Slashdot Mirror


Mike Melvill Chosen To Fly SpaceShipOne

ansimon writes "Mike Melvill is chosen to fly SpaceShipOne to the outer limits of this rock that we call earth. Mike will be the first to earn his astronaut wings with a privately-developed aeroplane/rocket. A new era of space exploration is about to begin! Godspeed and come back safe, so the rest of us can go too..."

46 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Share value of Mike's life insurance company plummeted.

    1. Re:In other news... by PPGMD · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, they have an exemption for hazardous activities.

      My first life insurance company didn't cover me while I was flying, took me a while to find a company that would cover me during recreational flying, and soaring, without charging me through the nose.

      Also don't tell some car insurance companies your a pilot, you will get the rates of a 16 year old.

  2. For the sake of argument . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    . . . even if something does go wrong, there wouldn't be any better way to go out, especially with a flight history such as his.

    On the other hand, not much left to top this if it does go flawlessly.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  3. I confess to a little excitement ... by isolationism · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... When I read the news as well, about the upcoming test flight.

    For one who's done a lot of reading of both science fiction as well as cosmology, the stars seem so far out of reach for my short lifetime.

    Getting into space isn't exactly reaching the stars, but it's the first step on the journey. I hope the mission goes smoothly and its success is a sign of things to come.

    1. Re:I confess to a little excitement ... by aheath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tomorrow's flight reminds me of the excitement that I felt about space flight when I was growing up in the sixties and seventies.

      I hope that a partnership between the public sector and private enterprise will help to drive down the costs of access to space.

      Early aviation development was partially funded by the public sector when the United States Post Office subsidized airlines by implementing air mail.

      I hope that the government will use private spacelines for all launches of non-military hardware.

    2. Re:I confess to a little excitement ... by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Getting into space isn't exactly reaching the stars, but it's the first step on the journey.

      I'd rather not reach the stars.. I hear it's very warm there.

    3. Re:I confess to a little excitement ... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Tomorrow's flight reminds me of the excitement that I felt about space flight when I was growing up in the sixties and seventies.

      I was a kid when the Columbia took its first trip in '81, so I've never lived in a time when space flight wasn't a reality. However, when I looked at pictures of SpaceShipOne tonight and read about the people filling the motels for miles around the world's first civilian spaceport, I literally started crying out of pure joy. Space has always been the domain of guys with The Right Stuff - bigger-than-life heros that risked it all. However, as of tomorrow, the rest of us get to take our shot at it. Tomorrow, I fly into space, and the universe will be a lot closer for me and my children.

      Bring 'er home safe, Mike. A whole world full of regular Joes are praying for you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  4. First to earn his astronaut's wings.... by GameGod0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... or the first person to get a privately funded cremation in outer space... you know, whatever floats his boat.

  5. Yeah by Hangin10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is really cool.

    I have to admit I'd rather be Captain of a
    large ship rather than pilot of a small
    tin can though...

    Saving up for my first starship, which I suppose
    will be available in the next 40 years or so,
    around the time I'll be having my first mid-life
    crisis (or for me, mid-life crisis'es...)

    We need to start NOW if we want to have 40 million
    people on the moon by 2371...

    1. Re:Yeah by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We need to start NOW if we want to have 40 million people on the moon by 2371...

      I am guessing your math doesn't include any births on the moon, so it would be done sooner. Besides, you put just 50 men and women in low g, several are going to at least be curious about sex.

      On another note...It will be very expensive to go into space as a passenger for a while, but I think they need to focus on their market: Rich internet dot.commers who want to have sex in space. Just like VCRs, the Internet, and video cameras, the first people who want to go into space have to be doing it for some reason tied to sex, and willing to pay full price, making it cheaper for the rest of us eventually.

