The users will be less happy - hell, some will be downright miserable - but they'll be more engaged,
You're right. However, users can choose not to participate on Facebook.
Personally, FB is an addressbook. As long as my addressbook can't downvote my ACCOUNT, who cares?
I don't post much and if I post something that I'm interested in and people downvote, I will ask them what's up because they are people I know. If their explanation is sketchy or rude, unfriend. Problem solved.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
People really need to start growing up and taking their own responsibility regarding their behaviour and mood. If your mood is bad, why is it bad? Are you worn out from running on the FB treadmill of clicking and being possessed by your friends list?
Every human being knows if they are getting sick from toxic things. FB's toxicity is SLOW. It won't kill you right away but it could if the depression or anxiety from whether you will get accepted or not gets bad enough.
Dopamine is what FB is after. It's proven that a 66% negative exposure will double the high you get when you get one upvote or comment.
But FB has had downvote installed for YEARS. It was just internal. If they say they didn't have it then why are so many user posts never seen by ANYONE?
Once the downvote feature is live, the FB feed can go back to realtime posts from all friends. Users could then just lower visibility on friends they care less about.
Or... maybe you exist in the multiverse where people who make fun of those who apply CAPITAL LETTERS for EMPHASIS must serve fries to those of us with a healthier outlook on what it takes to exist within civilized society?
But maybe you're right and MAYBE it's the other way around. Either way, I'll promise to be nice to you from now on if you agree to do the same!:)
I'll even friend u with mah 2digits of THOR'S HAMMER!!!:D
And how can you not understand that Blizzard still (rightfully, I might add) owns the assets?
I do understand it. However here is the real problem for Bliz in that regard: the private servers don't touch the assets. They are swarmed over a torrent and these are the same clients that BLIZ released to everyone already.
So the issue of private servers is NOT COPYRIGHT. The server only talks to the clients. YOU CANNOT REGULATE TALKING.:D
Bliz is trying to be ANTI-COMPETITIVE also. They started doing this stuff when players would leave the game to try other games when the content got boring. Then it just became a thing.
But really... Bliz are just being dicks about it. They should have originally just LISTENED to players and created PATCH SERVERS. We begged. We pleaded.
Now we get CLASSIC. Will it only be vanilla? Will it have some features that are great now but weren't in the game back then?
Private servers run different EXPANSIONS. Because Bliz took that feeling away from TBC and WOTLK. CATA garbage, MOP garbage.... and everything else pretty much after.
Even if Bliz starts to do classic mode (which they are) that still can't change the facts.
Bliz is wrong; they changed MAJOR aspects of the game to the extent that each expansion is like a GAME in and of itself, and not a VERSION of a GAME.
That is the final crux; Warcraft is many different games each time there is an expansion and the company DENIES PLAYERS the right of playing previous GAMES.
ie: TBC is warcraft but it is the game TBC. WOTLK is warcraft but it is the GAME WOTLK. When they bring out this next patch, LEGION will be ABANDONWARE.
These private servers are interacting with old clients that were released freely by Bliz. They claim the tables are nearly identical; the tables can easily be remapped.
If I was a judge that'd be my ruling: remap the table names and continue supporting ABANDONWARE; yes, private servers are running abandonware services; they designed the server stuff based on how the client expects to be communicated with.
DCMA has a very specific clause that blocks copyright on ABANDONWARE. Old warcraft patches aren't currently available and were unavailable for many years.
The servers are fine if there is an honest judge hearing the case.
Without a visionary in charge, the company cuts corners and is losing major ground in 2018. If I owned Apple stock it'd be sold today.
The best thing that could happen to Apple (and to Apple users) is if Elon Musk took control of Apple without him losing any influence at Tesla or SpaceX.
These companies are a good fit, really. Tesla would have Apple product design power and Apple could benefit from someone clearly on Steve Jobs' visionary and operational level.
