Slashdot Mirror


PhoneGaim Brings Phone Calling To IM Users

An anonymous reader writes "Eweek has an article on how PhoneGaim integrates IM and phone into one program making it possible for AOL/ICQ, MSN and Yahoo users to call each other, landlines and cellphones. It talks about how it could be a Skype-killer since it's based on open standard SIP and comes with free PSTN calling (5 minutes per day), free voicemail via email, and even supports incoming phone calls from PSTN. It's out first for desktop Linux (maybe the start of a new trend?) but it's open source so expect a MSWin version shortly from Gaim team."

19 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds interesting by QangMartoq · · Score: 4, Interesting
    But I wonder - Is the 2.28 cents per minute rate (domestic US only, others higher) a good deal?

    What about the call quality?

    A quick look at the site shows the adapter to be about $90 - which, I think, is required to be able to use a normal telephone. That kind of upfront cot is not going to win over customers!

    1. Re:Sounds interesting by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For a hardware VOIP solution how is 2.99 cents a minute better than say 0.00 cents a minute?

      http://www.packet8.net

      http://www.vonage.com

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  2. O. S. X! O. S. X! by numbski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, okay. I'm excited.

    Here's the deal. The house I just bought is POTS. I've long wanted a way to hook a box up between my NID and all the phones in my house, and have that box intercept all calls, and run it through a 'spam' filter if you will. Be able to filter calls by wildcard (block all calls from area code 803, or an exact number, or numbers without caller ID) and give a generic message to the caller, heck even pick up the call and hang up immediately. If it passes the filters, ring the house phones.

    I know that this gets off-topic, but it seems to me that this is a step in the right direction (possibly) of accomplishing what I want without having to go buy IP phones for my house.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  3. What I would like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    is a solution like this that will allow computer users to call VoIP services like Vonage and packet8 without having to use PSTN services. I.e. purely Internel calls.

  4. Re:That's nice... by memco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't strike me as something that will be very big. Especially with a whopping 5 free minutes a day; what kind of conversation can you possibly have in five minutes that couldn't just be done over IM? I've used iChat's VOIP, but only once in a blue moon; frankly I only use it because someone calls me. I wouldn't think it's worth the $20 phone or $5 a month fee for a number. It's simply not usefull enough to coulgh up the dough for extra hardware or services. It'll most likeley end up being one of those things you show people just to say "hey, look what I can do", and then never use it again.

    --
    Get me a meat pie floater!
  5. Vonage & SIP? by Duwke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does vonage use SIP? I would think not, but I noticed that both use the same softphone
    http://www.vonage.com/features.php?feature=softpho ne
    http://sipphone.com/softphone/

    Don't tell me Xten thought ahead and created a transport abstraction so that either could be used... cause I want to use GAIM with my vonage account!

  6. If only.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...they supported IM through SIP then I might make use of this product. I have no desire to place phone calls through my computer, especially if I have a limited number of minutes or have to buy extra hardware or the cost is going to be more than using the old-fashioned phone sitting on my desk right next to my computer. What I REALLY could use is a linux IM client that supports SIP. My company uses MS products for all it's IT, but everybody in my group runs linux desktops. Now that they've rolled out a corporate IM solution based on MS products we're effectively SOL unless/until somebody develops a SIP IM client for linux... I'd find a linux SIP IM client infinitely more useful than a linux SIP phone.

    1. Re:If only.... by chefmonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We're working on it, but it'll probably be a bit of time before we can dig up the time to add all the necessary features. (n.b. this is still alpha code. I'm pointing it out in case anyone wants to help develop).

  7. Re:missing the point by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I'd really like (and it may already exist, but I haven't been able to find it) is a totally hardware, totally internal VoIP solution.

    That is... We have a main office and I'm in a remote location (another country). I want to be able to buy a piece of hardware I can just connect to my remote location's LAN (which is connected to the Internet) and buy a piece of hardware that connects to the LAN at my main office. The hardware at my remote location would just connect to a normal phone while the hardware at my main office would just connect to a phone line (or extension of a PBX). When the line/extension rings, it goes over the Internet and rings my phone at my remote location. If I want to make a call, I pick up my phone and I'm given a dial-tone from my main office.

    But what I want is a pure hardware solution. I want to pay for the hardware and be done with it. There should be no monthly fee since once I have the hardware I'm not using anyone elses resources.

    Likewise, I should be able to make free phone calls to others that use the same hardware as long as my phone knows their IP address (or there is a free/cheap service that maps their number to their current dynamic IP address).

    Is there something like this? In theory the hadware ought to be dirt cheap since all it really would require is a network card, an ADC/DAC, and a microcontroller to perform the logic. Such a device could probably be built for less than $30, so it ought to be availble to the public for less than $100 for each location.

