Slashdot Mirror


More on Inflatable Space Hotels

StJefferson writes "It's anything but a traditional Budget Suites room, with a price tag projected to be somewhere in the range of US$50,000-100,000 per night. But Bob Bigelow's inflatable space habs will get their first trial next November, and are expected to go into production in 2008. There's even speculation that Bigelow is in talks with Burt Rutan regarding the small problem of getting customers to the door of his high-flying outposts. And the best part? Bigelow's doing this all on his own, as a private entrepreneurial venture. He's only answerable to his wife regarding the wisdom of this investment, and 'so far, she's on board.' Remind you Heinlein fans of anyone?" We've mentioned this guy before.

24 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Why do the private investors forget the DETAIL by LilJC · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We need a new shuttle.

    If they would make that and NASA used it, they would be plenty rich with all the fame to go with it.

    Without that, their inventions are like thought experiments... they'd be better off conducting the Schrodinger's Cat experiment with two ants.

    --

    The only thing more dangerous than a file named -rf is renaming it -rf\ /
  2. Entrepreneurs In Space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's good to finally see some of the benefits of the capitalist system making their way into attempts at space travel. I imagine Bigelow (and the people running SpaceShipOne, and any other Entrepreneurs In Space) will achieve better and faster results, too, since his (their) own money is on the line...which is kind of the point of letting the money run things instead of doing it because the government wants to put a flag on the moon just to stick it to those commie Russians.

    1. Re:Entrepreneurs In Space! by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whatever -- it was all USSR/USA tax dollars that these companies are exploiting. Testing, research, data etc etc -- virtually every bit of knowledge was created in State Run Programs.

      Now, fall the free-market theists are spouting how "nasa needs to get out of the way" -- out of the way of what? None of this would be possible *at all* if they hadnt proven it possible.

      Im not saying there isnt room for people to squeeze usefull project out of more reasonable resources, but they are only doing it because they are "standing on the shoulders of giants".

  3. Sky high prices by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...[needing a valve for life support]Bigelow went shopping. American aerospace giants were willing to sell him the valve at costs that ranged from $300,000 to $1 million. Bigelow found and purchased the same valve from a European company. The cost for the identical valve? A mere $5,000.
    Sounds like the legendary $500 hammer, you know the one where they put all the design and fixed costs into the price of the first run of products. It generally get really expensive if you are only doing one. For example if they only built one Ford Focus it would be a Billion dollar car. Most likely the german company has invested in a computerized milling machine, which greatly reduces costs for single items.
    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Sky high prices by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And why wouldn't the american companies have a computerized milling machine? Come to think of it, Germany's workers are on the average more skilled, but american companies are more set up for massive amounts of production.

      The american aerospace industry is so used to fat margins and unlimited budgets that in many ways they're 'fat and lazy'. This happens when compition doesn't exist.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  4. Re:This will be great by mrright · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think accidents will not be a big deal. People risk their lives for all kinds of crazy shit like climbing the mount everest, so why should they not be allowed to risk their lives to live in space?

    Early aviation history is full of deadly accidents. And people have still continued to build and fly airplanes.

    If some nanny state government like the peoples republic of california will outlaw private space flight, the development will simply move somewhere else. Even if private spaceflight is outlawed in the whole US, there are other countries in the world.

    --
    Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
  5. Re:This will be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, just like the first boat out of Europe in the 15th century that sunk or the first European scalped by an Indian froze in terror the heart of Europeans everywhere and made them stay home.

    When did people become such cowards? Our ancestors would be ashamed that a few deaths shutdown exploration everywhere. God how I hate the 21st century.

  6. Re:Radiation ? by mrright · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first space habitats will be in low earth orbit where the earth magnetosphere provides some protection from charged particle radiation from the sun and deep space.

    And the bigelow designs will use water-filled bladders on the inside of the wall to provide additional radiation protection. If you want to go outside low earth orbit, just add more water.

    For solar storms there will be a radiation shelter with very thick water walls.

    --
    Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
  7. Re:Radiation ? by argoff · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Well, if the inflatable hotels were shaded by inflatable water tanks, it might just work. Or perhaps some kind of artifical magnetic field too.

  8. Re:Why? by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, whatever. And transporting materials for heavy industry into a high orbit is going to cut costs.

    You're idea sounds a hell of a lot better and cheaper than decent acoustic insulation.

    Pardon the sarcasm above, but I'm just not buying it. Your idea seems too far-fetched even for sci-fi.

  9. Re:Burt Rutan does not matter. by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So why is Burt Rutan suddenly the go-to guy for all things space-related

    It's kind of like the Wrights and Curtis becoming "go to" guys for travel, even though they could move maybe two people 50 miles and everyone knew that Cunard Lines and Leland Stanford's railroads could actually accomplish real transportation.

    An alliance between pioneers in a field only makes sense; who's to say Rutan won't have an orbital vehicle in 10 years? Be kind of useless without a destination.

  10. Re:Burt Rutan does not matter. by julesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So why is Burt Rutan suddenly the go-to guy for all things space-related

    Because, while what he has achieved might not be everything, nobody else has achieved more without government backing.