      I'm not completely sure how this will work, but just about any new technology is always paid for by people wanting pr0n/sexchat/etc so why would this be any different? Would you pay $100,000 to get a bj in zero gravity?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Yeah by aliens · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm guessing sex in low g might not be all it's cracked up to be. Imagine spinning around and around and around, not exactly the best time to be getting motion sickness eh? ::)

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    3. Re:Yeah by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm guessing sex in low g might not be all it's cracked up to be.

      Thats a chance I am willing to take :)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Yeah by blockhouse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would you pay $100,000 to get a bj in zero gravity?

      Some people on this forum would pay $100,000 to get a bj here on earth. Some people would *have* to.

      . . . but not me, of course.

  6. YURI GAGARIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MALCOLM SCOTT CARPENTER
    ALAN SHEPARD
    JOHN GLENN
    BUZZ ALDRIN
    NEIL ARMSTRONG

    ...Mike Melvill

    SpaceShipOne will not only be making history because they will be breaking the tradition that only governments have the ability to get into space. They will also be breaking the tradition that only people with dramatic-sounding names get to perform important space-exploration milestones.

    Fly, SpaceShipOne, fly! Fly for the drably-named of the world! For all the "I'm sorry, what's your name again"s of the world! For everyone named "Morton"! You represent all of us.

    1. Re:YURI GAGARIN by foidulus · · Score: 4, Informative

      You left a very important name off of your list, Yang Liwei, the first Chinese astronaut(or if you must, taikonaut).
      I don't know if it is a very dramatic sounding name though :P

    2. Re:YURI GAGARIN by sheriff_p · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's the significance of the first black guy in space? Seriously?

      We note the first Chinese guy in space, but not the first East-Asian in space. Do you know who the first blonde person in space was? The first person with green eyes?

      The reason your country has such an issue with racism STILL is that you create such significance in skin colour, where really there should be none.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
  7. In case of slashdotting by bigberk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a mirror. Wishing Michael a safe flight!

  8. First since Columbia by moberry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I am not mistaken this will be the first vehicle launched in the USA since the Columbia accident. That alone is something to celebrate. The USA is back in busness. :p

    1. Re:First since Columbia by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First manned vehicle.

    2. Re:First since Columbia by Peyna · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, without all of NASA's developments and the tons of spent by the government in the past, would this private venture even be possible?

      --
      What?
  9. So far..... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far, I have seen some people posting stuff related to Melville dying. This is poor taste.

    I honestly hope that Melville completes this first trip unharmed. Not only for his sake, but for our sake. If he dies, the government will more than likely shut the whole private space exploration business down and set humanity back by an untold amount of years.

    Why would anyone wish harm upon someone trying to pave the waqy for the rest of us?

    1. Re:So far..... by TigerNut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government? Excuse me, but since when can your country's government bureaucracy tell private citizens in other countries what to do? (okay, besides the obvious answer - that's not my point). There is lots of underpopulated real estate outside of the USA that is entirely suitable for use as a space launching site, and there are definitely people that are not US citizens, that are also pursuing the X-prize. They may not be anywhere near as far along in their programmes as Rutan and Armadillo, but as with cryptography, the only thing that will happen if the US "bans" private spacecraft development, is that private spacecraft development will happen outside of the US, and then a lot of sniveling and handwringing will be done by those who got left behind.

      --

      Less is more.

  10. Damn. by agent+dero · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must have just missed the longer straw, Mike _always_ gets to test things before me

    aw, shucks

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  11. Bring A Towel =:-) by drenehtsral · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if he's got the weight allowance to bring a towel, just in case...

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  12. Disaster? Unlikely. by dinodrac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Scaled Composites seems to have done their homework. The craft has a double presure hull, is relatively small, and uses a propellant that is arguably more stable than what we burn in our cars. Any failure is more likely to result in an abort than in a catastrophe. SpaceShipOne has been tested extensively, and the design, although radical, is comparitively simple when viewed alongside early government funded sub-orbital flight.

    Good luck and Godspeed to the SpaceShipOne team.

