Slashdot Mirror


Custom DVDs & Players For Academy Members

xyankee writes "In an effort to curtail the piracy and bootlegging of DVD screeners, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has endorsed a plan to distribute about 6,000 special DVD players to members that will play specially encrypted screener discs that would be earmarked for a specific academy voter and would play only on that person's machine. The Associated Press has the full story, while Laurence Roth, VP and co-founder of Cinea, Inc., the company behind the technology, says 'the discs, by themselves, cannot be hacked.'"

27 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. Riiiiight.... by thryllkill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cause it's not like the original DVDs were encrypted against hacking either.

    --

    Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    1. Re:Riiiiight.... by sploo22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a list of the flaws in CSS:

      1. DVDs have one key for the disc, which is encrypted about 400 different times. One of the basic rules of cryptography is that you NEVER encrypt the same thing with different keys.

      2. The DVD players are publicly available, so it's not too hard to take out a ROM chip and analyze it.

      3. The key size was only 40 bits.

      Suppose this new system has only one key per disc, coded for a particular private player, using 256-bit Rijndael encryption. It will indeed be uncrackable given only the disc, which is what the quote said.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:Riiiiight.... by throwaway18 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the basic rules of cryptography is that you NEVER encrypt the same thing with different keys.

      No it isn't. You are half remembering the rule for one time pads (not any time of encryption) that you should never use the a one time pad twice.

    3. Re:Riiiiight.... by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But which academy member would risk selling / giving away discs if it was encrypted to them? Which academy member would even give someone a tape recording of the disc when that too would very likely be watermarked? Even the latter on its own would be an effective deterrent.


      I suggest that if the academy is prepared to swallow the expense of handing out the players (+ the bitching of members who have to play movies on it when their home cinema systems already has a player), they'll have a very workable security system.

  2. Alirght by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny
    Laurence Roth, VP and co-founder of Cinea, Inc., the company behind the technology, says 'the discs, by themselves, cannot be hacked.'

    Someone give that Johanson kid a call.

  3. Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by CdBee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it has a video-out port, it can be used to copy the disk. Unless they plan on shipping integrated DVD players with a built-in screen it's not going to work.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by Steve+Cox · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it has a video out, it will have Macrovision enabled to stop you recording a decent copy.

      Has everyone forgotten that you still have this kind of copy protection?

      Steve.

      (actually, two seconds of googling showed up this gem.

    2. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if it can be watched in decent quality it can be copied.. something the mpaa execs don't want to believe it seems, they don't want to believe it so hard that they even want to believe that these schemes work so they pump out money on them, money that's just adding to the 'piracy' problems lost money..

      (hell, I would be VERY surprised if piracy hurt major mpaa members more than what the license costs for macrovisions shit protections have cost them over the years)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it has a video out, it will have Macrovision enabled to stop you recording a decent copy.

      Ahhhhh! Curse You Macrovision!!! Your almighty copy protection cannot be stripped out by anyone! Arrrrrgggghhhh!!

    4. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Has everyone forgotten that you still have this kind of copy protection?

      Has everyone forgotten that all you need to get around it is a TV monitor with video out as well?

      KFG

    5. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by jb_02_98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once I had a video cd that I had made, and when I tried to copy it to a tape using my DVD player, I had all sorts of problems. I looked around for a solution and found that by hooking up a mixer (audio, 2 RCA connections) I was able to "trick" the system into looking correct. So the Macrovision, at least for me, wasn't that big of an issue.

    6. Re:Probably gonna be redundant.. but.. by Petronius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      here's all it'll take for someone to defeat this:

      image:
      - flat screen display
      - tripod
      - good camcorder

      sound:
      - grab stream from the entertainment center

      put them back together... voila.

      --
      there's no place like ~
  4. One word... by randomErr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Analog. Plug a VCR into the analog out and a $30 'video stabelizer' and you got a copy.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  5. Famous last words... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..the discs, by themselves, cannot be hacked..

    I hope that quote gets used a little later on down the line, when some 14 year old writes a few lines of code that circumvents yet another uncrackable encryption / protection system...

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  6. ha. by Heem · · Score: 5, Funny

    "'the discs, by themselves, cannot be hacked.'"

    uh huh.

    In related news, "That gun isn't loaded" , "The dog doesnt bite" and "The Titanic is unsinkable"

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  7. Took em long enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You figure they would have done this straight out, instead of just shotgunning the discs out to everybody. Everybody wins - the voters get to watch the discs whenever they want, without having to deal with some crazy 24-hour mission impossible self-destructing DVD, the Academy is reasonably sure that some random relative won't be copying discs to put online, and they managed to do it without having to buy off any new politicians to pass another law restricting everybody's rights.

    Yes, it isn't foolproof, but at least they're trying a reasonable solution, instead of poking everybody's eyes out with lawyers.

  8. is this actually going to help? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why go to such lengths; didn't they catch someone last year using only simple watermarking? Is there any conclusive evidence that the academy members are responsible for enough piracy to make this worthwhile?

