Slashdot Mirror


Fahrenheit 9/11 Discussion

xerid writes "I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 last night, and the theatre was packed & sold out for each showing. Today, I read on Michael Moore.com about the movie breaking records. However, what I haven't seen was coverage on Slashdot, about the movie's opening day." I saw the film on friday and was really impressed. But while it speaks much truth, and has many funny parts as well as truly heartbreaking ones, I don't know how many votes it will sway. But since there is very little other news so far today, why not talk amongst yourselves!

16 of 3,265 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Moore's history of dishonesty by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cato receives funding from the oil industry, and had Fox News head honcho Rupert Murdoch as a director. Now that's what I call fair and balanced reporting!

  2. Response to Hitchens by Sanity · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a pretty good response to this article here. Not sure if Moore himself has responded yet.

  3. Re:Truth? by div_2n · · Score: 5, Informative

    While there is a bit of this movie that isn't really informational and is meant to appeal to emotion, there are some VERY disturbing pieces of infomration given:

    -21 members of the Bin Laden family were flown out of the country on special chartered flights on September 13 while all other flights were grounded. They were NEVER questioned on Osama at all and there is no clear reason why they were given free flight out without interrogation.

    -Prior to the war in Afghanistan, there were plans on the board to put in a gas pipeline through the country. Members of the Taliban visited Texas regarding the issue. The project was abandoned after the US bombed Afghanistan in 1999. After the recent war, Hamid Karzai was made the leader. The papers were signed giving the green light for the pipline. Prior to being the leader, Karzai was a consultant for one of the companies trying to build the pipeline.

    -Prior to 9/11, Bush had been on vacation over 40 percent of his time in office. During one of those vacations, he was given a security brief that outlined Osama bin Laden training his agents to fly planes in the US as tools of terror. Condi Rice talked about that memo in some of the investigations. Nothing was done about it.

    -Pre 9/11, many Bush administration officials are ON THE RECORD as saying that Saddam Hussein didn't have any weapons of mass destruction nor was he capable and wasn't a threat. AFTER 9/11, their tune was exactly opposite. Why?

    -Condi Rice is on camera saying "There is a definite connection between Iraq and 9/11." We now know that isn't true.

    There are many more points he made that I think MUST be addressed by the Bush administration. If they cannot dispute them, then in my opinion any person with one ounce of thought ability should never consider voting for him.

  4. Sports writer says: ... most powerful movie ... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not just the fact that Michael Eisner of Disney did not want Disney to distribute the film. Fahrenheit 9/11 won the highest prize, the Palm D'Or, at the recent Cannes competition! It is only the second documentary in history to do so. The film received the longest standing ovation in the history of the Cannes festival!

    This story in Fahrenheit 9/11 is relevant to Slashdot because the situation is far worse than Michael Moore says. I put together links to 2 other movies and 35 books that say there is an extremely serious problem: Unprecedented Corruption: A guide to conflict of interest in the U.S. government. Slashdotted? Try:
    http://www.hevanet.com/peace/usgovcorruption.htm. Michael Moore is reporting things EVERY Slashdot reader and every person in the world needs to know. It they get their way, you WILL become poorer.

    People like the movie because they like the movie! Fahrenheit 9/11 is selling out everywhere. Today in the Sports [!] section of the Kansas City Star is an example. The writer, Jason Whitlock, says:

    "Fahrenheit is the most powerful movie I've ever seen. Not even Moore's heavy-handed, pro-Democrat slant could undermine his indictment of Bush's reaction to 9/11. The movie appears to have struck a chord with American moviegoers. I spent all Friday afternoon and evening driving from North Carolina theater to North Carolina theater trying to see the movie. The showings were all sold out. I snagged one of the last tickets to a mid-day Saturday showing."

    Judging from the stories, other reactions in the U.S. are even more enthusiastic than this. A theater with 10 screens in Portland, Oregon scheduled 18 showings for today, Sunday, June 27, 2004, in reaction to the movie's popularity on Friday and Saturday.

