Slashdot Mirror


Americans Read Fewer Books

DesScorp writes "The National Endowment for the Arts has released a study that shows a decline in the reading of fiction, poetry, and short stories. The study began in 1982, but shows a particularly steep decline from 1992-2002, the first decade of the Age of the Internet. They never seem to draw the conclusion that the Net may have accelerated our turn from this kind of reading, but the timing seems suspicious to me. I know I don't read for pleasure as much as I did years ago because of the time spent on the Net (and in technical books). NPR has a good audio link here for you non-readers; the Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a nice article as well." You could also - assuming you read - see the study itself.

9 of 726 comments (clear)

  1. why books by RepeatedEigenvalue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why should we read books? It's just a matter of time before they become movies anyhow. America rules.

    --


    friends don't let friends use linearly dependent row vectors.
  2. Attention spans by smilinggoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read alot, particularly content on the web, so I'm not really concerned with our culture becoming "post-literate" because of the decline in novel consumption. The thing I do worry about, however, is attention span. I believe my attention span has dropped thanks in part to sites like slashdot, where you get your morsel of information, feel satiated, and move on.

    That said, I believe television to be much more dangerous to the attention span than anything else.

    BTW, I just finished The Monkey Wrench Gang by Edward Abbey. Incredible!

  3. Prices, etc... by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Book prices have gone thru the roof in the past 10 years.

    Combine that with more Internet use and a 500 channel cable TV system (with a DVR, of course) and it's no wonder I hardly read anymore.

    Drop softcover prices down to a sane $4 and hardcover to $12 and we'll see an increase in reading again.

    1. Re:Prices, etc... by smilinggoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Book prices have gone thru the roof in the past 10 years.

      Riiiight. It costs so much to walk down to the local public library and check out a few books every now and again. Remember, if you return them on time they're FREE!

      Also, I buy used books. They're cheap and have the exact same content.

  4. Re:I read fewer books because by slavetrade55 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you tried Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin? That and the two subsequent books rocked my socks...this coming from someone who could never get passed the first 100 pages of Eye of the World. I mean come on, "Mountains of Dhoom"? That's just not trying very hard.

  5. Re:I read fewer books because by Nasarius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    GRRM r0x0r3d my s0x0rz as well. I actually got up to the beginning of book 9 in WoT before finally tossing it. Robert Jordan keeps writing the same dull crap, where every female (except Min) is an annoying bitch.

    Stuff actually happens in A Song of Ice and Fire, and GRRM can tell a damn good story. His characters are believable, deep, and diverse; you'll remember them, unlike in WoT, where you're buried in a mass of minor characters that you're expected to remember if you want to follow the story. I just wish he'd hurry up with book 4.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  6. Define 'reading' by The+Monster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I suspect that the reading we do on the Internet doesn't count, perhaps because it's so difficult to quantify, but I suspect it's because of an implicit elitist arrogance:
    • PhD's debating sophisticated cultural nuances amongst themselves are 'better' than talk radio/TV
    • Newspapers are 'better' than web pages.
    • Glossy magazines are 'better' than pulps.
    • Hardcover is 'better' than paperback.
    • Hand-crafted illuminated manuscripts, slaved over by monks, that could only be owned by the Church or a wealthy nobleman, were 'better' than Gutenberg's mass-produced works that the bourgeoise could purchase.
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  7. Re:I read fewer books because by cshark · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're missing the point. This study is obviously biased and funded by Microsoft. You see, a decline in reading paper books, actually helps them sell e-books in ridiculous proprietary formats. Think of the selling point, "no one wants paper anymore, and this proves it, buy our DRM enhanced versions of the classics today!"

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  8. Re:But of course! by cmacb · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The internet is a platform delivered through text and porn."

    True. But I read it just for the articles.