Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Detecting Faked Photographs Gets Easier

Posted by michael on from the cowboyneal-with-hat-is-REAL dept.

nusratt writes "Some years ago, an issue of 'Whole Earth' had a convincing cover-photo of a flying saucer cruising low over downtown San Francisco in broad daylight. The accompanying feature article proclaimed that photographs can no longer be trusted as evidence of anything, because of the ease of doctoring images digitally and undetectably. Now, Dartmouth Professor Hany Farid and graduate student Alin Popescu 'have developed a mathematical technique to tell the difference between a "real" image and one that's been fiddled with.' Farid says, 'as more authentication tools are developed it will become increasingly more difficult to create convincing digital forgeries'." There's also an NYT story.

8 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. So much for my faked photo of Rumsfeld & Sadda by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now they'll be able to prove that my photo of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam in 1983 is a fake.

    Rumsfeld was really shaking hands with an alien, and Saddam was shaking hands with Elvis, but the resulting merger of the two photos was much more provocative.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  2. I had developed a foolproof algorithm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but it was only accurate when the photo contained an image of Admiral Ackbar.

  3. practical use by Slothy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Run it on the goatse guy! If the results are positive I can finally start sleeping again.

  4. Re:So much for my faked photo of Rumsfeld & Sa by IamScared · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worse.

    Now my picutes with girls wont cause so much envy in my geek friends...

    Bye Angelia Jolie...
    Bye Liv Tyler...
    Bye, bye..
    I like you them all.

    Shame on you, heart-breaking algorithms!

    --
    FreeBSD: Because Computers Can Be Fun... Again.
  5. Re:Self Defeating by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what the big deal is. Old style film photos can be fiddled with, but digital photographs cannot be faked, and digital photography is taking over.

    --
    That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
  6. don't believe the parent post since... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a trap!

    --
    Lasers Controlled Games!
  7. Re:What kind of digitized photos does this work on by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Funny
    Good point. I should have RTFAMA (Read the Fucking Article More Attentively). Of course someone is probably already working on a Photoshop plugin for "correct faked image distortions", which would be handy to have along with some other plugins such as "remove ex-significant other from picture", "reduce glassy-eyed drunken stare", and my all time number one request, "remove drunk friends standing around with dicks hanging out by your mouth when you're unconscious".

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  8. The whole thing's a fraud... by MoeDrippins · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or the guy faked his own photo for the article.

    C'mon now. math geek... handsome... math geek... handsome...

    Sorry, I'm not buyin' it.

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.