Slashdot Mirror


New Generation of MP3 Players, New Features

i4u writes "We got our hands on new Flash MP3 Players from two Korean Manufactures. Both players feature audio functions not seen in MP3 Player before, like SRS, WOW and TruBass. The Muzio JM-200 uses a two color OLED display. The Eratech EMP-100 is betting on small size with measurements of only 30x75x16mm." The larger (and stranger looking) JM-200 also lists ogg playback as a feature.

90 of 406 comments (clear)

  1. The US always the last to get cool stuff by solarmist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny how a lot of the "cool" stuff takes forever to get to the states. I mean MP3's players like this have been standard since I got here in Jan and probably long before that. You'll see grandma's on the bus with these guys.

    Why is it that when it comes to tech like this, or cell phones or cool laptops that we always have to wait years???

    --
    "Curiouser and Curiouser" - Alice
    1. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not that I know anything about it, but it could be that the products have to be tested against US standards for EMI, etc. or redesigned so they are compatible with a different electricity distribution system.

    2. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why is it that when it comes to tech like this, or cell phones or cool laptops that we always have to wait years???

      Why is it that when we have tech like proportionally spaced fonts some people refuse to use it, even after it has been around for years?

    3. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by cspenn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      UL testing, among other things. I used to work at Sony Electronics, and about half of the Japan imports failed UL testing - the first run of VAIO laptops actually caught fire - as in flames like a Christmas hearth - when they were first brought to SEL Park Ridge back in 1997.

      UL stress testing replicates a lot of the unimaginably stupid things users do to their devices.

    4. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by OS24Ever · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FYI - Japan is on the exact same power distribution method that the US is. The rest of the AP companies aren't, but Japan is.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    5. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

      A quick googling provides this information about Japan's electricity:
      Electricity for domestic use is supplied at 100 volts, 60 cycles AC in west Japan (Osaka) and at 100 volts, 50 cycles AC in east Japan (Tokyo).

      But those are Korean products we're talking about here.

    6. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I code in fixed width fonts as well, but I don't post to /. using them unless I am posting code. I think that people the tt tag to make their otherwise unremarkable posts stand out from the crowd visually by making it harder to read.

    7. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The U. S. has had a good long run as global superpower, over half a century. The British Empire wasn't at its peak for that long.

      "Waiting for the cool (technological) stuff" is one of a number of signs that the U. S. may be at about the peak of its power and influence, and a slight decline may have already started.

      Computer technology is not a secret, and all the manufacturing is now being done overseas. We should not be surprised that the U.S. is no longer the dominant innovator.

      The U. S. is no longer the dominant winner of Nobel prices in the sciences, either.

      I am starting to see signs of Japanese cultural influence in the U. S. "Hello Kitty" merchandise, anime, etc. After years in which the rest of the world bought Jordache blue jeans and watched "I Love Lucy" and "Miami Vice," I think the tide is starting to turn there, too.

    8. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by ceswiedler · · Score: 3, Informative

      The British Empire was most certainly as dominating a power as the US for at least a half-century. By definition, nothing is at its peak for more than a moment.

    9. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by Grimmtooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You probably don't realize it, but UL certification isn't a federal requirement. So ask Sony why they want the UL seal if it bothers you.

      --
      /* .sigs are irrelevant */
    10. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      UL stands for "Underwriter's Labratories", as in insurance. I wouldn't want my product to be something that an insurance company wouldn't cover because of massive defects.

    11. Re: The US always the last to get cool stuff by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, it wasn't my comment. Second of all, whoever wrote that comment must, by definition, be capable of changing fonts since the default posting font is a proportional-width font.

      And lastly, coding in a proportional-width font makes for ugly code that no one wants to read. Mono-spaced fonts make for much neater-looking, more aesthetically-pleasing code. Code blocks are far easier to define, and outputs are far easier to construct. I prefer Courier (not Courier New) myself.

    12. Re:The US always the last to get cool stuff by babbage · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I am starting to see signs of Japanese cultural influence in the U. S.

      I am starting to see signs of Italian cultural influence in the U. S. "Sopranos" merchandise, pizza, etc.

      I am starting to see signs of Mexican cultural influence in the U. S. Latin pop music, tex-mex restaraunts, etc.

      Etc.

      The problem, of course, is that as a so-called melting pot -- how much things "melt" is debatable, and maybe "tossed salad" is a better metaphor, but whatever -- the U.S. exhibits lots of non-local cultural influences.

      The thing is, these influences may or may not have any bearing on how dominant the amalgamated American culture is in other places.

      A better indicator would be how American vs. [other] cultural artifacts are being adopted in other parts of the world. For examples, what movies were biggers hits in Jakarta, Nairobi, Lagos, Lima, Buenos Aires, etc: Lord of the Rings & Finding Nemo, or Shaolin Soccer & Spirited Away? What ethnic foods are more popular -- hamburgers or sushi? What languages are more popular in schools?

      You'll learn far more about which culture is more popular by looking abroad than you will by looking at what is happening in the USA.

  2. USB speeds? by thesp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These seem to be USB 1.1 devices. For all the snazzy features, high-speed data transfer should be a priority.

    1. Re:USB speeds? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      USB 2.0 probably wouldn't be such a big deal on a Flash player. Hard disk players need it, though.

