Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Settles Antitrust Suit with Vouchers

Posted by timothy on from the now-with-extra-lock-in dept.

TedCheshireAcad writes "Microsoft has apparently settled its antitrust case with the state of Arizona by offering $104 million in product vouchers. Arizona consumers in the state from 1996 to 2002 will get $15 for their past operating system purchases and $9 for past application purchases. Public schools in Arizona will get 50% of unclaimed vouchers and 50% of vouchers that have been claimed but not redeemed for software products. I remember when lawsuits were settled with money, not monopoly propogation."

29 comments

  1. Microsoft calculates 10000 digits of Pi by users.pl · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 1058209749445923078164062862
    08998628034825342117 067982148086513282306647093844 6095505822317253594081284811
    17450284102701938521 105559644622948954930381964428 8109756659334461284756482337
    86783165271201909145 648566923460348610454326648213 3936072602491412737245870066
    06315588174881520920 962829254091715364367892590360 0113305305488204665213841469
    51941511609433057270 365759591953092186117381932611 7931051185480744623799627495
    67351885752724891227 938183011949129833673362440656 6430860213949463952247371907
    02179860943702770539 217176293176752384674818467669 4051320005681271452635608277
    85771342757789609173 637178721468440901224953430146 5495853710507922796892589235
    42019956112129021960 864034418159813629774771309960 5187072113499999983729780499
    51059731732816096318 595024459455346908302642522308 2533446850352619311881710100
    03137838752886587533 208381420617177669147303598253 4904287554687311595628638823
    53787593751957781857 780532171226806613001927876611 1959092164201989380952572010
    65485863278865936153 381827968230301952035301852968 9957736225994138912497217752
    83479131515574857242 454150695950829533116861727855 8890750983817546374649393192
    55060400927701671139 009848824012858361603563707660 1047101819429555961989467678
    37449448255379774726 847104047534646208046684259069 4912933136770289891521047521
    62056966024058038150 193511253382430035587640247496 4732639141992726042699227967
    82354781636009341721 641219924586315030286182974555 7067498385054945885869269956
    90927210797509302955 321165344987202755960236480665 4991198818347977535663698074
    26542527862551818417 574672890977772793800081647060 0161452491921732172147723501
    41441973568548161361 157352552133475741849468438523 3239073941433345477624168625
    18983569485562099219 222184272550254256887671790494 6016534668049886272327917860
    85784383827967976681 454100953883786360950680064225 1252051173929848960841284886
    26945604241965285022 210661186306744278622039194945 0471237137869609563643719172
    87467764657573962413 890865832645995813390478027590 0994657640789512694683983525
    95709825822620522489 407726719478268482601476990902 6401363944374553050682034962
    52451749399651431429 809190659250937221696461515709 8583874105978859597729754989
    30161753928468138268 683868942774155991855925245953 9594310499725246808459872736
    44695848653836736222 626099124608051243884390451244 1365497627807977156914359977
    00129616089441694868 555848406353422072225828488648 1584560285060168427394522674
    67678895252138522549 954666727823986456596116354886 2305774564980355936345681743
    24112515076069479451 096596094025228879710893145669 1368672287489405601015033086
    17928680920874760917 824938589009714909675985261365 5497818931297848216829989487
    22658804857564014270 477555132379641451523746234364 5428584447952658678210511413
    54735739523113427166 102135969536231442952484937187 1101457654035902799344037420
    07310578539062198387 447808478489683321445713868751 9435064302184531910484810053
    70614680674919278191 197939952061419663428754440643 7451237181921799983910159195
    61814675142691239748 940907186494231961567945208095 1465502252316038819301420937
    62137855956638937787 083039069792077346722182562599 6615014215030680384477345492
    0260541466592520

  2. Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the punishment is... increasing their marketshare? Can my startup get that "punishment" too? Oh, wait, we're too small. We'd just get fined $36.2 billion.

    1. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by Kethinov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a punishment, it's a settlement. MS has made an offer and they have accepted it. Case closed.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right. My mistake. Still seems like Microsoft got the better deal though. If I were Arizona's lawyers, I'd have held out for at least a few million in cash. It still wouldn't hurt Microsoft noticably, but it'd be a hell of a lot more useful than a bunch of vouchers for MS Office.

    3. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trust me, the Arizona lawyers did hold out for a few million. In their pocket.