    (Reading the Kansas City Star commentary, 'Fahrenheit' powerful, persuasive, requires free registration. Be wary, the company says it will send you email, so you might give a trash email address, or use a free trash email address at Mailinator.com or DodgeIt.com. Judging from the registration information, if you give a real postal mail address, they may send you unwanted mail, also.)

    The movie is breaking all-time theater records all over the United States.

    1. Re:Sports writer says: ... most powerful movie ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know, technically, there were more americans than any other nationality in the jury...

      Quentin TARANTINO, USA (president of Jury)
      Benoît POELVOORDE, Belgium
      Edwidge DANTICAT, USA
      Emmanuelle BEART, France
      Jerry SCHATZBERG, USA
      Kathleen TURNER, USA
      Peter VON BAGH, Finland
      Tilda SWINTON, UK
      Tsui HARK, Vietnam

      Basically, 44.4% of the jury was of american origin (55.5% if you include the brit) while 11.1% was french. As such, your argument that the film won a prize because it was a French film festival holds no ground.

  5. Re:Dishonest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    and here is a rebuttal to Hardy Law.

  6. Re:Dishonest by Bri3D · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK... He claimed Bush let some Bin Laden family members out of the country during the air lockdown. This is not true. They were clearly let out of the country after the air restrictions were lifted. And yes, they are the same Bin Laden family is the infamous Osama belongs to, but just because one family member is evil doesn't have to mean the rest are evil.

    As a side note, the Bin Ladens are a family of oil tycoons, just the people Bush would want to slowly corrupt.

  7. Re:What out for Michael Moore lawsuits through.... by DragonMagic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, libel isn't protected by the First Amendment and isn't free speech. If someone can truthfully say something bad about the film or Moore, there's little he can do about that.

    However, if someone's going to go out and say that Moore made up the camcorder version of the kids' reading in Florida, or that it happened on another day and Moore spliced it in under lies, that's what I believe Moore is saying is reason for a lawsuit.

    Remember, slander and libel are *NOT* protected free speech in America.

    --

    Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
  8. Re:Personally, I thought differently... by rjung2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, I consider every single news flash regarding SCO more importan than a movie that you believe will make a fundamental impact on the future of how politics are played out in America, because I believe Michael Moores Fahrenheit 9/11 is little more than a heavily biased satire with truth buried so deep beneath the surface of the film that it is impossible to know what to trust and what to discard as satire.

    See the movie. I have, and Moore lists (just about) every single source he uses up front. Newspaper articles, dates, firsthand accounts from relevant experts... you can't say Moore is distorting what so-and-so says when so-and-so is saying it right into the camera.

    Moore is definitely biased, but at least he admits his bias, and gives you his supporting evidence up front. Which is more than the Bush Administration has done vis-a-vis Iraq.

  9. Re:Dishonest by ezra451 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the majority of bin Laden's did leave the country during the lockdown. Only one family member was evacuated in the weeks following and it was made public almost immediately. He was a student was begining to be harrassed. The issue of course is that none of them including hte last was questioned. What makes this crimial is the fact that the family was still in touch with Osama. The movie talks about this event as the wedding of one of Osama's sons. It didn't go on to quote the poem that the son read regarding the destruction of the USS Cole

    http://www.google.com/search?q=osama+wedding+son +p oem&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf -8&oe=utf-8
    google search.

    The Bin Laden family gained much more of their wealth through construction. They have been the main firm in the service of the Saudi king to build roads and infrastructure. Oil came later and certainly it's no shock that the Bush family would want to continue positive relations with wealthy Saudi elite.

  10. Re:Personally, I thought differently... by gozar · · Score: 5, Informative
    That's Moore's claim. However, his original version was that Disney killed the film because Jeb Bush would try to take away Disney's tax breaks on DisneyWorld in Florida... that's nice, but no such tax breaks exist for them to lose.

    From the Seattle Times: For example, in Osceola County, Fla., Walt Disney World receives the farming break on 1,600 acres of pasture, timber and nurseries where it grows plants for its theme parks. The land, worth $194 million, is taxed as if it were worth $12.3 million, according to the county land records office. Disney spokeswoman Jacquee Polack said the company keeps a buffer of undeveloped land around the park, but she acknowledged some of this property will be developed.