      TruBass not seen before on an MP3 player, though? I'm pretty sure I've got it on my (ogg-playing, DRM-unencumbered, fully Slashdot-politically-correct) iHP-140...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:USB speeds? by benito27uk · · Score: 3, Informative

      You have indeed, and you've got SRS and WOW as well on the really rather spiffy iHP-140

    3. Re:USB speeds? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Quite so. Unfortunately when I had TruBass switched on I quickly discovered the inadequacies of my car's sound system...

      I'm going to have to get hold of a copy of 'The Antisocial Urban Driver's Handbook on Making your Car into a Bloody Great Boom-Box' to make best use of this thing.

      Note: I an entirely unaffiliated with iRiver, but they do make some damn fine mp3 players.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:USB speeds? by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      TruBass is not an indicator of how good your car's stereo system is, to be frank. Effects like TruBass do DSP magic on the audio, and it's been my experience that such effects (ProLogic, TruBass, Circle-SRS) fuck the audio up royally. You should only use something like ProLogic or C-SRS if the stream was meant for it, like the Dolby Surround tracks on some DVDs (mostly TV shows), which were specifically encoded for ProLogic channel reproduction.

      But using things like TruBass is basically worthless. Your car's stereo system is probably fine. The DSP that TruBass does just happens to introduce a ton of artifacts into the sound that may or may not be perceptible, depending on what kind of music it is. For example, try listening to piano music with TruBass or Circle-SRS. It'll sound awful.

      Just stick with 2-channel stereo and mirror the front two channels to the back two in your car. You'll have a much fuller sound field, and you won't be fucking with the original sound any.

  3. WOW? by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's next, flutter?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:WOW? by KeithH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, nobody else here remembers wow and flutter specs from turntables. face it - we're old.

  4. flash MP3 players? by jbellis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    how 1990s :)

    seriously though anecdotal evidence suggests that the new HD-based devices are fine even for jogging. I guess the only niche left after that is if you need something even smaller than an IPod Mini...

    1. Re:flash MP3 players? by kneecarrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree. I can't see a single usage for a flash-based player. They are virtually indistinguishable on price and features (except for the low end) and in almost every case, the HD models have vastly more space.

      --

      I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    2. Re:flash MP3 players? by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think there is a niche for a cheaper player than the mini with, say 2 gigs rather than the mini's 4. Sell it for 99 dollars and I'll buy it. Add line-in recording and I'll buy 2.

    3. Re:flash MP3 players? by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Informative

      I own an iRiver flash MP3 player because it's tiny and light. I use it while jogging, so I wanted the lightest and least cumbersome player I could find. It also plays OGG, has an FM tuner, and is linux-friendly (thanks to the ifp-driver project). I think flash MP3 players are still a significant niche.

    4. Re:flash MP3 players? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nice troll.

      My nex-II + a 256 meg card can hold enough for a run and I dont care if I break it/lose it or intentionally smash it.

      Hell a total of $75.00 for a 256meg mp3 player with no DRM and easily swap to more music by swapping to another dirt cheap card.

      Oh, and 12 months down the road I dont have to throw my mp3 player away like Ipod owners do because the battery died and CAN NOT be replaced.

      a pair of AA batteries last me a week of daily use.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:flash MP3 players? by Like2Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, I need something smaller than an iPod Mini. In fact, I had something smaller than an iPod Mini, that cost $60, 128M, MP3 playback, looked like a disk drive to the computer, my daughter broke the USB connection too many times until I couldn't fix it... I've been looking for a replacement since.

      Good luck on finding your new daughter.

      As an aside, my father used to tell me that he could 'take me out' and make another one that looks just like me.

    6. Re:flash MP3 players? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The question is not are the HD based devices fine for jogging, but are they fine for sprinting? I bought a mini disc player a few years back, that was supposed to be safe to jog with, and it skipped uncontrollably when I ran faster than a pace of 7:30 minutes / mile. Plus, I'd like to point out that jogging / running put an unbelievable amount of stress on devices. If you've got an mp3 player in your arms that you're swinging wildly, and are running at a good clip, I would speculate you could cause a lot of damage to a hard drive that causes it to fail prematurely.

    7. Re:flash MP3 players? by krouic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a Rio PMP300 (yes the first portable MP3 player on the market) and have been using it for jogging about 40 km/week since January 1999, enduring heat, rain, freeze and sweat.

      It has no moving parts, hence its still perfect condition. It is smaller and weights less than an iPod and uses a normal AA (replaceable) battery.

      I do not think that a HD based player would have survived more than a year with the abuse my Rio has gone through.

    8. Re:flash MP3 players? by Tree131 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can't see a single usage for a flash-based player. They are virtually indistinguishable on price and features

      I disagree with you.

      I bought my gf a Soul III (cd-based mp3 player) when it first came out. I owned a Soul II and was pretty happy with it. Little did I foresee that she would completely destroy it only after 6 months of (ab)use. The metallic cover had a slight dent in it, the cd-rotating mechanism would make loud noise, and the audio became very staticky.

      My next purchase was a RioCali 256 Sport with rubber coated sides and NO moving parts. I think this one will last a lot longer. I hesitated to buy an iPod or a similar HDD based device because of moving parts. The only drawback to the Rio is that it's still USB 1.1, but based on amazon reviews it's virtually indestructible.

