Slashdot Mirror


Bash 3.0 Released

qazwsx789 writes "The first public release of bash-3.0 is now available via ftp and from the usual GNU mirror sites. For the official release notes by the author, Chet Ramey, check his usenet post."

40 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. I'm still waiting for a feature by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a GTK front end

    1. Re:I'm still waiting for a feature by Apreche · · Score: 4, Funny

      gnome-terminal, duh.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:I'm still waiting for a feature by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 3, Funny

      how about...wizards?

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    3. Re:I'm still waiting for a feature by SirPrize · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the Zenity web page:

      Zenity lets you display Gtk+ dialog boxes from the command line and through shell scripts. It is similar to gdialog, but is intended to be saner. It comes from the same family as dialog, Xdialog, and cdialog, but it surpasses those projects by having a cooler name.

    4. Re:I'm still waiting for a feature by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Funny
      How about Clippy?

      Hi! You appear to be typing something at the command prompt. It does not appear to be english. Maybe I can help. Would you like me to:
      • spell-check it for you?
      • change your local settings to another language?
      • do nothing: sleeping on keyboard
      • do nothing: that's PERL, you insensitive clod!
      • fuck off
      --
      do not read this line twice.
  2. OMGOMGOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've been waiting long for this day!

  3. On the list of changes: by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    System-specific changes for: SCO Unix 3.2

    What are these, I wonder? Something along the lines of changing the prompt to always display [litigious@bastards]$, perhaps?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:On the list of changes: by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Funny

      What category would you like to see it under, Star Wars?

    2. Re:On the list of changes: by sigxcpu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that mean that Solaris stole their 'timezone' from SCO?

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  4. Bashing linux at slashdot by badriram · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am looking at the title going a Linux bash headline on slashdot, now i must have been dreaming. But I am sure that i would not post that here, knowing i would loose all my karma in one stroke.

  5. Re:Neat by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry about it. Just let the adults keep using their computers and you can keep using your as a toy.

    (It's a shell, it's not susposed to be exciting)

  6. Movie Tie-in by Bistronaut · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have called the movie Bourne Again.

  7. It's...it's... by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Bourne Again and Again and Again Shell! Again!

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
  8. sco sco sco by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Funny

    **b. System-specific changes for: SCO Unix 3.2, Tandem.**

    I wonder.

    if sco then blowup

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  9. Re:First "zsh rules" post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will everyone stop with the Bash bashing, please?

  10. Re:Neat by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Funny

    It supports a new sequence brace expansion which should make snarfing porn easier and more efficent.

    Does it get more exciting then that?

    -Peter

  11. When are they going to upgrade MY shell? by g_adams27 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Yeah, Bash 3.0 is great and all, but when are the bash people going to upgrade rbash? Man, I can't do anything with that shell!

  12. Re:Neat by ellem · · Score: 5, Funny

    As part of the deal with Apple making fixes they need to get Bash to version 10 ASAP for Bash X marketing.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  13. Re:Neat by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Funny

    (It's a shell, it's not susposed to be exciting)

    Pfft... I thought geeks browsed Slashdot!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  14. Bourne Supremacy by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't be the only one who snickers every time I see a commercial for this film. Think Geek used to have a "Bourne Again Believer" t-shirt but I think they dropped it. Maybe I am the only one.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  15. MSH by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ha ha, you dorks, use MSH like a man!

    I wonder how this will get modded? :-o

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  16. POSIX by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
    This statement had me a little confused for a while:

    Several bug fixes for POSIX compliance came in from Apple; their assistance is appreciated.

    Then I looked through the POSIX spec, and sure enough I found this section, which explained things:

    POSIX section 23.4.18 (SHELL):

    To the extent possible on the terminal hardware, the shell shall present to the user the appearance mimicing a translucent plastic material. The shell rendering material model should incorporate prominent specular highlights suggesting a shiny smooth surface. The shell should cast fuzzy shadows on any user interface elements that lay below it.
  17. Re:Neat by KodaK · · Score: 5, Funny

    you can get error messages and such in your native language.

    This is so going to suck. If I get an error message that I'm unfamiliar with I'll plug it into google. Even if the hit is in a language I don't understand I can usually work out what a solution to my problem may be by looking at the command sequences posted in replies.

    Now I'll lose that ability just because a bunch of whiners (the rest of the world) want error messages in *their* language. That's just not fair, as it doesn't benefit me.

    I propose an immediate reversal of the i18n changes introduced into Bash 3.0. Who's with my jingoistic ass?

    --
    --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
  18. Re:Neat by A+Big+Gnu+Thrush · · Score: 4, Funny
    Pfft... I thought geeks browsed Slashdot!

    Real geeks do browse /.

    Only lusers post.

    Oh, wait...damn.

  19. Re:People still use a shell for Linux? by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny
    find . -type f -exec chmod a+r \{\} \;
    find . -type d -exec chmod a+rx \{\} \;
    Or would you rather go through every file in ~/public_html, right-click on it, and change the perms?
    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  20. Re:bash = "embrace and extend" proprietary crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    /bin/bash is standard on my computer.

  21. Re:once upon a time... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure there are plenty of people here who will change it for you if you give them your IP address and root access. :)

  22. I read this as... by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Bush 3.0. I was wondering why the last two incarnations of your US president were so god-awful. ;)

    1. Re:I read this as... by shadypalm88 · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...Bush 3.0. I was wondering why the last two incarnations of your US president were so god-awful. ;)
      Thankfully, in the release announcement, it says Bush 3.0 will include better internationalization support.

      (I can only dream!)
  23. Re:Neat by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool, but just saves a process. Could do this with seq before.
    seq 1 30 | xargs -i wget http://pr0nsite.com/image{}.jpg
    Not that I'd try this or anything... no...

    I do want to get a T-Shirt made:
    Real geeks download their pr0n with one line shell-scripts.

  24. Re:New features? by greck · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, bash 3.0 is not compliant with RFC 2324.

  25. Re:Neat by carpe_noctem · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...either that or change the project name to "iBash".

    hrms, that's kinda catchy, aint it?

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  26. Re:Neat by Megaweapon · · Score: 2, Funny

    As part of the deal with Apple making fixes they need to get Bash to version 10 ASAP for Bash X marketing.

    "I was writing a command string in the bash shell, and it was, like, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, and then, like, half of my grep string was gone. And I was, like ... huh? It devoured my regex pattern. It was a really good pattern. And then I had to do it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good. It's kind of a bummer."

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  27. Re:Dear Apple haters... by paco+verde · · Score: 2, Funny
    IBM works on many projects and gives back ... plus contributing all new things like JFS.

    err...didn't they just steal that from SCO?

  28. Re:Breaks Gentoo by Requiem · · Score: 2, Funny
    Breaks Gentoo

    Seriously? Damn. Ideologically, that's all the reason I need to upgrade!

  29. Re:Neat by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great.

    I've been waiting to refine that command which I also never use.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  30. Warning, the above is a sad unix joke! by xtermin8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know its hard to tell, even for people famaliar with rbash; but this is what passes for humor among unix geeks.

  31. Bash 3.0 by cygnus · · Score: 2, Funny

    leave 3.0 alone! >:(

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  32. Re:First "zsh rules" post! by Theolojin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will everyone stop with the Bash bashing, please?

    So you watched the Democratic National Convention, huh?

    Oh...

    *bash* bashing. heh.

    --
    Life is short; think quickly.
  33. Bush 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Not another one.