Antitrust is whenever a business performs unfair/underhanded actions that result in hurting competitors or society in a way that is outside "the norm".
Well it could be argued then that political parties that lie in politics are doing the same thing to their competitors. Anything illegal could be lumped into this kind of strategy, no?
I think we'd solve a LOT of problems we're facing this way. Then each party locks into their platform and whoeverso is elected must execute each promise within their term, or face fines for political antitrust.
The Cult of Scientology could learn a thing or two from Uber. They appear very grandiose and their vision is sociopathic to some extent as well as narcissistic. I cannot imagine how a company that would gouge so hard and yet governments do nothing about it for some strange reason.
We hired a company to port our whole email system to Google. They showed up totally ready it seemed until I discovered that one of the director's email history packages was linked directly to a lower level book keeper's email simply because both of their names started with the letter C.
When I found out I hit the roof and called the guy in and had an emergency meeting. What other bungles had happened? They made promises to fix it.
A week later I get an email that it's all fixed and sure enough I went on the same computer and the package was there still and just partially disabled. The company had just done the minimal effort to knock off work early.
I tell you that this type of attitude is PREVALENT today in IT. Apathy.
How to fix? Better AI. Most of the stuff that can be done on computers can be done BY computers now... we only have to standardize and make things more uniform... without going extinct in the process!
Computers never experience apathy, or better yet, apathy can be programmed out... but all computers start there... apathetic.
To what extent will you make them care about humanity? All of you working in IT today have a shot at making this world better. Robots to serve us willingly. Expansion into the universe. We can't do it without them. The calculations to pilot ships out of our solar system require AI... to turn long journeys into safe and short ones.
The average person today has way more computing power in their cell phone than any government or corporation several decades ago - it hasn't changed the balance of power because governments and corporations *also* have radically increased their computing power, so it still dwarfs that controlled by individuals.
You're right. However, my more nuanced point that possibly wasn't explained well enough is that we need to start actively thwarting that stranglehold. Individualism is good to a point. Collectivism is good to a point. These ideals are trumped by Oligarchy because they control the collective and also the individual in ways that impact short term sales volume. We all need to start deciding which companies will survive and which ones will bankrupt out.
Personally I'd like to see Google, MSFT and Apple all go belly up. They are horrible companies now. Once they were each demonstrating some potential for moral good... but MSFT and Apple veered way off their message very early on. Google took a little while longer to start doing evil... but nonetheless, here we are.
What we need are more companies like Tesla. We need Tesla now more than ever to step up and compete directly against corruption of all forms. Corruption is killing our species.
Also, unless there are massive advances in satellite internet (which there very well could be), the reliance upon massive corporations who own backbones will always be there holding us back.
We need advanced technology to free us but the problem is that R&D projects are always going to be hamstrung by lobbyists and big corps.
The other big issue here is student debt, tbh. Take any PHD and unless they sell their soul to big corps, they are penniless. It reminds me of guys like Tesla, who despite all of his advancements for human technology, died alone and completely depressed and broke.
If we could eradicate reliance upon educational institutions for furthering human knowledge, we could then start seeing more and more open source solutions to big problems.
AI is going to somewhat solve this problem. The AI arms race will be all about computing power. As quantum computers advance and become more accessible, an average person will eventually be able to do way more than they could today, including research and also personal protection, on the same level as large corporations or governments. But even then, we have the problem that everything we use for computing is sourced by massive corporations. Sure, eventually 3d printing will make home computer construction a possibility, but that's a long ways away.
If the world starts embracing a fair universal income standard, we could also see huge advancements happening from basements and garages at a much higher rate than today but still these efforts will face roadblocks designed by massive companies like MSFT and Apple who prefer to keep us in the dark about most of their design and getting worse every day for selfishness.
Today? Students are caught within the politics of old boys networks. That also is a huge obstacle. That said, most of these kinds of problems could potentially change dramatically as we further deplete our natural resources and our governments continue to be terrible examples of human beings.