      The point I'm trying to make is that people choose depending on their lifestyle and how much (ab)use they're going to give to their MP3 gadget, as well as how much use/life they want out of it.

    9. Re:flash MP3 players? by anonicon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The I recently bought a 512MB flash player that doubles as a usb drive."

      Too late now, but FWIW, you might check out the Muvo2 next time - 4GB, $199 flash-based player that also runs forever and doubles as a portable USB 2.0 hard drive. I used to own a NexII with 256mb until I gave it to Mom after ordering the Muvo2.

  5. Now all they need to do... by Throtex · · Score: 2, Funny

    is integrate a cell phone! Oh, and a camera!! I'm a genius!

    1. Re:Now all they need to do... by Wild+Bill+TX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget the game cartridge slot!

  6. Wait a second by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... these aren't iPods ...

    They don't even have apples DRM nor work with iTunes.

    So why is this on slashdot?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Wait a second by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any flash player that looks like a disk drive to the computer works with iTunes.

    2. Re:Wait a second by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After Apple told me in so many words to burn audio tracks of all my iTunes downloads so that I could be sure of not losing access to them, after they reset all my "authorized" computers because I couldn't de-authorize a system disk that had died, I treat the AAC version as ephemeral. The only real copy I have of a download is the CD I burned... so ripping that is no more trouble than ripping any of the other CDs I buy.

      And there's no need to use that kind of language.

  7. And we should get excited why...? by gearmonger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Unless the price of high-density flash RAM drops dramatically sometime really soon, hard drive-based MP3 players will continue to be the de facto standard for large-capacity players.

    Besides, these "innovative" new features aren't really all that innovative. So there.

    1. Re:And we should get excited why...? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many people don't want a large-capacity player.

      They want an affordable digital alternative to a walkman, that doesn't skip when they're jogging. They don't care if it can store 2 jillion hours of music. They just want their favorite workout tunes on it, or something to listen to riding the bus, etc.

      That's an enormous market, and IMO Apple is positively stupid to ignore it. If they released an iPod that was under 100 bucks, that had say 64-256megs of flash, it'd sell like hotcakes and they'd increase the amount of iTunes customers 10 fold.

      As a comparison, there is a niche market for those 100 disc DVD jukeboxes. But there's a much larger market for regular $50 DVD players for folks who maybe rent a movie a few times a month.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:And we should get excited why...? by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing you described is a minidisc player.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    3. Re:And we should get excited why...? by gearmonger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, I don't buy it. As the volume of, say, 4 GB hard drives increases, its price drops dramatically. If most people were given a choice between an $80 512MB flash-based player and an $80 4GB HDD-based player, they'd choose the latter. And no, my iPod Mini has never skipped on me...ever, yet my flash-based MP3 player hiccups on even the slightest imperfection in the MP3 file. All in all, the flash-unit stays in the drawer a lot more often these days (and I don't even have the iPod filled up).

    4. Re:And we should get excited why...? by ilsie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice troll, but I'll bite.

      They want an affordable digital alternative to a walkman, that doesn't skip when they're jogging. They don't care if it can store 2 jillion hours of music. They just want their favorite workout tunes on it, or something to listen to riding the bus, etc.

      I have an Ipod Mini- doesen't skip while I'm jogging (and I've taken it on a 50 minute run many times). Even though it has a 4 GB capacity, I only store around 400 MB of music on it, because that's all I care to listen to.

      But why would I spend $220 on that 512 MB flash based player when the 4GB ipod mini is only $30 more?

      If they released an iPod that was under 100 bucks, that had say 64-256megs of flash, it'd sell like hotcakes and they'd increase the amount of iTunes customers 10 fold.

      Nope. The point of iTMS is to get people to buy the iPod, not the other way around.

    5. Re:And we should get excited why...? by zhiwenchong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whoa, let's not be presumptuous here. It's easy for the man on the street to think that Apple should do this or that... but you have to consider the economics.

      Apple does not traditionally target the ultra low-end market for a couple of reasons. For one, they're not big enough. I believe this came up in a discussion comparing Dell and Apple, and cheap PCs. Dell has the manufacturing facilities and [vastly superior] distribution channels to handle a high-volume low-margin market. Apple does not. Just look at the problems they're having churning out enough $249 iPod Minis for the U.S. market (btw, because of production problems, us chaps in Canada still can't buy iPod minis; they're only coming out Jul 24 over here).

      Second, Apple has a reputation of making innovative products. It charges a premium for it. It just doesn't do assembly like Dell does; it also does industrial design. That's why iPods are well-liked and perceived to be cool. When it comes down to it, it's just a digital music player with really good design. Someone had to pay for the industrial design and marketing (not free, you know).

      In short, Apple just doesn't seem like that kind of company that thrives on products that just barely breaking even. It can't survive in that market.

      p.s. Steve Jobs has said that they're working to make cheaper iPods. But don't expect any $100 ones any time soon.

  8. Those features by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love the jargon they come up with to claim they have "features". Here's what they actually mean:

    SRS - "Small rectangular sticker". This is a small sticker in a rectangular shape with the letters "SRS" on it.

    WOW - "Works Over Water". this has been especially designed so that if you try to use it over a body of water it will still work.

