Slashdot Mirror
EU and US Agree on Galileo
An anonymous reader writes "The EU and USA have reached an agreement over the Galileo satellite positioning system, ending several years of negotiations." We had some good Galileo information in a story last month.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Can they still beat my honda hybrid ?
Third today ?
fp
The United States and the European Union have reached a final accord on resolving a transatlantic row over rival satellite positioning systems and will seal the deal at the US-EU summit this week in Ireland, officials from both sides said Monday. The agreement, reached after months of intense negotiations, builds on a framework deal reached by the two sides in February in Brussels to ensure compatibility and non-interference between the US Global Positioning System (GPS) and Europe's Galileo project, the officials said. "We have reached completion of a GPS-Galileo cooperation agreement," a US State Department official told reporters, calling the deal a "landmark" accord that would reap "profound benefits" for both the United States and Europe in the highly competitive satellite positioning market. The official, who spoke with two other US officials and an official from the European Commission, said the deal would be formally signed on Saturday at the US-EU summit in Dromoland Castle in Ireland by US Secretary of State Colin Powell and EU commissioner Loyola de Palacio. Irish Foreign Minister Brian Cowan, whose country currently holds the rotating EU presidency, will also sign the agreement, the official said. The February outline had resolved all but "legal and procedural" details which were finally hammered out over this past weekend, the officials said on condition of anonymity. "This is excellent news for both sides," the European Commission official said. The United States has been watching the development of Galileo warily for the past two years, fearing it could compromise US and NATO military operations which rely on the GPS system for navigation and combatant location and might interfere with a classified Pentagon positioning system known as M-Code. At one point, Washington suggested that the Galileo was an unnecessary rival to GPS that merely duplicated the US system. Despite the US reservations, Europe forged ahead with the project and Galileo is set to be operational by 2008 with 30 satellites encircling the globe in medium orbit. Late last year, the Europeans agreed to modify the modulation of Galileo signals intended for government use so they would not disrupt encrypted GPS signals to be used by the US military and NATO. Under the terms of the agreement, the two sides agreed on key points including: - a common signal structure for so-called "open" services, and a suitable signal structure for the Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS). - a process allowing improvements, either jointly or individually, of the baseline signal structures in order to further improve performances. - confirmation of inter-operable time and standards to facilitate the joint use of GPS and Galileo. Text and Picture Copyright © 2004 AFP. All other copyright © 2004 EUbusiness Ltd. All rights reserved. This material is intended solely for personal use. Any other reproduction, publication or redistribution of this material without the written agreement of the copyright owner is strictly forbidden and any breach of copyright will be considered actionable.
to add more layers of foil to your hats folks!
It's about time that the US give up on what was clearly becoming an impossible task: stopping the surge of demand for high accuracy civilian GPS. Kudos to them for reaching an agreement. :)
I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
... a Beowulf cluster of these?
Thank you.
After ReadingTFA and looking at some of the past stuff on this issue, there is still not a clear reason (at least for me) to duplicate GPS. Why does Europe want to spend all that money? Couldn't they put up other sats with the money, like Internet, etc? Is it just a control thing i.e. the EU doesn't want to be at the mercy of the US on this (wouldn't blame them)?
Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein
"We have reached completion of a GPS-Galileo cooperation agreement," a US State Department official told reporters, calling the deal a "landmark" accord that would reap "profound benefits" for both the United States and Europe in the highly competitive satellite positioning market.
Let me first say that it's nice to see the USA cooperating with Europe, but I have to wonder how much Blair's involvement in the Iraq war had to do with this agreement. Either way, it's nice to see the USA and other countries (like France) getting along.
- a common signal structure for so-called "open" services, and a suitable signal structure for the Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS).
This should be nice to see at work. I'd like to hear more about those open services, and what they will be exactly.
- a process allowing improvements, either jointly or individually, of the baseline signal structures in order to further improve performances.
Nice feature of the agreement. I think this will benefit all involved if nobody tries to improve their side into incompatibility.
- confirmation of inter-operable time and standards to facilitate the joint use of GPS and Galileo.
Does this mean they'll use the UNIX timestamp, with micro time enabled? Or is this something else entirely?
All in all, this almost appears like these governments are using the Open Source philosophy, or at least a small part of it. Hey, any step towards progress sounds great to me!
The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
As different systems evolve, maybe we will see more devices hit the civilian market and prices drop, which could mean a win-win for all consumers.
It's a win-win scenario because Galileo will greatly improve GPS accuracy and Galileo will benefit from the experience of the GPS system.
