Slashdot Mirror


Mike Melvill Chosen To Fly SpaceShipOne

ansimon writes "Mike Melvill is chosen to fly SpaceShipOne to the outer limits of this rock that we call earth. Mike will be the first to earn his astronaut wings with a privately-developed aeroplane/rocket. A new era of space exploration is about to begin! Godspeed and come back safe, so the rest of us can go too..."

24 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. I confess to a little excitement ... by isolationism · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... When I read the news as well, about the upcoming test flight.

    For one who's done a lot of reading of both science fiction as well as cosmology, the stars seem so far out of reach for my short lifetime.

    Getting into space isn't exactly reaching the stars, but it's the first step on the journey. I hope the mission goes smoothly and its success is a sign of things to come.

    1. Re:I confess to a little excitement ... by aheath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tomorrow's flight reminds me of the excitement that I felt about space flight when I was growing up in the sixties and seventies.

      I hope that a partnership between the public sector and private enterprise will help to drive down the costs of access to space.

      Early aviation development was partially funded by the public sector when the United States Post Office subsidized airlines by implementing air mail.

      I hope that the government will use private spacelines for all launches of non-military hardware.

    2. Re:I confess to a little excitement ... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Tomorrow's flight reminds me of the excitement that I felt about space flight when I was growing up in the sixties and seventies.

      I was a kid when the Columbia took its first trip in '81, so I've never lived in a time when space flight wasn't a reality. However, when I looked at pictures of SpaceShipOne tonight and read about the people filling the motels for miles around the world's first civilian spaceport, I literally started crying out of pure joy. Space has always been the domain of guys with The Right Stuff - bigger-than-life heros that risked it all. However, as of tomorrow, the rest of us get to take our shot at it. Tomorrow, I fly into space, and the universe will be a lot closer for me and my children.

      Bring 'er home safe, Mike. A whole world full of regular Joes are praying for you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  2. So far..... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far, I have seen some people posting stuff related to Melville dying. This is poor taste.

    I honestly hope that Melville completes this first trip unharmed. Not only for his sake, but for our sake. If he dies, the government will more than likely shut the whole private space exploration business down and set humanity back by an untold amount of years.

    Why would anyone wish harm upon someone trying to pave the waqy for the rest of us?

    1. Re:So far..... by TigerNut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government? Excuse me, but since when can your country's government bureaucracy tell private citizens in other countries what to do? (okay, besides the obvious answer - that's not my point). There is lots of underpopulated real estate outside of the USA that is entirely suitable for use as a space launching site, and there are definitely people that are not US citizens, that are also pursuing the X-prize. They may not be anywhere near as far along in their programmes as Rutan and Armadillo, but as with cryptography, the only thing that will happen if the US "bans" private spacecraft development, is that private spacecraft development will happen outside of the US, and then a lot of sniveling and handwringing will be done by those who got left behind.

      --

      Less is more.

    2. Re:So far..... by BillyBlaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If, God forbid, he dies, I don't really think the government would shut down the whole X-prize business, even just in America. Basically, it's not their jurisdiction as long as it's not a threat to public safety. Scaled Composites would be set back, sure, and it would give everybody pause, but they would likely continue. NASA stopping the Space Shuttles was different - they had a definite problem they had to fix, all their eggs were in one basket design-wise, and on top of that, they had an organization-wide safety audit and Congresspeople breathing down their necks. The X-prize teams, in contrast, have more diversity, less bureaucracy, and more brass.

  3. Re:First since Columbia by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First manned vehicle.

  4. Re:Yeah by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need to start NOW if we want to have 40 million people on the moon by 2371...

    I am guessing your math doesn't include any births on the moon, so it would be done sooner. Besides, you put just 50 men and women in low g, several are going to at least be curious about sex.

    On another note...It will be very expensive to go into space as a passenger for a while, but I think they need to focus on their market: Rich internet dot.commers who want to have sex in space. Just like VCRs, the Internet, and video cameras, the first people who want to go into space have to be doing it for some reason tied to sex, and willing to pay full price, making it cheaper for the rest of us eventually.

    I'm not completely sure how this will work, but just about any new technology is always paid for by people wanting pr0n/sexchat/etc so why would this be any different? Would you pay $100,000 to get a bj in zero gravity?

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  5. Re:To save everyone some time tomorrow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be a hell of a lot more likely if he were going up in the shuttle. I'd take my luck going into space (though this is just a suborbital flight) with a ship designed by Burt Rutan and his team at Scaled Composites over something built by NASA whose design decisions have more to do with red tape and beaurocracy than technical merit.

