Slashdot Mirror


FCC Allows Mix-and-Match Wi-Fi Antennas

Glenn Fleishman writes "We just filed a story at Wi-Fi Networking News about how the FCC recently and quietly approved rules that will allow the legal use of the Pringles can and other antennas. Currently, it's clearly illegal--even though it's incredibly easy--to swap out a manufacturers' antennas from a Wi-Fi access point with an antenna of your choosing. It's legal to sell antennas; not legal to deploy them. Call it the switchblade kit rule: legal to sell, but don't assemble. The FCC's new rule provides a middle ground: a manufacturer can certify their hardware with the highest gain legal antennas of each type (yagi, omni, etc.) and then end-users can swap in antennas of equal or lesser signal characteristics. It's an important move because it removes the potential for community wireless and individual users to be prosecuted for illegal antennas once new certifications are in place."

8 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Clearly Illegal? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IIRC, a couple of geeks got in trouble a while back for exceeding FCC regulations. I suppose it would be pretty easy for someone to "know enough to be dangerous."

    If you're not sure what dangerous could mean, think microwaves, pacemakers, cell phones, aircraft, etc.

  2. Re:What about Canada by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    We can use whatever gain antenna we wish so long as standard (60 cm) thick igloo ice can contain the signal.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. Amateur license holders have more freedom. by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Channel 1 is in a band that falls in spectrum assigned to amateur radio operators. That means, of course, we can legally transmit up to 2500 watts vs 50 milliwatts if that happens to be the lowest power we need to get the signal through.

    It also means we're licensed users of the spectrum, which trumps Part B and means a license holder could, technically, tell a neighbor to move off of channel 1.

  4. Wi-Fi Antenna Types by diagnosis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I noticed that the article lists a bunch of different antenna types. I didn't know what they all were, so I looked some of them up and thought I'd share:

    The info in quotes is verbatim from http://www.radiolabs.com/Articles/wifi-antenna.htm l

    Omni: (Omni-Directional)
    This is a standard antenna like you'd see on a cordless phone. Broadcasts the signal more or less equally in all directions.

    "An Omni-Directional antenna would serve as your main antenna to distribute the signal to other computers or devices"

    Yagi Antennas
    "Yagi antennas were the design of two Japanese people, Hidetsugu Yagi and Shintaro Uda, and are sometimes referred to as Yagi-Uda antennas...these antennas are typically very directional and are used for point to point."

    Yagis look like a ladder with one vertical bar in the center of each step.

    Backfire antennas
    "The backfire is a small directional antenna with excellent gain. They look similar to a parabolic dish, but the gain isn't as high."

    -----------------
    DrMovieMovie.com:
    Witty movie reviews, eating contests, and a guy who once drank a gallon of milk in an hour.

  5. illegal antennas are still illegal by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it removes the potential for community wireless and individual users to be prosecuted for illegal antennas once new certifications are in place

    No it doesn't. How'd you come to that conclusion?

    If a user has an antenna that exceeds the specs that have been certified for that antenna type with that device, it's still illegal to use and the user can still be prosecuted.

    And if the manufacturers don't get their devices certified with anything other than their weak default antenna, you still won't be legally allowed to use anything stronger than their default. This will vary by manufacturer -- Linksys might want to sell powerful upgrade antennas to its users, so it will get its equipment certified with a really powerful antenna. Apple, on the other hand, probably has no plans to sell replacement antennas for its Airport devices and will only get certification for its standard antenna.

  6. Re:Clearly Illegal? by plcurechax · · Score: 5, Informative

    How is it clearly illegal? I didn't know it was illegal to use your own attenas?

    Yes, because license-exempt transmitters ("Part 15" devices) are approved based on a specifc design including the antenna.

    Once you modify a Part 15 device, such as by using a non-approved antenna you modify its RF characteristics which change important details such as how much Effective Radiated Power (ERP) which is limited to 4W in the US (many European contries limit WiFi to 1W ERP I believe).

  7. Ham on 2.4gh by Faith_Healer · · Score: 4, Informative

    If any one wants to use highpower 802.11 on 2.4gh and use huge wave guide antenas with that high power equipment then all they have to do is get a ham lisense. With the introductory lisense you can use super high power out put transmitters and realy high gain antenas compared to the comercialy avable stuff. How would you like 100 wats PEP on your access point? The only thing is you cant use it for comercial purposes only personal uses. If you get the liscense you also get access to other bands and you can legaly build your own radio equipment. Its not hard to get the lisence either and there are probaly tons of hams in your area to help you get into and promote radio hobbies like packet radio. Check out www.arrl.org, or www.qrz.com if you need some more information.

    --
    Faith_Healer -- The antethsis to almost everything, and the worlds worst speller.
  8. Re:A minor note by maximilln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tony Chong, of Cheech'n'Chong, ran a glassblowing shop which made artwork glass tubes. The shop was taken down by the DEA and Chong was charged in court. I didn't keep track of the outcome.

    At the end of the day legality is determined by how badly they want to get you.

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80