Consumer Database Company Hacked Again
x-guru writes "CNN is reporting on the indictment of a Florida man on 144 identity theft charges including fraud, money-laundering, and obstruction of justice. Approximately 8.2 GB of data was stolen from Acxiom Corp, a company responsible for the storage of vast amounts of personal, financial and corporate data. It looks to be an inside job as six Acxiom employees have agreed to cooperate with the investigation." Acxiom was hacked last year as well.
of course i can't be bothered to RTFA, but when will we have laws making it a mandatory requirement for companies like this to fully disclose events like this to the public. after all, it is our information they're "losing"
It looks to be an inside job as six Acxiom employees have agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
It might just be the early morning talking, but could someone explain how employee cooperation implies an inside job? Maybe I need more coffee.
...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
Churchill
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Where exactly is $7 million coming from? Is there data worth about a million a gig?
Wow, I must have billions of dollars worth of pr0n then!
This is the great myth of the InterWeb security policies of most corporations -- you're only as safe as the weakest link in the chain. IBM, GE, et al, are probably among the most secure commercial sites available, and yet their customers still get nailed by third-party lapses.
Anyone want to take a gander on when Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion get busted for going through some minor service provider?
... is to not store it all in one place.
Centralised databases of sensitive data are evil.
-- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz
How about a quick game of Hangman, kids. "Here's hoping he gets time in a federal _____-__-__-___-___ prison!" (Commence flames from more enlightened readers in 3... 2... 1...)
Beyond the fact that a national ID card wouldn't provide any additional security, putting that much private information in one place is just asking for trouble. As this latest debacle shows, and as Schneier points out in the article I referenced.
From the CNN article:
Oh, good. That will surely stop it from happening.THIS WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB. Two people from different parts of the country were "hacking" Acxiom at the same time, using the same vulnerability. Neither of them even knew each other. Acxiom's security was a flaming turd.
Search all the Daniel Baas articles and you will find he cracked a password file they had in a public directory on the ftp server. This guy did the same thing. Acxiom should be shutdown for their stupidity.
Some days I wish someone would take my identity.
www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
...richie - It is a good day to code.
"of course i can't be bothered to RTFA, but when will we have laws making it a mandatory requirement for companies like this to fully disclose events like this to the public"
can you be bothered to contact your legislators, or consumersunion.org, or epic.org?
First off, 8.2 gigs is a LOT of simple data. We're talking about databases here, not mp3s. A few kbytes can give you everything you need to steal someone's identity and more. We're talking about hundreds of thousands or even a few million entries.
Second, what can you really do with 50 million social security/credit card/name/address matches that you can't do with 1 million? It's not likely this data was stolen just for spam, much larger databases are readily available for that purpose. Even the largest, most nefarious criminal organization would be set for years with a million verified identities to misuse. Even if you could only net a few hundred dollars from each identity theft, that's a LOT of money. And at a certain point the scale of the data overrides your ability to exploit it anyways.
As many slashdot readers will be sure to point out, this isn't theft. Like music pulled off Kazaa, Acxiom still has the original data, and their use of it is not diminished by this guy having a copy.