    TruBass - Much like TruCalling; If the bass dies it repeats the following day.

    The moral - don't be fooled by marketing hype.

    1. Re:Those features by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 3, Funny
      Error in your translation....

      TruBass - that fishy smell isn't artificial!

  9. Useless features? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it strange that everyone needs all these "amazing new features" etc. etc. but 99% of the time it won't change how the music sounds at all. I don't see the point of buying a new VCR because mine still works, same goes for TV, GBA(not SP) and so on and so forth.

    Why waste 300 on some new gadget which will work pretty much identical to the old ones when the global standard isn't changing much (global standard for MP3s will always just be the old MP3 untill replaced for example).

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Useless features? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently bought a Korean import player at my local OEM computer shop. The Muro MR-100 is a standard flash based MP3 player -- 256mb ram, FM radio, variety of settings. But the whiz-bang feature that sold me on it was the FM transmitter built in!

      For a 4 hour road trip on the long weekend I copied over my Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy radio plays and had a nice alternative to radio for the weekend. The transmitter worked flawlessly, and it saved me time and $ from burning my own CDs for the trip.

      I agree that alot of the 'amazing new features' are totally bogus, but every once in awhile there is some real innovation between product generations (aside from increased capacity).

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Useless features? by Null537 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find it strange that everyone needs all these "amazing new features" etc. etc. but 99% of the time it won't change how the music sounds at all. I don't see the point of buying a new VCR because mine still works,

      I agree, if somebody listens to Britney Spears it's still going to sound like trash, no matter how many "new features" are added, and porn doesn't need the best quality VCR to still look good.

    3. Re:Useless features? by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I find it strange that everyone needs all these "amazing new features" etc. etc. but 99% of the time it won't change how the music sounds at all.
      On the contrary, it will change how the music sounds. It'll sound worse.
  10. Apple on Top.. by artlu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless I can get a flash player for $50 that is the size of a AAA battery, flash players are dead to me. Nothing can stop the iPod!

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Apple on Top.. by Biogenesis · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it's only as big as a AAA what are you going to power it with? Your own sence of self satisfaction?

  11. I just see crappy iPod interfaces by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People seem to understand that iPod got it right with their circular controls, but all the other MP3 plays I've seen implement it ths far shrink it so much. I'm no giant of a man, but my fingers are still fat enough to mash a few buttons at once. Smaller is not always better. I never understood the benefit of OGG either. Could someone explain that? When I have 15GB does it really matter how great my compression is on the songs?

    1. Re:I just see crappy iPod interfaces by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the compression/quality ratio doesn't matter to you, there's really not much anyone could say to sway you. However, mp3 is actually a licensed technology, which is bad, and there is a movement to add DRM to it as a standard, which is worse. OGG (Ogg Vorbis to be correct)is free, and certainly isn't about to add draconian DRM to its code. Also, I should mention that I have upwards of 40GB of music on my PC hard drives, so really, a smaller ogg of nearly equal quality to a large mp3 would go a long way to putting more of my music into my device, and I don't think I'm all alone out here with not wanting to stick 256/320kbps MP3s on if 128/192kbps ogg vorbis files are pretty much just as good.

      --
      I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
    2. Re:I just see crappy iPod interfaces by Biogenesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ogg is simply free/open source. Better encoding quality is purely accidental.

    3. Re:I just see crappy iPod interfaces by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have an 80G portable so I can compress my music however I'd like to...

      Some of us use Ogg (note that it is not an acronym) Vorbis for our music collections on our computer and don't want to re-encode everything for our portables (especially when you start getting into the 300+ disc range as I have).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
  12. Geez... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 4, Funny


    "...with measurements of only 30x75x16mm"

    Great...I already can't find my keys half the time as it is.

  13. Ogg support by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't encode MP3s above 56kbps without paying a licence fee to Fraunhofer-IIS. You don't need to pay a licence fee for Ogg.

    1. Re:Ogg support by OS24Ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My iPod costs the same amount whether or not I use MP3 or Vorbis. It's not like there is a 'license fee free' version out there that supports only vorbis...

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    2. Re:Ogg support by hankwang · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can't encode MP3s above 56kbps without paying a licence fee to Fraunhofer-IIS.

      Unless FHG changed the rules in the past couple of months, the license-fee structure is something like this:

      • Selling encoded music: 3% (or so) of what you charge for the music
      • Selling an encoder: a fee per software license if you *sell* it. The lame encoder can be used legally for free because you don't have to pay for it. There are issues with distributing a compiled version, though.
      • Selling a decoder: a fee per decoder ($1 or so).
      There is a minimum amount of money you have to pay in license fees (a 5-digit number), but only a company that sells for more than $50,000 or so per year needs to pay any fees at all.

      You as a private person are perfectly allowed to encode MP3s. You can even legally sell the MP3s as long as you stay below the treshold (provided you don't violate copyright issues with the music itself, of course :-) ).

    3. Re:Ogg support by pavon · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are right - it doesn't really make any difference for hardware devices if you have to licence the codec or not - peanuts in the overall cost. Same with proprietary software - the licencing costs won't add much to the cost of the product, so no big deal.