  8. Re:To those wondering.. by chill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Note that you can only call people if you're BOTH using phonegaim. You could just exchange (S)IP numbers and use any normal SIP client for the same effect. Nothing to see here. There are already dozens of free SIP clients.


    Really? I was under the impression that you could attach a SIP number to a Buddy and call them as long as they had SIP capability. Like...MSN Messenger.

    While there may already be dozens of free SIP clients, name one on Linux that integrates IM (presence) with SIP.

    STUN "Simple Traversal of UDP through NAT" was designed to go with SIP and deal with NAT. It works pretty flawlessly.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  9. Re:phoneGaim by gnalle · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the faq : All code changes are being provided to the Gaim project and will hopefully be merged into the main Gaim distribution.

    However I wonder if gaim-vv will end up replacing phonegaim.

  10. It appears that the source code is broken. by Da+w00t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are two phonegaim specific files that are not in the latest tarball, off linspire.com *or* phonegaim.com.

    linphone.h, and osipua.h. During compiling:
    In file included from gtkblist.c:51:
    sipphone.h:3:26: linphonecore.h: No such file or directory
    sipphone.h:4:20: osipua.h: No such file or directory
    Hrm.. Lets see.... GPL software mods ... missing pieces of the mods... sound familiar? I'm not going to start hopping up and down like a crazed gully dwarf screaming "GPL VIOLATION!", but has anyone else successfully built phonegaim from source? I'm looking into starting to use SIP phone service (asterisk, vonage, sipphone.com), and this was one of the options I was looking at.
    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
  11. gaim updates by tannhaus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My only problem with this would be the frequency you have to update gaim to keep yahoo and others working. If they're going to use gaim they should have some type of notification built in to notify you when a new version is available...AND KEEP IT UPDATED.

    It won't be so bad for Joe Blow if all of a sudden he can't connect to Yahoo but sees a new update is available. Then he installs the update and Yahoo works again. He's satisfied and doesn't think anything of it. The problem will be when these lindows users download this and can't connect to yahoo or one of the other services. Then they think gaim is crap...when in reality yahoo just broke things on purpose again.

    1. Re:gaim updates by Gleapsite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what if in Gaim a patching system was implimented, and the default option was to alert the user when patches for specific protocols were available. so Jow Blow downloads the latest of Gaim and get an alert saying "Yahoo has changed their protocol, we are currently working on fixing this, please bear with us" or something of that like. This way we inform the users whats going on, and we don't actually have to have a fix to alert them that its broken. AND we can place the blame where it belongs, right on Yahoo's doorstep. just a thought

      --
      face the world with eyes of fire.
  12. It would be better.. by pugdk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if the gaim team would finish the support for normal IM's before throwing themselves into this kinda project.. I mean, I *still* can't get MSN to work using gaim... If I'm lucky I can connect but then I can't receive messages and if I try to write someone I will be disconnected immediately.. Please fix this before making a voice version :)

  13. Re:missing the point by malverian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cisco produces hardware VoIP phones. When I was studying for my CCNA in highschool, we visited one of the Cisco headquarters and they told us to just go ahead and make a phonecall to anywhere out of the country.

    While that in itself isn't telling, the phones were set top units (no computer needed) that had an ethernet cable plugged into them.

    Slightly off topic, but may appeal to the geek in you. Their cameras and televisions, projectors, thermostats and lighting was controlled by hardware TCP/IP based units. Very neat stuff.

    --
    You're just mad because the voices in your head talk to me.
  14. a word from Gaim by L.Schierer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a gaim developer, I'm rather curious to know where this idea that we will be providing a win32 version of this fork has come from.

    1. Re:a word from Gaim by L.Schierer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We have not as yet seen a patch from them, and I know from the brief glance we gave to the source when this came to our attention yesterday that if submitted as it currently exists, it would be unacceptable, as they have ignored some of the more basic design concepts in Gaim's source. So my question stands, I remain rather curious where this idea (on both their part and /.'s) comes from.

  15. Waste of time and resources by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has to be one of the most useless apps I've seen.

    first, it only works for lindows, you can get the source, but without some serious issues (I had to hack my makefile, and no prevail)

    no documentation whatsoever, so you gotta guess the deps.

    you could go with gaim-vv rather than this. this is just a waste, it cant connect to any other sip networks except the one run by lindows, and it can only communicate with other phonegaim clients, and it costs money to call a landline, not to mention the rates high for VOIP.
    The last comment in the article should be edited out because the GAIM devels have zero involvement with this.

    just dont bother with this, it's overhyped, only reason it's getting media coverage is because a company is behind the new features. gaim-vv is much better IMHO.

    bottom line, phonegaim is a cruddy hack. dont bother with it.