    Of course, they could just say they were doing this, and then send everyone an el-cheapo DVD player with a special decal on the front. That might be enough to psych out someone.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  9. Re:lol by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why hack when they can just get it analogically off the disc in extremely high quality as well?

    somebody just invented a good way to milk money off from mpaa..
    .

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  10. correct me if I'm wrong by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but, wasn't decss possible only because one software player left its key out in the open? Seems to me you'd need to get hold of one of those special players if you were going to crack their partner discs.

  11. 6000 members of the Academy... by jedrek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you belive you can take 6000 people of any group and find one that isn't just flat out dirty and corrupt, or at the very least, easily corruptable? Or that many Academy members won't want to hook up a special DVD player each time they watch a movie? Remember, the studios want as many Academy members as they can to watch each movie, because only that gives them a shot of getting awarded. Every 'problem' a given member has with seeing a movie will reduce its chances come Oscar night.

    These are all bandaids on a huge wound.

  12. On Hacking by condensate · · Score: 5, Interesting
    All the previous posts have been about hacking or not hacking a DVD. Come on, we know that!!! Nothing is ever secure from hacking, so why the fuss about it.

    I thin this is the beginning of a new stratagem: In principle one could sell DVD players with individual signatures that can somehow burn a tag on an individual DVD, which makes it impossible to be read and played by any other player. Now THAT's DRM for you.

    --
    Black holes were created when god tried to divide by zero
  13. A solution in 1 second by doktorstop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DRM... MacroVision... special players & MAYBE one day special TVs... totally useless as long as the ultimate goal is to watch the movie... with unprotected human eyes

    just take a digital camera, point it at the TV screen... et voila! Sure, won't be DVD quality, but, in home conditions, the quality will beat telesync =)

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
  14. The Big Studios should love it.... by innot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The studios would be expected to pay for a machine to encode its discs and a licensing fee to use Cinea's anti-piracy technology.

    "So you are a small indie studio with that incredible good movie (just picked up all prizes in the european festivals).
    Sorry, if you can't pay a few megabucks for the license & machines and some more kilobucks for making a few thousand individual watermarked DVDs, then the academy award is not for you.

    We hope for your understanding, but we have to protect the interests of our good clients from the MPAA who are in in for business and have no problem of paying these small academy consideration fees. Thank you!

    Best Regards,
    Mr. Big Boss of Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

    --
    X IMPRIMITE "SALVE TERRA!"
    XX ITE AD X
  15. DIVX does make sense by Fubar411 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) No one has ever successfully cracked the scheme. 2) The players could easily be manufactured again 3) The dial-up "feature" can be used to verify the academy award members are the ones watching the movie. I hated DIVX when it came out, but I can understand the studios wanting to protect their content, at least until the movie is out of the theatres. I can wait for the DVD like a good consumer, no need to pay bootleggers for someone elses work. Unless it is the original Star Wars DVD when Han shoots first.

  16. Secure yet waste of money by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First, everyone is saying this is useless because the movie can still be copied. That is not the point. People, think about what the academy is trying to prevent. They are trying to prevent the DVD from walking out of of someones house and appearing on the street where just anyone can play the DVD. This sytem effectively crushes the market for Academy DVD.

    My understanding is that the DVD and player are matched. Each DVD can only be played on one player. This means that even if a DVD escapes, it likely cannot easily be played elsewhere. If a copy of the movie is made, then it was probably off the Academy Member's machine, and there is probably some way to identifiy the member based on artifacts within the movie.. This is quite different from the current situation in which a member can just claim that the disk was 'lost',

    And yet one must wonder about the reason to go through such expense. Buying $6,0000 customizable DVD player that are hardened against attack cannot be cheap. Making sure that none of the unassigned DVD players hit the street must be expensive. Producing 60000 custom DVD cannot be cheap. From a bidness point of view, is there a real ROI from these costs? The theaters continue to rack up sales at astronimical rates. DVD sales continue at equal an equal nerve wrenching pace. But for some reason the Academy wants to concentrate on the management of custom DVD players rather than the creative act of making film. Madness.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  17. Re:Security by droleary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this has quite a good chance of being secure.

    Anybody that starts with that assumption, or the stated and equally unlikely "cannot be hacked" has already lost whatever battle they imagined they were fighting. There are probably more holes in making the discs than there are in distributing them. How many hands does a film pass through before it even gets to be a master copy waiting to be encrypted?

  18. The point isn't that it might be hacked by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems that everyone believes the point is that it might not be completely secure. BIG DEAL. The point is that the DVD's can't just be loaned out. Remember how the hulk was copied. A screener dvd, (one that was watermarked), was lent to a friend who decided no-one would catch him if he uploaded it. He was caught but that doesn't help that the movie was uploaded. I'd say the screeners are probably fairly trustworthy. This will 1: Keep them from loaning their disks out, (which is most likely the primary concern) and 2: make it a little tougher so that if their friend in batswana sais, "Hey, I'd REALLY like to see that", they can't say, "well, ok, let me copy it and send it over". Instead when a friend wants to watch it they'll go, "I'm sorry, it only works on my dvd player. Do you want to come over and watch it?" Yes, if they want to distribute a copy of it, they'll probably be able to, but I doubt thats the problem.

    --
    I do security