Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Music/Media Player Roundup?

robmueller asks: "Like most of you here on Slashdot, I've got my entire music collection on my PC, and would like to share it around the house to at least my lounge room stereo. While the AirPort Express is still a month away (mid July), and the lack of a remote control seems like a problem for a stereo away from the computer, there's a number of other devices out there already; D-Link DSM-320, Squeeze Box, Actiontec, Virtuoso MC-500 (uh... looks like the Actiontec), and a standard 'we hooked it up for 5 minutes' review of several more devices here. However, I want to hear from people who have actually used one, and what they liked, didn't like, ease of use, audio only, is audio & video useful? etc. So who's using one of these things?"

13 of 47 comments (clear)

  1. Why spend the extra money by sporktoast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a streaming setup, you need a much more expensive computer device to receive anything. FM radios are a dime a dozen. You are unlikely to listen to more than one stream at once.

    What you want is something like this . Plug it into the sound-out of a cabled media computer (or, heck, a Wireless Music/Media Player, if you feel the need to comply with the latest buzzwords). Put the computer wherever you have the space (closet, basement, attic) and keep your stereo clutter-free. Tune the FM transmitter to a free space low on the dial (89.3 or so), and listen to your streams on any stereo in/around/outside the house. So long as you aren't stepping on any other nearby frequencies, and the reception drops off significantly enough before you get more than a few houses away, you shouldn't have much worry about complaints.

    Or you can drag your Wireless Music/Media Player out into the backyard the next time you want to host a barbecue. Of course, "wireless" doesn't usually apply to power cables and wall warts.

    --
    In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    1. Re:Why spend the extra money by naden · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because the quality of those FM transmitters isnt the best.

      And I'm sure as you know all Slashdot readers have $100K stereo equipment which is too high end for crappy MP3, AAC or FM transmitters.

      So I'm sorry .. if its not streaming OGG it just ain't cutting the mustard.

      --
      Funtage Factor: Purple
  2. The fact still remains .. by naden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Songs bought from iTMS can only be played on your stereo using Airport Express.

    So I'm happy to wait the three weeks until it arrives, as iTMS + Airport Express + Bluetooth Phone + Sailing Clicker + Powerbook is just ubercool.

    Or in other words: "It really whips the llama's ass"

    --
    Funtage Factor: Purple
  3. HP DMR EW-5000 by prostoalex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bought an HP Digital Media Receiver from Buy.com on their special sale for $100. Wireless connectivity, composite audio, S-Video, what more can one want?

    Well, turns out, a lot. For one, the data was not exactly streamed through the unit, which I properly connected to my stereo system and TV. The local MP3 files and local JPEG pictures was the only thing that HP Receiver played, so if you wanted to broadcast a Shoutcast stream or Real Video stream, you were out of luck.

    None of the DRMed files worked either, so two WMAs that I have purchased from Napster would have to be ripped to CDs, re-ripped into MP3s and then loaded onto a local PC with wireless connection for that HP Media Receiver to pick up.

    I returned the item for a refund after a few days. Waste of money. Until full-blown audio streaming and any kind of video playback is supported together with multiple formats (OGG including), there's little incentive in getting a Media Receiver when a WiFi-enabled laptop plugged into stereo and TV will do the job even better.

  4. Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by tieke · · Score: 5, Informative

    I looked at all those options as well, and decided that with the way the market is going, there will be a more kick-arse version of anything I buy within 6 months. (I'm not just talking standard technology advances better, I'm talking everyone getting into the field better)

    I know that you specified wireless, (which I considered, as I already have an 802.11g AP plugged into my network) but for now I have ended up getting a Hauppage MediaMVP and putting in a run of cat5 to it.

    The MediaMVP is basically just a small remote-control driven, network-connected set-top box which plays content from a server on a win2000/xp machine. Linux drivers have been made though, and the built in mpeg decoder makes it a good combo for the standard Hauppage PVR cards.

    On the positive side, the sound quality is good, and the price is hard to beat ($99 retail, can be found for less).

