Slashdot Mirror


Spider-Man 2 Has Over 30 Mistakes

Jon Sandys writes "Spider-Man 2 may have won over the critics, but the hard-nosed bastards at moviemistakes.com are listing 31 mistakes already - and no, not nitpicky stuff that's different from the comics. A scar swaps sides on Peter Parker's face and dummies are visible in hurled cars, not to mention the numerous errors involving tritium which I'm sure Slashdot readers will enjoy refuting. Read the complete listing on the Spider-Man 2 page." Also, people bitten by spiders don't generally become ultra-powerful.

8 of 750 comments (clear)

  1. Randall. by EvilJohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What was it he said?

    "There's nothing more exhilarating than pointing out the shortcomings of others."

    --

    Less Talk, More Beer.
  2. Re:IT"S A MOVIE, FOR CHRIST"S SAKE! by noewun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But this would remove the ability of those who wish to make movies but never to feel superior by pointing out the mistakes of others.

    A harsh opinion? Perhaps. But sometimes it is the only way I can explain this middle school "neener neener neener" stuff. I would like to see these people work on a major motion picture and see how they feel afterwards.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  3. Re:IT"S A MOVIE, FOR CHRIST"S SAKE! by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure these were the same people who objected to the ents in LOTR as trees seldom pick up roots and walk, or pointed out the time travel anomalies in Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban (sp?) with respect to special relativity.

    It's called suspending disbelief, and some people, it would appear, are incapable of doing it.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
  4. Spider-Man 2 Has Over 30 Mistakes by telstar · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Spider-Man 2 Has Over 30 Mistakes"
    • ...somebody's got to give Slashdot some competition.

  5. Re:IT"S A MOVIE, FOR CHRIST"S SAKE! by Blastercorps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You act as though you think the people on that site do nothing but critique and criticise the movies they see. Is it so hard to believe that some people can watch a movie, enjoy it, and then at a later date enjoy poking fun at the obvious mistakes the movie makers let slip? You act as if these people NOT having orgasms in their seats over every movie ever made is the worst thing to ever happen. As you said: "It's a movie, for christ's sake!"

  6. Re:My only gripe by istewart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get the impression that both Spider-Man movies take place in the near (but not immediate) future. For instance, in the first one, they're celebrating a "World Unity Day" (some kind of PC World's Fair) and the military is testing advanced exosuits. (Not to mention that weird neutron grenade that the Goblin uses to disintegrate the Oscorp board.) In the second one, Jameson's son is an astronaut who has already been to the moon. Little background details like that make it easier to assume, for the purposes of the story, that somebody (maybe even Octavius) has perfected a more efficient means of harvesting tritium.

  7. Re:My only gripe by stienman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually the technicality here is that they never mentioned how pure the tritium was.

    In this case they only needed 0.001% pure tritium, so the size of the ball was entirely plausable.

    -Adam

  8. Re:Three things that got me... by jCaT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing is bugging me about your comment....

    Did you ever read the comic books? Really. You're wondering how robotic arms could attach to someone's spine, but you're OK with the fact that there's a guy that can shoot webs out of his wrists?

    I think some people actually go out of their way to NOT enjoy a movie at times. Just sit back, relax, and ignore the stupid shit. It's a fantasy movie, for chrissakes.