  6. Re:To save everyone some time tomorrow ... by TheWart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that really fair to say? Sure, NASA has had its share of red-tape screwups, and some tragic erros, but don't overlook what they *have* done.

  7. Re:Yeah by aliens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm guessing sex in low g might not be all it's cracked up to be. Imagine spinning around and around and around, not exactly the best time to be getting motion sickness eh? ::)

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  8. Reason to Celebrate by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, please. Get over yourself. Half of the reason it was only 20 million was because they didn't have to pioneer the system that had nailed down nearly 50 years of successful spaceflight. Ok, so it's civilan flight. Whoopdeeshit. As great as it is, these people are standing on the shoulders of giants to even get close to where they are today. No freakin chance this would be $20M if they had to R&D and fabricate a space program from the ground up.

    And yes, the USA is back and buisness and it is a reason to celebrate. Beyond the petty fact that there is a distinct lack of foreign competition in this sector, the event is a milestone in civilian rocketry worldwide. Whose market was this entire effort born from again...? Yeah, it sounds pigheaded as hell, but then so does dismissing this entire project as nothing more than a invidiual/corporate victory when it's a victory for the entire country whose very way of life made such impossible dreams a possible and whose economic environment could support such flights of fancy, something for which the entire world will look upon and follow.

    Damn right it's a reason to celebrate.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  9. This puts NASA in a very interesting position by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If these folks built this thing for peanuts (compared to NASA budgets), NASA will seem ridiculously ineffective. Like a giant corporation where no one gives a crap about what they're doing and comes to work every day not to do something to change the world, but to collect the paycheck every two weeks.

    It's not like they deserve this kind of treatment, but the question will be raised for sure.

    1. Re:This puts NASA in a very interesting position by east+coast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NASA will seem ridiculously ineffective

      Seem?? The are ridiculously ineffective.

      Like a giant corporation where no one gives a crap about what they're doing and comes to work every day not to do something to change the world, but to collect the paycheck every two weeks.

      They're even worse because they're government funded yet really answer to no one. They need not show a profit or even a reasonable effort. In corporations you have stockholders to answer to and you need to make money to stay in business. NASA only need to hold out their hand. The only reason I support NASA is because they're the only game in town... for now. Hopefully that will change tomorrow.

      It's not like they deserve this kind of treatment

      Why don't they deserve to be questioned and criticized? I pay their way. I want results and frankly I'm sick of their pussy-footing over matters. They are not beyond reproach. They need to be overseen and beat on a bit. They've wasted enough time and tax payer money. I want an alternative. I'm want NASA to have a fire under it's ass and realize that unless they get their shit together they'll be outside looking in.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:This puts NASA in a very interesting position by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Suborbital. Minimal payload capacity. Has NASA designed anything to that kind of spec since the early 60s?

      Well, the X-33 program was somewhere in that class. It was supposed to be a half-scale demonstrator for the next generation shuttle. Of course, in NASA's case they spent ~8 years, and around $200M, and didn't even produce flying hardware (let alone something that could attempt an actual suborbital hop). Whereas Rutan and Scaled Composites have apparently spent roughly a 10th the money that NASA did and now have something that has been off the ground, and will soon be suborbital.

  10. Best wishes .. this gives me goosebumps by xtal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never been all that excited about the space program; I missed those years by a decade. I worked for a PhD that was part of the Apollo program; he left NASA when he realized that he would never get to fly in space. He was right, so long as it was being run by governments - only the elite of the elite would ever have that honour, and even then, only while there was political interest.

    Looking at pictures taken from the edge of space make my spine tingle - especially when they're taken by what amounts to a shoestring budget done by private enterprise. Pictures are one thing; tomorrow if all goes to plan, private enterprise will have put a man up there at the edge of space. Maybe not in orbit; I'm sure that will come in time.

    I can't imagine what it must feel like to look up and see black, then look down and see the glowing blue curvature of the earth.

    If you're reading this Mike, and everyone at Scaled Composites, you did a damn good job and we'll be waiting for your safe landing!

    --
    ..don't panic
  11. Re:Yes, but by dmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I use Linux and have zero problem with someone doing well and making money. What I and many of have a problem with is the way money becomes power and then that power is outrageously abused. As I posted earlier today, MS is not only competing on quality of product and service. They are also competing with smear campaigns and lawyers. Remember that Brazilian minister who is getting sued for criticism of MS' marketing tactics? Yes, they disavow it now but MS fund AdTI and AdTI wrote a very "unhelpful distraction". They called it that once it become clear the mud was going to stick to them.

    We are by no means a united group of "commie hippies" out to undermine capitalism. Some of us even own businesses and would take exception to being collectivized. All most of us are trying to say is that making money is not an excuse to throw ethics and morals out the window. There is no problem with having a lot if money if you a) earned it honestly and b) don't use it to buy fake journalists and politicians.