      But open source software is a problem. It is illegal to distribute an mp3 encoder without paying the licence fees, which makes it impossible to have a legal open source mp3 encoder (or DVD players, or anything else that is patented) because to be open the licence must allow anyone to redistribute it without restriction. The way that LAME gets around that issue is that "LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder" - it is a reference implementation for educational use only. This doesn't really solve the problem, it just makes the users criminals instead of the developers and distributers.

      So we don't like patented formats for that reason - because it is illegal for us to use those formats on our open source systems, and if we are restricted to use open formats on our computer, it would be really nice to use them on our handheld music players as well, which fortunately is a very viable option, contrary to what the whiners here say, and thanks to some cool hardware companies.

  14. Cool laptops by SpinyManiac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool laptops? You can't get those anywhere.
    Only bollock burner specials these days.

    --
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
  15. iPod by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, I'm an unabashed Apple fanboy, but I'd like to know why I should choose this over an iPod. None of these features matter to me. Tru-Bass? the iPod has a huge EQ selection, and you can assign an EQ to each individual song in iTunes and it carries over to the iPod.

    If these gadgets aren't half the price of an iPod mini, I have no reason to consider them. There's no mention of disk space on the JM-200, but I want GB's, not MB's.

    1. Re:iPod by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's fine for you then.

      Myself, I couldn't imagine there's 20gigs of compressed music out there that I'd want to listen to. I'm a creature of habit, when I listen to recorded music, it's the same dozen punk and metal albums. Y'know, the ones with about 10 2 minute songs.

      I don't enjoy recorded music, it's merely a distraction while I'm on the plane. In the car, I'd rather listen to the radio. I prefer live music, I'd rather listen to some local band jamming at the bar on friday than stay up late buying songs on iTunes to fill up a big HDD with RIAA horseshit. I'd rather hear some small band doing Rolling Stones covers for free beer, because they enjoy playing, than to own the entire Stones' discography.

      To each their own. There's a huge market made up of people just like me. Not everyone has, or aspires to have, a 90000000 CD collection.

      So, how about a compromise. You buy what you want to buy, I'll buy what I want to buy.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:iPod by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. I've finally met you.

      Everytime I'm at a bar, and some caterwauling douchebag with a Heineken, Leathers, and a Michael Bolton haircut steps onto the "stage" and says, "thank you! we're 'turbo brush fire!'", I sigh to myself, die a little inside and wonder, "Who actually enjoys this shit?"

      Now I know. God bless you. ;)

      --Don't take it personally. Tis but a joke. Back to my nsync cd's. ;)

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
  16. Ogg Vorbis Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's nice to see these new players support open source audio formats like Ogg Vorbis. It's even nicer to see services like Audio Lunchbox and others offer Oggs for download.

  17. Actually..... by arcangelo · · Score: 2, Informative

    for Christmas of last year I did buy a Samsung Yepp' MP3 player (model YP-55 - 192Mb of storage). Mind you, it's not to be compared to any uber-fancy MP3 players that go for hundreds of $$$ but, it certainly does have features like WOW, SRS and TruBass .... and did I mention I got it in Canada? ;)

  18. Info by guido1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Googled up some info on these players, as I4U seems to be dead.

    The EPM-100 has 512M flash, a very small 3-line display, and is about the size of a thumbdrive. I found it selling for $220.

    The JM200 has 256M flash (unknown if upgradeable via cards), includes a FM tuner, and looks downright funky. It doesn't seem to be available for purchase yet.

  19. Not seen before? by Dryth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both players feature audio functions not seen in MP3 Player before, like SRS, WOW and TruBass.

    At last check, my iRiver iHP-120 supports SRS, WOW, and TruBass in amongst its EQ settings. Don't know about their Flash-based players, but it would be surprising if some of them didn't.

  20. More details of the Eratech by earthloop · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.eratech.co.kr/eng/prod/pro3_1.htm

    Grab it while you can.

  21. This is timely for me by ThePlague · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been looking to get an MP3 player as a gift for someone for a few weeks now, and I just can't seem to find one model that has the features I want:

    Flash-based: she's a runner, so I don't believe the HD based ones could last

    FM Tuner

    USB 2.0

    Voice Recording

    256 MB internal, with the ability to expand via a card slot (SD preferable, but others would be considered)

    Act as pen drive (in Windows) without additional drivers or the need for a cable.

    It seems like relatively simple and low-end requirements, but I can't seem to find a device that fulfills all these. If you know of one specifically, I would appreciate feedback.

  22. Coolest feature about these MP3 players: by torpor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the fact that, in quantity, these key-chain USB/MP3 players can be had for as little as $10 per item.

    Why is this great, "in quantity"? Well, I know plenty of unsigned artists whose mp3's are floating around the internet, promoting them, who can now offer "Albums" on these MP3 devices, custom-like, to their loyal fans.

    Mark my words: CD's are dead. Static MP3's are dead.

    Long-live the value-added MP3-player-bundled-with-new-tracks website freelance musician upsell!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  23. Audiobook Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have the Rio Karma, 20GB, which is pretty good all things considered, I really like it.

    But the one feature I've never been able to find in an MP3 player that would be perfect for listening to audiobooks is variable speed playback.

    Many audiobooks you could speed up the playback by 20% - 50% and still understand it and comprehend it. In many cases you retain more because your mind doesn't have time to drift off.

