Windows Compatability on the Linux Desktop
davecb writes "O'Reilly has been kind enough to publish one of my
how-to articles,
Windows Compatability for the Linux Desktop, about dealing with that 'one last annoying program
than only runs on Windows'. The answer? Run it under Linux and win4lin, and never venture onto the Windows desktop at all. Especially don't run programs via dual-boot, which tempts you to stay and use all those other wonderful programs like Outlook...
Meow meow Matt Bruce meow meow Henrietta Pussycat meow meow Presidents of the United States of America meow Kitty?
No definitions found for "compatability", perhaps you mean: web1913: Compatibility wn: comparability compatibility foldoc: compatibility
Now, mod me down if you want but it is quite serious when the topic has a typo.
OMG!! YOU have teh 172.0.0.1 as teh IP, JUST LYK MEE!!
OMG!!
Third page of the article at LinuxDevCenter.com - figure 6.0 /gra phics/visio_5.gif
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/linux/2004/06/1
Terminal window in the background. The author is using xhost along with some hairy ssh command line. Is there a good reason for this and not using ssh's built in X forwarding?
it's compatibility with an i, not compatability for crying out loud.
i ndependant,, a te
english isn't even my first language and still i get the hives whenever i read the kind of spelling mistakes you slashdot folks insist on making:
kernal,
impliment,
compatable,
preferance,
relatavists,
rediculous,
primative
definately,
paramaters,
experiancing,
alturn
the list goes and on and on and on...
Because they are not compatable.