But if you look at Health Care, for example, in many countries where a proper health care standard exists where people aren't bankrupted by hospital bills, that is always a public service and never is there a case supporting 3rd party health care where citizens are better off short term or long term.
I guess if there was a state security element to health care, we might see worse results with a public health care system, but overall the private healthcare systems are just terribly corrupt.
Hobbit was a tale of small town heroes adventuring away, whereas LotR was an epic tale of the plight of humanity against malicious and demonic adversaries. Huge scale difference.
With this prequel, they could potentially create something on par with LotR in terms of scale. However, few of the original LotR actors would be involved in the prequel... so the success or failure is going to depend upon the direction, the story and the casting. The LotR franchise (including The Hobbit) are on thin ice though. If there is a whiff of any garbage getting into this new series, it will lose its audience faster than Sauron losing everything with the loss of his ring finger.
Ahh kindred spirits!! There simply is something about the feeling of a perfectly machined system. Typing was a real bitch when I first learned in grade 9. By the time I was at Uni, my typing outpaced everyone I knew. It was then I discovered coding.
Nobody better touch my corsair k95 mechanical keyboard.:)
The G-keys up the side are so good for binding keys for any games or productivity and it's mechanical so that's awesome too.
I'm on the fence about interfaces that watch your hand movements. They seem like they would be prone to repeat stress injuries far worse than mouse & keys. Still waiting to see what people come up with. Perhaps a kind of malleable putty that lets you bind your own commands in it to whatever shapes or keys you come up with?
I always friend people who impress the shit out of me. Chances are if you are a friend of one of those people, you can find other people who will also impress the shit out of you.
When we get our army of AI soldiers, we'll remember who our friends were. (and weren't)
- Love Canada
As long as it's not BAD FUCKING ROCKET, we'll be ok. =)
You're right. However, users can choose not to participate on Facebook.
Personally, FB is an addressbook. As long as my addressbook can't downvote my ACCOUNT, who cares?
I don't post much and if I post something that I'm interested in and people downvote, I will ask them what's up because they are people I know. If their explanation is sketchy or rude, unfriend. Problem solved.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
People really need to start growing up and taking their own responsibility regarding their behaviour and mood. If your mood is bad, why is it bad? Are you worn out from running on the FB treadmill of clicking and being possessed by your friends list?
Every human being knows if they are getting sick from toxic things. FB's toxicity is SLOW. It won't kill you right away but it could if the depression or anxiety from whether you will get accepted or not gets bad enough.
Dopamine is what FB is after. It's proven that a 66% negative exposure will double the high you get when you get one upvote or comment.
But FB has had downvote installed for YEARS. It was just internal. If they say they didn't have it then why are so many user posts never seen by ANYONE?
Once the downvote feature is live, the FB feed can go back to realtime posts from all friends. Users could then just lower visibility on friends they care less about.
I agree with you on this statement, but YOU had to remove part of the sentence for YOUR view to APPEAR valid.
Appearances are deceiving.
No. You have to add the rest of his sentence and then it becomes sufficient evidence. Stop gaslighting it. You are smelling up this place.
Or... maybe you exist in the multiverse where people who make fun of those who apply CAPITAL LETTERS for EMPHASIS must serve fries to those of us with a healthier outlook on what it takes to exist within civilized society?
But maybe you're right and MAYBE it's the other way around. Either way, I'll promise to be nice to you from now on if you agree to do the same! :)
I'll even friend u with mah 2digits of THOR'S HAMMER!!! :D
I do understand it. However here is the real problem for Bliz in that regard: the private servers don't touch the assets. They are swarmed over a torrent and these are the same clients that BLIZ released to everyone already.
So the issue of private servers is NOT COPYRIGHT. The server only talks to the clients. YOU CANNOT REGULATE TALKING. :D
Bliz is trying to be ANTI-COMPETITIVE also. They started doing this stuff when players would leave the game to try other games when the content got boring. Then it just became a thing.