Too bad it took so long to reach an agreement and too bad the US never stopped to criticize a project that they are finally supporting.
Iraq: war to save the U
The Linux FAQ
:) This happens :)
Here's a list of some frequently asked and answered question here
and elsewhere that you may find useful in your quest to try linux.
Read these carefully before you decide to invest time in Linux, you
may find that you have better things you can do instead.
SECTION ONE - INSTALLATION
--
1.1 Q: I heard linux was easy to install, is it?
A: That depends on what distro you try. Most of them will have
trouble detecting all your hardware. Most new hardware devices
are not supported. If your lucky you might be able to find
something that someone threw together on the net. But that's
after spending a couple hours searching and probably won't take
advantage of your hardware to it's fullest capability.
1.2 Q: Once I get it installed, then what?
A: Then you get the joy of making sure everything is configured
right. Plan on a minimum of two hours per device to get it to
work. That's if the device is even supported.
1.3 Q: What happens if I'm in the middle of an install and the
installation freezes or just stops?
A: You get to reboot and start all over again.
every so often with Linux. It seems like it's buggy install
routines or something. Ain't Linux grand?
1.4 Q: What's the deal?! I installed Linux and it took up almost 2GB
hard drive space!
A: The Linux distros usually install a LOT of never-used programs
on the default install. You can pick and choose what you want,
but good luck figuring out what programs are needed and what is
useless, obscure tools. Linux usually installs stuff like 10
different editors, 12 different mail clients, and so on.
(more to come...)
SECTION TWO - CONFIGURATION
--
2.1 Q: What's with all these cryptic files?
A: All of Linux is configured with cryptic text files. Some of
the more user-friendly distros have configuration utilities
that claim to do it for you, but success with these works
sometimes and other times don't, so sometimes you have to
edit them by hand. With Linux's spotty reliability in UI
programming, you might as well get used to it.
2.2 Q: What is killall, HUP, ls, cat, rm, which, etc and why are
these programs telling me to do them? Arggg!!
A: These are command line programs that do things within the
system. It's what makes Linux a powerful OS for those that
are experienced with it. But it's also what makes it a pain
in the arse to use and inefficient as a desktop system. Who
wants to type all the time when they can just click?!
(more to come...)
SECTION THREE - APPLICATIONS
--
3.1 Q: Where can I get some programs to run on linux?
A: Good question. Because Linux doesn't have a large user base
on the desktop,(I think it's about 0.24%, less than 1%)
companies that make software won't write their programs for
Linux. There's a lot of community created programs out there,
and some are fairly good, but those are few and far between.
Most of the Linux software that tries to mimic it's windows
counterpart is substandard. It's usually slow and buggy and
early in development.
3.2 Q: I tried to install an RPM but I got 'failed dependencies', what
is that?
A: That's Linux's version of DLL hell. Different versions and
distros use different libraries. So unlike windows where
programs will run on many different versions, Linux programs
will fail if they're not made for your specific version.
3.3 Q: What is compiling and configure, make and make install? And
what is a makefile?
A: This is a way to
If people can get very accurate readings with Galileo anyway, where's the problem with supplying GPS at the same level of accuracy?
I can easily see products that incorporate both systems and pull coordinates from both at the same time - any GPS types here want to theorize on what hypothetical dual system devices can do for spatial accuracy in the field without having to do the whole fixed station - correct back at the lab stuff to get sub-meter resolutions?
Europe and the USA acting together could do this world a hell of a lot of good. Shame things have been so negative of late.
What I'd really like to see is co-operation on reducing arms sales globally. The USA and Europe are currently the world's biggest arms merchants. And the mad thing is, we're selling them to countries that could easily turn around and bite us on the ass. Saudi Arabia for instance. If they turn against us - which isn't outside the realms of possibility at the moment - they will be able to put up one hell of a battle because we've been selling them advanced weaponary for decades. Madness.
Seriously, I can understand Europe not wanting to be at the mercy of the US's whims for something that can become very important. But this is going to be a subscription service, and I can't imagine too many people are going to be willing to pay for something they already get free. Sure, they may have a slightly better accuracy, but I do not see that GPS is bad enough to be worth paying for slightly better service.
aQazaQa
- a common signal structure for so-called "open" services, and a suitable signal structure for the Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS).
- a process allowing improvements, either jointly or individually, of the baseline signal structures in order to further improve performances.
- confirmation of inter-operable time and standards to facilitate the joint use of GPS and Galileo.
This sounds like an effort towards standardisation. Something the EU and the rest of the world are pretty good at.