    Unfortunately the interface is shit. Very basic mp3 browsing - can move through the directories and playlists on your shared computer and select songs/playlists/directories. Unfortunately, there is no real skipping while playing several songs - the default setup if you choose a song is to play that one song and then stop. You can choose to play all songs in a directory, (shuffled if you wish), but it deosn't let you skip songs - if you choose another song, it just plays that one. The "skip" button just moves to the next page on the directory listing - an even worse interface on this first generation device than on my other first generation devices from preceding years.

    The gui should however get better with firmware releases - already the latest firmware lets you add streaming radio stations (although not realaudio) and play divx files (although these have to be transcoded by your server). The MVP internals run on linux as well, so there are good possibility of future improvements.

    As I said - there's quite a few similar devices coming out at the moment (eg this buffalo one ), and in six or seven months there will undoubtedly be something much better - but if I really want one of those I can buy it then, and I consider $99 a good price for 6-7 months of music.

    1. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just bought the Hauppage MediaMVP yesterday and tested it on my 802.11b network. It works fine that way for music and pictures, but, of course, that isn't quite enough bandwidth for video, so my MPEG-2 video recorded by my TV card stutters.

      I *might* be able to get it to work decently if I upgrade to 802.11g (which I'm planning to do anyway, soon), but instead I'm going to run cat5 from my computer room to living room which I thought I would never have to do since I went wireless.

      I used the out-of-the-box software for the MediaMVP just long enough to get really annoyed by it (about 10 minutes), then went to their website and downloaded the latest beta. Tons of improvement, but it still has quite a ways to go. As the parent poster said, navigating mp3's is a real pain -- if you are 75% down a long list of directories, open a subdirectory, then hit back, you are at the top of the long list again. One thing they added in the beta was using the numeric buttons as percentages of the list, so the '8' key moves you 80% of the way down the list. Better, but a "remember where you were" would be so much nicer.

      I suppose that what I really need to do is spend some time on my PC organizing directories and playlists so they can be easily navigated remotely.

      I haven't tried the Internet radio feature in the beta, but I'm dragging cable this weekend so I can give the video streaming a good test.

      For the record, I am using an ATI TV Wonder card on my PC hooked up to basic cable and the Beyond TV 3 PVR software for recording and I'm very happy with that setup.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    2. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just a followup on my own post -- don't know if anyone cares or not...

      I decided to not run the cat5 and instead upgraded to 802.11g and rearranged my setup. Video streaming is working great so far, even when someone is watching TV or browsing on the server computer. The MediaMVP UI still sucks, but it does what it needs to do and the picture quality on my 42" rear projection HDTV is acceptible (not archive quality, but definitely watchable quality). Any problems with quality are purely due to the source recordings and not to the MediaMVP box as the same files burned to DVD look exactly the same.

      I also set-up the Internet radio functions with a random selection of stations found on Shoutcast and was quite impressed with the audio quality, but then I'm no audiofile and am easy to please. They certainly sound better through my surround sound system than they do on my PC speakers. It can't handle RealAudio streams and the station must have a single URL that directly accesses the stream (which can be hard to find for some stations, the Shoutcast ones you can just right-click on play or listen and add the station to the MMVP favorites share).

      A few more gripes about the MediaMVP UI. There are no useful status indicators (connecting, buffering, etc.), so when you select a radio station, you just have to wait 5-30 seconds to see if it connects. If it doesn't, you never know, you just have to try another one. Secondly, the beta SW I'm running has hung up twice and got in a weird state once (could navigate, but couldn't play anything). Power on/off "fixed" it both times. The colors and contrast are a bit harsh, too, so I worry a bit about burn-in. It does have a screensaver, but I'm paranoid. When listening to MP3 or Internet radio, I just start it playing, then turn off the TV...

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  5. What would be really awesome by foidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would be something that not only streams music, but can also stream karaoke! Think about it, it would be so awesome if you could go to the iTunes music store from your laptop, d/l a song(normal version, plus karoake file with lyrics and timing, and even music video if appropriate, or you could do like the karaoke bars do in Japan and just put generic videos of people on the screen), then send it up on your bigscreen tv(and nice speakers) using an airport express kind of device. The sales of songs to drunk people on the iTunes music store would go through the roof! I mean, if you really want a song, what are you going to do, go to a p2p network to try to find a legit karaoke version or just go to the iTMS(since you will probably already have iTunes open) and buy the song.
    Come on Steve, lead the pack!

