Slashdot Mirror


Review: Elgato EyeTV 500

nsayer writes "My wife and I just took delivery of an EyeTV 500 - Elgato's brand-new box for U.S. over-the-air digital television. Elgato makes PVR hard- and software for Macs. With the 500, HDTV reception and recording functionality has arrived for the Macintosh." Pudge reviewed the original (USB, NTSC) EyeTV nearly two years ago; read on for the rest of nsayer's review of the FireWire-based 500 model (first mentioned earlier this month). The 500 will play back both standard and high-definition digital signals, but only broadcast, not cable.

The package is simple. The 500 comes with the box itself, which is slightly larger in all dimensions than a paperback book; an IR remote control and batteries; a CD; a quick-start card; and a standard 6-wire FireWire cable. The back of the box has antenna-in and -out jacks (the purpose for the antenna-out jack is unknown. As delivered, it has a plastic cover on it), two FireWire jacks and a DC power input jack (there is no power supply, um, supplied, and DC power input is optional. They do not recommend you plug bus-powered devices into it if the EyeTV device itself is bus-powered). The front panel has a window with the IR remote control receiver and a status LED. The box is light for its size and liberally perforated with ventilation holes, but in extended use I couldn't detect any heat.

The installation procedure is simplicity itself: You connect an antenna to the antenna jack, you connect the FireWire cable between your computer and the box, you insert the CD into your computer and drag the EyeTV application from the CD to your Applications folder (or anywhere else you want it). The first time you start the EyeTV application, you'll get a setup wizard that will ask about your EyeTV hardware, discover it, and begin the auto-tune procedure.

This is the first place that EyeTV stumbles ever so slightly: The purpose of the auto-tune procedure is to fill in the channel list used for the channel up and down buttons and for the channel list drop-down menu. It takes a couple of minutes to complete, but the first time I did it, the EyeTV missed a station that I knew it should have found. When I repeated the procedure, it found that one, but missed a different one. Finally, the third try yielded 28 streams (I have a good outdoor antenna in Santa Clara, CA, aimed at the Mt. Sutro tower). Elgato should add some way of manually adding or deleting channels (I don't really care about non-English language and home shopping channels).

The other thing to keep in mind is that this receiver is designed strictly for over-the-air reception, and for good reception, you'll very likely need a good outdoor antenna. If you get cable TV, then this isn't for you.

The software integrates well with TitanTV.com, which provides program-guide information. You can click on shows on the TitanTV web site and watch the EyeTV tune to the correct channel or set up to record the show. Recording shows is more or less on a timed schedule basis - it's not quite up to the standard of a TiVo season pass. But the software does poll Titan for schedule changes (if you allow it).

Once you've recorded a show, an iMovie-like editor lets you locate the commercials and cut them out, although the job of finding and marking them is a manual procedure. Once you've marked them, you can compact the show, which permanently removes the marked sections, reclaiming the disk space they were taking.

And speaking of disk space, the CPU and hard disk requirements for digital TV content are enormous. 1080i shows can take potentially 20 GB per hour. An episode of CSI:Miami, after being compressed to 41 minutes, takes 11 GB. A 41-minute episode of The Tonight Show takes 8. Simply displaying these streams at full size in a window takes about 75% of the available CPU of my wife's 1.6 GHz single-proc G5. I wouldn't recommend buying one of these for a machine less powerful than that. The software will scale the image down if it needs to, so it won't outright fail on lesser hardware (and you will be able to access multicasted streams), but the big selling point of this box is being able to watch 1080i shows at full size on your 23" cinema display. If you want to do that, you'll need some serious processor muscle.

All in all, I give this product a big thumbs-up. Digital TV will truly revolutionize broadcast television over the course of the next few years just the way color did for our parents and grandparents. At $299, the EyeTV 500 is a great way for Mac owners to get started without spending a lot, but still enjoying all of the benefits (and breathtaking pictures) Digital TV has to offer.

Thanks to nsayer for this review. Have an interesting review in mind? Slashdot welcomes feature-length submissions.