    Oh and remember this: "DOS ain't done until 123 won't run." This isn't jealously at the success of another. We are expressing moral outrage at behaivor that should not be acceptable to anybody. Even megacapitalists.

  12. Re:It's amazing by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hmm, the largest nation on earth managed to get a human to orbit the earth twice before coming down alive in 1961. The largest nation on earth kept a fully operating space station orbiting the planet for twenty years. The largest nation on earth was the first to put robots on the moon. The largest nation on earth has flown countless missions to space to execute many experiments and successful satilite launches. The largest nation on earth has put probes on Venus, and surveyed mars with radar.

    Most importantly the largest nation on earth pioneered the principles that Space Ship One will rely on. If you think this project even compares to the achievements of the Russian space program you are either very ignorent or very stupid.

    I am not Russian or anything but I am sick of morons that can't tell the difference between launching a Cosmonaut for two round trips of the planet 43 years ago with the aid of possibly a single computer (not on board), primitive materials and theoretical equasions and flying a plane at a sub-orbital altitude with the aid of 40 years of space research to build from. Oh, and also the morons that can't tell the difference between putting people on the moon and "winning".

    I of cause wish the Space Ship One Team luck, but they can never achieve such a victory for the human race as Gargarin did that day when he left the planet for the first time ever.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  13. Re:Yes, but by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Paul Allen has had cancer and survived. As a result he has re-organized his priorities, such as enjoying life a little bit more, giving away things he doesn't need, giving others a chance, etc.

    Why does it takes cancer to come to this view of life is beyond me, but kudos all the same.

  14. I tend to disagree by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While they are huge and a lot of money is no doubt wasted internally, they're doing "one of a kind" and "state of the art" stuff, and this is always expensive.

    It's not exactly easy to quantify their impact on our daily lives, but if you watch TV, use cell phone and/or pager, or GPS you see your tax dollars at work pretty much. None of these things would be easy or even possible without NASA.

    Saying that NASA is too expensive is like saying that Wright brothers had wasted too much money on their first crappy airplane. Sure they did, but it was the FIRST working airplane. These days any fool can build a working airplane out of readily available parts. Back then it was state of the art.

    It sure did cost billions to send rovers to Mars, too. And it's not something anyone else will be able to achieve within the next decade.

    This costs a lot. Can NASA be improved? No doubt. Is the cost justified even given the current inefficiencies? It sure as heck is.

  15. Ironic... Slashdot cheering for Microsoftie :) by dvk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Define Irony: all Slashdotters cheering for a company taht was (almost) fully funded by blood money of Evil Empire of Micro$oft.

    P.S. best of luck and successful flight to Mike and SS1 people.

    -DVK

    --
    "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  16. Re:YURI GAGARIN by sheriff_p · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the significance of the first black guy in space? Seriously?

    We note the first Chinese guy in space, but not the first East-Asian in space. Do you know who the first blonde person in space was? The first person with green eyes?

    The reason your country has such an issue with racism STILL is that you create such significance in skin colour, where really there should be none.

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
  17. Re:YURI GAGARIN by JanusFury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because, of course, racism is not a problem anywhere else.

    The problem isn't just distinctions based on skin color, ancestry, religion, or anything else.

    The problem is that people want to hate each other, and they will find any necessary excuse to do so. Skin color is just extremely convenient, because you can tell what color someone's skin is by looking at them. Even if you make it unacceptable to discriminate based on skin color, the root problem still exists. People want to hate. And they do.

    The reason our country still has a problem with racism is because our people still want to hate. And instead of solving the root problem (hate), we're putting bandages on it by trying to eliminate the symptoms (racism, discrimination) with laws and manipulation.

    I agree with your main point, but your statement about racism is just plain wrong. Racism isn't a disease you can cure with some sort of vaccine or magic treatment. People truly, deeply hate each other.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  18. Libertarians ... by DerWulf · · Score: 3, Insightful


    ... can finally enjoy watching space events without that nagging feeling of guilt.

    Space flight has always been an argument against the free market:
    a)'duh, who is going to pay millions of dollars just to visit space'
    b)'yeah, but it will get cheaper with time, as companys put huge investments into it to archieve the profits that can be realized when spaceflight has truly become a consumer good'
    a)'hahahahaha, look at how much NASA has to spend, going to space will always be expensive and dangerous, even the government hasn't managed it yet'
    b)'no, its expensive and dangerous *because* the government is doing it not despite.'
    a)'yeah right, thats what you always say, I'll believe that when I see it'

    --

    ___
    No power in the 'verse can stop me