Slashdot Mirror
An 802.11 Router For 3G Internet Service
An anonymous reader writes "Possio AB has launched a Linux-based wireless access point that allows users to connect to the Internet through 3G (third-generation) mobile telephone networks, which carry Internet data at broadband speeds. According to the Swedish company, which has filed for a patent on local-to-cellular routers, the PX30 can bring broadband wireless Internet service to small sites such as cafes, temporary hotspots such as building and event sites, mobile hot-spots such as buses and limos, and hot-spots in locations without a wired backhaul alternative. It can also be used, Possio says, by mobile-only carriers wishing to offer broadband Internet service, and in data acquisition and remote management applications such as M2M (machine-to-machine) applications."
Seriously, who needs broadband on the cell, and who's going to lug around a laptop for high speed access? What are you going to do, jerk to high quality pr0n on your local park bench?
Seriously though. High speed access may be neat for transferring large, high quality sound files, images, and even streaming video (boy, all those places that banned camera-enabled cells will love that), but I think the data / voice streams shouldn't intermingle. That way, if one gets hogged up by a lot of activity in a concentrated area, the other isn't adversly affected.
They're trying to reel in this specific type of routing. I don't know that it will fly, but clueless judges on the bench have been known to rule on, oh, say, taking non-portable address spaces with you like a telephone number, so who knows.
ok... I know that everyone likes broadband, and I think that this idea is pretty cool, but in all reality, being practical, you need to consider the fact that you generally won't need broadband on today's cell phones, but... in the future it will be useful, cell phones in the future may have the ability to stream video to a nifty little screen, or audio files, or who knows what, so setting up this technology as a framework for others to build on in the future is not a bad idea, it probably wont hurt anything... and another thing to consider is that as the services that cell phone providers offer increase, which is happening right now: 1. more and more people will use the services and 2. the features themselves will take up more bandwidth. So, for both of these cases, having a system like this will help. just my two cents
Connecting my Bluetooth GPRS phone to my Wi-Fi enabled mac laptop and adding a couple of routes would accomplish exactly this. Is this actually patentable?
How the hell is the trivial and obvious combination of widely available consumer technology patentable?
Will we need a patent license to plug a phone into a laptop, if the laptop has a Wifi card in it?
Will my zaurus w/GPRS card and built-in wifi be an infringing device?
I mean really, it's not like you need a pHD. to connect to two wireless networks at the same time on the same device.
I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
I have had this idea, and I am surely far from alone. There are probably people here who are handy with embedded Linux (or Windows CE, a la Microsoft's own home broadband routers) who have hacked together a similar device. With consumer-market PCMCIA cards that can handle the cellular end and mini-PCI 802.11 cards you can extract from most any home cable/dsl router, this is more of a hardware geek's weekend pleasure hack than a non-obvious, patentable invention.
Build one of these and mount it in your car, and you have Internet access for your laptop, PDA, and other gadgets when you hit the road. Run it on batteries and make a picnic basket or backpack that carries a wireless LAN wherever you go (power requirements shouldn't be huge, especially when the device is configured for use outdoors at very short ranges). The possibilities are endless. (Alas, I don't have the technical knowledge to build one myself.)
Microsoft Windows is, fittingly, the official Desktop OS of Olig
Is broadband speed a pre-requisite for wireless services nowadays?
Personally I would rather be able to use the Internet from as many locations as possible, than having a broadband conenction via 3G only in the city central.
Is 1G or 0.2G (or whatever older technology) too expensive to implement mobile Internet?
Rock that crushes, Paper & Scissors that don't matter.
Just see if a competent engineer can work backward, generating the desired result from the claims without the rest of the patent. It would be a piece of cake to implement such trivialities as the SUID bit or swinging sideways without being told the solution, but it's much more difficult to create a light bulb without previously understanding how one works.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
flat rate only to the handsets.
you cannot use it for data.
flat-rate "data" service to download ringtones and other garbage for $60 a month doesn't sound like a sweet deal to me.
quoting the article:
Japan has been wary of offering flat rate mobile services because of the strain on the limited amount of spectrum available. Users to the new service has unlimited access to e-mail and data services available through KDDI's portal, including access to the Internet, but does not apply to the use of a handset to connect a notebook computer to the Internet.