Slashdot Mirror


ISS Gyro Fixed Via Spacewalk

Teahouse writes "After a failed attempt last week, the ISS Astronauts finally got to fix the external gyroscope circut breaker in the station. Tests are being run today, but it looks like the ISS is back to having attitude stability with redundancy. This is particularly significant with the Shuttle being grounded for an extended period because the ISS would have had to use thruster fuel to keep the Station's solar panels pointed in the right direction without the gyroscopes, and no guarantee when more fuel would be arriving."

12 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Attitude stability? by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

    but it looks like the ISS is back to having attitude stability

    Did they put it on Prozac?

    1. Re:Attitude stability? by Xshare · · Score: 5, Informative

      Attitude = The orientation of a spacecraft relative to its direction of motion.

    2. Re:Attitude stability? by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wosh = Sound of joke flying right over your head.

  2. Another space station dying of neglect? by coupland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... Mir died of Russian neglect, and so early into its mission the ISS seems to be dying of US neglect. Even if shuttle missions resume the importance of the ISS in US plans has been eclipsed by a moon base and a Mars mission. Lots of people criticize the ISS because it was largely conceived with politics in mind moreso than economics or science. Surely they hate the new US direction even more -- billions more will be blown, over the course of far more administrations who will always be gunning to kill it for more cash -- just to give the impression of superiority over the Chinese. I say either fund and finish the ISS or start a new economical, science-based space project from scratch. But moon bases? Please, ISS doesn't deserve to fall apart for this...

    1. Re:Another space station dying of neglect? by character_assassin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's kind of arbitrary speculation to claim that the Bush "Mission to Mars" initiative is "just to give the impression of superiority over the Chinese." The US doesn't define itself relative to China, and only recently quit defining itself relative to Russia. Now, this may be more arbitrary speculation, but I think Bush's Mars initiative has more to do with Reaganesque feel-good-about-America vaporware. Quite frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing started on one of Karl Rove's cocktail napkins, which is probably as far as it will ever get.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  3. Reminds me of Galaxy Quest.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Specifically, the line "Why is this room here" when they're in thec hompers room. Note to self, when designing something where it is incredibly dangerous to go outside and fix, spring for the extra twenty feet of cable and put the circuit breaker INSIDE THE DAMN SHIP.

    --
    meh
  4. Fixing a bad gyro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Anybody can fix a bad gyro, so the question is: How does one fix a good gyro in orbit? There's no gravity! Extremes of temperature! I for one wouldn't want to eat an ISS gyro. Space tourism will never take off without good space resort chefs dammit!

    Now *THIS* is a gyro!

    (on second thought, this joke isn't very funny. posting anonymously anyway.)

  5. Problems with the Shuttle-centric approach? by A.+Pizmo+Clam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure a lot of people are going to use this malfunction and (necessarily) hazardous repair as an indictment of the current investment in manned, shuttle-based spaceflight.

    However, until NASA has a better platform, they will probably continue to use the shuttle.

    Perhaps if the open source movement were to desing and implement a shuttle replacement, we might have a working replacement faster than if NASA were told they have to come up with a cheaper faster replacement.

    For those thinking of suggesting that Soyuz would work, might I remind you that every Soyuz capsule is a one time use vehicle. Even when everything goes right, it doesn't get re-used. It has no airlock, so either everyone gets suited up, or no-one does a space walk. It has no payload capability, so no sattelite recovery. It has no manipulator arm, so you can't rely upon it for doing sattelite maintenance as the shuttle crew has.

    The shuttle may not be perfect. It was designed for a set of missions that have very little to do with what it is doing now. (The military provided some of the specs to support black projects, few of which have ever been attempted.)

    The Civilian side of the project was to haul people and material to and from the space station that was being desinged by NASA, which was not the international space station. It was also decided to use it to deploy sattelites as well once the capacity of the payload bay was defined.

    As a jeep, the shuttle has done an ok job. If you think we need a better design, I am all for it. Start working on that better desing, and give us status reports as you find the time.

    --

    Thank you for your support.
  6. Nice, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The station's computer is still complaining of an ongoing fault in the AE-35 unit.

  7. Re:We're going to Mars! by dj42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's supposed to comback online in 2005. Aside from that, safety concerns are a joke. These astronauts want to go to the space and the government, for political reasons is preventing them. What do you think test pilots, and the true explorers have been doing for ages? Sure, we don't want to needlessly die, but we're a bunch of water-meat-bags attached to a ball of rock -- if we're interested in the giant cosmos that supports us, and are willing to risk our lives to do so, isn't that a noble cause? My god. The USA will send thousands to their death to a country rich in oil, and yet, they won't even risk 5 or 10 people to explore the vast universe they live. What a short-sided pitiful view of the world. Right now, if I could fly in the shuttle, and they'd take me into space for some dangerous mission, I would go. No shit.

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  8. "attitude stability with redundancy" by geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    "attitude stability with redundancy"

    Wish my ex-gf had that =/

  9. Reasons for putting it outside by rosbif73 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The reasons were explained recently by a NASA insider on sci.space.station:
    To minimize the number of penetrations through the pressure hull (both the power source and the load are outside, in this case), minimize the number of connections through hatches (lesson learned from Mir), and minimize potential crew exposure to ammonia (used to cool external power components).