    Very useful, but I haven't been able to find a player (or even software on a PC) that will do it on the fly, so each file has to be transcoded, which is time consuming.

  24. I was really impressed untill... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I saw these two things:
    1. powered by a built-in Li-polymer battery
    2. Both players still feature only a USB 1.1 interface
    I went to the Korean website and peeked at the specs page (it's in Korean, but #s are still #s) and found out the battery is 3.7 Volts. Anyways, even though it's a lithium polymer, it's still only got ~3yrs of lifespan before it's kaput. And USB 1.1! It's not horribly slow, but with all the stuff packed in their you'd think we could get our 400Mbps worth.

    The USB 1.1 isn't a deal breaker, but if i can't easily get to that li-polymer battery... It'd be the whole iPod story again. This time with an overseas manufacturer.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  25. I think you need to speed up the silences... by N+Monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    But the one feature I've never been able to find in an MP3 player that would be perfect for listening to audiobooks is variable speed playback.

    Many audiobooks you could speed up the playback by 20% - 50% and still understand it and comprehend it. In many cases you retain more because your mind doesn't have time to drift off.


    Apparently a better thing to do is to reduce the length of silences between words etc. I remember seeing research (perhaps 20years ago!) into a variable speed tape recorder/player which would reduce silences in speech but leave the words at the normal rate.

    That way you don't have to listen to mickey mouse or the chipmunks yet still save time and maintain comprehension.

    1. Re:I think you need to speed up the silences... by skiflyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a lovely idea, it's how I watch seasons of shows like 24... cause lets face it, there's no acting genious in any of that stuff, but I still want to know what happens.

      I've found I can trim about 7 hours off each season by watching it at a faster bit rate, and really the only thing I ever lose are dramatic pauses.

      Would love to see this feature added to my iRiver, slow as they are, it's nice they actually do update firmware on occassion so maybe I'll get lucky.

      In the meantime, does anyone know if there's any software solution to the above suggestion? By which I don't mean re-recording my audio stream while playing it back faster, but one which would just re-encode an MP3 or OGG file with time compression?

  26. Compact Flash Damnit!!!! by NullStream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear MP3 player manufacturers,

    Lots of people have compact flash media why not make a model of your wonder device that supports compact flash? The semi-competant guys at Frontier Labs do (albeit the firmware from there products is less than perfect).

    SD/MMC cards are useless because they are too fragile (physically and electromagically) so much so you can't just put one in your wallet and just carry it around for a week without the card dying.

    Please support CF in your future products OK PLZ TKS.

    --
    Null

    --
    "Survival of the fittest Max, and we've got the fucking gun!" - Pi
  27. Jm-200 look like a real skined player by denisbergeron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google is my friend and give me this link : http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/muzio-jm200-flash- player-with-twocolor-oled-017186.php
    i want one. Period. here the texts :
    A new Muzio from Korean manufacturer Jungsoft (promoting the hot new band, "Man and His Cymbals"), this one called the JM-200. Besides being sort of ugly, which is probably not a bullet-point feature, the Muzio supports USB Host functionality, SRS (some sort of surround sound magic?), OGG Vorbis support, FM radio, aluminum body, and recharging via USB. Plus, it has a two-color OLED screen, which probably isn't too much to get worked up over, but there you have it. I4U has some information, and apparently a test model, so expect a proper review in the next few days.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  28. My solution by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always been an advocate of the Minidisc player, ever since they came out with NetMD, so you could hook it up to USB. These things have amazing battery life, unlimited storage capacity (switching disks), and are quite small. They never skip, are quite cheap, very durable, and as one poster was searching for, they allow you to fast forward while listening.

    Also, for me, it just feels a lot more like a music player, then those memory stick or built in hard drive players. Something about putting disks into it just make it seem more fun.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  29. Here's the real answer by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's because the major tech manufacturing/fabrication centers are in China, Korea, Japan. Usually the parent company is there too, so we've got major corporations, convienent manufacturing capabilities and a market place of over 1 Billion people. That more than anything is why we don't get this stuff for years. What they do is create a flurry of hi-tech gadgets and use their 1 Billion+ peoples as a test market. The best features make it into the U.S. and European markets, but waaaay after they were first introduced overseas.

    We ooh and ahh over our camera phones and neato-toys while the asian people I know have these wild phones that do decent videos and have respectably sized LED displays. Wafer thin laptops with split screens you can rotate, last year they were selling cellphones with 3D displays, teeny tiny Sony Viao laptops. They just can't afford to throw expensive toys into large scale production without gauging reliability and purchasability. That and the frequently have to redesign their products for meaty American fingers.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Here's the real answer by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, they market the gadgets in large cities like Soel or Chiba or Singapore or Shanghai or Tokyo or Hong Kong or Yokohama or Bangkok or Beijing... thats 9 cities & covers at least 55+ Million people. I might have under estimated since the numbers I found were a bit old.

      Here's a quote from an article dated Oct. 2003.

      Samsung can also use South Korea as a test market. Some 70% of the country's homes are wired for broadband. Twenty percent of the population buys a new cell phone every seven months.

