Slashdot Mirror


ISS Spacewalk Cut Short

RobertB-DC writes "The spacewalk that was intended to replace a balky power supply ended almost before it started, according to Spaceflight Now's Mission Status Center play-by-play. The Russian Orlan spacesuit worn by US astronaut Mike Fincke developed a problem with its oxygen supply (!), forcing both spacewalkers back to the airlock after less than 15 minutes. Mission control and the ISS crew are still debating what to do next."

17 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. The answer is simple... by Animaether · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just patch the leak with putty!
    NASA: Astronauts to get putty for small holes

    Though I have to question these NASA budgetcuts.. AstroPutty

  2. Russian Spacesuits by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FWIW, I thought it was kind of interesting that these spcesuits are not able to carry jetpacks, like the US ones, should the tether break. Pretty risky if you know you don't have a back up if it breaks. Although it's even more risky not having air.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Russian Spacesuits by jusdisgi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know...the tether breaking sounds pretty unlikely; has it ever happened before? I mean, rock climbers don't carry jetpacks either....

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    2. Re:Russian Spacesuits by azmatsci · · Score: 5, Informative
      Teathers have never broken when connected to a astronaught-type in orbit. Satellites have done experiements with teathers before where those have broken but it was a completly different environment.

      As for jet packs, the airlocks are not able to handle them. They would need to be mounted outside, but they would deteriorate, so they would need a locker.....and the problems keep mounting.

      --
      I stole this sig.
  3. Russian space suits... by Shoeler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are widely regarded as rugged, tough suits. However, I understand they lack many of the safeguards that their American counterparts have. Anyone know if this is true or my bad recollection? I saw a show on the Discovery channel some time ago that compared the Russian and American space programs. It spoke of how the American program uses multiple redundant systems, while the russians favor rugged, proven gear. It also spoke of how the russians bettered their space program by launching many rockets, knowing their failure rate would be high, but learning from those failures. In comparison the American program launched fewer and did lots of R&D between them.

    Personally I would want to be on the rocket that had a lower percentage of failure and thus would want the American space suit, but perhaps I'm biased. ;)

    1. Re:Russian space suits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The American suits have been used and are preferred for spacewalks (the US airlock recycles the air which is useful).

      Unfortunately when they tested the US suits shortly after getting onboard they found problems (air bubbles in the cooling system IIRC) so they had to use the Russian equipment. This meant a much more dangerous/risky spacewalk but it was the only working kit they had.

      Now it is a question of which kit they can fix/replace first.

  4. Debate by jusdisgi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mission control and the ISS crew are still debating what to do next.

    Mission control: Go back out there!

    ISS crew: No!

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  5. uh!? by mirko · · Score: 5, Funny

    IIS had problems, now it is ISS, I just hope that SSI are okay.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  6. What to do next by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    a problem with its oxygen supply (!), forcing both spacewalkers back to the airlock after less than 15 minutes. Mission control and the ISS crew are still debating what to do next." It should be obvious - take a deep breath!

    Seriously, maybe its time to think of something along the space pods in 2001 with their manipulators. They were cool because they were a realistic solution.

    1. Re:What to do next by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, right after they install a pod bay on the ISS. :) Since a space pod's manipulators would be controlled by an astronaut inside, why bother bringing along the astronaut? A pod could be much simpler if it didn't need life-support and all its mass. It could even be operated by the ground, although delay might be an issue for fine manipulation.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. Punctuation by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Russian Orlan spacesuit worn by US astronaut Mike Fincke developed a problem with its oxygen supply (!), forcing both spacewalkers back to the airlock after less than 15 minutes.

    Well, thank God for that parenthetical exclamation point to let me know it was a problem.

  8. Look out! by leenoble_uk · · Score: 5, Funny

    They just moved indoors to avoid being hit by David Beckham's penalty kick.

  9. ugh! by BaDunkaDunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    ya think they'd a been smart enough to take some friggin DUCT TAPE with 'em up there!... astronauts... indeeeeeed....

  10. Hal? by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Funny

    They weren't out to fix the AE-35 unit by any chance I hope.

  11. Re:Another argument against manned spaceflight by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This again begs the question: Do we really need manned spaceflights where unmanned, robotic spaceflights can do the job just as well and at a much lower cost?

    Do we really have any need to go down a concrete path at 60 miles per hour in a tin box just to see the latest Adam Sandler film? Perhaps we should hide away in our homes for all except the most urgent business.

    I know someone is going to mod that down as flamebait or mod me as a troll but the bottom line is that we risk lives everyday for much much less. These guys and gals know the risks and except them willingly. Frankly I'd do it, and if I were to die you can sleep well at night knowing that I'd rather have given my life for a decent contribution than dying at the age of 90 after a lifetime of pandering to idiots who are too lazy to try to reboot their PCs before calling the help desk over what are often non-issues.

    And besides, perhaps the robot aspect is cheaper but what about the time in development? Tell me to use a screwdriver, it'll take you 3 seconds and I'll get the job done and be able to work my way thru most unexpected problems. Do that to a robot and it takes hours if not days to tell it the task and when it encounters a problem it takes more time to figure out how to tell the stupid thing to overcome the issue. And good luck getting any input back from the machine that may help explain the problem.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  12. Abandon in place by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This stupid white elephant needs to be put down. It was a stupid idea in the first place.....Why? Because it is in the hands of two (or more) governments who know nothing about how to run a business. Put the space program in the hands of private businesses and watch how well it works. How much did it cost NASA to put the first American in space versus how much it costs the Rutan group to put the first private human in space? With cost overruns, stupidity, etc.....it's no wonder NASA can't hardly do anything right anymore. I use to be a big fan of NASA in the "golden age" but not anymore. They don't have a goal....in the old days it was beat the Soviets to the moon, since then it's been stumbling to find something to do to keep the gravy train of money funneling to it's doors. A lot of good scientific research has been funneled from NASA to the private sector, but that has pretty much stopped, since they can't do anything right anymore. The shuttle was for building the space station, and the space station was for the shuttle to bring people to it. Hardly a worthy goal if you ask me.

  13. Wardrobe malfunction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the correct term for what happened a "Wardrobe malfunction"