    1. Re:Disaster? Unlikely. by Keebler71 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "the design, although radical, is comparitively simple when viewed alongside early government funded sub-orbital flight."

      I have to disagree here. This vehicle is significantly more complex than the Mercury missions. Radical - yes, in the sense of using a dual-aircraft staging ascent, but you do not get much more simple than a redstone rocket with a purely ballistic capsule for re-entry. SpaceShipOne is closer to the space shuttle than it is to a Mercury capsule, in the sense that it flys like an aircraft with all the appropriate control surfaces - not to mention the feathering wing during re-entry. Radical - yes, simple - no. Bear in mind, that this design is made possible by relatively modern composite materials, so comparing this design to a 1950's iron capsule is a bit unfair.

      Let me preface what I am about to say with the following: I think that what Scaled Composites has done is nothing short of amazing. I don't need to wish them the best, as I have been to their plant, and seen and crawled inside their vehicle. They will win the X-prize tomorrow... That said, I believe that SpaceShipOne is more of a bureocratic and idealogical achievement. First off, SC defined the process by which civilian companies are certified for space flight. Second, this event will usher in a newfound pride and enthusiasm for space exploration that has been missing for decades.

      Unfortunately, this design is not very, well, useful other than to make Scaled Composites LOTS of money from space tourists. There is not a lot of interest otherwise in sub-orbital (heck, the Soviets skipped it entirely). SpaceShipOne was point designed to win the X-prize; the approach used is not scalable to an orbital version.

      All that having been said, I am very excited for the future of space flight... I know what I will be doing tomorrow morning!

      and yes, IAARS.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  13. Hopefully he will be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    to be seen by the Vulcans in our solar system. This will usher in a new era of interstellar space travel. It will also give us new plotlines for Star Trek: Enterprise.

  14. Re:To save everyone some time tomorrow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be a hell of a lot more likely if he were going up in the shuttle. I'd take my luck going into space (though this is just a suborbital flight) with a ship designed by Burt Rutan and his team at Scaled Composites over something built by NASA whose design decisions have more to do with red tape and beaurocracy than technical merit.

  15. Re:To save everyone some time tomorrow ... by TheWart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that really fair to say? Sure, NASA has had its share of red-tape screwups, and some tragic erros, but don't overlook what they *have* done.

  16. The last great X-Plane by dev_alac · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The X-15 was the first plane to fly into space, and I'm sure much of its heritage will be carried on with SpaceShipOne. An excellent history of the program by an actual member of the program is At the Edge of Space" by Milton Thompson. It is amazing to learn about the worries about the reaction control system for out-of-atmosphere flight and how their reentry procedures and much of their data enabled the Shuttle program.

    To Mike and the rest of the SpaceShipOne crew, best of luck tomorrow.

  17. If there's any doubt about 'space' by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the various articles about the x-prize and spaceshipone one could be forgiven for wondering whether these guys are really going into 'space', because relative to NASA's exploits they aren't exactly going that high. However, pictures like this and this from earlier test flights give a practical idea of just how high they are going to get... awesome! I wish there was some sort of webcast... anyone know of anything live?

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  18. 19 years experience as a test pilot? by ShallowThroat · · Score: 4, Funny

    wow, that is pretty amazing, i didn't realize test pilots even lived that long.

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
  19. MSNBC Streaming Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of us who don't have access to CNN but have a decent enough internet connection, MSNBC is planning on providing live streaming video. You can find the link in most of their recent articles about it, including this one: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5236958/

  20. This puts NASA in a very interesting position by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If these folks built this thing for peanuts (compared to NASA budgets), NASA will seem ridiculously ineffective. Like a giant corporation where no one gives a crap about what they're doing and comes to work every day not to do something to change the world, but to collect the paycheck every two weeks.

    It's not like they deserve this kind of treatment, but the question will be raised for sure.

    1. Re:This puts NASA in a very interesting position by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Suborbital. Minimal payload capacity. Has NASA designed anything to that kind of spec since the early 60s?