    But this probably wasn't what Moore was thinking about... :-)

    --
    What, me worry?
  11. Re:Moore's Politics by sean.peters · · Score: 5, Informative
    Has Bush done, said, implied, mimed, ANYTHING that would lead to the impression that he is a "messenger of God"

    Yes - from Common Dreams (who, in turn was quoting the Israeli newspaper Haaretz):

    Bush said: 'God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them.'

    link for your convenience.

    Another link

    Ok, if you want to talk about lies and liars--and imply GW Bush (I assume that's who you are implying?) is a liar--what's an example of a lie he told?

    Too many to even list here, but here's a typical example (from the Center for American Progress claim vs. fact db):

    Claim: "The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons...And according to the British government, the Iraqi regime could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes." [Source: White House Web site - since taken down]
    Fact: "Iraq did not have a large, ongoing, centrally controlled chemical weapons program after 1991. Information found to date suggests that Iraq's large-scale capability to develop, produce, and fill new CW munitions was reduced - if not entirely destroyed - during Operations Desert Storm and Desert Fox, 13 years of UN sanctions and UN inspections." - Bush Administration Weapons Inspector David Kay, 10/2/03

    Bush knew, or should have known, that his claim was false.

    Sean

  12. Re:Please provide a link to this alleged fact by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, you asked for it:

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F 40 B13FA35590C768CDDAC0894DC404482

    Also, if you don't want to register:

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/02/fil m. moore.reut/

    Or
    http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/05/289 086.sh tml

    Dude, it was all over the national news for weeks. It DID happen and Disney DID refuse to distribute the film...

  13. Re:Rush Limbaugh... by wrecked · · Score: 5, Informative
    I think that your question is extremely relevant. Noam Chomsky, for example, has said that part of the problem with trying to become an informed citizen is that no one has the time to conduct mini research projects on every important topic.

    Regarding open source alternatives to Lexis-Nexis et. al., I think that we're starting to see the emergence of these sources with the Groklaw project. Groklaw right now is confined to a narrow issue, but it publishes primary source material and commentary that is superior to many paid services, and in an open source fashion. It is only possible for Groklaw to do this, however, by focusing on a single issue.

    I hope that we will see more open source political projects like Groklaw in the future for other important issues.

  14. Re:BEFORE the flamewar commences... by MilenCent · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...everyone should know about Michael Moore's record for twisting facts.

    But also, everyone should be aware of the page in which Moore responds to the people who claim he twisted facts:

    Moore's considerably-less-famous response page.

  15. Re:BEFORE the flamewar commences... by frost22 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do any other non-Americans find this as hilarious as I do ?

    Ack.

    Those guys should have spent some time with real leftwing radicals. I mean, come on guys, there are places on the world, wehere gun control is whole heartedly supported by the conservatives, and they and the socialists keep overall tax burden far above 50% with a straight face. Where unions as you know them are a state guaranteed right and hold 50%-1 vote on every company board.

    Where the real lefties are so far removed from reality that you ask yourself what universe they come from. Hey, check out Germany's (really) beloved 'Secretary of State/Foreign affairs Secretary' Joschka Fischer, who started his political career personally knowing qiute a few of the 70's Terrorist luminaries, or our somehwat despised "Environment Minister", who not-so-long-ago used to be menmber of a real orthodox communist group ("orthodox" meaning "unconditionally loyal to Moscow" - we used to joke about those Spartakus guys in university that they would open their umbrella as soon as it started to rain in Moscow)

    Oh, and go to France, Britain, Spain, Italy, Greece, you name it - you will find all shades of real socialists and communists there as well.

    As for Europe, Mr. Kerry (like Clinton before him) is a moderate conservative, while Mr Bush would probably grouped with the likes of Haider, LePen and Fini as a borderline extreme right-wing populist (though his habit to name fundamentalist christian ayatollahs to top governement posts is a practice not seen anywhere in Europe these days).
    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.