But really... Bliz are just being dicks about it. They should have originally just LISTENED to players and created PATCH SERVERS. We begged. We pleaded.
Now we get CLASSIC. Will it only be vanilla? Will it have some features that are great now but weren't in the game back then?
No. 2.4.3 vs, 3.3.5...etc.
Private servers run different EXPANSIONS. Because Bliz took that feeling away from TBC and WOTLK. CATA garbage, MOP garbage.... and everything else pretty much after.
Even if Bliz starts to do classic mode (which they are) that still can't change the facts.
Bliz is wrong; they changed MAJOR aspects of the game to the extent that each expansion is like a GAME in and of itself, and not a VERSION of a GAME.
That is the final crux; Warcraft is many different games each time there is an expansion and the company DENIES PLAYERS the right of playing previous GAMES.
ie: TBC is warcraft but it is the game TBC. WOTLK is warcraft but it is the GAME WOTLK. When they bring out this next patch, LEGION will be ABANDONWARE.
I just hate how nobody UNDERSTANDS THIS. Dammit.
These private servers are interacting with old clients that were released freely by Bliz. They claim the tables are nearly identical; the tables can easily be remapped.
If I was a judge that'd be my ruling: remap the table names and continue supporting ABANDONWARE; yes, private servers are running abandonware services; they designed the server stuff based on how the client expects to be communicated with.
DCMA has a very specific clause that blocks copyright on ABANDONWARE. Old warcraft patches aren't currently available and were unavailable for many years.
The servers are fine if there is an honest judge hearing the case.
A lot more than that.
Thanks. That was funny.
Without a visionary in charge, the company cuts corners and is losing major ground in 2018. If I owned Apple stock it'd be sold today.
The best thing that could happen to Apple (and to Apple users) is if Elon Musk took control of Apple without him losing any influence at Tesla or SpaceX.
These companies are a good fit, really. Tesla would have Apple product design power and Apple could benefit from someone clearly on Steve Jobs' visionary and operational level.
Something like this or similar: https://www.marketwatch.com/st...
If only, AC. If only...
Antitrust is whenever a business performs unfair/underhanded actions that result in hurting competitors or society in a way that is outside "the norm".
Well it could be argued then that political parties that lie in politics are doing the same thing to their competitors. Anything illegal could be lumped into this kind of strategy, no?
I think we'd solve a LOT of problems we're facing this way. Then each party locks into their platform and whoeverso is elected must execute each promise within their term, or face fines for political antitrust.
The Cult of Scientology could learn a thing or two from Uber. They appear very grandiose and their vision is sociopathic to some extent as well as narcissistic. I cannot imagine how a company that would gouge so hard and yet governments do nothing about it for some strange reason.
We hired a company to port our whole email system to Google. They showed up totally ready it seemed until I discovered that one of the director's email history packages was linked directly to a lower level book keeper's email simply because both of their names started with the letter C.
When I found out I hit the roof and called the guy in and had an emergency meeting. What other bungles had happened? They made promises to fix it.
A week later I get an email that it's all fixed and sure enough I went on the same computer and the package was there still and just partially disabled. The company had just done the minimal effort to knock off work early.
I tell you that this type of attitude is PREVALENT today in IT. Apathy.
How to fix? Better AI. Most of the stuff that can be done on computers can be done BY computers now... we only have to standardize and make things more uniform... without going extinct in the process!
Computers never experience apathy, or better yet, apathy can be programmed out... but all computers start there... apathetic.
To what extent will you make them care about humanity? All of you working in IT today have a shot at making this world better. Robots to serve us willingly. Expansion into the universe. We can't do it without them. The calculations to pilot ships out of our solar system require AI... to turn long journeys into safe and short ones.