      Well, the X-33 program was somewhere in that class. It was supposed to be a half-scale demonstrator for the next generation shuttle. Of course, in NASA's case they spent ~8 years, and around $200M, and didn't even produce flying hardware (let alone something that could attempt an actual suborbital hop). Whereas Rutan and Scaled Composites have apparently spent roughly a 10th the money that NASA did and now have something that has been off the ground, and will soon be suborbital.

  21. I beg to differ........ by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Informative
    They will win the X-prize tomorrow...


    They will not win the X-Prize tommorow and they most likely will not win it in the nearest future.

    The X-Prize is for 2 manned launches with the equivalent of 3 persons mass within 2 weeks.

    Tommorow's flight is 1 person and less ballast mass and AFAIK, scaled has no plans to launch again in the following 2 weeks.
    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  22. Best wishes .. this gives me goosebumps by xtal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never been all that excited about the space program; I missed those years by a decade. I worked for a PhD that was part of the Apollo program; he left NASA when he realized that he would never get to fly in space. He was right, so long as it was being run by governments - only the elite of the elite would ever have that honour, and even then, only while there was political interest.

    Looking at pictures taken from the edge of space make my spine tingle - especially when they're taken by what amounts to a shoestring budget done by private enterprise. Pictures are one thing; tomorrow if all goes to plan, private enterprise will have put a man up there at the edge of space. Maybe not in orbit; I'm sure that will come in time.

    I can't imagine what it must feel like to look up and see black, then look down and see the glowing blue curvature of the earth.

    If you're reading this Mike, and everyone at Scaled Composites, you did a damn good job and we'll be waiting for your safe landing!

    --
    ..don't panic
  23. Ya, right by apankrat · · Score: 4, Informative


    Then how about JUGDERDEMIDIYN GURRAGCHA, who is not only first Mongolian cosmonaut, but is also named way beyond 'dramatically'.

    In fact, here is a complete list of all 436 cosmo-/astronauts. Choose your favourite

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  24. Scaled Composites == Burt Rutan by Dante_J · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's appropriate to view this attempt win the X Prize with a full perspective of who Scaled Composites are, and where they came from.

    Burt Rutan has been thinking outside the box, from the halcyon days of the Vari-Eze & Long-Eze to the innovative Ares and the 'appear-to-thumb-your-nose-at-physics' Boomerang.

    His company; Scaled Composites, have not only survived the drastic slump of the light aircraft market in the 80's and 90' but made innovation their tradition - no small feat.

    IMHO, they deserve to succeed with this attempt of Spaceship One.

  25. John Carmack's opinion by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Informative
    From his latest Armadillo Aerospace news post:
    Speaking of next week... I think Space Ship One has good odds of success in the single-person-to-100km flight. I only see two real issues they may hit: The extended burn above the atmosphere may run into some control issues as the nozzle ablates, which will be hard to correct with only cold gas attitude jets. This would be a fairly benign failure, with the pilot just shutting off the main engine if he can't hold the trajectory. The dangerous part of the test will be the reentry with a significantly bigger drop than the previous test. At this point, I hope Burt has everything work out and he is able to make the X-Prize flights soon, because our prospects are pretty dim for getting everything working perfectly in the big vehicle in five months and having permission to fly it. I certainly don't want the insurance company to keep the prize money. If Space Ship One crashes, we will probably throw ourselves at an attempt, but it will be a long shot. No, I don't think any of the other teams are close.
    Best of luck to Mike and the Scaled Composite team.
  26. Re:To save everyone some time tomorrow ... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, they may have fucked up human spaceflight for the last 20 years or so, but give them credit for Spitzer, Hubble, Chandra, Spirit and Opportunity, Cassini, and all the other wonderful science they've done that I can't remember right now.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  27. I tend to disagree by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While they are huge and a lot of money is no doubt wasted internally, they're doing "one of a kind" and "state of the art" stuff, and this is always expensive.