      Samsung already sells a phone in Korea that allows users to download and view up to 30 minutes of video and watch live tv for a fixed monthly fee. Samsung is selling 100,000 video-on-demand phones a month in Korea at $583 each. Verizon plans to introduce them in three US cities this fall

      *Does some quick math*
      That's $58.3 million per month. You think 100,000/month in the U.S. will spend almost $600 for one of those? The United States doesn't even have the freakin' infrastructure to send out live video & tv to a cell phone. Their current network gets swamped as it is "Network Busy".

      Every company sets up a limited release of their product in various test markets to guage how well it'll be recieved. Pepsi used to have a product called Pepsi Kona. Now guess why we aren't drinking it today? Because it didn't shine in the test market. The End.

      Oh, and no it's not because of design faults, its because most of their tech is expensive. If they roll out something new in a city of 10 million people and it doesn't catch on, you think they're going to send it overseas and try again?

      The other part is that U.S. consumers want it cheap. New != cheap. Cell phone companies here practically give away the phone so that they can lock you into a service contract. My phone was about $20 after an instant rebate and the store sending in the mfg rebate to knock off another $120 at the register. I haven't seen it anywhere for less than $260 & CompUSA sells it for $350. Ouch.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  30. Umm those are new features??? by FruitCak · · Score: 2, Informative

    since when, the iriver i picked up a couple of months ago has all those features

    --
    I'm me. I think.
  31. The perfect mp3 player by pcx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ideal mp3 player would be...

    1] A cell phone with bluetooth capability.
    2] A bluetooth enabled headset.
    3] All major music formats including ogg.
    4] A "bookmark" feature (useful for book on tape or book on mp3).
    5] Stopwatch with lap timing and counters. (For those of us who exercise)
    6] FM tuner.
    7] XM or Syrius Tuner.
    8] Uses standard flash ram cards for expansion.
    9] USB 2.0 at minimum.
    10] Rechargable battery and docking station.
    11] Garage door opener (for those who exercise and need a way to get into the house without lugging your keys around) :)

    That's my wish list. To date, nobody has even come close.

    1. Re:The perfect mp3 player by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you considered Sony Ericsson P 900?Apart from size i Guess it's allright.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
  32. nobody has come close... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because right now that would be the size of a laptop. :-)

  33. Flash players work better for the Korean market by Sangbin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm here in Korea and the people seem to use the players mostly in the subways and the buses.

    In the States where the people use it in the car or perhaps in their work places, the capacity of the storage is a big deal since they may use it for up to 8 hours continuously.

    That's certainly not the case for the people here. The average time spent in a bus or the subways is around 30min~1hr, and you don't need anything over a gig for that.

    When you don't need the storage, wouldn't you want a flash player that you can put in your pocket along with your cellphone?

    I think the US slashdotters would understand the reason behind the development of the new mp3 players when they understand the culture here better.

  34. What these do: by Otto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Essentially, these all mess with the audio in some way. These are all by SRS Labs, BTW.

    This is all my opinion, more or less. Quotes from SRS are found here: http://www.srslabs.com/ConsumerTechMonoStereo.asp

    SRS - Sound Retrieval System
    Claims to be able to "retrieve the spatial information that is lost during ordinary audio compression from any stereo recording and restores the original three-dimensional sound field." Also claims to be able to eliminate the "sweet spot" and "isolate and restore the spatial cues and place them in the proper space relative to the direct sounds, such as a soloist or dialogue."

    What it really does, as far as I can tell: It uses an algorithim to isolate the audio into various sets of frequencies, which it then amplifies on various speakers and introduces a slight time delay. The effect of this is to give a slight emphasis to various parts of the sound. In a 5.1 surround system, this will make it seem as if the various chunks of frequencies are coming from more specific parts of the room. This is a neat effect, but the truth of the matter is that you can't restore what isn't there. Not really. It's a trick that lets there appear to be spatial orientation on the sound, but the spatial orientation it gives is entirely made up. It's not really what it is supposed to sound like, and it's not "much closer to what the artist originally intended" as they claim. You think artists don't listen to their own work and talk to their sound engineers? The original source material you have in the player is what the artist intended because it's what you actually got from them. SRS is a neat trick, but not actually any better. It'll work on headphones, but works best in a 5.1 surround situation. On a 2 speaker scenario, the artifical delays it introduces really hurt the sound noticably.

    WOW
    WOW claims to "dramatically improves the quality, dynamics, image field size and bass tones of digitally compressed audio file formats including WMA, WAV, MP3 files."

    What it really does, as far as I can tell: It enhances a small band on the high end of the frequency spectrum, compresses the low end, then sticks the whole thing through a phaser to make it sound kinda deep and slightly echo-y (a phaser, for those not into audio, basically eliminates very specific frequencies.. whatever ones you have it set to... you can do all sorts of weird things with a programmable one, but it creates a pretty distinctive type of sound). On cheap ass speakers, this sort of thing can make it sound like your speakers are bigger, but the actual bass output suffers horribly on good speakers, and the echo type of effect is annoying as hell once you notice it.

    TruBass
    TruBass claims to "produce the perception of lower bass tones and deeper, richer bass from products that contain small, medium or large size speakers."

