Apple Not Too Harmonious with Real
An anonymous reader writes "As if in answer to the question previously asked on Slashdot, CNN Money is reporting that Apple isn't all that happy that Real pried open the door to the iPod for its RealMedia files. "We are stunned that RealNetworks has adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod." It should be interesting to see how this pans out in court, and if the DeCSS case serves as some sort of precedent."
With the constant Apple lovefests, the hatred of the DMCA and DRM, the dislike of Real Player, and the love of hacking.
I thought they were the good guys?
Now I can spend $300 on a music player AND get to use Real's spyware laden buggy hard-to-use interface! How can I loose?
I read the internet for the articles.
> Not cool.
Not cool by any stretch of the imagination.
"We are stunned that RealNetworks has adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod."
I was stunned too! 0%... 5%... BUFFERING 6%... etc.
Apple is going to get some financial buffering from RealNetworks, after this is done.
The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
UNDERSTANDING DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT: /--consumer choice?- <-<No.. . |
A SLASHDOT FLOWCHART EXCLUSIVE
Start:
Did a corporation use Was the encryption--Y-->Did someone reverse
encryption to prevent-Y->in question engineer the system,
their customers from pathetically weak? allowing for more
fairly using purchases? |
N-------N---<------<----N----<--+----<--
| \ Y
N<------N----<---Did the corporation Did this new<--+
| react violently, <--Y-software enable
| Was the<--Y--slander hackers, fair use?
| corporation and fire off legal
| Apple(tm)(R)? threats using DMCA to suppress speech?
| | |
| Yes +No-->Oh my God those assholes! It's time we put this source
|_ | code on a T-shirt! Time to contribute to the author's
\ / legal defense fund! Time to call our senator and tell
No big deal! him to repeal the evil, flawed DMCA! Time
Time to play "Quake!!!" to practice "civil disobedience!". Time
to write "distributed peer to peer"
corporate-subversion software! Time to call for a radical reform
of copyright laws! Time to decry Palladium(tm)(R) design and
distribution as a grand scheme to put us under the lock and key
of DRM! Time to raid DVD-Jon's jail cell with Dimitri as lead
commando! Time to hack Hillary Rosen's web site and deface statues
of Jack Valenti! Quick buy another 2600 T-Shirt!
By the way, wouldn't it be great if Devo was 99c a song?
God I still remember the HACKER MANIFESTO!!!!
RealNetworks Chief Strategy Officer Richard Wolpert: "We think consumer choice is going to win out over proprietary formats."
;)
And this is coming from Real! Gotta love it!
This is unspeakably wrong! A company spends MILLIONS, perhaps even BILLIONS to come up with their own proprietary mechanism for exchanging files between their OWN services, and some damned upstart comes along, reverse-engineers it, and has the AUDACITY to make their OWN service interoperate with it...WITHOUT PERMISSION?!?!?
All of that money that the company spent, down the drain, because some "hackers" figured out how their carefully crafted system works! This is wrong and unfair!
Our course is clear! We must NOT support the evildoers who have committed this foul act of hacking! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT!
We must NEVER use SAMBA AGAIN!!!!!
Wait...who were we talking about again?....
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
I do agree to some degree. But... First of all, I'd personally keep Real away is innovative enough for me. Seriously, who wants an iPod that would be spending half a day buffering. In the end people would say that iPod sucks [but it's Real that sucks really].
A slashdotter *not* buying an iPod is an oxymoron. :)
Jonathanjk.com
AUGH! Car/computer analogy! Kill it! Get the pipe-carrying homeboy! Get it! WHAM! WHAM! WHAM!
--- Ban humanity.
Hey, you got something on your chin, a huge dallop of Apple Semen.
Get off your knees you retarded fanboy.
The government owns your home; you are merely licensing it from them.
Don't believe me? Stop paying your property taxes.
Reminds me of a Confucious saying: "To get back on feet, miss two car payments."
I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
This post isn't informative (I have given up trying to apply logic to moderators' actions) but I certainly agree with it.
There should be mod points for +5 Fuckin' A.
It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
"If you replace "Apple" or "Jobs" with "Microsoft" or "Gates", would you feel the same? "
Pretty much... you would have to replace "Real" to make me feel differently
Like anyone can even know that
Yes, and while we're at it, I would like a PDA that lights my cigarettes and wipes my ass for me.
/. bitch about the iPod not having x encoding format or x obscure-as-shit Operating System Compatibility, I would probably have about $40 U.S. Sir, the dead horse you are beating is little more than so much decomposed mush now. Let it go. Please.
I want it to be able to light normal filtered class A cigarettes, but also include support for 100s and unfiltered.
I want it to support 1-ply AND 2-ply toilet paper and be forward-compatible for new multiple-ply standards in the future.
I would also like it to be child and babysafe, so that if a toddler is within a certain proximity of the machine it will not light cigarettes and will only use baby wipes.
Furthermore, it must be fully compatible with my OS/2 Warp box.
And I would like a pony, but that last one is optional.
Anyone that does not acquiesce to these demands is being closed and proprietary. For shame!
Apple's possible legal action aside, the iPod is an example of product implementation where their goal was to do one thing and do it well: let people play tons of music on a well-designed, portable device. Google did the same thing with search by keeping it relatively simple.
If I had a nickel for everytime I heard someone on