    It's not exactly easy to quantify their impact on our daily lives, but if you watch TV, use cell phone and/or pager, or GPS you see your tax dollars at work pretty much. None of these things would be easy or even possible without NASA.

    Saying that NASA is too expensive is like saying that Wright brothers had wasted too much money on their first crappy airplane. Sure they did, but it was the FIRST working airplane. These days any fool can build a working airplane out of readily available parts. Back then it was state of the art.

    It sure did cost billions to send rovers to Mars, too. And it's not something anyone else will be able to achieve within the next decade.

    This costs a lot. Can NASA be improved? No doubt. Is the cost justified even given the current inefficiencies? It sure as heck is.

  28. ... you are a party pooper. by Teancum · · Score: 4, Informative

    and comparitively speaking a troll.

    Seriously. This topic has been debated so much that I swear that this is some astro turfing by Boeing.

    People are clamoring to get into space, and has been pointed out in many areas, even with this limited capability it still even has value for some research programs. This is a bridge builder, not a dead-end technology.

    As has been pointed out many times, the flight distance of the original flight of the Wright Flyer was less than the wingspan of a 747. Does that mean it was a dead-end technology? In some ways yes. The flying system of a Wright flyer relied upon wing warping that has not been revisited until very recently, and that only in experimental aircraft. The body shifting a skilled pilot with that aircraft had to do is now really only used with hang-gliders, and even then it is much more refined. Even the later version of the aircraft were really only able to travel about 100 miles, and only under conditions we would call today VFR.

    I do believe this is much more than symbolism. This is building infrastructure and bringing back the days of barnstorming, where pilots from WWI wanted to earn a few extra bucks, so they took an airplane (sometimes military surplus as well) and flew it around for "air shows" (usually just a simple demonstration... not the current rather extravagant versions we have now), and occasionally taking on a few passengers. With Spaceship One, this era of flight can be reborn, and it was during that critical era that aircraft technologies matured enough that passenger air service finally occured, ultimately leading to the DC-3 (a fun aircraft that I've actually flown in as a passenger on a regular commercial flight).

    Right now, there isn't really anything between the Space Shuttle and the ship currently being built by the "Rocket Guy" Brian Walker And even Mr. Walker, while it may eventually work, still isn't even done.

    Finally there is a system in place that can and will approve commercial space flight (as proved by Scaled Composites... they have the permit in hand). Technologies can and will be upgraded, and as just about every participant in the X-prize competition has been proving, you can get to space on less than the most exotic rockets and materials. Let's see where spaceflight can happen when you don't have contractors saying "it doesn't matter what the cost of building it is. Just get it up there." That leads to Shuttle launches that cost 1/2 Billion dollars each. This next flight of the shuttle will cost way over $1 Billion. I know that private companies could do that for considerably cheaper. Indeed, $1 Billion could cover the entire R&D budget, including FAA certification trials, of a whole launch system capable of putting seven astronauts at the ISS with extra cargo room for some expendable supplies. Why wouldn't NASA go that route instead? Just make an x-prize equivalent for the same money, and it will be going well before the shuttle is ready and flight-recertified itself. (Well... maybe, but then you might as well junk the entire shuttle program if an alternative program is close to launching).

    If you don't think a $1 billion carrot for orbital characteristics would work, you really havn't been paying attention to the X-prize, have you? And that is money that will more than likely be spend in the the next two years anyway, why not put it to more valuable use?

  29. Actually, he's the lucky one.... by Jetson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mike Melville is the ONLY member of the team who doesn't have to prepare two speeches....

  30. Ironic... Slashdot cheering for Microsoftie :) by dvk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Define Irony: all Slashdotters cheering for a company taht was (almost) fully funded by blood money of Evil Empire of Micro$oft.

    P.S. best of luck and successful flight to Mike and SS1 people.

    -DVK

    --
    "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  31. Melvin has already quit by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...after finding out his uniform has a red shirt.

    --

    --
    What would Bill Clinton do?