Slashdot Mirror


Impoverish a Spammer Today

esj at harvee writes "Recently the Camram project released its latest version of a hybrid sender-pays anti-spam system. The project has proven that sender-pays works and has demonstrated how to make it work with existing e-mail systems. Camram has developed hybrid sender-pays techniques that scale down to the desktop and up to the enterprise. It's a completely decentralized system that can put spam-fighting power in the hands of individuals. It gives you control of not only the current generation of spam, but also any future commercial spam -- why replace Viagra ads from a scam artist with Viagra ads from Pfizer?"

3 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The problem is... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I dont consider a white list to be a "good" method. For one thing, most spam I get is claiming to be from a known source (ie someone who knows me has a worm and is spamming from their address book). So you cant just filter by sender. Also, white lists dont deal with the fact that a lot of email is from first time corresponders such as online retail outlets.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  2. Re:What happens... by Jim+McCoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Others have mentioned that this will make it easier for the user to notice that their PC has been hijacked, but another side-effect is that it will perform a rate-limiting service on that zombie. If each zombie can only send 100 messages an hour instead of 100,000 then that is another important benefit.

  3. Re:Hobbiests by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the next spam zombie worm will just whitelist everyone?