33 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Massive HD Space by thedogcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This setup could be very cool with an attached 23 or 30 inch Cinema Display...

    As far as HD space goes, could one use the newly discussed h.263 codec that was presented at WWDC to compress the movies into smaller file sizes?

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Massive HD Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was h.264, it's different. h.263 is used in video-telephony and old MPEG1 at very low resolutions.
      Anyway I think that if the Elgato software supports exporting via quicktime (very likely) and you have MacOS X Tiger, it is very possible to do what you are talking about.
      h.264 has HDTV resolution transparency at 8 Mbps, so a 41 minute episode of CSI:Miami would take 2.5 GB.

      giandrea

  2. Too expensive by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    $300 is too much to pay for a tv tuner and mpeg encoder.

    Considering the price of a real TV or a PVR in the same ballpark price that do the similar (or more functions), I don't see the justification for the expense. This is another example of where computers impare normal functioning of human logic.

    1. Re:Too expensive by MikeXpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's very good if say, you have a laptop and want to record directly onto the computer for viewing later at another location.

      I can tell you from experience plane rides are much more enjoyable with all 3 seasons of Family Guy.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Too expensive by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know where you live, but in the US HDTV tuners generally cost more than 300 bucks.

      The cheapest I could find on Amazon was $299.87, but it did NOT allow you to record and edit what you watch.

      Most HDTV monitors sold are just that, monitors. They do not include HDTV tuners. And even if your HDTV TV comes with a built in HD tuner, you cannot record HD content.

      I'm not saying that Elgato has the best deal, buy it certainly is a good deal.

      The best deal is ATI's upcoming HD version of its AIW series, which will only cost about 200 bucks. It comes with a remote. And if you have an ATI graphics card in your PC, you could use ATI's component video out adapter to connect your computer directly to your HDTV monitor.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you seen the pcHDTV (HD-2000) tuner card?
      It is <$200, and is Linux-only! Many are making a decent HDTV system using it...

    4. Re:Too expensive by iwadasn · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I don't know about that. My computer monitor is vastly better than my TV (which I don't have). I have one of these converters (the cheaper $199 one), and it works great. You tell me where I can get a 17 inch TV + Tivo + DVD burner for $200, praytell.

      In addition, the little tiny box takes up much less space than a TV + TIVO + DVD player/burner.

      In addition, being able to use the space on my hard drives (about 400 GB now) for either computer stuff, or TV stuff is also quite an edge. And I can share out the TV shows over FTP or windows sharing, or whatever. It's just nice to have everything in one place.

    5. Re:Too expensive by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I own an HDTV and it makes DVDs look good"

      At the risk of being provocative (what, on slashdot?) I have to ask if you've had your vision checked recently. OTA HDTV blows DVD out of the water! Even if the material on Leno is lame the picture is stunning. Just for the record the resolution of DVD is 720 x 480 interlaced. That is about half the resolution that FOX was using (480p) but is being cranked up to 720p which is 1280 x 720. The other HD resolution is 1080i or 1920 x 1080 interlaced.

      Never mind. What I'm guessing you mean is that you enjoy watching DVD's on your HDTV but not the TV stations. Depending on your location there might not be much available to your antenna but all the major networks are doing their new programs in HD. That includes PBS, CBS, NBC, ABC, WB, UPN, and FOX (with FOX making the transition this fall). We get all those in Minneapolis except for UPN. That is a lot of programs and they all put DVD to shame for picture quality but that is no guarantee the story will be similarly improved.

      On the other hand if you are watching upconverted regular programming or 480i the picture is usually better than NTSC but seldom as good as DVD.

  3. Still waiting for component HD recording by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it just the "rules" that prevent HD component recording? Right now there's a huge variety of devices that can record from composite or s-video (TiVo, VCRs, DVD recorders, video capture cards on your computer, etc). I just want to dump HD component video into a recorder the same way I dump it into my TV.

