Slashdot Mirror


EFF Begins Digital Television Liberation Project

Dozix007 writes "One year from today, on July 1, 2005, an FCC regulation known as the Broadcast Flag will lock up your digital television signals. But EFF's "DTV Liberation Project" aims to help the public keep over-the-air programming free. The Broadcast Flag, which places copy controls on DTV signals, attempts to stop people from making digitally-perfect copies of television shows and redistributing them. It also stops people from making perfectly legitimate personal copies of broadcasts. More disturbing, the Broadcast Flag will outlaw the import and manufacture of a whole host of personal video recorders (PVRs), TiVo-like devices that send DTV signals into a computer for backup, editing and playback. After the Broadcast Flag regulations go into effect, all PVR technologies must be Flag-compliant and 'robust' against user modification -- and that means, once again, that the entertainment industry is trying to tell you what you can do with your own machines."

12 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Our right to fair use has ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just how will you possibly be prevented from this scenario:

    a) output the TV signal as an analog signal

    b) input to a camcorder that has analog input

    c) route through camcorder over firewire to iMovie or the equivalent

  2. Re:Well, who owns the broadcasts? by HiThere · · Score: 4, Informative

    I disagree. If they hadn't suborned congress, then I would agree with you, but starting with the "Mickey Mouse protection act" the media companies have induced the congress to pass laws in violation of the general welfare and not otherwise authorized by the constitution. And I don't care what blather the supreme court uses to justify their bending the knee to to media companies.

    At this point I feel that nearly anything which is done to damage, or even inconvenience them is laudible. What I'd really like is to get all their managers and lawyers thrown in jail...and not a country club either. Well, this won't happen. The law is too corrupt. And since the "law" won't act, I won't condemn anyone else who does. I may think them foolhardy, but I won't condemn them.

    The corruption of the congress, the presidency, and of the courts should be considered a crime on the level of treason. As such, anyone who comits such a crime should pay an extravagant penalty. And when a company does so, not only should the company be attained, but also the decision making officers and those who implemented the decision. And those managers or directors who approved it. In many ways it's a far worse crime of treason than a soldier deserting in the face of the enemy. And it deserves a harsher penalty.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  3. Re:Broadcast flag on news reports by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is already done. You know on CSPAN when our leaders (USA) say "reserve the right to revise and extend"? That means that they can come back at a latter date and edit/replace everything they said before the TV Cams.

    This means the Congresional record isn't an accurate record of what was said on the floor.

  4. Re:Our right to fair use has ended... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    no It's a law that simply makes the regular honest citizen a criminal.

    Grey market devices will be available forever. the last DVD player I bought, is 100% region free and does not obey the "you cant skip this" flag on video files.

    you can get them shipped directly to you and they are supposedly "illegal"

    same goes for the DVR's in a couple years.... China will have the uncrippled versions for us.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Re:Missed the Point by furball · · Score: 3, Informative
    It is? To quote:


    Fair use is never mentioned in the Constitution (not even mentioned in any copyright law until 1976). Rather, it originated in the courts during the nineteenth century as a means by which producers of intellectual property could make limited use of the work of others (and allow somewhat freer use for nonprofit educational purposes).
  6. DVD Macrovision and now this!! by Nogahide · · Score: 2, Informative

    What!! I'm still not done being pissed about how every time I hook up my DVD player through my VCR the macrovision kicks in and screws it up so I cant watch the DVD on the TV or make a "low quality" VHS recording for the Van (so the kids can watch the DVD I just bought on the road). I had to go out and spend 100 bucks on a sima color corrector (and macro vision defeater).

  7. Support the EFF by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Do you support the EFF? If not maybe you should. The EFF will accept just about any item in the form of a donation. You can also join the EFF with 4 different membership levels to choose from: Student ($15), Advocate ($25), Benefactor ($65) or Pioneer ($100). I just renewed. You should too if you haven't in a while. If you've never joined then this is a prime time to do so.

    "How else can I help the EFF," you ask? 30% of the profits from book purchases at No Starch Press (when follow the link from the EFF's website) are donated back to the EFF.

  8. That is all wrong. by Luke727 · · Score: 0, Informative

    It was ABC, not CBS. And he only had permission from ABC, not the NFL. I know this because I saw that episode on Cartoon Network a few days ago. Sorry to be a Nazi, but I love The Family Guy so much that I cannot let people mix up the details.

    --
    If you find this post offensive, don't read it! THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING! I am what I am because of how apes behave.
  9. Re:Well, who owns the broadcasts? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bzzt! The spectrum used by cellular was sold to the companies via public auction and is considered private. The spectrum used by TV was loaned to the stations and so is still public. Thanks for playing!

  10. Re:Is piracy really that much of a problem? by WarmBoota · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry to say this, but you have no right. You have a temporary lease provided by the citizens of the United States of America. There is no natural law that prevents one individual from copying the ideas of another. Any nearby child should be sufficient proof that copying is a common and natural action.

    The Founders realized that it might be useful to provide impetus to authors and inventors. With this in mind, they empowered Congress to promote the progress of science and the arts by providing a limited monopoly on ideas.

    The current state of copyright is appalling:

    • Copyright laws are indecipherable by the average citizen
    • Despite this enormous corpus of legalese, industry lobbyists continue to convince lawmakers to create additional laws about copyright infringment. This is some type of sick, symbiotic relationship where the legislative branch feels the need to constantly make new laws and the *AA is more than happy to pay a bonus AND provide the text.
    • Copyright laws allow someone to profit from a single idea, never creating again. If necessity is the mother of invention, how do lifetime copyrights promote progress?
    • "intellectual property" is an oxymoron created to apply the laws associated with physical property while avoiding laws associated with taxation.
    --
    90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
  11. So remove the flag! by DaHat · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I doubt anyone will read this due to the lateness of this post, I still must do so.

    Lemme just say first... I am something of an expert on digital television... it is my job.

    Digital TV is for the most part based on the ATSC standard, which in turn is based on the ISO/IEC 13818-1 standard (AKA "Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems".

    Our enemy though, is the "Redistribution Control" As defined in ATSC Standard A/65B, now for a quick overview...

    Within 13818, a stream of data (the transport stream is made up of packets who's length is always 188 bytes, within the first 4 bytes of the transport packet there is a field known as the PID which helps a decoder to know what is in a stream.

    100 dollars worth of hardware could easily build a part which would demodulate an 8vsb signal on one end and pass the contained transport stream into a FPGA for instance who's sole job would be to do basic processing of the transport stream's EIT's to see what PID carry's the Redistribution Control (RC). Once the PID is detected, locating packets which carry it would be a simple task. Finally, once a packet is found to be carrying an RC, the FPGA would restamp the PID of the packet to 1FFF (the PID of a null packet who's payload is ignored by the decoder) then finally pass the stream to a modulator which would create the signal your decoder would receive and bada bing bada boom! No more Redistribution Control!

    Sad thing is... I work with hardware everyday which would be capable of doing this... but even with my employee discount it's still far out of my price range. Of course such a device (as described above) would be illegal as it's only real use would be to bypass a copy control mechanism.

  12. Re:Our right to fair use has ended... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.dvdoverseas.com/dvd.htm
    http://www.reg ioncodefreedvd.com/
    http://www.zonefreedvd.com/
    http://www.dvdcity.com/

    and then mine....

    http://www.codefreedvd.com/dvd_codefree1500.htm

    Pretty sad that the country known for opressing freedom (china) is becoming the source for freedom to US citizens.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.