Value Was Lost (TM).
That was my first thought, too. Mediatrons are finally coming.
If you use Privoxy, the majority of those ads will go away, and you can do custom filtering for fun and profit easily.
I'll meet you at The Black Sun.
Erm, what? The USS New Orleans only had 2600 deficiencies when inspected: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_Orleans_(LPD-18). Learn to read your own links.
I don't like the Neo Nazis. I'd rather they chose not to say what they say. But I will defend, to the death if needs must, their right to say it. Someday, I might find myself the lone voice of dissension. I'd hope no matter what my views you'd stand up and support my right to say them. Otherwise, one day *you* might be that lone voice...
I agree fully, and that's why my Troll moderation is nonsensical. Apparently I should've laid down the sarcasm a bit more thickly...
I think speech should be free, but seriously, how much worse off would we be if we didn't have Nazi sympathizers and other hate mongers?
There's no reason you can't have your cake and eat it too. We have virtual filesystems like proc, why not a 'registry' filesystem? People will still be able to modify config files to their heart's content, with all the benefits of a 'registry'.
I agree. I'm nearly positive they've already sold at least 10 phones, so they're leaps and bounds ahead of OpenMoko.
Yea, this is bullshit. There aren't any tech companies in Massachusetts that Google is competing with for employees. None at all.
Only if you're reading this from 2007.
What the hell, this isn't interesting, it's funny. Moderators these days...
'Company-specific knowledge' is covered by NDAs, which are universally (in the US and most other countries) recognized. If you don't want them to leave at all, compete.
The fact that people still think hashes are reversible makes it pretty clear that they need more than "no, you can't do that".
No hash, even the very worst, is reversible. The reason for this is that an infinite number of input strings will produce the same, finite, output string. See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/330207/how-come-md5-hash-values-are-not-reversible for more information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EyeTap
OpenSolaris is primarily CDDL.
Lately? I think you're new here...