See ITU and 3GPP. And of course IETF. ;)
It is good to see that US is seeing the values and benefits of standardisation.
Hey, that's my password you are typing
My Despair, Inc. calendar indicates that today is an auspicious anniversary date for Galileo:
"Galileo recants absurd theory about the Earth revolving around the sun. (June 22, 1633)"
I guess the Vatican used it influence to get Galileo to revolve around the Earth!
that's why I wear a Faraday Cage Helmet.
Galileo used frequencies which were interleaved with the US military use of gps, meaning that the US couldn't jam galileo without jamming gps for their military at the same time. The US was adamant that this was unacceptable, that they wouldn't be able to disable galileo whenever they wanted, so the EU backed down, and promised to use frequencies which are more easily jammed.
By "Agree on Galileo", did they mean compensation for diong this.
This will be interesting because I think we will see dual band recievers. Often for one reason or another (interference most likely) GPS will give you incorrect position or non at all. However if you have a reciever that can switch over to galileo then this could greatly help all who use GPS. Just think of all the current applications currently using GPS. Shipping, personal aircraft, recreation, wardrivers! Suddenly WiGle will become a lot more accurate.
What could possibly go wrong?
"highly competitive satellite positioning market"
who else is in the market? dont you need at least two players actually in the market to call it a competitive one?
My impression from the article is that they want Galileo to interoperate with GPS. Does anyone know if this means that Galileo will work with existing GPS devices and that there will basically just be 60 GPS satelites in orbit? Or is it a completely seperate system that will require devices that support both? I'm hoping on the former.
-- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
Whats the US going to do? shoot them down? I don't think so, Europe could have done better than this rather than just give in sheepishly. Ive seen bush standing next to the queen he looks a kid standing next to the head-mistress, she could have come in there and said "i think we would quite like these frequencies" and then just walked out. One of the major points of galileo is that it is a system not to undermined by the us gps, it needs an equal footing to say "were here, you're not the only country in the world, get over it".
This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
I wonder how much this decision was spurred by the fact that, after yesterday's launch, the world's governments know
that if they don't provide GPS someone else will?
25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
Thank your president Bush for murdering another innocent man.
Iraqi insurgents have killed the South Korean civilian they were holding hostage, according to South Korean Foreign Ministry officials. A spokesman said the U.S. military informed the South Korean Embassy in Iraq that they had found a body that appeared to be that of an Asian male, the officials said.
The Galileo system will drive the US Military to develop better jamming systems. The military will require information dominance in future conflicts which will require the degredation of the Galileo signal without damaging the GPS signal.
Pod Six was jerks- Capt. Murphy
"A large sand hourglass timer, a sextant, a compass, several long pieces of rope and a reliable cabin boy to turn the hourglass over will be more than anyone ever needs to determine their position"
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
While far from having detailed knowledge of GPS, I understand that it estimates position based on the delays of clock signals from the satellites. The more data available for the calculation, the better the estimate. Inaccuracy in the timing signals results in worse estimates. I believe that the degraded civilian GPS accuracy exists because satellites provide a less accurate time to civilian GPS receivers. A combined receiver using signals from both systems would yield higher accuracy, and a receiver can appropriately weight the different systems according to their known accuracy to calculate a better position estimate.
Basically, it is not a matter of switching. For the best performance, use all available sources of information simultaneously.
More satellites = more information = better GPS
That anything important enough to turn off GPS for is important enough to reduce another constellation of satellites which you don't own, should the owners find themselves in an uncooprative frame of mind.
One part of the article almost gets it right,
Unfortunately, it looks like the EU caved in, so it will not be safe to assume that Galileo will be operational for the safety critical applications which it is designed for, such as air traffic control.
flossie
Write now. Defend liberty
Galileo is bad news for Europeans. Imagine a future where you will be forced to install Galileo devices in your cars (at your expense, of course) for the purpose of taxing you for every mile that you travel. We can all look forward to receiving an itemised account of our journeys at the end of every month. Think I'm exaggerating? I quote from BBC concerning Britain: "Transport Secretary Alistair Darling wants to set pay-as-you-drive charges using satellite tracking devices fixed to cars. " http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2972430.stm
Furthermore, with the accuracy of Galileo, it will then be possible to automatically issue speeding fines (lets say 1 fine incurred per every 5 seconds of speeding) etc - because Galileo will be accurate enough to know when you are on a main road, not a parallel side road etc. Won't that be fun on a long holiday journey - apart from your per-mile tax, you could incur $1000's in extra fines automatically! Better stay at home... Thanks, Galileo!