    The big problem right now is that I can record over-the-air HD with devices like this (and even some HD VCRs and HD capture cards in computers), but I can't record the analog HD signal out of my DirecTV HD box and if I ever got digital cable, I wouldn't be able to record that one either. If I want to record DirecTV HD, my only option right now is to get a HD TiVo (for about $1000), but that's not an archiving solution. (and yes, I know there's hacks, but I'm talking off-the-shelf technology that my mom could use).

    I'm very well versed in this stuff but I find it incredibly frustrating trying to sort out exactly what types of signals I can record and when.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Still waiting for component HD recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, the EyeTV 500 respects the so-called "broadcast flag" that prevents you from recording television programs for the purpose of time-shifting. Because this constitutes a violation of your Fair Use rights, I am urging all netizens to boycott all high-definition TV products while my lawsuit against the RIAA is pending.

      It would in theory be possible to create a device that ignores the "broadcast flag" or hack an existing device to behave fairly. Unfortunately, under the draconian laws of the so-called "United" States of America, this is illegal. Of particular import is the DCMA that would make this act a federal felony. I, too, have a lawsuit pending to render the DCMA unconstitutional.

      In conclusion, I recommend a total and far-reaching boycott.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Media Rights Privacy Expert Watchdog

  4. iMovie-like editor? by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not just encode the SD material into DV25, which the MacOS loves. Then users can just use iMovie to edit. Why do devices like this insist on shipping with software intended to reinvent the wheel? I would love a simple PVR for my PowerBook, but I don't need editing features, I can use iMovie for that.

    1. Re:iMovie-like editor? by Bakafish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because:

      A) This is a HDTV recorder, it does do *digital* SD, but all of the streams are simply dumped in RAW MPEG2 off of the decoder chip. There is no onboard transcoder chip that could re-encode that stream to DV on the fly, and it would be useless to downsample all the HDTV resolution streams to DV as it wouldn't be HD anymore.

      B) Transcoding RAW MPEG2 to DV in software is way slower than realtime, and would actually INCREASE the amount of space required to store the information by a lot.

      C) The RAW MPEG2 stream can conceivably be dumped directly to DVHS, or piped to the FireWire port on an HDTV (Mitsubishi, Sony, etc...) Try doing that with DV.

      If you want to use iMovie, no one is stopping you. You can transcode it yourself. In order to record in DV you would have to give up the ability to watch TV in realtime, or they would have to invest in a onboard chip to do the transcoding (think thousands of dollars per box.) So that's why.

      By the way, there are FireWire *standard* definition Tuner units for the Mac that record in Native DV, but again this is HD.

    2. Re:iMovie-like editor? by Baumi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Austrialian/European version of EyeTV for digital over-the-air TV (DVB-T standard) doesn't convert the video format at all - it "just" singles out one MPEG2 stream from all those transmitted and sends it over to be saved on the Mac's HD.

      My guess is that the HDTV version works the same way. Re-encoding the material on the fly would probably be too processor intensive, so it's easier to have a simple editor built into the software. Besides: iMovie is pretty self-contained. It wants its own project files,etc. For simple editing, you'd want something like QuickTime Pro, which can edit a single file without all the hassles iMovie puts you through. And, basically, EyeTV's editor feels almost like QuickTime Pro (a bit better with the thumbnails and such) but it comes with the device and is integrated into the recording and scheduling software whereas QuickTime Pro costs extra money and is an external application.

      If you really need to do some iMovie tricks with your recordings, I'm sure there's a way to turn them into a DV stream, but most poeple won't want to do that, so I think it's wise they don't force users to create an iMovie project just to edit out some simple commercials - EyeTV's own editor does that just fine.

  5. Misunderstood... by bgarcia · · Score: 4, Funny
    Elgato makes PVR hard- and software for Macs.
    Did anyone else read that as "Elgato makes a hard-to-use PVR, as well as some Mac software?"
    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  6. Antenna out... by kulakovich · · Score: 4, Informative


    Antenna out is for the rest of your boxes, you insensitive clod!

    But seriously, though - your source should go to your primary recorder, then out to any other inline devices, then to your tv. That way you get the best signal into the recorder.

    For instance, You'd go from source, to the eyeTV, to your VHS recorder, to your projector, then to your regular TV, were you to have all those things.

    My curiousity is this whole "but not with cable" thing. Just how does it block that?

    kulakovich

  7. Still a little confused by turbotalon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why can't it record off of cable? Does cable use different frequencies for the same channels or something? I thought they were the same...

    --

    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy

  8. Re:TiVo by hype7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Basically, what is the *business* behind the EyeTV 500?


    Well, I can't speak for the developers, but this thing does HDTV right?

    Well, the first thing that springs to my mind is that 30" behemoth Apple announced a couple of weeks ago...

    -- james
  9. Would love it by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    except it's Mac only. I love Firewire but for some reason people who produce Firewire products like to make them Mac only, excluding about 80% of the potential audience.(PC's are about 95% of the audience but quite a few don't have Firewire).

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Would love it by Microlith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I/O DATA out of Japan makes a firewire TV tuner that is both PC and MAC compatible, for about 23000yen or so (maybe more?)

      Only problem is that they don't sell it outside of Japan, and it's frigging impossible to get anyone to import electronics like computer components.

  10. Recording Digital Video off of Cable by cbelt3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the nonce, this solution seems to be functional. Get the firewire enabled video box, record into DV compatible tool, and away you go.

  11. This isn't the device I want by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want a souped-up ReplayTV.

    I currently have a DirecTivo, basiclly a two-tuner Tivo with built-in two-tuner DirecTV reciver. It's great... but it can't record my local TV. Now, DirecTV will be adding a few of my city's local channels to their broadcast in 2005, but not all of the channels.

    What I really want is a box with about 5 inputs and 2 outputs. I would like it to switch between my VCR, DVD player, generic DirecTV box (or two), and tune local TV stations. HD capability would be nice too. Add in PVR/timeshifting features and the ability to control said devices. Software upgradability would be nice, perhaps in the future it could learn how to control my future DVD player/recorder to burn to disc some of the shows I have recorded.

    I basiclly want a PVR that's also the hub of my home theater. I want to keep discrete components (use my TV as a display, use my audio reciever as an amp, etc) but I need some sort of switching/recording hub to control it all.

    An HTPC is an interesting concept, but until it can handle multiple channels of video I/O, it's not of much use to me.

    1. Re:This isn't the device I want by darrylo · · Score: 2, Informative
      MythTV can do multi-channel recordings, either on the same PC (via multiple encoder cards) or via multiple PCs (each with one or more encoder cards). With multiple PCs, however, LAN bandwidth can be an issue. (For fairly high-quality recordings, say 600-700KB/sec per channel.) Your power bill can be an issue, too. ;-)

      Distributed, multi-channel recordings are very nice. If you have multiple PCs, you can also do distributed TV watching (watch a recorded program on a PC other than the one which recorded it).

      MythTV also has the cool feature where, if all the encoder cards on your current PC are busy recording shows (which means that you can't watch something else), MythTV will transparently use another encoder on another PC, and stream that output to your current PC. Sehr cool.

      Unfortunately, MythTV can be a royal pain to install and configure. The easiest approach is to use something canned like KnoppMyth, but the current version (R4V4.1) still needs a fair amount of hacking/tweaking to work with high-quality encoding cards like the Hauppauge PVR-250 or PVR-350. Still, it's better than starting from scratch.

  12. Do this for free with your digital cable box... by Casshan · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have a modern digital cable box with Firewire outputs, just download iRecord and connect your Mac to the box with a quality firewire cable. iRecord is developing quickly into a good PCPVR solution for digital cable boxes.

    The interesting thing is that you can record anything the box is showing over the firewire output, including video on demand, HDTV, Music Choice, and digital-tier cable channels.

    You can then take the captured MPEG2 transport stream and convert it to a standard MPEG file by using VLC's advanced output options in the file open dialog.

    Now if someone can figure out how to send the MPEG transport stream back to the digital cable box for playback...

  13. Another alternative for Mac users... by homgran · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few months ago, I stumbled upon this page which explains how to record and play back HDTV signals using free tools and a cable box.

    Regarding playback, VLC can *just* manage to play back HD 1080i recordings on my 1GHz TiBook (using the OpenGL playback option), so it sounds like it does not require the gargantuan system specs stated in the above article.

    Now if only we could recieve HDTV in the UK. :/

  14. Re:If you have cable - just use firewire by igorsway · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a working link. HDTV to a Mac

  15. HD Without Extra Hardware ( sort of ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out
    AVS Forum - Mac HD PVR

    and

    Some interesting software

    If you have a cable box with a firewire port (most HD cable boxes have them, and if yours does not then you can get one from the cable company as there is a law saying that it must be available to you - at least that's what I have been told and the cable company agreed)... Anyway, it works pretty well.. Have fun.

  16. Designed for digital stations by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why can't it record off of cable? Does cable use different frequencies for the same channels or something? I thought they were the same...

    Modern TVs can tune both cable and over-the-air stations in a similar manner, and certain cable and air stations share the same frequencies, but not all.

    This device is designed for tuning and recording digital (including HDTV) stations. To get these, you need an over-the-air antenna.

    Digital cable comes in a variety of flavors, depending on your cable provider. There is no easy way for Elgato to support these. (And there may even be legal issues as some digital cable boxes have bizzare authentication systems).

  17. Apple provides free HDTV recording tools at ADC by jeffehobbs · · Score: 5, Informative

    (link to previous critically acclaimed post).

    It doesn't sound nearly as elegant as the ElGato solution -- they make good stuff -- but for a quick n' dirty geek HDTV recording hack, the example code Apple provides actually does work.

    ~jeff

  18. Don't bother purchasing these right now... by Critical_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The biggest problem right now with the HDTV stand-alone recorder boxes and computer HDTV tuners is that they cannot record from digital cable. Digital Cable uses QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) which means that it generates 4 bits out of one baud for encoding HDTV channels. Cracking that is the holy grail of HDTV recording and there are many users out there willing to put up lots of cash as an incentive for this happen. The point is over-the-air (OTA) HDTV is unencrypted and can be recorded for the time being using both stand-alone and computer equipment. Both satellite-based and digital cable-based HDTV use either QAM64 or QAM256 which cannot be tuned well by any equipment out today. There was a Dish 5000 reciever that could be hacked to output HDTV digital streams over firewire but the modulation on the network has changed so the box cannot decrypt the streams anymore for output. I would suggest waiting for the time being.

    To qualify the above statement, DViCO makes the Fusion HDTV QAM PCI card for desktops which unofficially claims to tune QAM256 but it still has problems with QAM64. Link A simple seach at the AVS Forums should provide more information on current issues with the card. Lastly, for you laptop PC owners out there, Sasem makes a USB HDTV tuner which claims to tune QAM but is really only useful for OTA HDTV at the moment. Link ATI will be releasing an HDTV card soon but I am not aware if it has any QAM tuning abilities.

    1. Re:Don't bother purchasing these right now... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'll never see a digital cable PCI card, since it would be almost impossible for a PCI card to meet the OpenCable robustness requirements.

      Your best bet is to get a digital cable box with Firewire (your cable company is legally required to provide one) and hook it up to your computer.

  19. This post below explains why it can't record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  20. New software released today by Bakafish · · Score: 4, Informative

    ElGato just released version 1.5 today that lowers CPU requirements for HDTV playback. I read reports of dual 866 G4 being able to play back a full 1080i stream.

    The review was vague about being able to receive standard VHF and UHF over the air broadcasts. The online documentation also doesn't specifically indicate that it can receive them. And no Cable input? I mean come on, how is that useful. All the PCI based solutions provide dual antenna inputs. I could understand the lack of Cable based HDTV, but it should at least allow you to record and play standard def cable.

    1. Re:New software released today by nsayer · · Score: 2, Informative
      The review was vague about being able to receive standard VHF and UHF over the air broadcasts

      Allow me to clarify:

      The EyeTV 500 does not receive analog signals at all. It only receives digital TV signals and only works with a normal UHF/VHF antenna receiving broadcast signals over-the-air.