    4. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      That is so true. This case is NOT about the consumer. If you think the lawyers were on your side, trying to right a wrong, punish MS, you are quite naive. It's about greed - lawyers getting rich. Most class-actions are about greed.

    5. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not a punishment, it's a settlement. MS has made an offer and they have accepted it. Case closed.
      That's the part that breaks my heart about this. I expect MS to make an offer like that. It's the best for them and gets them off the hook from a cash settlement. BUT, I expect it to be laughed at--not accepted! It's the prosecuting side that screwed this up. If they accept these kinds of settlement offers, that's when we lose. I wonder if MS is able to do this because of their threatening legal presence. Winning cases is very valuable for a lawyer's reputation. I wonder if that is swaying the decision on accepting these Mickey Mouse kinds of offers. The lawyer gets to look like he "beat Microsoft", which looks great on a resume. If he doesn't accept it, MS is going to bring the Hammer(TM) to try to squash them and get off scot free. The lawyer gets paid either way, but it looks better to "win" easily in a settlement than to potentially lose if it goes all the way through court.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    6. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      MS has made an offer and they have accepted it. Case closed.

      Many state AG offices will deal with MS this way.

      New Mexico's AG settled their part of the anti-trust trial for US$100K plus legal expenses; somewhat less than what MS makes in the way of profits in the state. Maybe they were giving Bill a pass because he spent some time in NM before moving back to Washington.

      As far as most people are concerned, MS owns an essential facility for computers and the product vouchers are practically as good as cash.

      It shows that most of the public, including those in state law enforcement offices, remain unaware of alternatives that are much better than they suspect (open source, MacOS...) .

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    7. Re:Aren't punishments supposed to punish? by sevenatis · · Score: 1

      What ticks me off.....if they had paid in cash, people would be bitching that the fine isn't big enough because of they have such huge cash reserves. A penalty is a penalty; it sets legal precedent for the next time. Eventually they will go to the well one time to many and then they pay the piper. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they do turn!

      --
      ++ Jesus loves you as you are;
      ++ Cuthulhu thinks you need barbeque sauce!
  3. Paying out in Monopoly money? by Isomer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, this gives a whole new look on money you get with those monopoly games. Turns out that if you are a monopoly you can print your own currency and have people use it....

  4. Vouchers just for M$ products? by djcapelis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can the vouchers be used for other things like with several other settlements? Or does it have to just be refunded for more M$ crap?

    --
    I touch computers in naughty places
    1. Re:Vouchers just for M$ products? by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Funny
      Swap them for Gmail invites?

      (Can I be modded redundant if I've made the same joke in different discussions?)

    2. Re:Vouchers just for M$ products? by jtev · · Score: 1

      Microsoft makes realy nice mice. Work in X to. If I was in AZ I'd be getting one. Especialy since the settlement says the value of any vouchers redemed on non-software products goes to schools.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    3. Re:Vouchers just for M$ products? by sgeye · · Score: 1

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3848531.stm "These will be valid for the products of any computer firm, not just Microsoft."

  5. other companies by will.murnane · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Can you imagine if this happened in other fields?
    In the news today: Ford has issued a recall affecting 36000 vehicles. Customers with the 2007 F150 are affeted, and can turn in their vehicles for a replacement vehicle and a free muffler.

    I don't think it'd go over so well. Or maybe book publishing - if your book is damaged we'll give you 15 pages of the next one in the series.

    1. Re:other companies by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except they're not even giving you anything of value on its own! Its like being given a fucking gift certificate to HMV after one of their CD racks fell on you and crushed your legs. That'd go over like a lead baloon, yet Microsoft can practically get away with murder? I don't get it. Something is seriously fucked with the system if this is what passes for "modern justice".

    2. Re:other companies by k12linux · · Score: 1
      Actually, wouldn't it be more like receiving a coupon towards $1000 off your next Ford... and it would have to come with the "may not be used in conjunction with other offers" disclaimer.

      Yes, that seems more accurate. Then you can go to the dealer and get your $1000 off, or possibly take advantage of the $1500 cash back offer instead; making your coupon basically worthless.

  6. Right... by stienman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember when lawsuits were settled with money, not monopoly propogation.

    I doubt it. Pithy comments are all well and good, but I'd like you to point out one such case against a monopolist that you remember where money (and nothing else) was paid in restitution.