Come on, don't be naive - don't support Galileo just because the technology is "cool" or just because it is not American or some stupid reason like that.
We discussed RF tags, GPS, optical, ultrasonic. We discussed sensor costs ($50.00-100.00 per sensor seemed reasonable) and size (they need to be small and rugged). We discussed limiting the environment that the system would be used in to come up with a cheaper system. The system also couldn't interfere with other people outside the volume, nor did we want outside interference to be a problem. Non line-of-sight is also a priority (thus ruling out optical systems).
Thinking about it, GPS seems like the only real option - but it seems to have its own set of issues: speed is an issue (update rates aren't that fast - the more samples-per-second, the better), accuracy for civilian use is poor, and it may not work in the indoors environment we are envisioning the system being used in (which is part of the application).
It does have a pro side: Garmin makes small and cheap matchbook-sized OEM components which can send a serial stream to a microcontroller or PC via a serial port.
Can a differential GPS signal be put in the area to increase the accuracy just for the volume being measured?
Is there another solution? Because of the line-of-sight requirement, optical tracking solutions, while cheap and allowing for high-speed, large volume scanning - are not sufficient for our application.
Something else I have thought about, similar to RF tag location (which seems to have dodgy accuracy and speed), is using radio (active FM) sensors, and low-power FM transmitters placed in the four corners of the upper portion of the volume - and measuring gain to compute intersection spheres to get the position (but I doubt it would be accurate).
Can anybody tell me if such a system as needed, or technology, or white papers, etc - are available for such a system? I only need X/Y/Z coordinates, yaw/pitch/roll attitude measurements are not really needed.
It seems like large volume position tracking (with fast sampling, great accuracy, and multitudes of sensors) is something that either doesn't exist - or that would satisfy a major market. GPS seems like the only possibility - am I missing something?
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
Scene: American spy plane strays over Chinese airspace & then collides with Chinese interceptor sent to check it out; killing the Chinese pilot. American plane crash lands & it & it's crew are arrested by the Chinese.
:-|
Americans: "Give us our plane back!"
Chinese: "No."
Americans: "Give us our damn plane back; now!"
Chinese: "No; you were in our airspace & you have caused the death of one of our pilots. Perhaps you might like to apologise."
Americans: "Give it back, damn you, goddamit, give it back!"
Chinese: "No."
Americans: "Give it back, or we'll... we'll... Just give it back."
Chinese: "No."
Americans: "Look, we want our people to come home"
Chinese: "Say sorry then"
Americans: "Do you know who we are! Give it back!"
Chinese:
Americans: "sorry"
Chinese: "Pardon"
Americans: "SORRY alright!"
Chinese give back plane & aircrew.
I'll give you a billion dollars if you can prove this, because it quite simply isn't true. Take it from someone who used to work at 2SOPS (The military unit in charge of care and feeding of the satellites). To be honest, the only change in GPS performance over the last few years is to make it better!
Can you imagine the legal ramifications if the government was to degrade the performance selectively without notifying users properly? What if an airplane crashed?
Im not saying they shouldn't work together and build a better system. But alot of people said it was nice that for the USA to cooperate with Europe. I see it the other way around, its nice Europe cooperates with the USA. The USA has the system up and running already and Europe wants to piggy back un the USA GPS system. They need to use the same frequency so thats what I read. So if anything they got to work with the Americans.
Question?? The Americans and Europeans will be combining together into one system. But what happened to the Russian system? Why hasn't that gone commericial?
Title says it all. Then if we go in there and try to start it up again by force, we wind up shutting it down even worse because we blow it all up.
Doug Coulter, lost my pword.
Funny, how international law suddenly matters when it's in favor of US interests.
I love C++
Why bother a dual band receiver, when you can have one Galileo band receiver with more accuracy and lower price?
A dual band will be more accurate than a single one for obvious reasons. For the cheapest possible receiver, a Galileo receiver might be good enough in accuracy.
A major US worry has been that when the US goes to war, the US controls the availability of GPS.
Has that demand been dropped? Or is this language about Galileo "not disrupting" the US military signal a codeword for saying that the US military gets the same control over Galileo as it has over the US system?
The problem is not the accuracy of our weapons, it's our withholding of force. When the insurrection started in Fallujah by slaughtering four contracters and dragging their bodies through the street, we could have responded by simply leveling the city with a single bomb. No sensible person, however, thinks of this as a good solution. So, instead, we send in the Marines with the intention of engaging the "bad guys" one on one. In the process it takes longer and has less of a lasting effect on potential problems.
Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them