You're right. However, my more nuanced point that possibly wasn't explained well enough is that we need to start actively thwarting that stranglehold. Individualism is good to a point. Collectivism is good to a point. These ideals are trumped by Oligarchy because they control the collective and also the individual in ways that impact short term sales volume. We all need to start deciding which companies will survive and which ones will bankrupt out.
Personally I'd like to see Google, MSFT and Apple all go belly up. They are horrible companies now. Once they were each demonstrating some potential for moral good... but MSFT and Apple veered way off their message very early on. Google took a little while longer to start doing evil... but nonetheless, here we are.
What we need are more companies like Tesla. We need Tesla now more than ever to step up and compete directly against corruption of all forms. Corruption is killing our species.
Passion is not a replacement for logic.
Also, unless there are massive advances in satellite internet (which there very well could be), the reliance upon massive corporations who own backbones will always be there holding us back.
We need advanced technology to free us but the problem is that R&D projects are always going to be hamstrung by lobbyists and big corps.
The other big issue here is student debt, tbh. Take any PHD and unless they sell their soul to big corps, they are penniless. It reminds me of guys like Tesla, who despite all of his advancements for human technology, died alone and completely depressed and broke.
If we could eradicate reliance upon educational institutions for furthering human knowledge, we could then start seeing more and more open source solutions to big problems.
AI is going to somewhat solve this problem. The AI arms race will be all about computing power. As quantum computers advance and become more accessible, an average person will eventually be able to do way more than they could today, including research and also personal protection, on the same level as large corporations or governments. But even then, we have the problem that everything we use for computing is sourced by massive corporations. Sure, eventually 3d printing will make home computer construction a possibility, but that's a long ways away.
If the world starts embracing a fair universal income standard, we could also see huge advancements happening from basements and garages at a much higher rate than today but still these efforts will face roadblocks designed by massive companies like MSFT and Apple who prefer to keep us in the dark about most of their design and getting worse every day for selfishness.
Today? Students are caught within the politics of old boys networks. That also is a huge obstacle. That said, most of these kinds of problems could potentially change dramatically as we further deplete our natural resources and our governments continue to be terrible examples of human beings.
But if you look at Health Care, for example, in many countries where a proper health care standard exists where people aren't bankrupted by hospital bills, that is always a public service and never is there a case supporting 3rd party health care where citizens are better off short term or long term.
I guess if there was a state security element to health care, we might see worse results with a public health care system, but overall the private healthcare systems are just terribly corrupt.
Hobbit was a tale of small town heroes adventuring away, whereas LotR was an epic tale of the plight of humanity against malicious and demonic adversaries. Huge scale difference.
With this prequel, they could potentially create something on par with LotR in terms of scale. However, few of the original LotR actors would be involved in the prequel... so the success or failure is going to depend upon the direction, the story and the casting. The LotR franchise (including The Hobbit) are on thin ice though. If there is a whiff of any garbage getting into this new series, it will lose its audience faster than Sauron losing everything with the loss of his ring finger.
Security has infinite bypasses. As soon as a new layer is added another method appears to circumvent. Life, uh, finds a way.
https://media.giphy.com/media/...
Ahh kindred spirits!! There simply is something about the feeling of a perfectly machined system. Typing was a real bitch when I first learned in grade 9. By the time I was at Uni, my typing outpaced everyone I knew. It was then I discovered coding.
Nobody better touch my corsair k95 mechanical keyboard. :)
The G-keys up the side are so good for binding keys for any games or productivity and it's mechanical so that's awesome too.
I'm on the fence about interfaces that watch your hand movements. They seem like they would be prone to repeat stress injuries far worse than mouse & keys. Still waiting to see what people come up with. Perhaps a kind of malleable putty that lets you bind your own commands in it to whatever shapes or keys you come up with?
I always friend people who impress the shit out of me. Chances are if you are a friend of one of those people, you can find other people who will also impress the shit out of you.
Hello friend of a friend! ;)