  6. OSS homebrew... by emphatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    i'm in the same boat. i have a huge collection of digital music (ripped all my CD's) that i want to play in different rooms. bonus points for my backyard patio for BBQ's.

    here is what i'm going to use:

    1) cheap laptops
    2) cheap wifi cards
    3) XMMS
    4) netjuke (for the main 'streaming' app)
    5) LIRC (linux infrared remote control)
    6) XMMS-LIRC plugin

    this way, i'll have a remote to control xmms from, i have access to all my tunes in one place (not in a separate database for each remote device) AND the laptops can act as photo frames when i'm not listening to tunes (screensaver w/ photos, etc).

    i've looked into every single one of those devices that we keep seeing and they all have either limiting features, or a high cost. also, many required a custom streaming app to be used on the main server application.

    i like netjuke, but if i don't like it, i can use some other web-based tool. i like xmms, but if i don't like it, i could use something else. control man... control :)

  7. Slimdevices' Squeezebox by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 3, Informative

    As I've mentioned before, I purchased one of these recently and I can't recommend it more highly. It plays every music format I can think of, using the server computer to resample obscure ones into a format it understands, on the fly. It can read and save Winamp playlist files, for convenience, and it can play streamed content off of the Internet. There are even plugins written that allow you to browse the Shoutcast.com streams and Internet Music Archive, and play those streams, all from the player's interface. And yes, the server software can interface with iTunes, and I imagine can play iTunes-purchased songs.

    My only gripe is that the software seems less stable than it could be under all circumstances, but I run the nightly builds, so I can't really complain. =)

    I think the thing that sets the Squeezebox apart from many of the other devices out there is its interface. Although a computer is required for the backend, you need never actually deal with the SlimServer program if you don't want to; almost every bit of configuration and management can be done from the player, with the remote. This is a big selling point for me, as it completely eliminates the need for me to have any electronics around aside from the Squeezebox itself and the stereo.

    I should also mention that the software supports synchronization between different players, and that there's a GUI Java player (SoftSqueeze) that can run on any computer so that you can synchronize that computer with any number of hardware players. I know this is functional because I did it myself, just this week while I was doing chores around the house.

    Anyway, that's my reasoning. I love the thing, and would gladly buy it again in a heartbeat. There are going to be many networked media players, but for me, the interface and the server software definitely tip the scales in favor of the Squeezebox.

  8. To TV or not to TV by grefft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem that I've found with most of the remote streaming devices is that they need to have a television nearby to control them. As a person who finds television mindnumbing and don't even own one, is there a good streaming product that doesn't need a TV at all? Perhaps one with it's own graphics display to show cover art when browsing?

  9. Squeezebox by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have several of the predecessor device to the squeezebox, the SliMP3. It's great. Even has a high WAF -- my wife asked me to put one in her office too.

    Oh yea, it can read your iTunes DB so it knows your songlists and shoutcast radio stations and the like. The server software is all GPLed so you can tweak it (the guys at slimdevices integrate lots of user-contributed changes). It can't play your iTMS songs though unless you know how to use google. For that, your only alternative is the Apple device.

    They're easy to use, quite reliable, and plug straight into the stereo. What more is there to say about it?

    All in all, a real winner.

  10. Prismiq by stinkwinkerton · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use the prismiq and like it a lot. Unfortunately, you have to have a television hooked up to it, and the media interface isn't the best in the world. However, they run linux on it, it is wired or wireless (your wireless card), they publish the source, it can play internet radio, rhapsody, mp3, slideshows, divx, vobs, and other .avi, you can program your own plugins for decoding, and is, in general, pretty cool. And surf the web. From what I understand, the PC does most of the transcoding then sends it to the media player. Bunch of good reviews from various magazine sources. Check out www.prismiq.com and www. prismiq.org. And, no, I don't work for the company.

    --
    "Look! There! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!" --Buckaroo Banzai