  11. Re:Why? by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sex.

    The VCR took off because of porn
    The internet took off because of porn
    Space tourism will take of because of Sex.

  12. This is Waaayyy before it's time. by phayes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Private sector access to space is nowhere NEAR ready! A "Space Hotel" needs to be placed in ORBIT, not just the 100km flea jump the X prize needs. Rutan's SS1 will almost certainly win the X prize in the near future, but it was designed SPECIFICALLY to win the X prize & is a dead end for access to orbit. Other entrants in the X prize such as Xcor & Armadillo may be beaten to the punch by SS1, but they have a much better chance of being adaptable to an orbital rocket.

    SS1 reaches Mach 3 at maximum speed. Even if you could swap the rocket motor in SS1 with one which can reach orbit, neither SS1 nor it's mothership are big enough to carry it. In order to attain orbit Mach 25+ is needed and the difficulties (notably thermal protection issues) mount at the cube of the mach. Reentry heating is almost a non issue for SS1, but as the last shuttle flight showed is A MAJOR PROBLEM when returning from orbit.

    I wish it was different but we'll need at least another decade & probably more before private access to space become a reality beyond the souped up sounding rockets that the X prize contestants represent.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  13. this is cool and all by jford235 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but is there wifi and will my powerbook work up there?

  14. Re:Why? by 3waygeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
  15. The space question I've never dared ask.... by LilJC · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So we all are familiar with astronaut questions like how they pee, heck it's been televised... but what about, erm, other needs?

    A guy is in space for 6 months... his testicles are still working, right? They have to have some solution, or they'd just have a bunch of nocturnal emissions on their space blankets.

    Yes this is a silly question, but I'm not trying to make a joke, I am genuinely curious.

    --

    The only thing more dangerous than a file named -rf is renaming it -rf\ /
  16. Re:He seems serious by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The big aerospace companies haven't been taking these people seriously exactly for the fact that they're "only" spending $500 Mil. Would you take anyone seriously if they told you they could build a car for 1% of what everyone else is selling it for? ($5 Billion vs $500 Million) Oops, that's just the initial investment, add in the .2% each one will cost and you're saying you'll build a car company and sell $200 dollar cars. And you'll do it in 6 years.

    I wouldn't believe you. Individuals have always been able to do amazing things on relatively shoe-string budgets, when they don't have to get caught up in the big business shuffle.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  17. Re:Why? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, whatever. And transporting materials for heavy industry into a high orbit is going to cut costs.

    It would severely cut costs if the materials come from a higher orbit, IIRC, the moon has quite a lot of construction materials such as Iron. You could mine the materials from there, and mass drive them to your factories. "Rare" materials could potentially be mined in large quantities from passing asteroids. Given the DeltaV necessary to move the material into the proper orbit, these materials probably won't drop prices by much, but they will provide an abundant supply.

  18. Re:He seems serious by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The car market is a mass-production, mature industry. The space industry is not.

    Think about how much a hand built car used to cost (include inflation), before Ford came along and made the process more efficient. That's along the lines of what this guy is trying to do. Just the fact that he managed to get a valve for $3k instead of $300k indicates that costs can be cut.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  19. Re:OT: zillion-dollar-hammer by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just like the $300 coffee pot was for a C-130 full of troops

    Couldnt they have, like, used flasks ?

    Actually, it was part of a $20,000 hot coffee/tea/soup dispensing system built into the planes used by the Rapid Deployment Force. When you need to send the RDF somewhere, there really isn't time for people to go find a thermos make a pot of coffee. Besides, when they wake you up in the middle of the night and say "get your gear and form up"*, you have no way of knowing if it's just a drill or if it's the real thing. Do you carry around thermos of hot coffee all day and sleep with one under your pillow all niught, just in case?

    * happened to me in December 1989. Woke us up at 2am and said "get your shit ready". Four hours later we were flying to Panama.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  20. Re:Burt Rutan? by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not a mod today, but I am disappointed in you. Burt's craft (arguably Paul's craft) solves many, many problems. Its a first step (see tier) in developing a cheap way to space. I challenge you to get to 100km on $20 million (2004 dollars). I wonder how much other teams have spent & what there chances are of reaching space at all, much less doing it twice, with a 600lb payload, in 2 weeks. Nevermind doing it *first*.

  21. Re:Yes you are missing something. by barawn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    X-15 flew 199 times, Spaceship One flew once. You have to divide the cost by the flight count.

    Three times already, actually. And what kind of bizarre logic is that? As that article pointed out, just the research for the engine alone cost more than three times SS1's current complete development cost. If the X-15 had flown once, it wouldn't have cost just $1 million.

    And even admitting that logic, you'd still have to back down after the next three flights, at which point the two vehicles would be at the same cost per flight in real dollars, and adjusting for 40 years of inflation is a lot of adjustment.

  22. Altitude 62 miles by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That was the magazine article's author's figure, not Bigelow's. Remember that these "hotels" only make sense if they're in orbit, and that probably means a lot higher than 62 miles if they want to be somewhere stable for long enough to make back their investment. Mir hung out around 195 miles; ISS is at 400km. So 200-mile-high club is probably about right.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks