Slashdot Mirror


Google Acquires Picasa, Improves Blogging Tools

clandestine writes "It appears that our lovable search engine has again expanded its horizons - the internet wasn't enough; now you can search and organize your own pictures. I don't know about you, but I use Google for nearly everything; heck, I found links about their acquisition of Picasa through Google News! Any slashdotters going to benefit from this tech, or already do? And yes, the addition of Picasa to their arsenal is a couple of days old, but they just started linking them on the homepage today."

14 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anybody tell me why on this page I get the link to Picassa, but on this one, I get nothing.

  2. Re:Well...I'm still waiting by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or how about identification of individual people? So that I can outline a section of a given picture and it'll find all other pictures which contain a similar section (AKA a given person).

    Then I'll get excited...


    Then I'll get scared.

  3. Re:Monopoly by arieswind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google will never become another Microsoft. If you think about it, the cost of moving is 0. Google will only be the market leader as long as it is the best. As soon as something better comes out, people will switch over. Google's sucess is based off of how good its product is, Microsoft's success is based off of how well it can lock its consumers in.

  4. Q: When will they start being evil? by soloport · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A: When they go public. :-/

    How many of you (probably would have to be not-so-wet behind the ears) have joined a truly excellent company, gotten your hopes up that "This is the company to last the rest of my career!" -- it's that good -- only to watch it go psycho when the board decides to take it public?

    No, the madness doesn't happen overnight. You slowly begin hearing about the symptoms as the pressure begins... "But it's the end of the month! This (shit) has to ship!", etc.

    Sad, but true and (by my experience) inevitable. I wish there were no rules which forced a company to commit what is essentially "fiscal lobotomy".

  5. Re:Funny thing.. by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When microsoft "expands" we all bitch and whine, but then google goes out and devours companies and services, and its suddenly "cute".


    It is because:

    1. Google services just works and are not famous for their bugs and instability
    2. Google doesn't require you to upgrade your PC with each new release of their flagship product
    3. Google doesn't force PC manufacters to buidle their product with your hardware using unfair clauses in contracts
    4. Google customers do not send you documents in cryptic format which only Google products can read.
    5. Google is not designed to enable virus propagation.


    There was other point - you don't trust your data to Google. But since introduction of GMail this is no more true

  6. Re:Funny thing.. by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's because Microsoft has a proven history of stifling innovation, whereas Google has been doing nothing BUT innovation since their inception. Further, when MS expands, we can expect some technological offshoot of this expansion to be irrevocably tied to the OS with the next service pack, whereas Google still provides a better service while still leaving us the option of having it or not.

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  7. Re:Monopoly by isopossu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Gmail's 1 GB mailbox without the option to
    1. forward the messages
    2. move the whole mailbox elsewhere

    looks just like locking the consumers in. For example in Yahoo you can buy yourself out by paying $ 20 and upload your 2G anywhere. You can't do this in Gmail.
  8. AskJeeves? by peterdaly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "With the IPO, Google will have huge pockets. This could put Google in the market to buy a much larger player, such as AskJeeves or even AOL," he said.

    I don't think the person who wrote this really understands Google's business. Google for the most part has been buying up innovative technologies which require relativley low overhead to run or integrate. I don't view AskJeeves as innovative, and don't view AOL as low overhead by any means.

    I know this is nitpicking a small relativly not important part of the article, but it lept out at me as a "huh?" section.

    -Pete

  9. One more thing... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Insightful

    6. Google is free.

  10. Re:Monopoly by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then, why do they buy a company that produces windows only software ? Shouldn't they go for multiplatform / opensource software ? Isn't this Sun's and IBM's and Novell's strategy ?

  11. The Yahooization of Google by Cavio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does it concern anyone else that Google is going the way of Yahoo? Trying to become the end-all-be-all of web services seems a sure way to make all your offerings mediocre at best.

    Back in 1997, Yahoo was the cool kid on the block, and was both buying and building every feature under the sun. People lapped it up, and thought it was wonderful to have all their internet needs under one umbrella. Then, reality set it. Yahoo stopped enhancing and in some cases (Yahoo Groups) even maintaining the services. Quality has deteriorated, and the once proud Yahoo brand had withered and crumbled into what is now the K-Mart of the internet.

    I guess Google wants to be the Wal-Mart.

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

  12. Re:Monopoly by override11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows only is not a crime. Developing for 90% of the world's PC's only makes sense.

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
  13. Re:Monopoly by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Then, why do they buy a company that produces windows only software ? Shouldn't they go for multiplatform / opensource software ? Isn't this Sun's and IBM's and Novell's strategy ?

    Who says they won't make it crossplatform? They can do anything they want with it now.

  14. Re:Improved blogging tools? by Jon_Aquino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Picasa includes the ability to create online photo galleries, linked to a user's Blogger account so he can publish them on his blog, then it would be quite neat. Not sure if you already know this, but the Picasa company has a tool called Hello that can be used to publish images to your Blogger blog -- not exactly gallery-functionality that you specifically want, but still pretty cool because they're hosting an unlimited number of images for you.