    Perhaps I just missed the "I'm pretending I'm an old timer" or "sarcasm" tag...?

    -Adam

    1. Re:Right... by node+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember when lawsuits were settled with money, not monopoly propogation.

      I doubt it. Pithy comments are all well and good, but I'd like you to point out one such case against a monopolist that you remember where money (and nothing else) was paid in restitution.

      That's not what the guy said. He said that the punishments of the past worked against the monopoly, not propogating them, and that cash damages were paid in cash.

      While I can't speak for cash damages, I know that IBM was (is?) prohibited from pre-announcing new products (thus they couldn't really promote new versions of OS/2, for example, before they were out), and AT&T was prohibited from selling computer software (thus Unix was semi-free until the next monopoly fiasco of AT&T which broke it apart and allowed them to market Unix).

      This time it's absurd. It does a really poor job of punishing MS, and does nothing to stop them from further breaches. After all, what does MS have to fear? They'll have to give away some software which, btw, helps their marketshare?

      The point of punishing a monopoly is to keep them from either a.) remaining a monopoly, or at the very least b.) stop them from continuing to abuse their monopoly status. This isn't punishment, it's encouragement!

    2. Re:Right... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Judge: "And for remaining to be a monopoly, your reward is..."

    3. Re:Right... by polyp2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This time it's absurd. It does a really poor job of punishing MS, and does nothing to stop them from further breaches. After all, what does MS have to fear? They'll have to give away some software which, btw, helps their marketshare?

      Yeah, its like a drug dealer getting busted and as a punishment having to give some of his stash away for free.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    4. Re:Right... by cgenman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd like you to point out one such case against a monopolist that you remember where money (and nothing else) was paid in restitution.

      There is a very famous case, which supports the voucher "punishment," whereby for its rampant and flagrant price fixing Nintendo was ordered to send out $5 vouchers to its customers. The irony was that Nintendo at the time was making more than $5 per cartridge sold thanks to its flagrant price fixing, so even when being "punished" it was making a profit due to the activity it was being punished for.

      --
      The ______ Agenda
  7. OMFG THIS IS 2 AWESOME LOL! I can't wait! by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Holy frigging rebates Batman, I'm gonna get me a software voucher!

    Let's see, it's only good for MS software, and I get $15 for Windows 98 and $9 for Office - $24 - SWEET! I can finally grab that copy of Microsoft Bob I've been itching to pick up. And with the $10 I've got left, I'll score a copy of "Return of Arcade" for Windows 3.1. This is gonna be AWESOME! Thanks, Bill - All is forgiven! Please send my vouchers soon!

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    1. Re:OMFG THIS IS 2 AWESOME LOL! I can't wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Cow, I had totally forgotten about MS Bob... the good ol' days, when software didn't need to have a purpose to suck money out of my wallet!

  8. Those lawyers... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... obviously have no concept of natural justice.

    OK, it is a settlement (why should a company settle if they are innocent? Do they understand how valuable reputation is? Even for MS) but the overwhelming feeling is of injustice: MS was caught doing something improper (heck, they pretend they are apologizing for it with those vouchers) and their punshment is to facilitate for them to do more of the same.

    USians: what are you doing about this insanity?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Those lawyers... by sevinkey · · Score: 1

      What do you expect Americans to do? Shoot Bill Gates?

      You sound as if you think we actually CAN do something about this.

  9. ..Meanwhile, in an Arizona courtroom: by chuckcolby · · Score: 1
    Judge: You are ordered to pay 3 billion dollars to the people of Arizona.
    Microsoft Lawyer: Your honor, thats more than $1000 per citizen. (lie) We simply don't have that much cash around. (/lie) We have lots of these "Bill Bucks", though!
    Judge Okay, that'll do. (gavel bangs)

    --
    We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
  10. it's a settlement, not a judgement by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I doubt any attorney or law firm would take on a class action lawsuit like this without a real paycheck at the end. Was Plaintiff Attorney payed with Bill Bucks, or hard cash? Was he payed by the people of Arizona, or by Microsoft?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  11. What monopoly propogation? by ljhiller · · Score: 1

    There is nothing in any of these articles that states the MS vouchers must be redeemed for MS products. The CA settlement permitted vouchers to be redeemed for any software and some hardware purchases. This entire article is a troll.