    What it really does, as far as I can tell: Basically it increases the Bass. What? You have a bass control? Well, TruBass does it better. Oh wait, no, it doesn't. It's using some kind of tricky harmonics deal to enhance the low end of the audio to make it seem louder without actually making it louder. In other words, TruBass will increase the *perception* of the bass without actually increasing the amount of bass there. The human ear is better at certain frequencies than others, and TruBass adds harmonics to the bass that increase those frequency ranges, increasing the amount of bass you hear. But it will not increase the amount of bass that you *feel*, which to me, is kinda the whole point of bass. TruBass will work best on small crappy speakers, in other words, where you don't expect to feel any bass anyway. And the distortion on the bass is pretty severe, if you have a song with good bass to begin with.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  35. New Features? by Zarnce · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have an IRiver iHP-120. My player already has all those "new" features. Whats the big deal?
    My player is just slightly larger than an ipod. It lasts twice as long. It handles the Ogg format. I could keep going but I should get back to work.

    Zarnce

  36. OLED lifetime issue? by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    uses a two color OLED display

    Don't OLEDs still have a shorter lifespan than standard LCDs?

    Considering how often an mp3 player is using the display when running, song info - etc., would the shorter lifespan of the OLEDs make a difference?

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  37. My flash-based wishlist by NoData · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the links in the post (i4u.com) asked people to send in a description of their dream mp3 player. Here's the (admittedly long-winded) email I sent them If someone knows a player that meets this description, I'd love to here about it.

    (To be fair, flash cards are not essential. If they designed a 2 GB fixed flash player, I'd probably be happy with that as well. But HD is still too heavy and not rugged enough for serious exercise).

    ----

    Hi. I'm writing to answer the question posed in your June 24 article regarding what would be included in my "dream" portable music player. Here's my version.

    I primarily use my mp3 player to work-out. So the popular hard drive-based players are either too bulky, too heavy, or, most importantly, just too skip- and damage-prone for rigorous fitness activities. Thus, I want to design the ideal flash-based player for active use. However, the flash-based players currently out there geared for fitness lack several key features.

    The first problem is memory format. Most flash-based players (like the Nike PSA) have a fixed amount of flash memory. With flash card technology, that's just an unnecessary limitation. Why would I want fixed storage when virtually unlimited storage is possible with just the addition of a card port? However, even among card-based players there is an incredible paucity of those that support CompactFlash. Even though this is the flash format of choice for the immensely popular Canon camera line, and is the cheapest flash format per MB, very, very few players (with the exception of the hard-to-find Nex line) support it. This puzzles me quite a bit. I own a Canon camera, and I want a flash MP3 player. Why would I want to invest in two different flash card formats? It seems that a manufacturer that shrewdly marketed the lower cost and ubiquity of CF for existing cams could take advantage of this.

    CF is larger than other card formats, but it's still so small and light that its form factor really does not add bulk. Plus, it is now available in higher capacities (like 1 GB) than any other flash format, rivaling some hard drive players.

    The second feature I would want in my player is playlist support. Especially when I'm listening to music for exercise, the songs I pick hugely impact my level of motivation and performance. I want to be able to choose on the fly the subset of tunes that fit the mood of the moment. No flash-based player I know of support m3u or other playlist formats. This is a HUGE drawback. On my Nex II player, I have to create new folders with songs dropped in the order I want to hear them every time I go work out. It's a pain. Plus, with flash capacities growing, I want to maintain a set organizational strategy for my music (like folders by artist and album) and not reorganize music every time I listen. The built-in song-flagging pseudo-playlist feature some of these players have is not a substitute for a standard, reusable playlist. This is a must.

    The third feature I want my player to have is a quality digital FM tuner. Most gyms have TVs set up in front of exercise equipment (like stationary bikes, treadmills, etc.), broadcasting the audio portion on local FM bands. I want to be able enjoy this feature of my gym, as well listen to local stations from time to time. Another must for any gymrat.

    Finally, the player must be ergonomically designed for use by someone who is exercising while using the player. That is, it should, foremost, come with a comfortable, washable, neoprene *armband* case that holds the player snugly. Tunebelt makes some great generic versions of such a case, but they are not tailored for particular players (iPod being an exception). Second, the player itself must have *large* controls, clearly discriminable by touch, and inuitively positioned so one can reach them on their arm while working out. A tiny stick-like player is useless while working out, as is something bouncing around on a lanyard around your nec

    1. Re:My flash-based wishlist by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't seem to support "external" playlists (i.e. I don't see any way to upload one), but the player itself has a playlist feature. Aside from using playlists you can break out the songs into directories and the player has options for playing only that directory. Also, if you don't set it on shuffle it'll play the songs in exactly the order uploaded, if that helps any. So I don't think it has the playlist support you're looking for, but I haven't come across any flash player that does.

  38. Loading up music by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All that said, having to "load up" with music from my PC still annoys me.

    Agreed, that is the part I like the least. I use the ifp-driver, so I think the best way, if you want to switch up music often, is to write a simple script to take off every file and upload a random set from a hard disk directory. That way you just plug it in and run one script. Of course having it all on the player would be most convenient, but a script might not be so bad.

    1. Re:Loading up music by shut_up_man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is exactly what I plan on doing when iRiver release UMS firmware for my IFP-790T. That will make it visible as a removable drive under Windows, instead of forcing me to use the nasty "copy a single file at a time by dragging and dropping" manager they bundle with the unit.

      Pretty funny though, a actual example of where Linux's driver support is superior to Windows when using a just-released multimedia gadget!